The Byzantine Forum
Newest Members
connorjack, Hookly, fslobodzian, ArchibaldHeidenr, Fernholz
6,169 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
1 members (arekeon27), 527 guests, and 85 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
by orthodoxsinner2, September 30
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
by Veronica.H, April 24
Byzantine Catholic Outreach of Iowa
Exterior of Holy Angels Byzantine Catholic Parish
Church of St Cyril of Turau & All Patron Saints of Belarus
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics35,518
Posts417,611
Members6,169
Most Online4,112
Mar 25th, 2025
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,994
Likes: 10
A
Moderator
Member
Moderator
Member
A Offline
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,994
Likes: 10
Friends,

Can't we ever leave out the Bushes from conversations that have nothing to do with politics? eek

I happen to like and respect that family, ie: their marriages, their personalities, their values, etc...good old North East WASP stock they are...and from my experiences having worked in Connecticut, I contend that such people are the most proper, decent, gracious and kind people one will ever meet....and anyway, how can I dislike George Senior when he loves Greece so much, and visits there practically annually? smile

Then again, if the Clintons (or more precisely: Senator Clinton) come back in, one might say that we have been dominated by TWO Presidential dynasties these past years: the Bushes AND the Clintons! wink

Alice


Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,440
Z
Member
Member
Z Offline
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,440
Quote
Can't we ever leave out the Bushes from conversations that have nothing to do with politics?

I happen to like and respect that family, ie: their marriages, their personalities, their values, etc...good old North East WASP stock they are...

Dear Alice,

I agree with you. I too respect the Bush family. I respect their morals, values, and everything decent we still have in this nation.

I also respect their honesty and sincerity...but I realize that many people can only see others through their own eyes... (as the Greeks would say). So taking that into consideration, it's understandable that the things I see and respect about the Bush family, will not be seen by others. So in that sense, is it any wonder they've been critisized unjustly. crazy

God Bless,

Zenovia

Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,285
AthanasiusTheLesser
Member
AthanasiusTheLesser
Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,285
Originally Posted by Zenovia
Quote
Can't we ever leave out the Bushes from conversations that have nothing to do with politics?

I happen to like and respect that family, ie: their marriages, their personalities, their values, etc...good old North East WASP stock they are...

Dear Alice,

I agree with you. I too respect the Bush family. I respect their morals, values, and everything decent we still have in this nation.

I also respect their honesty and sincerity...but I realize that many people can only see others through their own eyes... (as the Greeks would say). So taking that into consideration, it's understandable that the things I see and respect about the Bush family, will not be seen by others. So in that sense, is it any wonder they've been critisized unjustly. crazy

God Bless,

Zenovia

Dear Zenovia:

And you don't see things through your own eyes?

Ryan

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,440
Z
Member
Member
Z Offline
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,440
Quote
And you don't see things through your own eyes?

Dear Ryan,

Yes I do! That's why I see them as honest, sincere and moral individuals. But we have to realize that I am a product of this culture...or at least how it was when I was young. So in that sense, they conform to my opinion of what is honest, sincere and moral.

There might have been times in my life that my view of their policies would have been different, but that has nothing to do with the values that I have been raised with. The American Protestant ethics of this nation is part of what I am, so in that sense it conforms to theirs.

God Bless,

Zenovia

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,405
Likes: 38
Member
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,405
Likes: 38
Dear SPDundas,

(Very good Russian, by the way :))

Certainly, the American system of government is very good as it is based on the British model from which it evolved!

The American Patriots did not originally fight to remove themselves from the Crown - only to change their status UNDER the Crown. To do that, they needed military aid from France and Germany and the price for that aid was separation from the Crown.

Canada's culture is American - but American Loyalist. On June 19th 1793, the first Loyalists (who were afraid of a republican government) representing a total of ten different cultural groups landed in Adolphustown in what is now Ontario.

They established our institutions and defended the Dominion of Canada etc.

And our system of government got rid of slavery years before yours did and without the bloody cost of a civil war . . .

God bless America!

Alex

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 943
Member
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 943
Thanks, Alex!

Wow. I guess we all didn't know so much about American history or at least it was "re-written" according to propraganda agendas. Oh well!

I used www.freetranslation.com [freetranslation.com] to type anything I wanted to say in English and it would translate it into a given language I wanted it to be translated into. Easy. So, there, I cheated! I'm busted! LOL

G-d bless America and Canada!

SPDundas
Deaf Byzantine

PS, I grew up in Oregon and it was ALWAYS a great treat going to Canada. I love it up there. It's like Europe on American soil.

Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,505
Member
Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,505
Relax Alex.
It was just a joke. I was teaching a French priest the English language and he made the mistake once, although, I think there might have been intentional sarcasm when he said, "God shave the Queen.
It reminded me of this and I had to chuckle.
Stephanos I

Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,678
Likes: 1
L
Member
Member
L Offline
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,678
Likes: 1
Well, Alex, y'all got rid of slavery first because your economy wasn't sustained by it, you didn't have expansive cotton and tobacco fields, etc. That is misleading to somehow hint that Canadians have higher morals than Americans...we all know that's not true!

And, P.S., the British had to employ German/Hessian mercenaries to battle us as well...and they lost anyway! wink

Alexis

Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 542
Member
Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 542
Originally Posted by Orthodox Catholic
Dear SPDundas,

(Very good Russian, by the way :))

Certainly, the American system of government is very good as it is based on the British model from which it evolved!

The American Patriots did not originally fight to remove themselves from the Crown - only to change their status UNDER the Crown. To do that, they needed military aid from France and Germany and the price for that aid was separation from the Crown.

Canada's culture is American - but American Loyalist. On June 19th 1793, the first Loyalists (who were afraid of a republican government) representing a total of ten different cultural groups landed in Adolphustown in what is now Ontario.

They established our institutions and defended the Dominion of Canada etc.

And our system of government got rid of slavery years before yours did and without the bloody cost of a civil war . . .

God bless America!

Alex

Alex....

Germany? The Hessians aided the British.

Try (then-Catholic) Spain. The Spanish Navy knocked the snot out of the British Navy, expelling the Redcoats from the Mississippi Valley and harrassing the British throughout the Caribbean and the Gulf of Mexico.
The society ladies of Havana gave their wealth so General Washington would be able to feed and clothe his Army in the last winter of the war.

Of course, Spain wanted Florida back, having lost it to Britain in 1763 and did get it back, until 1821. You gotta hand it to Spain - they knew real estate. When the USA became an independent nation, most of the present day US was under the dominion of the King of Spain. Florida, Texas, California - all were Spanish territory.

Slavery was an institution established by Loyal Subjects to the Crown of England, as the Colonies were then dominions of Great Britain, while...
the Spanish were setting up missions through the present day American Southwest from Texas to California.

Yes, Britain eliminated slavery before the United States, but it was under the auspices of the Crown that it started in the first place.

So, I'm a republican (small "r") and a reluctant Republican (capital "R").

About the Bush family - at least Jeb Bush and his family is Catholic.


Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,724
Likes: 2
B
Member
Member
B Offline
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,724
Likes: 2
Since the song is apparently under copyright, here's the link to the lyrics.
God Shave the Queen [amiright.com]

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,405
Likes: 38
Member
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,405
Likes: 38
Dear Mr. Clean,

Yes, the Hessians were an important part of the Loyalist immigration to Ontario - at one time, they made up a full 70% of the Ontario population and are a founding father-community of our province.

As for slavery, yes it started under the Crown. But it was abolished, not, as Alexis suggests due to economic reasons, but do spiritual reasons.

The Anglican servant of God William Wilberforce represented a group of Evangelical MP's in parliament called "the saints" that, at one point, had more than 40 individuals.

They fought against slavery valiantly on Christian principles, not economic ones, and William Wilberforce died just before the British Empire abolished slavery completely on August 1st 1837.

In Upper Canada, our first Lieutenant Governor, John Simcoe, curtailed slavery with the first laws of our first legislature in 1793. He was actually a student of William Wilberforce in England, a pious Anglican Evangelical and hated slavery on Christian grounds.

Ex-slaves from the U.S. saw Canada as a destination of freedom via the Underground Railroad, as did Harriet Tubman etc.

The point is that in Canada and the British Empire, it was a Christian Evangelical movement in parliament that defeated slavery.

In the U.S., it was a "Johnny come lately" policy that was enacted late in the Civil War (that was NOT fought over the issue of slavery) that formally abolished it.

That is an historical fact.

Alex


Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,405
Likes: 38
Member
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,405
Likes: 38
Dear Charles,

In fact, Constitutional Monarchy is much more democratic than even U.S. republican government.

Songs like that, although in bad taste and offensive, would be viewed with much greater disdain in the U.S. than in Britain or Canada.

At least we in a constitutional monarchy do not pledge allegiance to the fluttering cloth of an inanimate flag but to a living person. And the fact that our sovereigns are seen as "parents" of the country with the subjects as a family means much more than having a republic with untrammeled individualism.

This is why the religion of the U.S. is, characteristically, Protestantism with its emphasis on individualism.

I am not saying that the Crown of Britain, which is also the Crown of Canada, is for everyone. Ireland can and should have her own High King etc.

The point is that when Presidents outside the U.S. are symbolic heads of state - why do you need to vote for them as one does for another politician? It doesn't make sense. Kings and Queens can eminently fulfill the role of symbolic head of state and insofar as they represent the history of the nation, they represent ALL the people and so are truly democratic representatives of the people in a way elected politicians can never be, nomatter how many votes they get.

Alex

Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,678
Likes: 1
L
Member
Member
L Offline
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,678
Likes: 1
But, Alex, I can certainly promise you that had Canada used slavery as expansively and as much to their economic profit as America did (which y'all couldn't, because of the climate), it would NOT have been abolished so soon!

Alexis

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,440
Z
Member
Member
Z Offline
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,440
Quote
The point is that in Canada and the British Empire, it was a Christian Evangelical movement in parliament that defeated slavery.

In the U.S., it was a "Johnny come lately" policy that was enacted late in the Civil War (that was NOT fought over the issue of slavery) that formally abolished it.

That is an historical fact.

Dear Alex,

What you say is true of course. There are though other issues, that have been ignored.

I recall years ago, reading letters of Northerners stating how the slaves themselves realized how much better off they were in the American south, than they would have been in the English colonies of the Carribean. They knew quite well the sufferings and torments suffered by their British owned counterparts. If the predominant humaneness of the whites in the South towards their slaves is not known today, it is because of the outspokeness of our American blacks. To re-inforce that, I recently read an old novel that I found in my summer home when I was young. It was from the early 1920's and concerned an English settler in South Africa. Whipping a black servant, according to this novel, was commonplace.

Hmmm! But then again, didn't the 1920's posters show the silent movie star Rudolph Valentino with a whip in his hand. I guess it was romantic. crazy How times change!

Then of course we have the economic situation of the South. The climate was not condusive to white labor. Regardless, I realize that slavery is abhorrent. I always assumed it was better to be taken captive than being killed in wars, and that bonded servants were basically slaves. But I think there is a psychological difference. The pain and humiliation in feeling you are owned by another, must be horrific. shocked

God Bless,

Zenovia


PS- And I have to add that I like and respect Queen Elizabeth, even though she married that Greek sailor. laugh biggrin grin biggrin laugh

Last edited by Zenovia; 05/02/07 12:56 PM.
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,285
AthanasiusTheLesser
Member
AthanasiusTheLesser
Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,285
Originally Posted by Zenovia
If the predominant humaneness of the whites in the South towards their slaves is not known today, it is because of the outspokeness of our American blacks. To re-inforce that, I recently read an old novel that I found in my summer home when I was young. It was from the early 1920's and concerned an English settler in South Africa. Whipping a black servant, according to this novel, was commonplace.

I ask, what was humane about buying, owning, and selling other people against their will? What was humane about the raping of black women by their white owners? What was humane about splitting up families? What was humane about the beatings to which the slaves were subjected? What was humane about denying slaves any education? What was humane about making the slaves work incredibly long hours under such harsh conditions? The idea that slavery in the American South could be characterized as ?predominantly humane? seems to be thoroughly preposterous to me.

Ryan

Page 2 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Moderated by  Irish Melkite, theophan 

Link Copied to Clipboard
The Byzantine Forum provides message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial, have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as a source for official information for any Church. All posts become property of byzcath.org. Contents copyright - 1996-2024 (Forum 1998-2024). All rights reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0