The Byzantine Forum
Newest Members
Fr. Abraham, AnonymousMan115, violet7488, HopefulOlivia, Quid Est Veritas
6,181 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 378 guests, and 109 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
by orthodoxsinner2, September 30
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
by Veronica.H, April 24
Byzantine Catholic Outreach of Iowa
Exterior of Holy Angels Byzantine Catholic Parish
Church of St Cyril of Turau & All Patron Saints of Belarus
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics35,529
Posts417,661
Members6,181
Most Online4,112
Mar 25th, 2025
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 936
L
lm
Offline
Member
Member
L Offline
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 936
http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/04/03/collins.commentary/index.html

By Dr. Francis Collins
Special to CNN

Editor's note: Francis S. Collins, M.D., Ph.D., is the director of the National Human Genome Research Institute. His most recent book is "The Language of God: A Scientist Presents Evidence for Belief."

ROCKVILLE, Maryland (CNN) -- I am a scientist and a believer, and I find no conflict between those world views.

As the director of the Human Genome Project, I have led a consortium of scientists to read out the 3.1 billion letters of the human genome, our own DNA instruction book. As a believer, I see DNA, the information molecule of all living things, as God's language, and the elegance and complexity of our own bodies and the rest of nature as a reflection of God's plan.

I did not always embrace these perspectives. As a graduate student in physical chemistry in the 1970s, I was an atheist, finding no reason to postulate the existence of any truths outside of mathematics, physics and chemistry. But then I went to medical school, and encountered life and death issues at the bedsides of my patients. Challenged by one of those patients, who asked "What do you believe, doctor?", I began searching for answers.

I had to admit that the science I loved so much was powerless to answer questions such as "What is the meaning of life?" "Why am I here?" "Why does mathematics work, anyway?" "If the universe had a beginning, who created it?" "Why are the physical constants in the universe so finely tuned to allow the possibility of complex life forms?" "Why do humans have a moral sense?" "What happens after we die?" (Watch Francis Collins discuss how he came to believe in God )

I had always assumed that faith was based on purely emotional and irrational arguments, and was astounded to discover, initially in the writings of the Oxford scholar C.S. Lewis and subsequently from many other sources, that one could build a very strong case for the plausibility of the existence of God on purely rational grounds. My earlier atheist's assertion that "I know there is no God" emerged as the least defensible. As the British writer G.K. Chesterton famously remarked, "Atheism is the most daring of all dogmas, for it is the assertion of a universal negative."

But reason alone cannot prove the existence of God. Faith is reason plus revelation, and the revelation part requires one to think with the spirit as well as with the mind. You have to hear the music, not just read the notes on the page. Ultimately, a leap of faith is required.

For me, that leap came in my 27th year, after a search to learn more about God's character led me to the person of Jesus Christ. Here was a person with remarkably strong historical evidence of his life, who made astounding statements about loving your neighbor, and whose claims about being God's son seemed to demand a decision about whether he was deluded or the real thing. After resisting for nearly two years, I found it impossible to go on living in such a state of uncertainty, and I became a follower of Jesus.

So, some have asked, doesn't your brain explode? Can you both pursue an understanding of how life works using the tools of genetics and molecular biology, and worship a creator God? Aren't evolution and faith in God incompatible? Can a scientist believe in miracles like the resurrection?

Actually, I find no conflict here, and neither apparently do the 40 percent of working scientists who claim to be believers. Yes, evolution by descent from a common ancestor is clearly true. If there was any lingering doubt about the evidence from the fossil record, the study of DNA provides the strongest possible proof of our relatedness to all other living things.

But why couldn't this be God's plan for creation? True, this is incompatible with an ultra-literal interpretation of Genesis, but long before Darwin, there were many thoughtful interpreters like St. Augustine, who found it impossible to be exactly sure what the meaning of that amazing creation story was supposed to be. So attaching oneself to such literal interpretations in the face of compelling scientific evidence pointing to the ancient age of Earth and the relatedness of living things by evolution seems neither wise nor necessary for the believer.

I have found there is a wonderful harmony in the complementary truths of science and faith. The God of the Bible is also the God of the genome. God can be found in the cathedral or in the laboratory. By investigating God's majestic and awesome creation, science can actually be a means of worship.

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1
J
Junior Member
Junior Member
J Offline
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1
What's wrong with that, everyone has own belief's and opinion.

let's respect it.





educational videos [nestlearning.com]

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 166
T
Member
Member
T Offline
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 166
Francis Collins beleives in theistic evolution much like John Paul II and reads CS Lewis -anglo-catholic, Chesteron - Catholic convert, and Augustine the churchs second greatest church father and doctor (after Aquinas) in the west and some say first in the west. Yet this guy is an evangelical (many whom think theistic evolution is anathema) don't get that one. Pretty smart guy whose influences were pretty Orthodox and eithe leaning or downright apologetical catholics. How he is not catholic or Orthodox is beyond me. Let's pray for one more conversion here.

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 848
Member
Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 848
OK, so I should state that I'm also involved in the study (and now started to move into research in) the biological sciences. So I can asociate with some of Collin's views. Where I think the trouble starts is where he says "science cannot answer". Science doesn't answer anything. Science asks things, and uses statisical models and the results obtained from the questions to infer facts. Those facts always present a margin of error. be it 1%, 5%, whatever. The business of saying science provides answers is false in my view. While in most cases the inferences drawn from results are confirmed over, and over and over and then become seen as representaitve of fact, it is only as good as the next experiment. Science is a means of asking questions, and to some extent and whilst I see majesty in the structure of the miraculous things I see in cells and microorganisms that reflects my faith and says nothing whatsoever about the value of, or compatinilty of science with faith. Science is what it is, straying from the concept of scientific method and giving it attributesit doesn't have is where the problems start.

Ned

Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 936
L
lm
Offline
Member
Member
L Offline
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 936
Quote
Science is what it is, straying from the concept of scientific method and giving it attributes it doesn't have is where the problems start.

I can't disagree with you there. But it seems to be the fault of many scientists that they want to make pronouncements or judgments which are not proper conclusions from the data that they observe. Finally they too must be judged by the metaphysician in the natural order (who is considering more than the material world), and the theologian in the order of grace.

See my post regarding Jastrow's comment in the Einstein thread. Jastrow was head of the Wilson Observatory. He knew the limits of modern science.



Moderated by  Irish Melkite, theophan 

Link Copied to Clipboard
The Byzantine Forum provides message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial, have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as a source for official information for any Church. All posts become property of byzcath.org. Contents copyright - 1996-2024 (Forum 1998-2024). All rights reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0