The Byzantine Forum
Newest Members
isadoramurta7, Tridemist_Zoomer, FrAnthonyC, L.S. Predy, Mike Allo
6,049 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
2 members (Mickeyb, San Nicolas), 656 guests, and 50 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
by orthodoxsinner2, September 30
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
by Veronica.H, April 24
Byzantine Catholic Outreach of Iowa
Exterior of Holy Angels Byzantine Catholic Parish
Church of St Cyril of Turau & All Patron Saints of Belarus
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics35,420
Posts416,920
Members6,049
Most Online3,380
Dec 29th, 2019
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 12 of 12 1 2 10 11 12
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,391
Likes: 31
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,391
Likes: 31
Dear Mr McNabb, "Son of the Abbot"

I think you've said too much in your post above!

EC's do NOT think the later Roman Councils are invalid at all!

Which EC has ever said that? ANATHEMA! smile

It is ONLY a question of whether they are Local Councils or Universal Councils - that's all.

They truly do appear to be Local Councils as they address internal Roman Church issues that have NEVER cropped up in the Eastern Churches.

The Orthodox also have their Local Councils, some of whose canons have been made Universal and binding on world Orthodoxy.

That is the gist of the matter.

So if we were neighbours and lived side by side in separate houses and your basement flooded, but mine didn't, I don't see why I should have to be involved with your discussions with the City authorities to settle the financial aspects of the repairs!

It was your basement that was flooded and not mine.

I love my dry basement and am writing to you from it right now!

Alex

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 147
G
Member
Offline
Member
G
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 147
Quote
Originally posted by Orthodox Catholic:
Dear Mr McNabb, "Son of the Abbot"

I think you've said too much in your post above!

EC's do NOT think the later Roman Councils are invalid at all!

Which EC has ever said that? ANATHEMA! smile

It is ONLY a question of whether they are Local Councils or Universal Councils - that's all.

They truly do appear to be Local Councils as they address internal Roman Church issues that have NEVER cropped up in the Eastern Churches.

The Orthodox also have their Local Councils, some of whose canons have been made Universal and binding on world Orthodoxy.

That is the gist of the matter.

So if we were neighbours and lived side by side in separate houses and your basement flooded, but mine didn't, I don't see why I should have to be involved with your discussions with the City authorities to settle the financial aspects of the repairs!

It was your basement that was flooded and not mine.

I love my dry basement and am writing to you from it right now!

Alex
I can see how this arguement might fit for some of the councils, but many of the Dogmatic declarations of the "western" Councils seem, IMO, to have a great deal of effect on Eastern Catholics. Such as Papal Infalibility and Purgatory. I do not understand how one could deny those two essential Dogmas (though I can see how one might use Eastern Theological terms to define the exact same Dogma, such as Toll houses for Purgatory)

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,391
Likes: 31
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,391
Likes: 31
Dear "Son of the Abbot,"

The East has always prayed for the dead and even more than the West ever has. The East accepts that the dead are in Hades awaiting final release - "Hades" is, in part, what the West refers to as "Purgatory" - the latter term was concocted by Western theologians for want of a better word.

As for the Papal doctrines - the East has ALWAYS accepted the Primacy of Rome.

And the East, in the first millennium, always saw Rome as the ultimate arbiter and referee in disputes between, say, Patriarch and Emperor (a much needed referee!).

And the teaching authority of Rome - dating from Pope Clement I - was likewise always recognized by the Orthodox Catholic Church of the East.

So even the papal doctrines didn't tell Eastern Catholics anything they didn't know or believe already from when they were (and believe they still are) Orthodox.

However, we EC's believe that the teachings on papal infallibility are incomplete, rather.

They require further elucidation and explanation.

So we await further papal pronouncements on primacy of jurisdiction and infallibility to COMPLETELY reflect the way these two issues were understood and practiced by the once United Church of Christ of the first millennium.

Alex

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 147
G
Member
Offline
Member
G
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 147
Quote
Originally posted by Orthodox Catholic:
Dear "Son of the Abbot,"

The East has always prayed for the dead and even more than the West ever has. The East accepts that the dead are in Hades awaiting final release - "Hades" is, in part, what the West refers to as "Purgatory" - the latter term was concocted by Western theologians for want of a better word.

As for the Papal doctrines - the East has ALWAYS accepted the Primacy of Rome.

And the East, in the first millennium, always saw Rome as the ultimate arbiter and referee in disputes between, say, Patriarch and Emperor (a much needed referee!).

And the teaching authority of Rome - dating from Pope Clement I - was likewise always recognized by the Orthodox Catholic Church of the East.

So even the papal doctrines didn't tell Eastern Catholics anything they didn't know or believe already from when they were (and believe they still are) Orthodox.

However, we EC's believe that the teachings on papal infallibility are incomplete, rather.

They require further elucidation and explanation.

So we await further papal pronouncements on primacy of jurisdiction and infallibility to COMPLETELY reflect the way these two issues were understood and practiced by the once United Church of Christ of the first millennium.

Alex
Lol "Son of the abbot" I assume that is ment to be a compliment.

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,790
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,790
Yes I'm sure it is; I believe that is the meaning of your name "McNabb", and I'm sure that Alex knows that the early Celtic monks were not always celibate, and that abbots were frequently the local patriarch.
-Daniel

Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,884
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,884
Daniel, I think then not much has changed in that area wink .

ICXC
NIKA

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 147
G
Member
Offline
Member
G
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 147
Quote
Originally posted by iconophile:
Yes I'm sure it is; I believe that is the meaning of your name "McNabb", and I'm sure that Alex knows that the early Celtic monks were not always celibate, and that abbots were frequently the local patriarch.
-Daniel
Lol no he is comparing me to Father Michael Mary C.SS.R. the Abbot of the SSPX affiliated redemptorists.

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,855
Likes: 8
A
Member
Offline
Member
A
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,855
Likes: 8
Quote
Originally posted by Orthodox Catholic:
[. . .]

It is ONLY a question of whether they are Local Councils or Universal Councils - that's all.

They truly do appear to be Local Councils as they address internal Roman Church issues that have NEVER cropped up in the Eastern Churches.

The Orthodox also have their Local Councils, some of whose canons have been made Universal and binding on world Orthodoxy.

That is the gist of the matter.

[. . .]

Alex
Alex,

I agree. Thus, the fourteen "general" councils of the West are merely local synods, which are not binding upon Eastern Christians.

Similarly, the Blachernae Council of A.D. 1285, and the Palamite Councils of the fourteenth century -- which are clearly local synods of the East -- are not binding upon Western Christians.

As far as the question of the primacy is concerned, Easterners should only be required to accept that doctrine as it was formulated and lived during the first millennium (See Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger, "Principles of Catholic Theology," page 199).

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,391
Likes: 31
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,391
Likes: 31
Dear "Son of the Abbot"

No, Sir, I would NEVER do that and my reference to you above is NOT intended to compare you to anyone other than the meaning of the name "McNabb" that Daniel has quite correctly identified as signifying "son of the abbot" and referring to the early Celtic tradition of allowing abbots and monastics to have wives.

This was abolished at the Synod of Whitby along with other Celtic practices such as the Celtic Easter calculation, the "tonsure of Simon Magus" - from side to side, the Celtic practice of refraining from Holy Communion on Easter Sunday until "Little Easter" or St Thomas Sunday and others.

If it offends you, as it appears that it does, this will be the last time I use this play on "MacNabb."

I apologise for having caused you discomfort or the semblance of offense in this - please forgive me, but it is my style in dealing with people I am fond of. And I am fond of everyone on this forum - some more than others . . .

Alex

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 147
G
Member
Offline
Member
G
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 147
Quote
Originally posted by Orthodox Catholic:
Dear "Son of the Abbot"

No, Sir, I would NEVER do that and my reference to you above is NOT intended to compare you to anyone other than the meaning of the name "McNabb" that Daniel has quite correctly identified as signifying "son of the abbot" and referring to the early Celtic tradition of allowing abbots and monastics to have wives.

This was abolished at the Synod of Whitby along with other Celtic practices such as the Celtic Easter calculation, the "tonsure of Simon Magus" - from side to side, the Celtic practice of refraining from Holy Communion on Easter Sunday until "Little Easter" or St Thomas Sunday and others.

If it offends you, as it appears that it does, this will be the last time I use this play on "MacNabb."

I apologise for having caused you discomfort or the semblance of offense in this - please forgive me, but it is my style in dealing with people I am fond of. And I am fond of everyone on this forum - some more than others . . .

Alex
Lol no you did not offend me at all haha. Sorry I am not particulary knowledgable about my own last name, its a borrowed last name because my familiy isn't Scottish on any side of it haha. My native american ancestors took it as a last name (Since native americans lack last names) to honor a scottish friend or something like that.

Anyways my interpurtation of it didn't offend me anyways, I am quite suprised I haven't been called a "lefebvrist" yet lol...

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,391
Likes: 31
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,391
Likes: 31
Dear McNabb,

I can oblige you, if you like! wink

Alex

Page 12 of 12 1 2 10 11 12

Moderated by  theophan 

Link Copied to Clipboard
The Byzantine Forum provides message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial, have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as a source for official information for any Church. All posts become property of byzcath.org. Contents copyright - 1996-2024 (Forum 1998-2024). All rights reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5