The Byzantine Forum
Newest Members
Fr. Abraham, AnonymousMan115, violet7488, HopefulOlivia, Quid Est Veritas
6,181 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
1 members (San Nicolas), 505 guests, and 84 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
by orthodoxsinner2, September 30
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
by Veronica.H, April 24
Byzantine Catholic Outreach of Iowa
Exterior of Holy Angels Byzantine Catholic Parish
Church of St Cyril of Turau & All Patron Saints of Belarus
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics35,529
Posts417,668
Members6,181
Most Online4,112
Mar 25th, 2025
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
#174927 03/11/04 09:06 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,310
Member
Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,310
Perhaps they are just itching for a chance to paint over the walls... biggrin

#174928 03/11/04 10:12 PM
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 838
Member
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 838
more likely a chance to earn some spending money....


the ikon writer
#174929 03/12/04 06:23 AM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 10,090
Likes: 16
Global Moderator
Member
Global Moderator
Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 10,090
Likes: 16
For a full list of the Dancing Saints, with bios, and feast days indicated, see:

Dancing Saints [godsfriends.org]

They are nothing if not ecumenical. John XXIII, of blessed memory, is listed, among others of "ours" (also St. Patrick biggrin ). (Try to picture our beloved and ever-smiling Good Pope John dancing, which I actually find isn't all that hard to imagine; it's a rather gently humerous thought.)

Gaudior et al,

I do think we're being harsh, judgmental, and pompously pious in suggesting that these folks are in any grave danger of imminent punishment from God, by lightning bolt or otherwise. Neither their style (e.g., liturgical dance) nor their theology is mine and, honestly, their place of worship puts one more in mind of an arts and cultural center than a church. (As the former, it is truly a magnificent collection of beautiful objects drawn from the liturgical experiences and styles of an incredible variety of religious cultures. They even have a sprung wooden dance floor with an inset labyrinth, a beautiful recreation of an architectural feature not uncommonly found in the worship spaces of the Shaker communities - and, btw, a great surface on which to enjoy dancing wink .)

As Dave said:

Quote
... from an Orthodox standpoint, the subject matter is flawed. However, we must keep in mind that this is not an Orthodox or Catholic church. It is Episcopalian. Therefore, our rules really don't apply. For this church, these are their saints. This fits in with their theology and ideology. We may not like it or think it is right and canonical, but it is outside of our jurisdiction.
I'd go a bit further even. Canonicity doesn't apply, because they are not "of us". And, I don't think we can say it's not right - what is wrong about it? They have chosen to recognize and venerate, through their iconographic-style presentation, a diverse community of persons, many (perhaps not all, in our personal opinions, but that's what they are - our personal opinions) of whom have contributed to the betterment of the lives of God's peoples. I rather think that there are worse things they could have done. We, as the good Christians we claim to be, owe them respect for having taken the time and made the effort to see good in the world and to acknowledge by whom such good was done, even though some of those persons may be outside the confines of our own space, place, times, and comfort zones.

There are many persons, both famous and relatively unknown, who would not readily be adopted into the Catholic calendar, Eastern or Western, perhaps because of their theological ideology, maybe because what they accomplished in life didn't quite achieve that standard, but who have contributed in some not insignificant way to the betterment of man's existence, brought him closer to an understanding of God's will and plan, or exhibited a caring for their fellow human beings that mirrors, in its own way, what Jesus taught and did. I rather think that, if solicited, each of us could come up with the names of one or two such folks who would be worthy of inclusion in the type of memorial these folks have created. IMHO, that we could do so speaks to the legitimacy of what they have done.

Many years,

Neil


"One day all our ethnic traits ... will have disappeared. Time itself is seeing to this. And so we can not think of our communities as ethnic parishes, ... unless we wish to assure the death of our community."
#174930 03/12/04 09:46 AM
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,405
Likes: 38
Member
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,405
Likes: 38
Dear Neil,

And if one day this parish ever comes into communion with Rome - these dancing saints may just become part of the canon . . . smile

I saw a documentary about an African-American Catholic parish in New York City.

The liturgy there lasts three hours, with all the hymn-singing and . . . dancing.

The priest comes out and dances around with his deacons and altar-servers.

During the Consecration, they continue to sway and move to rhythmic beats etc.

At their Sunday School, a deacon asked a girl what she would tell someone who was trying to get her involved in drugs and sex.

She enthusiastically replied, "I would say that there is no way I was going to risk my relationship with the Lord Jesus Christ by getting involved with sin of any kind!"

Admittedly, such dancing in St Peter's Basilica would definitely cause comment . . . smile

God bless, Irishman!

Alex

#174931 03/12/04 02:54 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,010
Likes: 1
C
Member
Member
C Offline
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,010
Likes: 1
This topic brings up many thought-provoking questions.

Does the Orthodox Church/Christian East have exclusive rights to the Byzantine iconographic style?

Is it truly wrong for those NOT of this tradition to use and adapt it for their own purpose? Examples would be these icons in San Francisco, Lentz's work, the Anabaptist icons that were the subject of a recent thread, and, to an extent, icons of Roman Catholic saints.

Is the Byzantine iconographic style inherently sanctified and thus off limits to "other" artists?

Is the interest in iconography expressed by large numbers of non-Easterners a good or bad thing? Is the desire of these individuals to paint icons of their saints positive or negative?

What does everybody think?

Dave, iconographer

#174932 03/12/04 04:41 PM
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,405
Likes: 38
Member
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,405
Likes: 38
Dear Dave,

I think it is ALL positive.

A strength of this Episcopal Church is its "multi-ritual" character and blending of Roman, Anglican, Ethiopian and Byzantine elements.

It is also a strength of the Catholic Church herself.

Alex

#174933 03/12/04 06:51 PM
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,658
Member
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,658
Yesterday 60 minutes featured an interview with "Bishop" Gene Robinson with parts of his consecration ceremony.

The so called consecration was like a fashion parade, men dressed as Bishops in blue and pink colour, they all laid their hands over his head while a crowd shouted.

This all was like a parody of a Catholic liturgy and a consacration of a true bishop, a mockery of the holy orders and a clearly countereit religion.
I just can't believe how Catholics can stabd this episcopalian sect and its sacrilegous ceremonies.

#174934 03/12/04 07:03 PM
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,790
Member
Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,790
Toleration of apostasy is not a virtue [and by apostasy I do not mean dancing in liturgy, which can be perfectly appropriate in some cultures; rather I mean moral laxity about abortion and homosexuality and toleration for clerics who deny essential Christian doctrine.]
Iconography is not a "style" of art so much as an expression of theological truth in line and color, and one is not free to express one's own theological ideas. To use the techniques of iconography to paint images of people who were not holy, as the Church understands holiness, or to promote a political or religious agenda is to commit sacrilege.
Daniel, an iconographer

#174935 03/12/04 08:36 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,010
Likes: 1
C
Member
Member
C Offline
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,010
Likes: 1
It seems that "icons" of people who were not saints are nothing new.

Apparently there were paintings in Russia known as "parsuna" (from "persona"). They were essentially iconographic portraits of living people or people who were not saints. I don't know much about it, but it seems to be related to this thread.

http://www.galleries.ru/sorokin/index.asp?series=\'parsun\'

http://www.museum.ru/tretyakov/hid/Images/Img/15272.jpg

http://www.ihavelovedyouso.com/ivantheterrible.jpg

http://www.galleries.ru/sorokin/thumbnails/P8133910.jpg

More food for our eyes, and for thought. wink

Dave

#174936 03/12/04 10:02 PM
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,790
Member
Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,790
Abuses are nothing new....

#174937 03/13/04 12:14 AM
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,790
Member
Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,790
And what's up with Lentz's use of "OFM"? Anybody?
Somehow I devoutly hope that he is not a canonical Franciscan...

#174938 03/13/04 04:01 AM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 10,090
Likes: 16
Global Moderator
Member
Global Moderator
Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 10,090
Likes: 16
Quote
Originally posted by iconophile:
And what's up with Lentz's use of "OFM"?
Daniel,

Lentz was a Franciscan in some formative capacity from about 1964 through 1974 or 1975. I don't believe he ever took vows of any sort. Since I haven't seen any suggestion anywhere that he is using ofm after his name, I suspect it was added by a copywriter who didn't accurately read his bio or did and decided to gild the lily as it were.

Many years,

Neil


"One day all our ethnic traits ... will have disappeared. Time itself is seeing to this. And so we can not think of our communities as ethnic parishes, ... unless we wish to assure the death of our community."
#174939 03/13/04 05:20 AM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 10,090
Likes: 16
Global Moderator
Member
Global Moderator
Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 10,090
Likes: 16
Quote
Originally posted by iconophile:
Iconography is not a "style" of art so much as an expression of theological truth in line and color, and one is not free to express one's own theological ideas. To use the techniques of iconography to paint images of people who were not holy, as the Church understands holiness, or to promote a political or religious agenda is to commit sacrilege.
Daniel,

I am an iconophile but not an iconographer, so we are looking at this from two different perspectives. Although iconography is an expression of theological truth from the point of view of we of the Eastern Churches, it remains that it is a style of art and, as such, is available for the use of those artisans who choose to employ it. We neither hold any patent on its techniques nor otherwise enjoy any exclusivity with respect to it. Although Impressionism was the style of Monet and others, and purist devotees may object to its use by pedestrian painters of the 20th century, it does not preclude the production of paintings in the Impressionistic-style; the same is true of paintings in the style of iconography. We can, if we choose, point out that such are only paintings and not "written" in the classical meaning of such, that they do not necessarily follow the canons of iconography, that those who produce them are not iconographers as we mean the term, but we cannot term what they do to be sacrilege.

One is indeed free to express one's own theological ideas, as long as those do not contravene or reject theological dogma. Postulating that a person is holy and is worthy of veneration in one's eyes, does not appear to me to be a rejection of dogma. In fact, it's very Eastern, as we have long been quicker than the West to permit and even encourage local venerations. And who is to say that those portrayed are not holy in the sense that the Church understands holiness? Was Martin Luther King's struggle to bring about equality and afford civil rights to minorities not a holy act? Why? Because he committed indiscretions at times in his life? The list of those now called "Saint" by the Church who committed indiscretions in their life is not a short one. And I, for one, feel much more comfortable acknowledging the holy good done by others, of which I have an awareness as a conscious, thinking, observant human, than I do in judging them for that which they did which was unholy. The latter, it seems to me, is the province of a higher Judge than me.

Many years,

Neil


"One day all our ethnic traits ... will have disappeared. Time itself is seeing to this. And so we can not think of our communities as ethnic parishes, ... unless we wish to assure the death of our community."
#174940 03/13/04 04:09 PM
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,716
Member
Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,716
Quote
Originally posted by Theist Gal:
Quote
Originally posted by Chtec:
[b] However, we must keep in mind that this is not an Orthodox or Catholic church. It is Episcopalian. Therefore, our rules really don't apply.
Quite true. In fact, I think the official motto of the Episcopalian Church (especially these days) is:

"Rules??" biggrin [/b]
Well, to be fair, St Gregory's is one of the most "way out" of Episcopal parishes in that diocese. It really is not representative of even Episcopalian views.

#174941 03/13/04 04:31 PM
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 180
Member
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 180
All,

St. Gregory of Nyssa Episcopal church seems to be a model for the new ECUSA-that is to say, the Episcopal church USA which has emerged after their last General Convention. Which many, even in their own Anglican Communion have deemed, "non-Christian."

It is a shame that this hodge-podge of venerable liturgical traditions has been melded into a confusing, if not ridiculous farce.

Why am I so critical? Basically I do not like to see some of my own Catholic traditions performed a) by "priesteses" b) alongside with heretical innovations c) by a group claiming true catholicity.

Thankfully there are still those Anglicans/Episcopals who have not resorted to these types of practices. In fact this has now made me wonder-whatever happened to the Anglican-rite Catholic Church/diocese which was supposed to be formed as a result of the ECUSA's actions last year?

I am aware that a new Network of conservative Episcopalian parishes has been formed in the U.S though. If any one has any information on this let us know please.

God Bless,

ProCatholico


Glory be to God
Page 2 of 5 1 2 3 4 5

Moderated by  Irish Melkite, theophan 

Link Copied to Clipboard
The Byzantine Forum provides message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial, have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as a source for official information for any Church. All posts become property of byzcath.org. Contents copyright - 1996-2024 (Forum 1998-2024). All rights reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0