0 members (),
1,181
guests, and
74
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums26
Topics35,506
Posts417,454
Members6,150
|
Most Online3,380 Dec 29th, 2019
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,595 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,595 Likes: 1 |
Can only answer question 2 - but yes it has happened in the past - both in the UK and in the US.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,904
Orthodox Catholic Toddler Member
|
Orthodox Catholic Toddler Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,904 |
Although I do not have access to the statistics, I have heard that there are over 100 married Roman Catholic priests in the United States alone. The priest nearest to me (that I am aware of) was actually a former Lutheran, not an Anglican.
This would be FAR, FAR more married Roman Catholic priests than married Eastern Catholic priests in the United States. Giving lie to the possible scandal it could cause the faithful of the Roman Catholic church and discrediting the logic used to prohibit married Eastern priests originally.
I think there may be several hundred married Roman Catholic priests in England, due to the large number of Anglicans who crossed over in the last decade.
Yet the mythology about it all continues, I noticed on another board a strong (if false) case was made for mandatory celibacy because the eastern churches supposedly have always had married priests and still have a shortage! The point I am trying to make here is that the average Roman Catholic is unaware of the facts.
I would think that it is time for Rome to set up an Apostolic Administration for the those who might be willing to convert in the United States, and accept whole provinces or dioceses around the world where that is legally possible and likely.
But I know next to nothing about what Anglicans around the world themselves actually think about all of that. They may prefer to set up another communion with Lagos or Singapore as the Primatial see! Or perhaps they will do nothing.
MichaEL
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 180
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 180 |
All,
The lastest news that I have come across from the Episcopal church is of a so-called "realignment" policy. From what I gather there is a new momentum in the ECUSA to create a "Network of ECUSA diocese and congregations". Whereby, the orthodox Episcopalians can join and form a new Anglican body, part of the worldwide Anglican Communuion, and exclude the liberal factions within their church.
Essentially this would constitute as a schism within their national body. Already many Anglican provinces in the Global South have stated that they have "impaired or broken" communion with the ECUSA.
I have yet to see any public mention from any diocese or specfic ECUSA congregation on their plans to join Rome. All of this seems to be happening behind closed doors, presumably because it is a painful process. Hopefully the Anglican Rite within the Catholic Church will be created in the near future.
The question of married priests, I do not belive, would be an issue. This because, married Roman Catholic clergy already do exist (though not many) and married priests are also present in our Eastern Rite Churches. The Pastoral Provision in existence today in the Roman Catholic Church allows married Anglican clerics who convert to become priests. So I would not think that the issue in regards to married priests would be a problem.
The point is, it is time for the creation of the Anglican Rite.
ProCatholico
Glory be to God
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 180
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 180 |
All,
I forgot to mention on my post above, if I am mistaken on any of this, please correct me.
Thanks, and of course I look forward to seeing more news or comments on the matter.
God Bless,
ProCatholico
Glory be to God
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 10,090 Likes: 15
Global Moderator Member
|
Global Moderator Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 10,090 Likes: 15 |
Originally posted by ProCatholico: I forgot to mention on my post above, if I am mistaken on any of this, please correct me.
Like nobody would, if he didn't ask? data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58d82/58d8217e3d30fba0138ae4516a6d54e1d46ce86d" alt="wink wink"
"One day all our ethnic traits ... will have disappeared. Time itself is seeing to this. And so we can not think of our communities as ethnic parishes, ... unless we wish to assure the death of our community."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 180
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 180 |
Well then, I am glad to know that I am so perfect. Only kidding, of course. Seriously though, I hope everyone here keeps on top of these important developments. ProCatholico
Glory be to God
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,904
Orthodox Catholic Toddler Member
|
Orthodox Catholic Toddler Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,904 |
An article appearing in the Wichita Eagle from the Associated Press Posted on Sat, Dec. 13, 2003
Church seeks to avoid schism
Associated Press
The head of the Episcopal Church says the denomination will resolve internal divisions over the consecration of its first openly gay bishop without direct intervention from overseas Anglican leaders.
Some U.S. conservatives who are opposed to ordaining gays are building a separate network of Episcopal churches and are appealing to Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams to provide direct oversight for them.
But Presiding Bishop Frank Griswold sent a letter last Friday to American bishops saying that, together, they will devise a plan providing alternative church leadership for dissenting congregations -- not Williams or others. A draft will be considered at the U.S. bishops' next meeting in March.
Williams is the spiritual leader of the 77-million-member Anglican Communion, which is represented in the United States by the Episcopal Church.
Griswold is working to avert a schism over V. Gene Robinson, who lives openly with his male partner and was elected bishop of New Hampshire this year.
The American Anglican Council, based in Washington, announced Monday that 13 U.S. bishops have agreed to establish the conservative Network of Anglican Communion Dioceses and Congregations, with Pittsburgh's Bishop Robert Duncan as moderator.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,904
Orthodox Catholic Toddler Member
|
Orthodox Catholic Toddler Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,904 |
An article appearing in The West Australian dated November 22, 2003 Sydney Archbishop eyes Anglican schism By Gavin Simpson SYDNEY'S Anglican Archbishop Peter Jensen has threatened to split the Church and transfer his allegiance from the Archbishop of Canterbury to the Primate of Nigeria over the issue of gay clergy.
"We must recognise the possibility that the Anglican communion will actually divide," Dr Jensen says in an interview which is to be screened on Channel 9's Sunday program tomorrow.
"It is conceivable, I have to say, that two world Anglicanisms may develop, perhaps with two mutually exclusive centres."
Instead of looking to the Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams, for moral authority, Sydney could "look more to Nigeria or some other place for the chairmanship of the board".
"It may be that we will find more of our fellowship with the global south churches than we do with the old western churches," he says.
The issue has been brought to a head by the ordination in America of gay bishop Gene Robinson and approval by the diocese of New Westminster of same-sex unions.
Dr Jensen said Dr William's authority had been jeopardised by his failure to take a harder line on Bishop Robinson's ordination. "He is against it because he doesn't like the disunity that's being caused. I'm hoping he would speak against it because it's wrong in itself," he said.
The Nigerian Church, the second biggest in the Anglican communion, has cut ties with the New Westminster diocese. The Church's Primate, Archbishop Peter Akinola, has issued a written warning to his flock to be prepared for a potential split.
Dr Jensen also threatens in the interview to withdraw Sydney, the nation's biggest and wealthiest Anglican diocese, from the Australian Church if it allowed active homosexuals to be ordained.
The Australian Primate, Perth's Archbishop Peter Carnley, has called Dr Jensen's comments unhelpful: "I think in America there is a possibility of a group going its own way, I think that's a possibility. But I don't think there's going to be that type of division within the Anglican communion as such," he said.
I would have to remind all that this particular article is already over three weeks old, but I was hoping to find some indication of the thinking in various points around the world. Michael
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,405 Likes: 38
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,405 Likes: 38 |
Dear DavidinVA, Yes, let the Episcopal Church have the "Voice of the Faithful" people! Let them take them! I won't mention who else should take them . . . The Anglo-Catholics I know are already as Catholic as all get out and they give the Pope a "First among Equals" status. So they are like Western Rite Byzantine Catholics! There would be no problem with a married Anglican Rite priesthood. They would only have to obtain the right to continue with it after communion is achieved. But I should rather think that with the numbers of married Anglican priests coming over to Rome (we'll see, shall we?), this will transform the Latin Church in the U.S. especially. As I understand, Rome is nervous about receiving all these married Anglican priests precisely BECAUSE it will effectively change its priestly celibate church culture. On the other hand, it would be nice to have more priests to serve the Catholic faithful, period . . . And these would be more traditional in outlook and spirituality, than many Latin priests today. Wouldn't it be ironic if these Anglican-Catholic married priests start a movement toward a more traditional Latin Catholicism throughout North America? Ah, the wonders of God's Ways!! Alex
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 180
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 180 |
All,
With this new call from the Anglican leadership to try to retain some semblance of unity in their already fractured church, does this imply that hopes for an Anglican rite are halting?
Like I have stated, besides this one article from Seattle, I havent heard much about the creation of an Anglican Rite.
Any thoughts?
ProCatholico
Glory be to God
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 117
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 117 |
A parish in Wichita,Ks. will be recieved in the Antioachian Orthodox Church in the new year.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,405 Likes: 38
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,405 Likes: 38 |
Dear Friends, Those who are interested might want to contact Fr. Stephen Walinski of the Antiochian Orthodox Church in Omaha, Nebraska. He was a former Episcopal priest who came to Orthodoxy (Western Rite) with his parish and has helped bring other parishes over too. His contact information is on the Antiochian site. Tell him, "Alex from Toronto" sent you! Alex
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 117
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 117 |
Hey Alex, These guys will be western rite too.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,405 Likes: 38
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,405 Likes: 38 |
Dear C4C, What is ironic is to sometimes hear Orthodox attacking Western Catholics for the use of statues, Eucharistic Adoration and others, but tolerating such for Western Rite Orthodox . . . Alex
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,790
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,790 |
And haven't the Orthodox criticized the existence of Eastern Rite churches within the Catholic communion? Are there two standards? Am I going to get in trouble with the Administrator for asking a question that is critical of Orthodoxy?
|
|
|
|
|