The Byzantine Forum
Newest Members
BarsanuphiusFan, connorjack, Hookly, fslobodzian, ArchibaldHeidenr
6,170 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 615 guests, and 114 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
by orthodoxsinner2, September 30
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
by Veronica.H, April 24
Byzantine Catholic Outreach of Iowa
Exterior of Holy Angels Byzantine Catholic Parish
Church of St Cyril of Turau & All Patron Saints of Belarus
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics35,521
Posts417,613
Members6,170
Most Online4,112
Mar 25th, 2025
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,398
J
Member
Member
J Offline
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,398
Memo,

Those are very good points.

Joe

Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,505
Member
Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,505
Wondering I was not saying that there are not some people who should not divorice an abusive spouse. But in most situations tell me if there really is a person who 100% has not contributed at least a fraction to the divorice?
We can feel sympathy for them and support them in the healing of their lives.
Stephanos I
An annulment is not a divorice. It is simply a statement by the Church that there was no valid marrige and so if the person is ready and mature enough and has dealt with the issues that caused seperation then they are free to enter into marriage.

Last edited by Stephanos I; 04/18/07 01:49 PM.
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,405
Likes: 38
Member
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,405
Likes: 38
Dear Friends,

Actually, it matters not which Rite/Church one belongs to - the issue of giving scandal by ordaining someone who has been divorced in the civil courts and has had his marriage annulled is something that can be a real headache for the bishop.

I've seen one case (actually someone in my extended family) who had his marriage annulled and was remarried by Roman decree etc. and who later got ordained.

This is what happened:

1) letters from people - including family and friends of the first woman/wife - to Rome complaining about him, saying it would be a scandal if he were ordained, they would consider leaving the Church if he were etc.

2) Lots of gossip from priests here, some actually called me directly to "let me in" on a few "facts" concerning his annulment, with nice comments like "his daddy paid big bucks to procure that so-called 'annulment' and similar kindly remarks . . .

3) More of the same even after his ordination - at which time the Bishop decided to post him in a far corner of the Eparchy etc.

4) When he died, an untoward comment about his life DURING HIS FUNERAL!

That's what can be involved and it is not a good thing at all.

Alex

Last edited by Orthodox Catholic; 04/18/07 01:55 PM.
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,405
Likes: 38
Member
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,405
Likes: 38
Dear Joe and Dr Eric,

And we have news here about (2) Latin Catholics becoming married Protestant ministers then asking to return to the Latin Church to be received as married Latin priests . . .

Whatever it takes . . .

Alex

Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,398
J
Member
Member
J Offline
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,398
Originally Posted by Orthodox Catholic
Dear Joe and Dr Eric,

And we have news here about (2) Latin Catholics becoming married Protestant ministers then asking to return to the Latin Church to be received as married Latin priests . . .

Whatever it takes . . .

Alex

Alex,

I can't imagine that going over very well with Rome. Of course, I suppose that someone could sincerely leave the Catholic Church, go into ministry, and then sincerely recant and go back. But, I would suspect that Church authorities would be hesitant to ordain such a person to be a priest, since it could be seen as encouraging Catholic men to get married, leave the church, become protestant ministers and then return later.

joe

Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 84
C
CRW Offline
Member
Member
C Offline
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 84
Grounds for the annulment are relevant here. Specifically, annulment based on defect of form would indicate that the marriage laws of the Church had been violated. This is generally an impediment to ordination according to canon law both east and west.

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,405
Likes: 38
Member
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,405
Likes: 38
Dear Joe,

Actually . . .

"Invincible ignorance" seems to cover a multitude of sins. And I do know of two cases of Catholic men doing this.

We have former Catholic priests who have left to get married and who have become ministers in Protestant congregations - our United Church actually proclaimed a policy on this (that such a one need only attend a parish regularly for one year before being admitted to its public ministry etc.).

I must correct one thing I said above - the two did not become "protestant" ministers, but joined what appear to be Old Catholic groups.

Used to not know the difference between these groups and canonical jurisdictions - I do now and stay away from the former.

Once had lunch with one of their "metropolitans" who asked my advice on naming a particular group within his jurisdiction that were of the "Anglican Rite."

So he got that advice and the name continues to this day . . . smile

Isn't that a real achievement? wink

Alex

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,405
Likes: 38
Member
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,405
Likes: 38
CRW,

Well, what I'm suggesting is that there are two sides to the story of annulment - what actually happened and what people gossip about what happened.

And that gossip can be deadly, affecting a person's life as a priest etc.

Our parishioners (and priests) can be deadly cruel.

Alex

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,133
Member
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,133
Hi,

Originally Posted by Orthodox Catholic
And we have news here about (2) Latin Catholics becoming married Protestant ministers then asking to return to the Latin Church to be received as married Latin priests . . .

Whatever it takes . . .

Exactly, and that is why Catholic ordination for former Protestant clergymen is not automatic.

If a bishop were to allow this (and I am not saying I can't see it happening), then he would be endorsing this "Whatever it takes" position which, IMHO, goes against the nature of what ordained ministry is in the life of the Church.

In other words, I would find it very strange that God was actually calling you to break communion with your Church, so you can get ordained by another denomination, only to return to your original Church as a clergyman.

In my experience, Grace doesn't work that way.

Shalom,
Memo

Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  theophan 

Link Copied to Clipboard
The Byzantine Forum provides message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial, have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as a source for official information for any Church. All posts become property of byzcath.org. Contents copyright - 1996-2024 (Forum 1998-2024). All rights reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0