The Byzantine Forum
Newest Members
Hookly, fslobodzian, ArchibaldHeidenr, Fernholz, EasternLight
6,168 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
1 members (1 invisible), 251 guests, and 87 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
by orthodoxsinner2, September 30
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
by Veronica.H, April 24
Byzantine Catholic Outreach of Iowa
Exterior of Holy Angels Byzantine Catholic Parish
Church of St Cyril of Turau & All Patron Saints of Belarus
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics35,516
Posts417,593
Members6,168
Most Online4,112
Mar 25th, 2025
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 5 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 217
Junior Member
Junior Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 217
Quote
Originally posted by Theist Gal:
Quote
Originally posted by wild goose:
[b]The Church desperately needs to re-visit the Bible before the next Catechism is published, in my humble estimation.
I guess that says it all ... frown [/b]
I guess that says it all smile ...

unless you subscribe to a complete disregard for the Witness of Scripture Today, TG. I shouldn't think so, sister. But it sure sounds like that to me...

so are you saying Scripture could be consulted in the 1st 4 centuries, while Tradition was being formed... but shan't be consulted ever again? God forbid, yes! smile

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 217
Junior Member
Junior Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 217
p.s. TG, I'm not that easily dismissed! cool

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,766
Likes: 30
John
Member
John
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,766
Likes: 30
Quote
Originally posted by wild goose:
Quote
Originally posted by Theist Gal:
[b]
Quote
Originally posted by wild goose:
[b]The Church desperately needs to re-visit the Bible before the next Catechism is published, in my humble estimation.
I guess that says it all ... frown [/b]
I guess that says it all smile ...

unless you subscribe to a complete disregard for the Witness of Scripture Today, TG. I shouldn't think so, sister. But it sure sounds like that to me...

so are you saying Scripture could be consulted in the 1st 4 centuries, while Tradition was being formed... but shan't be consulted ever again? God forbid, yes! smile [/b]
I suspect that Theist Gal was thinking that God gave the Holy Scriptures to the Church through the Church, and that the Holy Scriptures can only be correctly interpreted by the Church from within the Church. There simply is no right to a personal interpretation of the Holy Scriptures. WG�s novel and unique personal interpretations of the Holy Scriptures in attempts to make Scripture mean whatever he wishes it to mean exemplify the dangers of placing one�s own meaning on God�s Word.

I must again ask Wild Goose to preface each and every comment he wishes to make about the Holy Scriptures with �It is my personal belief that�� if he wishes to continue to participate here. It is quite clear from his posts that WG�s personal beliefs about what the Holy Scriptures mean are very far from the correct teaching given by the Church.

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,134
T
Member
Member
T Offline
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,134
Quote
Originally posted by wild goose:
p.s. TG, I'm not that easily dismissed! cool
Glenn Close? is that you?? :rolleyes:

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,134
T
Member
Member
T Offline
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,134
Quote
Originally posted by Administrator:
I suspect that Theist Gal was thinking that God gave the Holy Scriptures to the Church through the Church, and that the Holy Scriptures can only be correctly interpreted by the Church from within the Church. There simply is no right to a personal interpretation of the Holy Scriptures.
Thank you, Administrator! Yes, it is a little difficult to discuss something when you don't know what authority the person accepts and doesn't accept. If the final authority is the Scriptures, the next question is: whose interpretation? wink

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 217
Junior Member
Junior Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 217
Quote
Originally posted by Administrator:
Quote
Originally posted by wild goose:
[b]
Quote
Originally posted by Theist Gal:
[b] </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="verdana, geneva, lucida, 'lucida grande', arial, helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="verdana, geneva, lucida, 'lucida grande', arial, helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by wild goose:
<strong>The Church desperately needs to re-visit the Bible before the next Catechism is published, in my humble estimation.
I guess that says it all ... frown [/b]
I guess that says it all ...

unless you subscribe to a complete disregard for the Witness of Scripture Today, TG. I shouldn't think so, sister. But it sure sounds like that to me...

so are you saying Scripture could be consulted in the 1st 4 centuries, while Tradition was being formed... but shan't be consulted ever again? God forbid, yes! smile [/b]
I suspect that Theist Gal was thinking that God gave the Holy Scriptures to the Church through the Church, and that the Holy Scriptures can only be correctly interpreted by the Church from within the Church. There simply is no right to a personal interpretation of the Holy Scriptures. WG�s novel and unique personal interpretations of the Holy Scriptures in attempts to make Scripture mean whatever he wishes it to mean exemplify the dangers of placing one�s own meaning on God�s Word.

I must again ask Wild Goose to preface each and every comment he wishes to make about the Holy Scriptures with �It is my personal belief that�� if he wishes to continue to participate here. It is quite clear from his posts that WG�s personal beliefs about what the Holy Scriptures mean are very far from the correct teaching given by the Church. </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="verdana, geneva, lucida, 'lucida grande', arial, helvetica, sans-serif">John,

What you say is alright up to a point.

It can be safely said that the Church gave is the Scriptures and it can be safely said that the Scriptures are a gift to the Church.

The fact of the matter is that the Scriptures and the Church grew up together.

On the easily worn out example of slavery, the Whole of the Scriptures have not one prohibitive word to say... yet the Church would not countenance an acceptance of slavery today!

So we see that what the Church may teach may not agree with or take from the words from Scripture any major supporting documentation.

Your point is good... as far as it goes. It just doesn't go far enough. And you're too intelligent to not know otherwise, my brother in Christ.

And on the point that I should preface all my statements here with 'I believe this or that'... I couldn't possibly say what anyone else believes, now could I! wink

I've not stated that anyone here is wrong; I've not said the Church is wrong to have taught certain things.

Just as the Church changed Her mind with regard to slavery... so the Church may change Her mind on other things. This is inevitable.

Why is there a problem pointing out what is inevitable? blessing, wg

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 217
Junior Member
Junior Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 217
Quote
... the Holy Scriptures can only be correctly interpreted by the Church from within the Church. There simply is no right to a personal interpretation of the Holy Scriptures.
this person does interpret by and from within, thanks... with many other Catholic and Orthodox clergy and laity. blessing, wg

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 129
A
Member
Member
A Offline
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 129
Are we getting into a
Sola Scriptura discussion here ?

antonius

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,766
Likes: 30
John
Member
John
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,766
Likes: 30
Quote
Originally posted by wild goose:
Quote
... the Holy Scriptures can only be correctly interpreted by the Church from within the Church. There simply is no right to a personal interpretation of the Holy Scriptures.
this person does interpret by and from within, thanks... with many other Catholic and Orthodox clergy and laity. blessing, wg
WG, you most certainly do not interpret Scripture by and from within the Church. Authoritative teaching on Scripture comes only through the entire Church speaking as one voice (the bishops in council led by the Successor of Peter). What you are doing is ignoring the voice of the Church led by the Spirit and attempting to make the Holy Scriptures say whatever it is you wish them to say.

Admin

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 217
Junior Member
Junior Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 217
Quote
the entire Church speaking as one voice
as I said earlier John, I look forward to the next time the Church speaks; I remain hopeful! smile

However, even when Cardinal Ratzinger was the top man in the Congregation, not all agreed with him... and that was made clear by further pronouncements from his Congregation. One voice would be good indeed, please God! bless, wg

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 217
Junior Member
Junior Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 217
Quote
Originally posted by antonius:
Are we getting into a
[b]Sola Scriptura
discussion here ?

antonius [/b]
Hello antonius,

Did you want to? blessing, wg

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 217
Junior Member
Junior Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 217
Quote
Originally posted by Theist Gal:
Quote
Originally posted by wild goose:
[b] p.s. TG, I'm not that easily dismissed! cool
Glenn Close? is that you?? :rolleyes: [/b]
Surely you mean the rabbit-boiling character that Glenn Close portrayed, right!?! biggrin

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,440
Z
Member
Member
Z Offline
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,440
Dear Wild Goose you said:

"Just as the Church changed Her mind with regard to slavery... so the Church may change Her mind on other things. This is inevitable."

I say: The Church never changed her mind with regard to slavery, but rather made no comment. You seem to forget that the alternative to slavery was and still is death. An ugly death.

Slavery existed throughout history and still does. Now what does one do if one cannot support their children? Should they allow them to starve or sell them?

Also if there are tens of thousands of captives that one conquers in a war and that will always pose a threat what should one do? Sell them to an ally or kill them?

How can the Church condemn one thing when the alternative is just as evil.

Zenovia

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 217
Junior Member
Junior Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 217
Quote
... but rather made no comment.
Sorry zenovia,

But that is too much like what the Church did during the reign of Hitler in Nazi Germany.

It just won't do. It is from evil; human evil, pure and simple and...

ugly as hell.

Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O'Connor is off to Eaglefields for the G8 in Scotland and the Archbishop of Zimbabwe is raising his voice against the tyranny there... the Church does have a few brave ones.

Always has and always will.

Sadly, their opposite number exists as well-- 'good' folk who stand by and let evil have its way. grace and peace, sister, wg

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 217
Junior Member
Junior Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 217
Quote
Originally posted by Zenovia:
Dear Wild Goose you said:

"Just as the Church changed Her mind with regard to slavery... so the Church may change Her mind on other things. This is inevitable."

I say: The Church never changed her mind with regard to slavery, but rather made no comment. You seem to forget that the alternative to slavery was and still is death. An ugly death.

Slavery existed throughout history and still does. Now what does one do if one cannot support their children? Should they allow them to starve or sell them?

Also if there are tens of thousands of captives that one conquers in a war and that will always pose a threat what should one do? Sell them to an ally or kill them?

How can the Church condemn one thing when the alternative is just as evil.

Zenovia
Dear Zenovia,

I seriously don't think you've stopped to think about, or feel (with the compassion of Our Lord), what you posted.

The Church of God is commissioned to say a bold "No!!!" to slavery and war. We don't just sit back and wring our hands while evil flourishes! God forbid! blessing, wg

Page 5 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6

Moderated by  theophan 

Link Copied to Clipboard
The Byzantine Forum provides message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial, have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as a source for official information for any Church. All posts become property of byzcath.org. Contents copyright - 1996-2024 (Forum 1998-2024). All rights reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0