Dear Friends,
Did someone mention "scapulars?"
As for superstition, Eastern Christians take second place to NO ONE in that department, especially in Eastern Europe.
And superstitious attitudes can cover a wide range of things and behaviours - like the fellow in my parish who said that if one doesn't accompany the Easter procession as it goes outside, that one has not properly observed Pascha etc.
And it goes downhill from there!
Scapulars are associated with religious Orders and there are (were) 18 such scapulars allowed by the Church for use by laity.
One had to get invested in them by the religious of the Order, and observe some aspects of the Order's spirituality, be it Carmelite, Benedictine, Franciscan etc.
Sorry to differ on this, but Eastern Catholics have been using scapulars for quite some time, including Tertiaries of certain Orders.
In fact, Pope Pius XII approved a special Byzantine ritual for the blessing of Brown scapulars for Eastern Catholics WITH the stipulation that that blessing alone is valid for Eastern Catholics etc.
My grandfather, Fr. John (+ memory eternal!) invested me in my scapular using that (Church Slavonic) prayer.
The Brown scapular is STILL wildly popular in western Ukraine and elsewhere (of course, those poor Uniates still haven't woken up to their true Byzantine traditions, but what can one do?)
There are also Byzantine Carmelites, such as those that Archbishop Raya once had under him when he was in the Middle East.
There is also an Orthodox icon of Our Lady of the Scapular that is very popular in Horodyschenske in Western Ukraine (Poselianin, "Bogomater Shkaplyernaya").
For many Eastern Catholics, and not just the recent vintage of "Orthodox in communion with Rome" variety, the brown scapular is a cherished private devotion that, as some Russian Catholics I've spoken to have told me, meshes well with our devotion to the Mantle of Protection of the Mother of God.
And I agree. There was a time when I got rid of my scapulars as I thought this was a form of "Latinization."
But I've come to other conclusions later in life.
No one forces anyone to wear a scapular, medal or anything else.
And no one need wear everything around one's neck.
Have we forgotten the actions of some, like St John Maximovitch of San Francisco who did indeed wear the large icon of Our Lady around his neck on a strap?
Eastern Saints have also worn very heavy neck Crosses and even IRON analavs on their bodies, as did St Herman of Alaska (whose chains, heavy crosses etc are on display in Alaska).
Perhaps this gave these saints an "Orthodox stoop."
But, for them, it had great spiritual meaning.
St Alphonsus Liguori wore ALL 18 scapulars on his body - it is now miraculous and hasn't decomposed etc.
I wear only one scapular and this serves to remind me of the mantle of protection, as if Our Lady's arms envelope me and protect me.
It is a reminder for me to be in continual prayer, and to ask for the grace to serve her Son in a way that He and She would wish.
It makes me feel very close to her, as does my medal of "Our Lady Joy of all Joys" that I wear and that was touched to relics of St Seraphim.
I have other medals and I wish I COULD wear them all (sometimes I wear one on its feast day etc.).
But that's my business and it's something I like to do.
My confessor(s) don't see anything wrong with it and have blessed me to practice these devotions.
The scapular, owing to its popular, widespread use among many EC's, can be privately practiced and it is especially relevant if one follows the spirituality of the particular Order to which the scapular is attached (as Charles has said previously).
The icon of Mt Carmel that is in Naples, Italy is a beautiful Byzantine Icon that the Latin and Greek Carmelites brought with them from the Holy Land.
The reason St Simon Stock was praying to our Lady at Aylesford was because the Western religious Orders in England were about to eject the Hermits of Carmel as they felt they were an EASTERN group that had no place in a Western Church!
The way the scapular has been "reconstructed" today is very meaningful - for those who like the devotion.
It is considered within the context of "religious clothing" dying to self (and the original idea of an "askeem" or scapular in the Coptic tradition was the wearing of the hide of a dead animal to signify one's death to the world in order to live in Christ).
And it is also considered as a way in which a person may bond more closely to a religious way of life that involves the Divine Office (as true monastics practice) and other forms of monastic prayer (and the Jesus Prayer is a monastic prayer, first and foremost).
Monasticism is a lay movement, truth be told. It belongs more to "us laity" than to "them clerics."
So if the spirituality of the scapular can be about the public prayer of the Church, the meditative reading of the scriptures, the sense of being connected to the "desert" even while living in the "world," - what is wrong?
Is this not a great way to live the Life in Christ in the world, in some form of community/prayer group etc.?
Let's also remember that the EC Churches in Eastern Europe that are flowering today are doing so because of an intense prayer life among the laity.
And what does this prayer life consist of? Not only the Eastern liturgical services, Friends!
There is the forty hours devotion, the Perpetual Adoration, the Perpetual Rosary etc.
I met a married EC priest from a village in the Carpathians who has the Perpetual Eucharistic Adoration his parish (when I once asked him if he wore a scapular, he smiled and said, "Doesn't everyone?") and he said that even small children want to do their daily "Hour of Adoration" before the altar and he's published little books etc.
People love those devotions and they PRAY them. Sorry IF that offends!
Those devotions, including that "superstitious scapular"

have ALWAYS been the mainstay of E European ECism. (Are "Orthodox in communion with Rome" living in a vaccuum?)
They are so today as well (yes, including the Sacred Hearts of Jesus and Mary that were so close to, e.g. , Bl. Paul Goydich OSBM).
And do we know why the ROC is so terribly PISSED OFF that it has lost western Ukraine to the UGCC?
Fr. R. Taft confirmed that it was because a goodly proportion of priestly vocations for the ROC came from there - the effects of that piety and daily devotion that was grounded on Latin practices.
And this is why the ROC, when it was still in Western Ukraine as the dominant force, allowed the Sacred Heart, Eucharistic etc. devotions.
They were never abrogated and they are still there now in many Orthodox churches (along with the Stations of the Cross).
With apologies to the Administrator for the possible shock impact of the above
Alex