0 members (),
340
guests, and
125
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums26
Topics35,525
Posts417,643
Members6,178
|
Most Online4,112 Mar 25th, 2025
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,268
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,268 |
Pope Benedict XVI, through Cardinal Sodano, the Vatican Secretary of State, officially responds to the written request of Metropolitan Volodymyr of the UOC-MP to "rescind" the transfer of the UGCC hq from Lviv to Kyiv under a warning of "serious consequences" if it was not acted upon! :rolleyes: Breaking news at: http://www.cwnews.com/news/viewstory.cfm?recnum=40339 UGCC did it as a Church sui juris! Rome supports it and it will defend it! Amado
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 937
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 937 |
Dear Amado, This is wonderful news if valid. The reason I state that is: 1. In August Cardinal Lubomyr Husar, the Major Archbishop of the Eastern-rite Ukrainian Orthodox Church, moved his see from Lviv to the Ukrainian capital city of Kiev despite firm opposition from some leaders of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church. At the time, Vatican officials pointed out that the self-governing Ukrainian Catholic Church did not need Vatican approval for the move. I feel if this were a valid church communication, then the UGCC would be decribed accurately. 2. gently explained that the Poep would not intervene. A typo of this nature in a Church communication causes me some concern. That is all. Truthfully, if this is valid, I do rejoice! Michael
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,411
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,411 |
I can't wait for the comments to appear on the site attached to the story. They're usually some pretty entertaining ones posted on CWN about how Russia needs to convert, the hierarchy is all in the KGB, etc.
Andrew
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,268
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,268 |
Dear L&F:
Those typos are not attributable to the Church communications, as they are not being entirely quoted by CWNews.
They should be attributable to CWNews proof readers/encoders!
Amado
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 828
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 828 |
Well Michael if it means anything its true that RISU ran the story: Pope Approves Move of Greek Catholic Head to Kyiv [ risu.org.ua] Assuming the veracity of this message the Holy See's response to the UOC-MP gives me much hope for the future. Benedict XVI's 'communio' ecclesiology has guided his writings on the Church since he was a simple theologian called Fr Ratzinger and I think the implementation of this, allowing the Eastern Synods to govern themselves as is right, can only be good for the Catholica.
"We love, because he first loved us"--1 John 4:19
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,658
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,658 |
Well why not moving it to Kharkiv or Donetsk, why to Kiev? Is it absolutely necesary??
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,595 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,595 Likes: 1 |
Originally posted by Mexican: Well why not moving it to Kharkiv or Donetsk, why to Kiev? Is it absolutely necesary?? I'll get my head in my hands for this BUT To this idiot it seems ridiculous that the Head of the UGCC does not have his Cathedral in the capital of the country Anhelyna now let the battle begin - AGAIN
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,505
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,505 |
"Shine in splendor, O New Jerusalem, For the glory of the Lord is risen upon you, O Sion sing with joy and rejoice,and you, pure Mother of God, rejoice in the exaltation of your Son." "Eis polla eta" Stephanos I
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,964
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,964 |
Originally posted by Mexican: Well why not moving it to Kharkiv or Donetsk, why to Kiev? Is it absolutely necesary?? Because ----- In 1596, our Church affirmed our faith and loyalty as the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church in communion with the Holy See in Rome. - the Union Of Brest. Given in the Year of God 1595, the month of June, the first day according to the Old Calendar.
MICHAEL, Metropolitan of Kiev and Halych and all Rus'
Hypatius, Bishop of Volodymyr and Brest' Cyril Terletsky, by the grace of God Exarch and Bishop of Lutsk and Ostrih Leontius Pelchytsky, by the grace of God Bishop of Pinsk and Turov [the seals of eight bishops are added, including Gedeon Balaban of L'viv and Dionysius Zbirujski of Kholm.] Because - our Metropolitan is finally free to return to his proper See. Now, we have to work on that "all Rus" part. The text of the Union may be found at: http://www.archeparchy.ca/archeparchy/history/brest.htm John Pilgrim and Odd Duck
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,411
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,411 |
Originally posted by Mexican: why to Kiev? To stick it to the Russians. Andrew
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,505
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,505 |
Don't you think it is rather humorous that those who we decrying that Rome intervined in Eastern affairs now cry out for Rome to do it? Stephanos I "Oh the lengths to which we will go when it involves our own agenda."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,517
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,517 |
Stephanos I writes: "Don't you think it is rather humorous that those who we decrying that Rome intervined in Eastern affairs now cry out for Rome to do it?"
Have I missed something? I seem to remember that Saint Paul teaches that we are "intervined" with, or to, the Israel of God, by engrafting, so presumably we are also "intervined" with one another.
Incognitus
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 784
Member Member
|
Member Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 784 |
Rillian,
This was not to stick it to the Russians.
This was to return our Apostolic Church *back* to Kyiv where it all began-- where St. Andrew came and blessed, and where Volodymyr made Ukraine into a Christian kingdom.
As I have said before in earlier posts, I doubt our church is much concerened with Russia at all. This move is for Ukraine, its people, and for the Glory of God.
If our church was concerned with Russia, we would have disbanded a long, long time ago.
No, this move was spiritual, not political.
-uc
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,411
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,411 |
Originally posted by ukrainiancatholic: This was to return our Apostolic Church *back* to Kyiv where it all began-- where St. Andrew came and blessed, and where Volodymyr made Ukraine into a Christian kingdom. Except there's an apostolic church headquartered there already with a Metropolitan. Do you consider that church to be a valid inheritor of the Kievan tradition and its apostolic links? No, this move was spiritual, not political. The reason given on RISU [ risu.org.ua] was the following. RISU note: According to a recent statement of Fr. Ihor Yatsiv, press secretary of the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church (UGCC), the key reason for the transfer of the UGCC�s metropolitan see to Kyiv is the need to improve the administrative activities of the church. According to him, the head of the UGCC should be more available for the common faithful living all over Ukraine. �Our church is not a regional one. Therefore the move of the head of the UGCC to Kyiv is not a demonstration of aggression but a vital necessity,� said Fr. YatsivAndrew
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 784
Member Member
|
Member Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 784 |
"Except there's an apostolic church headquartered there already with a Metropolitan. Do you consider that church to be a valid inheritor of the Kievan tradition and its apostolic links? "
In my opinion, no. The link is lost in loyalty to the Moscow church. I say this in a spiritual sense because Kyiv is an Apolstolic city, not Moscow.
Moscow is a spiritual duaghter of Kyiv, no doubt, but Kyiv is the parent.
The move to Kyiv by the hierarchy of the UGCC is a twofold spiritual reason: To return the Church to the Apolstolic orgins from which it came and now flourishes, and to work prayerfully and dillegently for the establishment of a united Kyivan Patriarchate.
Kyivan Patriarchate. Not a just a Metropolitan See subserviant to the daughter church in Moscow.
-uc
note: These views are mine, and not specifically of the UGCC!
|
|
|
|
|