0 members (),
275
guests, and
52
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums26
Topics35,461
Posts417,217
Members6,102
|
Most Online3,380 Dec 29th, 2019
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,505
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,505 |
Penances? None that I am aware of. Which explains why Father Ambrose has to think of second marriage as a sacrament, A second marriage is a Sacrament, as is the first. In the Orthodox Church we DO NOT allow people to live in fornication -which is what sexual intercourse is without the Sacrament of Matrimony. No priest in the world has the authority to give a couple a blessing to engage in sexual intercourse without the Sacrament of Matrimony.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,505
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,505 |
It's interesting that the Trebnyk refers to the 2d Marriage ceremony as "Second Crowning". And the book actually seems to prescribe a Crowning.
I was told at one point, by a cleric, that there was only 1 Crowning and the others were not Crownings - I guess he was wrong?
I was also told that the Second Crowning was a penitential service. There is a couple of prayers which have some penitential theme to them, but not nearly as much as I thought. Having looked at the Trebnyk.
So now I'm even more confused because an Orthodox told me that their church basically never does the Second marriage but does the ordinary Crowning service - even after a case of divorce.
any help out there? The Rite of a Second Crowning is used when both parties have been divorced. If it is a first marriage for one of the parties the customary Rite of Crowning is used. (Not sure what Stuart would make of that? One spouse receives the Sacrament, the other does not?)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,505
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,505 |
As a further mark of ecclesiastical disfavor, the crowning (venchanie) was prohibited. Instead, prayers over the newlyweds were recited at vespers. This is irrational. 1) What was the service performed over the couple before Vespers? 2) What are the prayers recited over the newlyweds at Vespers? -oOo- How does Levin deal with the fact that the Church was gving people approval to live in fornication? Or does she count the second marriage as a Sacrament?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309 Likes: 3
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309 Likes: 3 |
How does Levin deal with the fact that the Church was gving people approval to live in fornication? Or does she count the second marriage as a Sacrament? The facts are the facts, Father. Live with them and get over it. I am not going to engage in a discussion with a man whose only argument is, "I just don't believe it", and who puts down everyone who disagrees with him as being a "revisionist". Read more history, try to understand how people were thinking then, and maybe, just maybe, you will get some answers to your questions.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,505
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,505 |
How does Levin deal with the fact that the Church was gving people approval to live in fornication? Or does she count the second marriage as a Sacrament? The facts are the facts, Father. Live with them and get over it. The facts are that you have not produced even one statement from either an Orthodox Synod or even one Orthodox bishop which confirms what Pope Benedict said, namely that the Orthodox do not regard a second marriage as a Sacrament. I am not going to engage in a discussion with a man whose only argument is, "I just don't believe it", How can I engage in a discussion with a person who has not been able to back up Pope Benedict's words by producing one statement from an Orthodox Synod that second marriage is not a Sacrament? and who puts down everyone who disagrees with him as being a "revisionist". Really that is exaggerative. I spoke of the revisionist character of Schmemman's and Meyendorff's writings which had them banned from Russian seminaries. You must be aware of the accusation since it is made not just by the rectors of Russian seminaries but also by people in the West? The discussion before us is whether Pope Benedict was correct in his address to the priests of the diocese of Aosta in 2005. Here it is again... http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/b...n-xvi_spe_20050725_diocesi-aosta_en.html"We know the problem, not only of the Protestant Communities but also of the Orthodox Churches, which are often presented as a model for the possibility of remarriage. But only the first marriage is sacramental: the Orthodox too recognize that the other marriages are not sacramental, they are reduced and redimensioned marriages and in a penitential situation; in a certain sense, the couple can go to Communion but in the awareness that this is a concession "by economy", as they say, through mercy which, nevertheless, does not remove the fact that their marriage is not a Sacrament."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,994 Likes: 10
Moderator Member
|
Moderator Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,994 Likes: 10 |
At the risk of getting involved in this, I will ask both Father Ambrose and Stuart to cease their posts to each other until our Administrator can review this thread. I believe that at this point it is getting out of hand.
Alice, Moderator
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309 Likes: 3
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309 Likes: 3 |
But only the first marriage is sacramental: the Orthodox too recognize that the other marriages are not sacramental, they are reduced and redimensioned marriages and in a penitential situation; in a certain sense, the couple can go to Communion but in the awareness that this is a concession "by economy", as they say, through mercy which, nevertheless, does not remove the fact that their marriage is not a Sacrament." Pope Benedict and all the Orthodox sources are correct. You are wrong, because you refuse to recognize the extent to which present pastoral practice is at odds not only with canonical norms but the entire Orthodox theology of marriage. And that is my last word.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,994 Likes: 10
Moderator Member
|
Moderator Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,994 Likes: 10 |
REPEAT:
At the risk of getting involved in this, I will ask both Father Ambrose and Stuart to cease their posts to each other until our Administrator can review this thread. I believe that at this point it is getting out of hand.
Thank you.
Alice, Moderator
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 151
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 151 |
[quote=StuartK] Pope Benedict and all the Orthodox sources are correct. You are wrong, because you refuse to recognize the extent to which present pastoral practice is at odds not only with canonical norms but the entire Orthodox theology of marriage. And that is my last word. [/quote]
Fr. Ambrose has asked for evidence from Orthodox sources multiple times. Please provide it.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309 Likes: 3
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309 Likes: 3 |
I've presented more than enough evidence. As I said, I am through on this topic.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 695
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 695 |
Are all the liturgical typiks/texts the same for Second Marriage (Greek AND Russian)?
Do the Greeks do an actual Crowning in Second Marriage.
And what do the Old Believers do?
That would be very telling.
Although in general the Russian usages may be older, according to sociological & linguistic principles colonies are more conservative (cf. North American English versus UK English).
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,132
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,132 |
This seems to be a discussion among those in the Byzantine Tradition, but if I may be permitted to join:
Brother StuartK suggested earlier that Second marriage in the Russian Church was conditioned by an accomodation of secular considerations. Could this have occurred because of the caeseropapism that the Russian Church has experienced throughout its existence?
Comparatively, the Coptic Orthodox Church (which did not experience the same caeseropapism) only permits crowning in the first Marriage of any person. The Coptic Encyclopedia states: "the second marriage [is] inferior to the first; thus, the church accords it not the blessing of a crowning, but a prayer of forgiveness." Third marriages are not allowed. And there is only one reason for divorce - apostasy; as marriage reflects the relationship of Christ to his Church, adultery is seen as merely a subset of apostasy - i.e., apostasy from marriage.
Blessings
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,505
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,505 |
Comparatively, the Coptic Orthodox Church...only permits crowning in the first Marriage of any person. The Coptic Encyclopedia states: "the second marriage [is] inferior to the first; thus, the church accords it not the blessing of a crowning, but a prayer of forgiveness." Is the second marriage considered to receive the Sacrament of Matrimony? Or is it considered as a "blessing" to cohabit without the Sacrament of Matrimony? The question as to whether a second Crowning is a Sacrament has been the rather complicated question of this thread.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,505
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,505 |
Comparatively, the Coptic Orthodox Church (which did not experience the same caeseropapism) only permits crowning in the first Marriage of any person. I note that it is more restrictive than that and Crowning is permitted only if the bride and groom are virgins. http://www.copticchurch.net/topics/thecopticchurch/sacraments/6_matrimony.htmlWhat form does the wedding take when they are not?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,505
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,505 |
Brother StuartK suggested earlier that Second marriage in the Russian Church was conditioned by an accomodation of secular considerations. Could this have occurred because of the caeseropapism that the Russian Church has experienced throughout its existence? I have been searching for this essay and managed to find it thanks to The WayBack Machine. It is an interesting overview of marriage and divorce by Yuri Koszarycz, a Byzantine Catholic, who is a Senior Lecturer at the School of Theology at the Australian Catholic University. He lectures in Ethics, Bioethics, and Church History. "Divorce and Remarriage: A Challenge to the Christian Tradition"http://web.archive.org/web/20050615114810/http://www.mcauley.acu.edu.au/~yuri/ethics/Divorce.html
|
|
|
|
|