The Byzantine Forum
Newest Members
ElijahHarvest, Nickel78, Trebnyk1947, John Francis R, Keinn
6,150 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
2 members (Hutsul, 1 invisible), 352 guests, and 90 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
by orthodoxsinner2, September 30
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
by Veronica.H, April 24
Byzantine Catholic Outreach of Iowa
Exterior of Holy Angels Byzantine Catholic Parish
Church of St Cyril of Turau & All Patron Saints of Belarus
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics35,506
Posts417,454
Members6,150
Most Online3,380
Dec 29th, 2019
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,930
Member
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,930
I received this question today on an email. I thought that it would be better answered by the 'answer grapes' on here biggrin since this person asked what the 'differnent rites' think. I will send them the link...

I know the Eastern and Western rites differ on their understandings of purgatory. First, I know that the East doesn't like that term much. And, quite honestly, I don't blame them. I also know that the Eastern rites see the final theosis as less of a place or state of punishment, and more of a place for growth in holiness. I can understand that as well. That said, does the Byzantine church practice indulgences? I know that they do commemorate the dead and pray for their souls. Even as a conservative Lutheran, the pastor at my grandmother's burial prayed "May yu rise at the last judgement with all the saints". Even though I didn't learn to pray for the dead as a Lutheran, I see no difference between Catholic prayers and the Pastor's prayer. However, do you believe in partial versus plenary indulgences? I'm finding this a bit hard to understand. I know that an indulgence doesn't actually remit a certain number of days in purgatory like some think. I was just curious to know how the other rites viewed indulgences....




Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,930
Member
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,930
I think when this person was referring to rites, it meant the different Churches of the East both Catholic and Orthodox.

Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,125
Likes: 1
E
Za myr z'wysot ...
Member
Za myr z'wysot ...
Member
E Offline
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,125
Likes: 1
Pani Rose,

Your friend seems to have hit the nail on the head with regard to the Eastern Churches and their understanding of how and why we pray for the dead. We do not particularly like the Roman teaching on Purgatory and Indulgences, although those of us who are in communion with Rome do not condemn it.

As far as indulgences go, in recent centuries this has been primarily a way for the Pope to encourage certain devotional practices. In other words, he adds an indulgence to a prayer or devotion as a way of putting a kind of papal "seal of approval" on it. Indulgences may be sought for one's own soul, or they may be applied to another, living or deceased.

At one time there was a bit of controversy over whether the spiritual disposition of the one seeking the indulgence was important if he was seeking the indulgence for another, but Johann Tetzel's opinion--that it did not matter--has essentially been discredited. Thus, a plenary indulgence requires a very pure and devout intention, along with the other requirements. This makes it a lot less of a "get out of jail free card" than it was considered in the past.

The number of days applied to an indulgence never meant the number of days spent in Purgatory, even though it was often thought to mean that. It actually referred to the equivalent number of days performing public penance in terms of its benefit to the soul. (In fact, the entire practice of indulgences derived from the practice of public penance.)

Anyway, this is all rather moot, since as Eastern Catholics we mostly just ignore them (even though they have been attached to some Eastern devotions, such as the Akafist to the Mother of God), just as many in the West do nowadays.


Peace,
Deacon Richard

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,217
Likes: 2
L
Member
Member
L Offline
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,217
Likes: 2

Pani Rose

When I attend Divine Liturgy, more than 90 pct of the time it's Ukrainian Rite, and the church I typically go to, is more indulgence-purgatory (in a very Latin sense) oriented than the vast majority of Roman Rite churches I've attended. I know that at least in the Ukrainian Rite (where I have to admit I feel the most at home) this seems to vary from parish to parish. I could be wrong, but I believe this is also common in the Maronite Rite.

Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,564
Likes: 1
F
Member
Member
F Offline
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,564
Likes: 1
Dear Lawrence,
Sorry, but "Ukrainian Rite" is a meaningless term, since no specific Ukrainian rite exists. I realize that such expressions are often used, but that doesn't make them accurate. The Ukrainians are one of a group of Local Churches having in common the liturgical, spiritual, theological, and disciplinary tradition which developed in Constantinople and places like that. Each Local Church has some particular uses, especially in music, but having some particular uses in the application of the basic Constantinopolitan tradition does not mean tht a new rite has been created - by way of an example, contrast the Divine Liturgy of Saint John Chrysostom, which is basically the same in a Ukrainian, Russian, Ruthenian, Hungarian, Slovak, Romanian, Bulgarian, Serbian, Croatian, Albanian, Italo-Greek, Arab and so on parish, with the Soorp Patarag of the Armenian Rite.

Fr. Serge

Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,675
Likes: 7
Member
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,675
Likes: 7
It should be noted that while the East has officially condemned 'the sale' of indulgences, indulgences themselves have not been condemned. They were even given by Eastern Patriarchs. I have heard it stated that this was a latinization, perhaps, but it was not a forced latinization and the official condemnations do not make mention of the Eastern use of them.
Quote
Indulgences in the History of the Greek Church [pravoslavie.ru]

In the 16th�18th centuries the Greek Church, even though limited in its contacts with the outer world to the borders of the Ottoman Empire, came under a great influence of Western Christianity�greater than did the Russian Church. Here Catholic propaganda worked more effectively, especially with the foundation in 1622 of the Sacred Congregation of the Propaganda of the Faith, for both Greek scholars and theologians had increasing contacts with the West and most of them studied there. These and other factors led to the Greek Church in great part undergoing a Western metamorphosis, according to the expression of Father George Florowsky.

One of the manifestations of such a metamorphosis was the introduction of the sale of Christian indulgences into the practice of the Greek Church.[1]. These were real indulgences: certificates which absolved from sins, which anyone could obtain, often for a specified sum of money. The absolution granted by these papers, according to Christos Yannaras, had no connection with any participation of the faithful in the Mystery of Penance, nor in the Mystery of the Eucharist.[2]

It's hard to determine when indulgences began to be used among Greeks living under the Turkish yoke. They were widespread enough in the 16th-century. At the beginning of the 18th century, the Patriarch of Jerusalem, Dositheus Notaras, writes of indulgences as of a well-known and ancient tradition. �We have the custom and ancient tradition, which is known to all, that the most holy Patriarchs would give the people of the Church a certificate for the absolution of their sins.(Sinhorohartion)�.[3]

The practice of issuing indulgences, having existed at first unofficially, got its official confirmation at the Constantinople Council of 1727. That Council was called in response to increasing Latin propaganda, spreading mainly in Syria, Mesopotamia, Palestine, and Egypt, and it was also the continuation of the Constantinople Council of 1722.[4] That Council published "The Confession of Faith"[5], the text of which was compiled by the Patriarch of Jerusalem Chrysanthus (+ 1731), and was signed by these patriarchs: Paisius II of Constantinople, Sylvester of Antioch, and Chrysanthus of Jerusalem, as well as hierarchs located at that time in Constantinople and participating in the Council

Thus, in the 13th clause of the document it is said: "The power of the forgiveness of sins, which is termed by the Eastern Church of Christ �Absolution Certificates� when given in writing, but by the Latins �Indulgences,� is given to the Holy Church by Christ. These Absolution Certificates are issued in the whole Catholic Church by the Four most holy Patriarchs: Constantinople, Alexandria, Antioch, and Jerusalem."[6]

As is seen in both selections, from Patriarch Dositheus and from the Constantinopolitan Council, the issuance of indulgences was bound up with the power of the Orthodox Patriarchs. The attribution to the Patriarchs (and only to them, as may be seen in the text of the "Confession") of the power to forgive sins and to issue special certificates were distorted rudiments of the old institution of the Pentarchy, which was formulated after the fourth Ecumenical Council and indubitably underwent a crisis in the epoch of Turkish government and the spread of Latin influence. In the consciousness of the Greeks of that era, who had by that time become quite used to thinking in western stereotypes, the power of the Orthodox patriarchs was in large associated with the power of the Roman Pope.

In their polemic with Latinity, the Greeks didn't cast doubts so much on the phenomenon of indulgences, but rather on the Roman Popes ascribing exclusively to themselves this right to forgive sins Thus, in the 13th clause of the council�s Confession, it is said, "to say, then, that the power to issue (indulgences) is possessed only by the Roman Pope is a plain lie.[7]"

It's remarkable that even such a theologian and expert on the canonical tradition of the Church as Venerable Nicodemus of the Holy Mountain not only did not oppose, but participated in the practice of indulgences. Thus, in his letter to Paisius, Bishop of Stagonas, who at that time was living in Constantinople, dated April 1806, he asks him to get an Absolution Certificate at the Patriarchate for a �living� monastic, also named Nicodemus, and send it to him. He promises him that he would send the money necessary to purchase the certificate as soon as he knows how much it would cost.[8]

Indulgences as a means of enrichment were condemned at the Council of Constantinople in the year 1838. That Council, like the Council of the year 1727, was devoted to the extermination of Latin dogmas and usages. Its main theme was the Unia. An Encyclical, published by the Council, was signed by the Patriarch of Constantinople, Gregory VI and the Patriarch of Jerusalem, Athanasius and also eleven hierarchs of the Constantinopolitan Synod. The text was likewise sent to the absent Patriarchs, Hierotheus of Alexandria and Methodius of Antioch.[9]

In the 9th clause of the encyclical, the "horrid and unheard-of evil usage, originating in arrogance, by which the bishops of Rome employ the most holy most sacred, and most awesome articles of belief of the sacred Christian Faith as a means to raise money� is condemned.[10] The only thing addressed by this condemnation is the taking of money for the forgiveness of sins, even if only in Jubilee years. The existence of indulgences per se, once again, is not met with a needed theological evaluation by a Council. Likewise, in that Encyclical, the Greek Church�s practice, analogous to that condemned by the Council, is neither mentioned nor condemned. In addition, it was difficult even for Council decisions to eliminate a practice so popularly rooted. That this practice was popularly rooted is shown by the fact that �Absolution Certificates� lasted in Greece until the middle of the twentieth century.[11]


___________________________________________________________________________________________________________


[1] There is a special study relating to this by Philip Ilios: Sygkhorokhartia: The History, Athens, vol. 1 (1983) pp. 35-84, vol. 3 (1985), pp. 3-44. See likewise Chr. Yannaras, Orthodoxia kai Dysi sti Neoteri Ellada (Orthodoxy and the West in the Greece of most recent times).

[2] Christos Yannaras. Op. cit. 31996, p. 150

[3] A. Papadopoulos-Kerameus, Symvolai eis tin istorian tis arkhiepiskopis tou orous Sina (Towards a History of the Archbishopric of Sinan). Saint Petersburg, 1908. p. 133.

[4] For the text of the Encyclical published by the Council of 1722, see I. Karmiris: Ta Dogmatika kai Symvolika mnimeia tis Orthodoxou Katholikis Ekklisias (The Dogmatic and Symbolic Monuments of the Orthodox Catholic Church) Graz, Austria, 21968, pp. 822-859

[5] I. Karmiris. Op. cit. 21968, pp. 861-870

[6] I. Karmiris. Op.cit, 21968, pp.867-868.

[7] I. Karmiris. Op.cit. 21968, p. 868

[8] Philip Ilios: Sygchorochartia // Ta istorika, Athens. Vol. 3 (1985), 22-23.

[9] Its text was published in: I. Karmiris. op. cit., pp. 894-902.

[10] I. Karmiris. Op. cit. p. 898.

[11] So, for example, Philip Ilios produces an indulgence dated 1955.

Sergei Govorun
Translated by Bishop Tikhon of San Francisco & the West

Last edited by Michael_Thoma; 02/16/07 03:17 AM.
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,411
A
AMM Offline
Member
Member
A Offline
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,411
Quote
final theosis

I have never heard this term used in an Orthodox Church, in terms of there being a "final" theosis. My understanding of theosis is actually that there couldn't be a final stage per se.

Last edited by AMM; 02/16/07 08:44 AM.
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,045
Member
Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,045
Pani Rose is on target when she says that the idea of Purgatory doesn't ring a good tone with Eastern Christians (my words). in my mind, Purgatory looks like a situation where everyone from Mother Teresa (eternal memory) to Adolph Hitler line up for a spanking of various severity and then go off to Heaven.
but seriously, there are philosophical issues to consider. Roman Catholicism has a Carthaginian legal (one may say legalistic) view where there are certain penances for each sin (number of prayers, etc.), so in Purgatory, a certain number of indulgences (500 days for each Sign of the Cross, 1000 days if you use Holy Water) that we need to obtain to get loved ones out of Purgatory, and to guarantee a short stay there ourselves. true, Rome has come a half millenium far from the days of Tetzel where if you make a coin in the box cling, a soul in Purgatory out he'll spring. we all know where that led: Martin Luther and off to the races.I have serious issues with that whole scheme. Eastern Christians look to the mystical and philosophical view from Alexandria, discounting legalistic formulas, but prayng for dead ones with the hope and faith that God will hear us and act on behalf of those we pray for. to go to Confession, the Eastern priest will pray for us and with us for forgiveness.
but is there any merit for the whole idea of Purgatory? perhaps. I am reminded of what C.S. Lewis said when he compared Purgatory to a man in the dentist chair who after an extraction of a tooth (end of life)is given a glass of water and told to rinse his mouth out (of all that the old life has left behind).
Much Love,
Jonn

Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 580
M
Member
Member
M Offline
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 580
I wouldn't take the article writen by Sergei Govorun and translated by the retired Bishop Tikhon (OCA) too seriously.
I have read on another site that the article is not based on solid scholarship and is an attempt of a Russian writer to criticise the Greeks.
If and when I find the site I will provide it.

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,411
A
AMM Offline
Member
Member
A Offline
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,411
Originally Posted by Miller
I wouldn't take the article writen by Sergei Govorun and translated by the retired Bishop Tikhon (OCA) too seriously.
I have read on another site that the article is not based on solid scholarship and is an attempt of a Russian writer to criticise the Greeks.
If and when I find the site I will provide it.

Oh yeah, good old Bishop Tikhon crazy

pravoslavie.ru is also not what I would call a good source of information.

Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 773
Member
Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 773
I too, have preferred not to use the language of induglences, and think in terms of theosis. But it is also true that Eastern Catholics have incorporated indulgences into their piety. See this explanation from Melkite Bishop Elya, from the Melkite.org web site: Bishop Elya on indulgences & praying for the dead. One Eastern Bishop's view:

http://www.melkite.org/bishopQA.htm

Indulgences: Your Grace, The Holy Father Pope John Paul II has said that this Jubilee Year of 2000 is an opportunity for Catholics to gain indulgences such as by going on pilgrimage to a church designated as a pilgrimage site or by making an act of charity towards one's neighbor. The belief in indulgences is a doctrine long held by the Roman Catholic Church.

Are Melkite Catholics and all other Eastern Catholics obligated to believe in the doctrine of indulgences? I know of Eastern Catholics who say "no", stating that it has no basis according to the Eastern understanding of sin, and that it is a "Latin" doctrine. I always understood the doctrine of indulgences to be a "Catholic" doctrine- not a "Latin" one - and therefore all Eastern and Western Catholics are to believe in it.

Are Eastern Catholics to believe in indulgences?

Bishop John's Answer : You ask whether or not Eastern Catholics are to believe in indulgences. Yes, I too have heard some folks remark that the doctrine is incompatible with Eastern theology, however, they are sadly mistaken.

The notion of an indulgence that removes the temporal punishment due to sin is deeply rooted in the theological consciousness of both East and West. While it is an explicit doctrine of the Roman Catholic Church, and thus a doctrine that we Eastern Catholics accept as we walk with the successor of Peter, you will find ample evidence of our Eastern affirmation of the cleansing of the soul after death as we progress towards the moment when, through God's generosity, we are admitted to eternal intimacy with Him.

When we look, for example, at the prayers that comprise the Sacrament of Holy Anointing that we celebrate as part of our observance of Holy Week, we find there, in several of the prayers, the notion that God's healing comes to us as we submit ourselves to His cleansing grace. Repeatedly, the priest prays for a purification from the effects of sin, the complete remission of the effects of sin, and for a healing that penetrates both body and soul. Many of the sacred traditions of our Eastern Church that deal with our prayers of suffrage for the dead speak of our plea that the Lord will wipe away the effects of sin, cleanse us and the faithful departed from its effects so that they might enter fully into the kingdom.

The Church, as the living, mystical Body of Christ, dispenses the mercy of God in many ways. We find that the doctrine of indulgences is a beautiful expression of the Church's role in bringing salvation and healing to both the living and the dead. Feel secure in the teachings of the Church. I suggest that you read No. 1471 of the 1992 Catechism of the Catholic Church that Pope John Paul II addressed to all Venerable Cardinals, Patriarchs, Bishops, Priests and to all faithful [of the East and West.] This is a jubilee year of abundant graces and many indulgences. We do well to take advantage of its many blessings.

Bishop John's continues to explain indulgences and praying for the dead.

Several folks have asked questions concerning the doctrine of indulgences given the heightened interest in indulgences granted during this jubilee year. I am often astonished at remarks that the legal nature of indulgences seem to prove that they are applicable only to the Latin Church and are thus foreign to our Eastern theology. Many people do not realize that the legal aspects of church life, including canon law, began in the East. The Emperor Justinian and the Byzantine court developed canons that are still the basis for many principles of law used in the church today.

Indulgences deal with the wider notion of praying for the dead. We ask the question: Are our prayers for the dead efficacious? Can we benefit our deceased loved ones by prayer, good works and suffrage prayers such as liturgies? Our Eastern liturgy is replete with prayers for the dead. Our calendar, unlike the calendar of the Latin Church, has several feast days that are set-aside for prayers for the dead. The Saturday before Pentecost and the Saturdays of Great Lent are good examples. Further, we observe the third, ninth, and fortieth day after the death of a loved one as important anniversaries that we observe with a Liturgy offered for the repose of the soul of a loved one. Clearly, both in the East and the West, we believe that our prayers benefit the dead. The writings of St. John Climacus: The Ladder of Divine Ascent describes some of the imagery that we find in our Eastern view of the soul's ascent to God. Perhaps you have seen the ancient icon that portrays the soul on its ascent to God. We pray that the journey will be free of pain and diabolical attack.

Indulgences, while subject to abuses in the Middle Ages, and an object of polemics against the Catholic Church in many circles, are, nonetheless, connected to the valued doctrine of God's mercy and generosity in dealing with us when we present ourselves to Him before the "awesome judgment seat of Christ". The idea of temporal punishment due to sin is not entirely foreign to our Eastern theology. In some Eastern cultures, the surviving family members of dead offer candy to passersby at a Memorial Service, especially on the Saturday of the Dead, praying that the person would offer forgiveness to the deceased for any wrongs, imagined or real. In the prayers of absolution said over the deceased, the Church prays for the dissolution of any bonds that would keep the deceased tied, in a temporal way, to the corpse or to an intermediate state of purification. We see dying and death as a process of growing towards union with God in eternity. We assist our loved ones with our prayers, our sacrifices, and even by applying indulgences to them.

Our Eastern Catholic Churches in full communion with the Apostolic See of Rome have experienced theological developments and growth. We, as we walk with the successor of Peter, are not bound to the forms of the ancient East in a slavish manner, but rather interpret our liturgy and forms of prayer through the eyes and insights of a church that is both alive and evolving. It is a grave error to keep ourselves blindly confined to the theological ideas of the first 10 centuries. My family has been Melkite Catholic for many generations. Are we to discard our Catholic beliefs because they find their origins in Catholic thought of the 20th century? We appreciate and value our heritage, but we are open to the development of new theological insights as they develop under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit. We are a living Church.

Last edited by lanceg; 02/16/07 11:46 AM.
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,930
Member
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,930
No wonder I posted in on here, y'all are giving an excellent lesson. THANKS!

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,217
Likes: 2
L
Member
Member
L Offline
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,217
Likes: 2

Fr Serge

I meant Ukrainian Greek Catholic, which on occasion does get referred to as Ukrainian Rite Catholic. My only experiences have been in churches in the Eparchy of Chicago, and they do seem to vary a bit regarding Latin devotions.

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,855
Likes: 8
A
Member
Member
A Offline
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,855
Likes: 8
Originally Posted by AMM
Quote
final theosis

I have never heard this term used in an Orthodox Church, in terms of there being a "final" theosis. My understanding of theosis is actually that there couldn't be a final stage per se.
You are correct. There is no such thing as "final theosis"; instead, theosis is a never-ending process. It is an eternal stretching (epektasis) into God through a real participation in the uncreated divine energies.

God bless,
Todd

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,855
Likes: 8
A
Member
Member
A Offline
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,855
Likes: 8
As far as Bishop John's statements quoted in Lanceg's post are concerned, I disagree with the good Bishop on this issue, and a few others too. Sadly, he appears to suffer from a certain degree of Latinization, and perhaps the fact that he was appointed a Bishop in the Melkite Church by the Pope rather than by the Melkite Holy Synod accounts for that. So, in spite of what Bishop John has written, I do not believe that Eastern Catholics are bound to accept the Latin theory of indulgences.

God bless,
Todd

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  Irish Melkite 

Link Copied to Clipboard
The Byzantine Forum provides message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial, have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as a source for official information for any Church. All posts become property of byzcath.org. Contents copyright - 1996-2024 (Forum 1998-2024). All rights reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0