The Byzantine Forum
Newest Members
EasternChristian19, James OConnor, biblicalhope, Ishmael, bluecollardpink
6,161 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
1 members (EasternChristian19), 1,782 guests, and 91 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
by orthodoxsinner2, September 30
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
by Veronica.H, April 24
Byzantine Catholic Outreach of Iowa
Exterior of Holy Angels Byzantine Catholic Parish
Church of St Cyril of Turau & All Patron Saints of Belarus
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics35,508
Posts417,509
Members6,161
Most Online3,380
Dec 29th, 2019
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,405
Likes: 38
Member
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,405
Likes: 38
Dear Mexican,

Certainly, the Orthodox Church does not refer to monastics by the names of the various founders of religious Rules.

But this doesn't mean that all Orthodox monastics follow the same Rule.

In addition to those few Antonian hermits and those following St Pachomios' Rule, the Orthodox Church also formally approves of the Rule of St Benedict and also the regulations of St Basil the Great (indeed, the prayer-rope is derived from St Basil).

There were other monastic "reform Rules" including that of St Paisius Velichkovsky who outlined his way of life in about 20 points, as I understand, with a tremendous emphasis on Hesychasm.

The West loves to tack on initials at the end of monastics' names and even have them sign documents at their profession rites.

It used to be a tradition for members of the Confraternity of the Most Holy Rosary to take on a version of the Name of Mary as a second name, whether they were men or women (I understand this practice persists in a number of RC religious orders to this day).

Alex-Maryam

Joined: May 2004
Posts: 321
Likes: 5
F
Member
Member
F Offline
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 321
Likes: 5
Alex,
funny you should mention that. In latin countries, and particularly in Portugal it is very common for children, girls AND boys to be given the name Maria in honour of Our Lady, this would come after the "male" name.
In my case for example, I was supposed to be baptised Filipe Maria, but wasn't in the end.
My Father's brothers include Miguel Maria and Francisco Maria. Jos� Maria and Jo�o Maria are also very common.
Not to mention girls names, all my aunts, on either side of the family (English and Portuguese) have Maria or Mary in their names, and my paternal grandmother was called Maria de Lourdes.
Even in many cases where girls are known as Ros�rio, Assun��o, Concei��o, Lourdes, F�tima etc, this is a shortened version of Maria do Ros�rio, Maria da Assun��o, Maria da Concei��o etc etc.
It's an ancient tradition that I would very much like to continue with my children... my wife to be (17 days left!) is not as happy about the idea as I am.
It is an ancient and, in

Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,685
Likes: 8
Member
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,685
Likes: 8
Any updates on this story?

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,405
Likes: 38
Member
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,405
Likes: 38
Which one?

Alex-Maryam wink

Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,885
Member
Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,885
Yes back to the Chaldean liturgy theme. So is this in line with the mind of the Church as expressed by various Popes and Vatican II. If so then it is very good. I can't imagine them putting something up for approval that did not comply.

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 128
E
Member
Member
E Offline
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 128
This might have been posted elsewhere, but I only noticed this today: The English text of the reformed and renewed Chaldean Catholic Liturgy can be found here: http://www.kaldu.org/WeeklyNews.html

If you read the "Essay on the Reform", you can see the reasons why things were changed. One of the primary reasons was to remove Latinisms.

My only regret, in reading through the text, is that the Words of Institution were retained (they're an obvious Latinism that wasn't removed) and that the parts of the litanies that resemble the Byzantine "angel of peace biddings" were removed. Oh well. For the rest, the reasoning in the "Essay on the Reform" is pretty solid, IMO.

Peace,
Alex NvV

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 674
Member
Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 674
"who for us men, and for our salvation"?

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,520
Likes: 10
G
Member
Member
G Offline
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,520
Likes: 10
Quote
I know too little about Russian Catholicism to respond, but judging from the earlier posts by others in this thread (and viewing the Russian Byzantine Catholic Church of Our Lady of Fatima in San Francisco ( http://www.byzantinecatholic.org/ ) as an example), it seems to me that the Jesuits are currently supporting the Eastern Catholic Churches assiduously. (Trivia: Did you know that the Very Rev. Peter-Hans Kolvenbach, the current General of the Society of Jesus, grew up as a Latin Catholic but consciously chose to be canonically enrolled in the Armenian Catholic Church?)

The Jesuits are no longer administering Our Lady of Fatima Russian Catholic Church. The pastor is Rev. Hieromonk Eugene Ludwig, OFM Cap.

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,520
Likes: 10
G
Member
Member
G Offline
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,520
Likes: 10
Originally Posted by Mexican
A Synod of Chaldean Bishops that took place in Rome last week, approved a New Liturgy that will be prsented before His-All-Holiness Pope Benedict XVI.

According to the news, the reforms were made to standardize the liturgy and to oficialy implement some changes needed for "pastoral reasons" (addings some words to the anaphora in the vernacular, etc).

This phrase makes me very suspicious:

Quote
"With the Vatican's green light, the new mass will be gradually explained to the faithful and priests. A trial period will then begin at the parish level and the process will end with a new synod vetting whatever problems that may emerge and deciding a definitive version"...
It seems that the spirit of the 1960's is now entering the Eastern Catholic Church.

Complete news here:

http://www.aina.org/news/20051111130825.htm

Mexican,

This news link is from November 2005! shocked

The reformed Chaldean liturgy has already been implemented at the beginning of this year.

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,346
Likes: 1
D
Jessup B.C. Deacon
Member
Jessup B.C. Deacon
Member
D Offline
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,346
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by nicholas
I smell Jesuit meddlers

Jesuits do have a distinct smell; l'odeur de Chardin! sick

Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,461
Likes: 1
Member
Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,461
Likes: 1
"Let him who has not received baptism go..."
Let him who has not accepted the sign of life go..."
Let him who will not receive it go..."
"...who, for us men and for our salvation"
"Brethren, receive..."
"It was for us that the Only-Begotten of God betook of man..."

Doesn't look too bad.

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,346
Likes: 1
D
Jessup B.C. Deacon
Member
Jessup B.C. Deacon
Member
D Offline
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,346
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Diak
"Let him who has not received baptism go..."
Let him who has not accepted the sign of life go..."
Let him who will not receive it go..."
"...who, for us men and for our salvation"
"Brethren, receive..."
"It was for us that the Only-Begotten of God betook of man..."

Doesn't look too bad.

Beats the heck out of what we've been saddled with.

Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,685
Likes: 8
Member
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,685
Likes: 8
One question about the 'Sign of the Cross' - as far as I know the Syriac Church cross from left-to-right, as the Latin Church, although it is not a latinisation.; both in India and the Middle East. Why does the Chaldean new Mass change to the Byzantine manner?

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 128
E
Member
Member
E Offline
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 128
Originally Posted by Michael_Thoma
One question about the 'Sign of the Cross' - as far as I know the Syriac Church cross from left-to-right, as the Latin Church, although it is not a latinisation.; both in India and the Middle East. Why does the Chaldean new Mass change to the Byzantine manner?

I have asked Assyrian Christians how they do the Sign of the Cross, and apparently they do it exactly like the Byzantines -- same direction and same finger positions. So, it's only the West Syrian Tradition, not the East Syrian Tradition, that does left-to-right like the Latins.

Blessings as Qyamta (Pascha) draws near!


Peace,
Alex NvV

Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,685
Likes: 8
Member
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,685
Likes: 8
Oosha`n� phorooqoyto blessings to you as well Alex!

The Syro-Malabar Church signs in the Latin/W.Syriac manner, does it not?

Perhaps the practice was in flux/varied by locality, does the Chaldean-Syrian Church in India also cross from right-to-left? and was the practice ever mentioned when the Malabar Chaldean Qurbana was being restored?

Last edited by Michael_Thoma; 04/02/07 01:34 AM.
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3

Link Copied to Clipboard
The Byzantine Forum provides message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial, have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as a source for official information for any Church. All posts become property of byzcath.org. Contents copyright - 1996-2024 (Forum 1998-2024). All rights reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0