The Byzantine Forum
Newest Members
EasternChristian19, James OConnor, biblicalhope, Ishmael, bluecollardpink
6,161 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 473 guests, and 95 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
by orthodoxsinner2, September 30
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
by Veronica.H, April 24
Byzantine Catholic Outreach of Iowa
Exterior of Holy Angels Byzantine Catholic Parish
Church of St Cyril of Turau & All Patron Saints of Belarus
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics35,511
Posts417,526
Members6,161
Most Online3,380
Dec 29th, 2019
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 186
Z
Zan Offline
BANNED
Member
BANNED
Member
Z Offline
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 186
Alex - very interesting! Thanks for the post

Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 68
J
Member
Member
J Offline
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 68
St. Dimitri of Rostov was a devotee of the Immaculate Conception.

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 63
T
Member
Member
T Offline
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 63
Originally Posted by The young fogey
Eastern Catholics are required to believe what Rome does but the high-church easternising position, if it's honest about remaining under Rome, sees those teachings as compatible: translatable into 'Easternese'.

Aren't Byzantine Catholics "in communion with Rome" rather than "under Rome"?

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 63
T
Member
Member
T Offline
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 63
Originally Posted by Misha
there is no such a thing..orthodox in communion with Rome...
it sounds like a joke...anyone who considers the pope as the head of the church, belongs to papism and has nothing in common with the orthodox church.
(more about the orthodox view,)

I believe that the Pope of Rome, as the successor of Saint Peter, is first among equals and Shepherd of the Church on earth. If I am not mistaken, that is what the Eastern Church believed before the separation.

Last edited by Father Anthony; 08/13/07 09:49 PM. Reason: link deleted
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 672
Likes: 2
Member
Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 672
Likes: 2
Wow! I never knew that. Was the idea of the "immaculate conception" of Mary the same in Kyivan Rus the same as in the West? In other words, could there have been a different understanding of the definition?

Ray

Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,564
Likes: 1
F
Member
Member
F Offline
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,564
Likes: 1
Perhaps to clarify things we might refer to our slightly estranged brothers as "our Orthodox brethren who do not as yet enjoy full communion with the First among the Bishops".

Meanwhile, take heart. I'm still basking in that London newspaper headline the morning after the election - the banner headline on the front page read "Cardinals Elect Orthodox Pope"

What more could we ask?

Fr. Serge

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4
BANNED
Junior Member
BANNED
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4
Originally Posted by Tertullian
Originally Posted by Misha
there is no such a thing..orthodox in communion with Rome...
it sounds like a joke...anyone who considers the pope as the head of the church, belongs to papism and has nothing in common with the orthodox church.
(more about the orthodox view,

I believe that the Pope of Rome, as the successor of Saint Peter, is first among equals and Shepherd of the Church on earth. If I am not mistaken, that is what the Eastern Church believed before the separation.

Content of post deleted. Violation of the forum rules of charity

Last edited by Father Anthony; 08/13/07 09:49 PM. Reason: link deleted
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,437
Likes: 1
Administrator
Member
Administrator
Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,437
Likes: 1
Misha,

You are a new member here that in the few posts that you have made today has sparked a number of complaints to the administrators. Your tone towards other posters and manner of respect displayed are unacceptable. You will either tone it down and show the respect and charity towards others befitting a Christian on this forum as you agreed to when you registered, or your posting privileges will be terminated.

In IC XC,
Father Anthony+
Administrator


Everyone baptized into Christ should pass progressively through all the stages of Christ's own life, for in baptism he receives the power so to progress, and through the commandments he can discover and learn how to accomplish such progression. - Saint Gregory of Sinai
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 672
Likes: 2
Member
Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 672
Likes: 2
Eastern Orthodoxy is often called the "Church of the Seven Ecumenical Councils." These Councils were held in the first 800 years of the undivided Church. Can somebody cite what the Councils decreed about the role of the Pope of Rome?

Ray

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 186
Z
Zan Offline
BANNED
Member
BANNED
Member
Z Offline
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 186
Originally Posted by 70x7
Eastern Orthodoxy is often called the "Church of the Seven Ecumenical Councils." These Councils were held in the first 800 years of the undivided Church. Can somebody cite what the Councils decreed about the role of the Pope of Rome?

Ray

This is a Catholic page but the info is unbiased - it lists all of the references to the Pope of Rome in the first 7 Ecumenical Councils.
http://www.globalserve.net/~bumblebee/ecclesia/ecu.htm

Last edited by Zan; 08/13/07 07:38 PM.
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 672
Likes: 2
Member
Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 672
Likes: 2
Thank you for your quick response.

Ray

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 63
T
Member
Member
T Offline
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 63
Originally Posted by 70x7
Eastern Orthodoxy is often called the "Church of the Seven Ecumenical Councils." These Councils were held in the first 800 years of the undivided Church. Can somebody cite what the Councils decreed about the role of the Pope of Rome?

Ray

One could consider how the Council of Chalcedon ranked Rome first among the apostolic sees.

Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 68
J
Member
Member
J Offline
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 68
Yes, but Chalcedon is controversial for Roman Catholics because it accorded Constantinople equal privileges with Rome.

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 63
T
Member
Member
T Offline
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 63
Originally Posted by JohnRoss
Yes, but Chalcedon is controversial for Roman Catholics because it accorded Constantinople equal privileges with Rome.

This would further help my position that the Bishop of Rome is first among equals.

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,405
Likes: 38
Member
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,405
Likes: 38
Dear JR,

You are more than correct - and St Dmitri was actually called up on the carpet by the Synod to examine his views on the Immaculate Conception at one point (Met. Ohienko, Sv. Dmitry Tuptalo).

The OCA site, in its calendar under "Conception of St Anne," states that the icon for this feast depicts the Mother of God in full stature, with hands lowered from which flow blessings - and she is flanked by icons of her parents.

Sounds very much like the depiction on the Miraculous Medal to me!

Alex

Page 3 of 5 1 2 3 4 5

Moderated by  theophan 

Link Copied to Clipboard
The Byzantine Forum provides message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial, have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as a source for official information for any Church. All posts become property of byzcath.org. Contents copyright - 1996-2024 (Forum 1998-2024). All rights reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0