The Byzantine Forum
Newest Members
EasternChristian19, James OConnor, biblicalhope, Ishmael, bluecollardpink
6,161 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
1 members (1 invisible), 1,278 guests, and 110 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
by orthodoxsinner2, September 30
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
by Veronica.H, April 24
Byzantine Catholic Outreach of Iowa
Exterior of Holy Angels Byzantine Catholic Parish
Church of St Cyril of Turau & All Patron Saints of Belarus
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics35,510
Posts417,515
Members6,161
Most Online3,380
Dec 29th, 2019
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
#222306 02/03/07 06:24 PM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 937
Member
Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 937
Slava Isusu Christu! Glory forever!

My cantor has reviewed the revised Divine Liturgy (rDL) and provided me with some very positive feedback.

1. The third antiphons are included.

2. The Beautitudes are included.

3. We are reinstituting the use of the zenon (hope I got this right- adding very warm water to the Most Precious Body and Blood of Jesus Christ).

Yes, there are opportunities with the rDL but I am observing a few positives also.

On a side note, as an altar server, I would like to see the availability of the Presbyter version with altar server comments added, to create a more uniform Divine Liturgy within the Archeparchy.

Has anyone given this any thought? An altar server's guide to the rDL?

Thank you.

In Christ,

Michael

Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,564
Likes: 1
F
Member
Member
F Offline
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,564
Likes: 1
There are a few guides for altar servers in print. The Antiochian Archdiocese did one about forty years ago, which is not bad, except that it calls for more servers than many parishes can muster.

Fr. Serge

Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,373
U
Member
Member
U Offline
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,373
There also is alot of negative feedback in Pittsburgh. Many are upset, some churches are even contemplating leaving. It seems that this revised liturgy will result in casualties.

U-C

Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,390
W
Member
Member
W Offline
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,390
Originally Posted by Ung-Certez
some churches are even contemplating leaving.
Realistically? Or grumbles among a few?

Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,373
U
Member
Member
U Offline
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,373
No, I do mean whole parishes.

Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,390
W
Member
Member
W Offline
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,390
Originally Posted by Ung-Certez
No, I do mean whole parishes.
I am very sorry to hear that. frown I will pray for all.

Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 58
A
Member
Member
A Offline
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 58
I can't help wondering if these specific churches are among those in the Archeparchy that remain highly Latinized?

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,533
Likes: 1
Member
Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,533
Likes: 1
I am glad to hear we are saying "Theotokos". Regarding inclusive language I have consulted an independent expert who said the new translation is correct and the original Greek can be translated "for us men" or "for us". Both are correct.


Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,231
Member
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,231
Originally Posted by andrasi
I can't help wondering if these specific churches are among those in the Archeparchy that remain highly Latinized?

If they are Latinized parishes, where would they go? They'd find a similar climate in ACROD and certainly the OCA or ROCOR would not be good places. If on the other hand they are MORE eastern and fear losing their "eastern-ness," ACROD or the OCA would be the best fit. Either way, hopefully they'll be let go with grace and none of the ugliness and court battles of the Thirties and Forties. Times SHOULD have changed.

Last edited by John K; 02/03/07 11:22 PM.
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 564
Member
Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 564
Dear Ray,

We've got other experts here who say it isn't correct. So there! smile

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13
Junior Member
Junior Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13
Zeon is super hot water. Usually in an Orthodox parish this is done during the liturgy with a device that rapidly boils the water. If not, it is held in a thermos. No matter how one may justify the changes, we can simply start at the very beginning of the Liturgy and see that a proper Proskomedia doesn't exist. If something isn't right from the very beginning, it isn't right anywhere else.
Excuses, excuses. While it is nice the term Theotokos is being used, it doesn't make up for the other troubles found in the new liturgy. Once again, if there is to be any similarities with the Orthodox brethren, then why not simply adapt the Orthodox Liturgicon? Why re-write and not fix major key points that are lacking (proskomedia just for a start).
I can give a positive note, essence is better than substance.

Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,373
U
Member
Member
U Offline
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,373
Is there going to be a modern day K.O.V.O/Borba of this revised liturgy?

God help us all!

Ungcsertezs

Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 58
A
Member
Member
A Offline
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 58

"If they are Latinized parishes, where would they go?"

My point is that many parishes are already very Eastern, and have been using some of these changes for at least 10 years. I would guess these changes will not be met with much resistance. Those still Latinized have been resistant to any type of change over the last 30 years- ie Iconostasis, etc. Where would they go? Probably to the nearest Latin church.

As for the Zion (I thought it was 'teplota' sp? -maybe that means warmer as opposed to boiling) this is not new to the Ruthenian church either. We have many parishes that have adopted this practice, some easily 15 years already.

Changing "Mother of God" to "Theotokos" is more in line with our Orthodox brothers and sisters. It sounds beautiful when sung by their choirs.

I don't personally believe the court cases of the 30's are possible today. The parish properties are all owned by the bishop. We may support them, etc. but the days of trustee ownership are long gone, and you can bet the bishops have legally corrected deeds, structuring, etc to prevent any chance of recurrence.


Joined: Aug 1998
Posts: 4,337
Likes: 24
Moderator
Member
Moderator
Member
Joined: Aug 1998
Posts: 4,337
Likes: 24
Savethelitugry,

What do you find wrong with the Proskomedia?

Fr. Deacon Lance



My cromulent posts embiggen this forum.
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,411
A
AMM Offline
Member
Member
A Offline
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,411
Originally Posted by andrasi
As for the Zion (I thought it was 'teplota' sp? -maybe that means warmer as opposed to boiling) this is not new to the Ruthenian church either.

I believe Zeon and Teplota are the same thing, just the Greek and Slavonic terms for the warmed water added to the chalice before communion. I am pretty sure Zeon can also refer to the vessel for holding the warmed water.

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

Link Copied to Clipboard
The Byzantine Forum provides message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial, have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as a source for official information for any Church. All posts become property of byzcath.org. Contents copyright - 1996-2024 (Forum 1998-2024). All rights reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0