The Byzantine Forum
Newest Members
bluedawg, AndrewGre12, miloslav_jc, King Iyk, BlindEyes
6,136 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 276 guests, and 72 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
by orthodoxsinner2, September 30
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
by Veronica.H, April 24
Byzantine Catholic Outreach of Iowa
Exterior of Holy Angels Byzantine Catholic Parish
Church of St Cyril of Turau & All Patron Saints of Belarus
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics35,493
Posts417,361
Members6,136
Most Online3,380
Dec 29th, 2019
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 15 1 2 3 14 15
#219041 01/08/07 12:10 PM
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 648
D
Orthodox domilsean
Member
Orthodox domilsean
Member
D Offline
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 648
I'm surprised no one has posted this yet.

The New Liturgy was promulgated as of Theophany, January 6, 2007. It is it be implemented by parishes in the Archdiocese by the feast of Sts. Peter and Paul (June 29, 2007).

It seems the Archeparcy will send the pew books and whatnot to the parishes by the end of this month. Will parishes be responsible for paying for these?

Another question that has been raised at the parish level regards the use of Slavonic. Archbishop Basil says that no other version of the Liturgy is to be used after June 29, 2007. Does that include only English versions, meaning to keep priests from using the older English versions (which so many in the forum love)? Or does it mean ANY version. My pastor pointed out that no new Slavonic translation has been issued, though I think it's a linguistic situation. Maybe someone knows about this? Will parishes still be allowed to sing the Trisagion and Cherubic Hymn, for example, in Slavonic, or is this covered under the "No other translation" ban... seems to me that Slavonic shouldn't fall under this ban (which is why I cite the linguistic situation).

Let me say that I recognize the problems with the Revised Liturgy as well as the protest, etc, it has raised. However, I'm not against the Revised Liturgy and as a cantor I will support the Archbishop publicly on this, as is my duty as cantor. I think that we may debate and complain here all we like, but in our parishes, Cantors anyway must toe the line, regardless of you opinions, as we are (like it or not) second to the clergy in terms of representing the Church. It will be up to us to help explain the changes to the rest of the Faithful. This also goes for all you Faithful here on ByzCath who now have a greater knowledge of the Revised Liturgy than the rest of your brethren (or should I now say "Brothers and Sisters", j/k). We have to instruct and help our pastors in this time of transition. Whether we like it or not, the new translation is here, and most likely it is here to stay. We must help ease the way.

Administrator's Note:
I decided with the addition of Bishop John's letter that the title to this needed to be edited.

In IC XC,
Father Anthony+
Administrator

Last edited by Father Anthony; 01/19/07 08:35 PM.
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,564
Likes: 1
F
Member
Member
F Offline
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,564
Likes: 1
As a wise person famously commented, the Bible often tells us that "it came to pass", but the Bible never tells us that "it came to stay"!.

Fr. Serge

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,437
Likes: 1
Administrator
Member
Administrator
Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,437
Likes: 1
The following attached file link below was forwarded to me this evening. It is a PDF copy of the promulgation letter sent out to the priests of the Metropolia of Pittsburgh. This matter was originally told to me last night, but I refused to have any thread going on it until something official could be posted as to not to incite hysteria among the faithful of the Byzantine Catholic Church. That is why this original thread was moved off the public forum area until such documentation could be had and posted.

A note to ALL posters commenting on this thread:

1) Under NO circumstance will any uncharitable language be tolerated regarding the hierarch or any individuals.

2) No posts advocating direct or overt disobedience towards the church or the hierarchy will be tolerated.

3) Comments and post should be strictly limited to the text of the letter of promulgation, and possibly how it may or may not effect your spiritual life.

Any violation of the above points, will result in the immediate deletion of the post, and violations of points one and two of the above conditions may result in further action against the poster. I am sorry if this seems harsh, but it not the policy of ByzCath to incite uncharitable conduct or disobedience to Church authority.

In IC XC,
Father Anthony+
Administrator
Attachments
Attached PDF document
16-RDL-Promulgation.pdf (369.82 KB, 1207 downloads)


Everyone baptized into Christ should pass progressively through all the stages of Christ's own life, for in baptism he receives the power so to progress, and through the commandments he can discover and learn how to accomplish such progression. - Saint Gregory of Sinai
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,735
Likes: 5
Member
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,735
Likes: 5
Post deleted by Father Anthony

Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,735
Likes: 5
Member
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,735
Likes: 5
"Let no one be permitted to bring forward, or write or compose a different faith besides that defined by the holy Fathers who assembled with the Holy Spirit in the city of Nicaea. And whoever dares to compose a different faith, or present, or offer [one] to those wishing to turn to the knowledge of the truth�let such, if they be bishops or belong to the clergy, be alien-�bishops from the episcopate, and clerics from the clergy--and if they be laymen, let them be given over to anathema."

Canon VII of the Third Ecumenical Synod

Alexandr

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 13
S
Active
Active
S Offline
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 13
Could anyone outline, in detail, what appeals are availabe, in light of this decision?

Sine Nomine

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 153
Member
Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 153
Does the promulgation letter above carry the force of law across all eparchies of the metropolitanate?

Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 31
Member
Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 31
What does the latin words vacatio legis mean?

Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 402
Likes: 1
J
Member
Member
J Offline
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 402
Likes: 1
Christ is baptized! In the Jordan!

The complete letter of promulgation is, in fact, signed by all four hierarchs, and is published for the entire Byzantine Catholic Church sui juris in the U.S.A.

Prof. J. Michael Thompson
Byzantine Catholic Seminary
Pittsburgh, PA

Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 402
Likes: 1
J
Member
Member
J Offline
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 402
Likes: 1
The term "vacatio legis" refers to the time between the promulgation date (Jan. 6, 2007, the feast of Theophany) and the date after which no other English text can be legally used (Jun. 29, 2007, the feast of Ss. Peter and Paul). During the time of the "vacatio legis," either the 1965 Liturgikon or the 2007 Liturgikon, or a combination of both, may be used.

Prof. J. Michael Thompson
Byzantine Catholic Seminary
Pittsburgh, PA

Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,373
U
Member
Member
U Offline
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,373
...fait acompli.

Hunariacertezei

Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 564
Member
Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 564
I would still like to see the letter of approval, dated from March 31 of 2001. How could that letter of approval still be valid, if changes were made to the liturgy after that time?

Has the text of that letter been made public as well? Can someone scan it?


Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,735
Likes: 5
Member
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,735
Likes: 5
Post deleted by Father Anthony

Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 202
F
Member
Member
F Offline
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 202
Pseudo-Athanasius,

To clarify: the letter of approval remains valid because the changes made since then were strictly in conformity with that letter.

Fr. David


Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,173
Likes: 1
Member
Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,173
Likes: 1
Now that this chapter is behind us, what is next for the BCC?

Page 1 of 15 1 2 3 14 15

Link Copied to Clipboard
The Byzantine Forum provides message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial, have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as a source for official information for any Church. All posts become property of byzcath.org. Contents copyright - 1996-2024 (Forum 1998-2024). All rights reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0