The Byzantine Forum
Newest Members
EasternChristian19, James OConnor, biblicalhope, Ishmael, bluecollardpink
6,161 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 1,799 guests, and 106 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
by orthodoxsinner2, September 30
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
by Veronica.H, April 24
Byzantine Catholic Outreach of Iowa
Exterior of Holy Angels Byzantine Catholic Parish
Church of St Cyril of Turau & All Patron Saints of Belarus
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics35,508
Posts417,509
Members6,161
Most Online3,380
Dec 29th, 2019
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 388
P
Member
Member
P Offline
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 388
Kiev, February 26, Interfax - Metropolitan Vladimir of Kiev and All
Ukraine has stated that the Ukrainian people are not ready to establish
an autocephalous national Church.

http://www.interfax-religion.com/?act=news&div=2645

Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 32
N
Member
Member
N Offline
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 32
What I think is behind this is the MP trying to keep hold of resources and geography. Too often its really about that ... and nothing else.

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,133
Member
Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,133
I usually support the Ukrainian Orthodox Church Moscow Patriarchate, but this makes 0 sense to me. I'd like to see Kiev Patriarchate recognized by Moscow ASAP.

Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,564
Likes: 1
F
Member
Member
F Offline
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,564
Likes: 1
This is strange, since quite recently Metropolitan Volodymyr again petitioned Moscow to grant his Church autocephaly.

Fr. Serge

Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 580
M
Member
Member
M Offline
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 580
Quote
This is strange, since quite recently Metropolitan Volodymyr again petitioned Moscow to grant his Church autocephaly.

Fr. Serge
Dear Fr. Serge,
You are right about Metr. Sabodan. However, this cited press release comes from "InterFAX" which tends to be very anti-Ukrainian. While the Orthodox Church _MP in Ukraine itself may include people who want autocephaly, in Moscow itself there is a strong voice that is imperialistic and looks back with fondness on the Russian Empire of Nicholas 1 and also the the Russian chuavanism of the former Soviet Russia. Their version of "Holy Rus" equates "Rus" with Moscow.

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,133
Member
Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,133
I hope its not MP putting pressure on His Beatitude Metropolitan Vladymyr to say that. frown

I have no problem with MP, I'd just like autocephaly for Ukraine.


Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,346
Likes: 1
D
Jessup B.C. Deacon
Member
Jessup B.C. Deacon
Member
D Offline
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,346
Likes: 1
http://www.interfax-religion.com/?act=mosaic&div=117

I find the above linked article to also be of interest, in a bizarre sort of way.

Dn. Robert

Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,564
Likes: 1
F
Member
Member
F Offline
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,564
Likes: 1
Please keep in mind that it is extreme bad manners to refer to an Orthodox hierarch by his surname. One properly says "Metropolitan Volodymyr", not "Metropolitan Smith". The reason is simple: the hierarch is a monk, and monks do not use their former surnames, especially not with their monastic names. The only accepted exception occurs in legal documents.

Fr. Serge

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 7
I
Junior Member
Junior Member
I Offline
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 7
Interesting that Moscow does not consider Kiev ready for autocephaly, since it was Kiev that spread Orthodoxy to Great Russia. The Churches of Poland, Prague and Finnland, however, are ready. Go figure.

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,133
Member
Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,133
frown

I think the problem is the fact that Metropolitan Filoret was excommunicated from MP.

I hope unity and Autocephally will come when there are new Heirarchs in the Ukraine.

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,346
Likes: 1
D
Jessup B.C. Deacon
Member
Jessup B.C. Deacon
Member
D Offline
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,346
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Serge Keleher
Please keep in mind that it is extreme bad manners to refer to an Orthodox hierarch by his surname. One properly says "Metropolitan Volodymyr", not "Metropolitan Smith". The reason is simple: the hierarch is a monk, and monks do not use their former surnames, especially not with their monastic names. The only accepted exception occurs in legal documents.

Fr. Serge

I like that whole tradition of monastic bishops, in and of itself, and the tradition whereby they keep their monastic names. First of all, you are probably more likely to get a Bishop with some spiritual depth, as opposed to a mere administrator or a mere "brick and mortar guy" (a clarification-nothing wrong with good administrators and/or builders-but spiritual depth must also be there-a good monastic is likely to have that attribute). Secondarily, the names "Bishop Job" or "Bishop Isaiah" even sound one heck of a lot better, and more dignified than "Bishop Todd" or "Bishop Sam". Just my two cents.

In Christ,
Dn. Robert

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 532
Likes: 2
F
Member
Member
F Offline
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 532
Likes: 2
Dear Deacon Robert,Since your namesake in the Ukrainian Catholic Church has the last name,"Moskal",I can see why Ukrainians would prefer to call Bishop Robert by his first name! Inok,the Finnish Orthodox Church is Autonomous,not Autocephalous, and it belongs to Constantineople.The Polish Orthodox first recieved autocephaly from Constantineople in 1924,I believe.After WWII,when Poland fell under Soviet influence,the Moscow Patriarchate granted the Polish Church a "new" autocephaly.The Czechoslovak Church was missionary territory of the Serbian Orthodox Church between the two world wars.Moscow gave it autocephaly in 1951,I believe,for the same reason as she gave it to the Polish Church.

Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,564
Likes: 1
F
Member
Member
F Offline
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,564
Likes: 1
The Church of Finland is not yet autocephalous. But it's on the agenda.

Fr. Serge

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,405
Likes: 38
Member
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,405
Likes: 38
And the UOC-MP independence from Moscow is not.

Moscow is the one that is not ready for this, nor will it ever be.

Unfortunately, the only way for a canonical Orthdox Patriarchate in Kyiv is to take steps that will result in its being declared uncanonical.

Alex

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,133
Member
Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,133
I think after Metropolitan Filaret is gone, the dialague between the current UOCMP and UOCKP will improve and this will result in a canonical Kyiv Patriarchate.


Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

Link Copied to Clipboard
The Byzantine Forum provides message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial, have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as a source for official information for any Church. All posts become property of byzcath.org. Contents copyright - 1996-2024 (Forum 1998-2024). All rights reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0