1 members (1 invisible),
514
guests, and
119
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums26
Topics35,521
Posts417,614
Members6,170
|
Most Online4,112 Mar 25th, 2025
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 43
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 43 |
Charity unites us to God... There is nothing mean in charity, nothing arrogant. Charity knows no schism, does not rebel, does all things in concord. In charity all the elect of God have been made perfect. -- Pope St. Clement I
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 937
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 937 |
Dear Sam,
IMHO, if you are making a backup for something you purchased, then yes, it is your right and moral to copy it.
If you want to burn a disc that a friend owns, then that would be like stealing, unless for instance, you have a computer game that you both went halfs on to save money, where the disc has a cd key that is needed for online use, and can only be used once at a time, then that should be okay.
I like lots of music, but many times, only one or two songs on an album. Buying the whole album in the past was a waste of money, but I did it. Now, I can purchase the single song, and create custom cds of all the songs I like, for a small price.
Microsoft has on it EULA, (End User License Agreement) that you can install its programs, such as Office, on two separate computers, provided you only use the program on one of the computers at a time. I.E. Office 2003 installed on your and my computer, same serial number. When you use it, I should not use it, but when you close the office application, I can then use it. If we both have the application open at the same time, then we are violating their agreement.
Now is that a sin, or a disregard of a business agreement? We have discussed DVD and VHS copying at our parish, and the majority feel copying something you own or went halfs on is okay, but copying something you did not purchase is immoral.
Then, what about the person that pays for all his/her software, for the last 7-9 years, and is tired of spending all that money for software that is now archaic on the current PC processors. He has the opportunity to get a fully licensed copy of the current version for free and burns it and uses it. Is that immoral? He spent literally thousands of dollars to that company and their previous products no longer function....
I would really like to hear from a man of the cloth on this for guidance.
In Christ,
Michael
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 43
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 43 |
thanks. I would also like to here from a Holy Priest about this. I don't want to go to hell over stolen music. It seems i have a lot of music i have to delete. Is it wrong for someone to upload music from a cd from a family member onto their computer?
sam
Charity unites us to God... There is nothing mean in charity, nothing arrogant. Charity knows no schism, does not rebel, does all things in concord. In charity all the elect of God have been made perfect. -- Pope St. Clement I
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,437 Likes: 1
Administrator Member
|
Administrator Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,437 Likes: 1 |
OK Sam,
I was trying hard not to answer this post, but it seems my brother clergy are just as reluctant. You really need a lawyer more than a priest to answer this.
My spin (no pun intended) is that if you own the CD, to upload it to your computer or to copy it to a MP3 player is legitimate. Your regular media software will allow it. The problem with making copies upon copies is a few fold. First, you do not own the CD (or whatever source). The artist and company derive their earning from the sale of the music. For some it is not a problem, but for some it is taking the bread off their table. The next problem is that you had to lie. Your media player has asked for the original version and that you had ceritfied that it is such. The last, by our desire to have it may bring about not only spiritual disease of covetenous, but the disease of the computer virus, from making copies from another's computer.
So you see, we have the spiritual diseases of covetenous, lying, and theft asssociated with this practice. Now if you want a moral desicion, I leave it for you to decide.
In IC XC, Father Anthony+
Everyone baptized into Christ should pass progressively through all the stages of Christ's own life, for in baptism he receives the power so to progress, and through the commandments he can discover and learn how to accomplish such progression. - Saint Gregory of Sinai
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,994 Likes: 10
Moderator Member
|
Moderator Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,994 Likes: 10 |
I will let you all have a chuckle at my expense. Just when I thought that I was pretty 'cool', I realize how not 'cool' I really am....I thought that the poster was inquiring about LITERALLY burning his cd's--as in throwing them in the fire!!!! :rolleyes: LOL!  :p HOW stupid is that!!!! Alice
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,437 Likes: 1
Administrator Member
|
Administrator Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,437 Likes: 1 |
Alice,
After hearing some of the "music", that might not be a bad idea.
In IC XC, Father Anthony+
Everyone baptized into Christ should pass progressively through all the stages of Christ's own life, for in baptism he receives the power so to progress, and through the commandments he can discover and learn how to accomplish such progression. - Saint Gregory of Sinai
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,994 Likes: 10
Moderator Member
|
Moderator Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,994 Likes: 10 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,595 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,595 Likes: 1 |
Nah - they don't burn - sadly But they do make nice bird scarers and can also be used as coasters 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,700
Administrator Member
|
Administrator Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,700 |
Father Anthony has raised all the points. I don't understand about burning CD's, though I would like to.
I remember when I was in studies, there were questions about photocopying books (I guess it is the same principle involved, eg. intellectual property).
Libraries would only allow you to copy up to "a chapter" of a book, or up to "one tenth" of the book. If you wanted the whole book, then one should buy a copy.
However, when books were permanently out of print (and you made a reasonable effort to obtain one), or it was over 50 years old (I presume when the text became public property), then there was more liberty.
Those principles seemed reasonable, and I wonder if they transfer to CDs?
the unworthy, Elias
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 222
ByzanTEEN
|
ByzanTEEN
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 222 |
I think it would be good to just burn them for replacements. My Switchfoot: Nothing Is Sound CD is the perfect example of this. There's plenty of scratches on it now, but none of them fatal to the disc. I need to burn a copy (to make sure I don't lose the music) so I should. As long as I don't have it over to someone else to burn it should be fine..
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 43
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 43 |
my question is: Is it stealing to take a cd that my father bought or my brother bought, and burn it, or put it on my ipod?
Charity unites us to God... There is nothing mean in charity, nothing arrogant. Charity knows no schism, does not rebel, does all things in concord. In charity all the elect of God have been made perfect. -- Pope St. Clement I
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 22
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 22 |
The RIAA (you know, THOSE GUYS, the ones who'll getcha for downloading from Napster) say, yes, it's against the law to share music. See Fair Use Laws here: RIAA Fair Use [ http] . But then they are downright rabid about this. Whether it is a sin or not would be an excellent topic to discuss with your spiritual director or confessor and not on a public forum. C'mon, it's called iTunes: 99 cents a song, you own it, the RIAA can't touch ya, and your soul isn't in danger. Unless you are downloading certain, well, questionable kinds of music, and we won't go there today. On this same topic, have you heard about Magnatunes? Magnatunes [ magnatunes.com] In particular, the Eastern Voices page of Magnatunes: Eastern Voices [ http] You can listen to 439 complete albums for free. I don't know what happens on album #440.  And if you do want to buy an album, you get to choose how much you want to pay for it. I particularly enjoyed the Kyiv Chamber Choir and the Ensemble Sreteniye.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,437 Likes: 1
Administrator Member
|
Administrator Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,437 Likes: 1 |
I would guess that gifts that your family have given you is allowed.
In IC XC, Father Anthony+
Everyone baptized into Christ should pass progressively through all the stages of Christ's own life, for in baptism he receives the power so to progress, and through the commandments he can discover and learn how to accomplish such progression. - Saint Gregory of Sinai
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 43
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 43 |
Thanks Father.
Dominus Vobiscum,
Sam
Charity unites us to God... There is nothing mean in charity, nothing arrogant. Charity knows no schism, does not rebel, does all things in concord. In charity all the elect of God have been made perfect. -- Pope St. Clement I
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,688
Moderator Member
|
Moderator Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,688 |
Sam asks: "Is it stealing to take a cd that my father bought or my brother bought, and burn it, or put it on my ipod?" To which Father Anthony replies: "I would guess that gifts that your family have given you would be allowed." With all due respect, that was not the question. Sam said nothing about a gift. Sam's father or brother is the owner of the CD, as Sam describes in the scenario he takes the CD to make a copy or put it on the ipod. The Copyright Act of 1976 and as amemded in 2002 of the US Code states: � 106 � Exclusive rights in copyrighted works: Subject to sections 107 through 122, the owner of copyright under this title has the exclusive rights to do and to authorize any of the following: (1) to reproduce the copyrighted work in copies or phonorecords; (2) to prepare derivative works based upon the copyrighted work; (3) to distribute copies or phonorecords of the copyrighted work to the public by sale or other transfer of ownership, or by rental, lease, or lending; (4) in the case of literary, musical, dramatic, and choreographic works, pantomimes, and motion pictures and other audiovisual works, to perform the copyrighted work publicly; (5) in the case of literary, musical, dramatic, and choreographic works, pantomimes, and pictorial, graphic, or sculptural works, including the individual images of a motion picture or other audiovisual work, to display the copyrighted work publicly; and (6) in the case of sound recordings, to perform the copyrighted work publicly by means of a digital audio transmission. The scenario Sam describes is an infringement upon the exclusive rights of the owner of the copyright to reproduce the copyrighted material, unless the owner allows free copying. Father Elias is correct about library policy of photocopying. The US Code places a limitation on the "exclusive rights" under a test entitled "fair use": � 107 � Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include� (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. Father Anthony had it right the first time, "You really need a lawyer more than a priest to answer this." My advice: buy the CD or pay the fee to download the music. It's much cheaper than talking to the lawyer. This music is someone's labor, and that person is certainly entitled to receive compensation for that work. From the Unpublished Sayings of the Desert Fathers: "Better not to burn a CD, than to burn in the lake of fire." 
|
|
|
|
|