The Byzantine Forum
Newest Members
HopefulOlivia, Quid Est Veritas, Frank O, BC LV, returningtoaxum
6,178 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 340 guests, and 125 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
by orthodoxsinner2, September 30
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
by Veronica.H, April 24
Byzantine Catholic Outreach of Iowa
Exterior of Holy Angels Byzantine Catholic Parish
Church of St Cyril of Turau & All Patron Saints of Belarus
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics35,525
Posts417,643
Members6,178
Most Online4,112
Mar 25th, 2025
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,268
A
Member
Member
A Offline
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,268
Pope Benedict XVI, through Cardinal Sodano, the Vatican Secretary of State, officially responds to the written request of Metropolitan Volodymyr of the UOC-MP to "rescind" the transfer of the UGCC hq from Lviv to Kyiv under a warning of "serious consequences" if it was not acted upon! :rolleyes:

Breaking news at:

http://www.cwnews.com/news/viewstory.cfm?recnum=40339

UGCC did it as a Church sui juris! Rome supports it and it will defend it!

Amado

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 937
Member
Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 937
Dear Amado,

This is wonderful news if valid. The reason I state that is:

1.
Quote
In August Cardinal Lubomyr Husar, the Major Archbishop of the Eastern-rite Ukrainian Orthodox Church, moved his see from Lviv to the Ukrainian capital city of Kiev despite firm opposition from some leaders of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church. At the time, Vatican officials pointed out that the self-governing Ukrainian Catholic Church did not need Vatican approval for the move.
I feel if this were a valid church communication, then the UGCC would be decribed accurately.

2.
Quote
gently explained that the Poep would not intervene.
A typo of this nature in a Church communication causes me some concern.

That is all. Truthfully, if this is valid, I do rejoice!

Michael

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,411
A
AMM Offline
Member
Member
A Offline
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,411
I can't wait for the comments to appear on the site attached to the story. They're usually some pretty entertaining ones posted on CWN about how Russia needs to convert, the hierarchy is all in the KGB, etc.

Andrew

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,268
A
Member
Member
A Offline
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,268
Dear L&F:

Those typos are not attributable to the Church communications, as they are not being entirely quoted by CWNews.

They should be attributable to CWNews proof readers/encoders!

Amado

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 828
M
Member
Member
M Offline
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 828
Well Michael if it means anything its true that RISU ran the story: Pope Approves Move of Greek Catholic Head to Kyiv [risu.org.ua]

Assuming the veracity of this message the Holy See's response to the UOC-MP gives me much hope for the future. Benedict XVI's 'communio' ecclesiology has guided his writings on the Church since he was a simple theologian called Fr Ratzinger and I think the implementation of this, allowing the Eastern Synods to govern themselves as is right, can only be good for the Catholica.


"We love, because he first loved us"--1 John 4:19
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,658
Member
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,658
Well why not moving it to Kharkiv or Donetsk, why to Kiev? Is it absolutely necesary??

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,595
Likes: 1
O
Member
Member
O Offline
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,595
Likes: 1
Quote
Originally posted by Mexican:
Well why not moving it to Kharkiv or Donetsk, why to Kiev? Is it absolutely necesary??
I'll get my head in my hands for this BUT

To this idiot it seems ridiculous that the Head of the UGCC does not have his Cathedral in the capital of the country

Anhelyna

now let the battle begin - AGAIN

Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,505
Member
Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,505
"Shine in splendor, O New Jerusalem, For the glory of the Lord is risen upon you, O Sion sing with joy and rejoice,and you, pure Mother of God, rejoice in the exaltation of your Son."
"Eis polla eta"
Stephanos I

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,964
T
Member
Member
T Offline
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,964
Quote
Originally posted by Mexican:
Well why not moving it to Kharkiv or Donetsk, why to Kiev? Is it absolutely necesary??
Because -----

In 1596, our Church affirmed our faith and loyalty as the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church in communion with the Holy See in Rome. - the Union Of Brest.

Quote
Given in the Year of God 1595, the month of June, the first day according to the Old Calendar.

MICHAEL, Metropolitan of Kiev and Halych and all Rus'

Hypatius, Bishop of Volodymyr and Brest'
Cyril Terletsky, by the grace of God Exarch and Bishop of Lutsk and Ostrih
Leontius Pelchytsky, by the grace of God Bishop of Pinsk and Turov
[the seals of eight bishops are added, including Gedeon Balaban of L'viv and Dionysius Zbirujski of Kholm.]
Because - our Metropolitan is finally free to return to his proper See. cool

Now, we have to work on that "all Rus" part. biggrin

The text of the Union may be found at:

http://www.archeparchy.ca/archeparchy/history/brest.htm

John
Pilgrim and Odd Duck

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,411
A
AMM Offline
Member
Member
A Offline
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,411
Quote
Originally posted by Mexican:
why to Kiev?
To stick it to the Russians.

Andrew

Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,505
Member
Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,505
Don't you think it is rather humorous that those who we decrying that Rome intervined in Eastern affairs now cry out for Rome to do it?
Stephanos I
"Oh the lengths to which we will go when it involves our own agenda."

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,517
I
Member
Member
I Offline
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,517
Stephanos I writes: "Don't you think it is rather humorous that those who we decrying that Rome intervined in Eastern affairs now cry out for Rome to do it?"

Have I missed something? I seem to remember that Saint Paul teaches that we are "intervined" with, or to, the Israel of God, by engrafting, so presumably we are also "intervined" with one another.

Incognitus

Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 784
Member
Member
Member
Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 784
Rillian,

This was not to stick it to the Russians.

This was to return our Apostolic Church *back* to Kyiv where it all began-- where St. Andrew came and blessed, and where Volodymyr made Ukraine into a Christian kingdom.

As I have said before in earlier posts, I doubt our church is much concerened with Russia at all. This move is for Ukraine, its people, and for the Glory of God.

If our church was concerned with Russia, we would have disbanded a long, long time ago.

No, this move was spiritual, not political.

-uc

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,411
A
AMM Offline
Member
Member
A Offline
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,411
Quote
Originally posted by ukrainiancatholic:
This was to return our Apostolic Church *back* to Kyiv where it all began-- where St. Andrew came and blessed, and where Volodymyr made Ukraine into a Christian kingdom.
Except there's an apostolic church headquartered there already with a Metropolitan. Do you consider that church to be a valid inheritor of the Kievan tradition and its apostolic links?

Quote
No, this move was spiritual, not political.
The reason given on RISU [risu.org.ua] was the following.

RISU note: According to a recent statement of Fr. Ihor Yatsiv, press secretary of the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church (UGCC), the key reason for the transfer of the UGCC�s metropolitan see to Kyiv is the need to improve the administrative activities of the church. According to him, the head of the UGCC should be more available for the common faithful living all over Ukraine. �Our church is not a regional one. Therefore the move of the head of the UGCC to Kyiv is not a demonstration of aggression but a vital necessity,� said Fr. Yatsiv

Andrew

Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 784
Member
Member
Member
Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 784
"Except there's an apostolic church headquartered there already with a Metropolitan. Do you consider that church to be a valid inheritor of the Kievan tradition and its apostolic links? "


In my opinion, no. The link is lost in loyalty to the Moscow church. I say this in a spiritual sense because Kyiv is an Apolstolic city, not Moscow.

Moscow is a spiritual duaghter of Kyiv, no doubt, but Kyiv is the parent.

The move to Kyiv by the hierarchy of the UGCC is a twofold spiritual reason: To return the Church to the Apolstolic orgins from which it came and now flourishes, and to work prayerfully and dillegently for the establishment of a united Kyivan Patriarchate.

Kyivan Patriarchate. Not a just a Metropolitan See subserviant to the daughter church in Moscow.

-uc

note: These views are mine, and not specifically of the UGCC!

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
The Byzantine Forum provides message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial, have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as a source for official information for any Church. All posts become property of byzcath.org. Contents copyright - 1996-2024 (Forum 1998-2024). All rights reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0