The Byzantine Forum
Newest Members
Quid Est Veritas, Frank O, BC LV, returningtoaxum, Jennifer B
6,177 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 422 guests, and 128 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
by orthodoxsinner2, September 30
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
by Veronica.H, April 24
Byzantine Catholic Outreach of Iowa
Exterior of Holy Angels Byzantine Catholic Parish
Church of St Cyril of Turau & All Patron Saints of Belarus
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics35,524
Posts417,640
Members6,177
Most Online4,112
Mar 25th, 2025
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 135
J
Member
Member
J Offline
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 135
Papal Document Vindicates Adherents of Latin Mass
by John Vennari

Pope Benedict XVI�s document Summorum Pontificum, easing restrictions for the celebration of the Old Latin Mass, was released on July 7.

�What earlier generations held as sacred remains sacred and great for us too, and it cannot be all of a sudden entirely forbidden or even considered harmful,� the Pope wrote.

The New Mass

The Pope�s move is an effort to heal a rift within the Catholic Church since Pope Paul VI�s introduction of the New Mass in 1969.

Millions of Catholics the world over reacted against the New Mass, arguing that it is not merely an English translation of the traditional Mass, but an entirely new liturgy containing disturbing liberal elements.

The most well known of these �traditionalist� Catholics is the French Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre. In 1970, the Archbishop founded the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) in response to the requests of seminarians who wanted to be formed according to the traditional doctrine and liturgy of the Catholic Church. The SSPX was established as an international organization and now hundreds-of-thousands of adherents around the globe support the SSPX.

In 1988, Archbishop Lefebvre consecrated four bishops without Vatican approval. Pope John Paul II labeled the consecration a schismatic act and said that the Archbishop and the four bishops he consecrated had excommunicated themselves.

Lefebvre and his followers � arguing from Church tradition and Canon Law � insist they are neither schismatic nor excommunicated, but remain faithful to what the Church always taught and practiced. Such fidelity, they maintain, compels them (according to the Catholic Doctors of the Church, e.g. St. Thomas Aquinas, St. Robert Bellarmine) to resist many of the liberal reforms of the Second Vatican Council, such as ecumenism.

In 1988, Cardinal Ratzinger, now Pope Benedict XVI, led the discussions with the Society of St. Pius X in an effort to effect reconciliation. Since then, the Vatican has continued its conversation with the leadership of the Society of St. Pius X in an ongoing effort to heal the rift. On August 29, 2005, Pope Benedict XVI met with Bishop Bernard Fellay, Superior General of the SSPX.

Recently Vatican Cardinal Castrillon Hoyos stated that the Society is not in formal schism, though many issues remain unresolved.

�A Banal on-the-spot product�

Pope Benedict XVI has voiced his own reservations about the New Mass of Paul VI. Years ago, then-Cardinal Ratzinger lamented that he had hoped the liturgical reforms of Vatican II would draw from the riches of liturgical tradition, instead, he said, we �can only stand, deeply sorrowing, before the ruins of the very things that (we) were concerned for.�

Of the New Mass, Cardinal Ratzinger said, �in the place of liturgy as the fruit of development came fabricated liturgy. We abandoned the organic, living process of growth and development over the centuries and replaced it � as in a manufacturing process � with a fabrication, a banal on-the-spot product.�

This was not the first time a Vatican Cardinal spoke negatively of the liturgical reform.

In 1969, before Paul VI released the New Liturgy, Vatican Cardinals Ottaviani and Bacci sent Pope Paul VI a letter that accompanied a brief Critical Study of the New Mass. Here the Cardinals said the New Mass �represents, both as a whole and in its details, a striking departure from the Catholic theology of the Mass as it was formulated in Session 22 of the Council of Trent,� and would produce an agonizing crisis of conscience for numerous priests.

The Critical Study also said that the New Mass �would gladden the heart of the most modernist Protestant�.

Pope Benedict XVI�s new Motu Proprio does not acknowledge the doctrinal problems with the New Mass. Traditional Catholics have already sadly noted that this is a deficiency in the document.

�To all who desire it�


Before becoming Pope, Benedict XVI favored lifting the restrictions on celebrating the Latin Mass. In his 1997 interview-book Salt of the Earth, he said, �A community is calling its very being into question when it suddenly declares that what was its holiest and highest possession is strictly forbidden and when it makes longing for it seem downright indecent.� He continued, �the old rite should be granted much more generously to all who desire it.�

Those Catholics �who desire it� have insisted for decades that the Old Mass was never forbidden.

In 1986, Pope John Paul II convened a commission of nine Vatican Cardinals to provide answers to two questions: 1) Did Pope Paul VI or any other competent authority ever forbid the celebration of the traditional Mass? 2) Does the priest have the right to celebrate the traditional Mass even against the will of his bishop?

Vatican Cardinal Alfons Stickler, at a 1995 Christi Fidelis conference in Fort Lee, New Jersey, related that he was one of the Cardinals on the Commission. Cardinal Stickler said, �the answer given by the nine cardinals in 1986 was �No, the Mass of Saint Pius V (the Tridentine Mass) has never been suppressed�.�

The Cardinal went on to explain that Pope John Paul II had a decree drawn up relating this fact but did not sign it due to the opposition of various Cardinals and bishops.

In answer to the second question, Cardinal Stickler said, �the nine Cardinals unanimously agreed that no bishop may forbid a Catholic priest from saying the Tridentine Mass.�

Cardinal Ratzinger � now Pope Benedict XVI � was also a member of the 1986 nine-Cardinal Commission.

Not much has changed since 1986. Many bishops, particularly in France and Germany, are not well disposed towards the Old Latin Mass, and had voiced objections to the Pope�s Motu Proprio prior to its release. These bishops see the revival of the Latin Mass as a threat to their modern reforms � reforms, incidentally, that have virtually emptied their churches.

�Never Abrogated�

For traditional Catholics, the most important section of the new document is Pope Benedict XVI�s words: �Hence it is licit to celebrate the Sacrifice of the Mass in accordance with the typical edition of the Roman Missal promulgated by Blessed John XXIII in 1962 and never abrogated��

On Sunday, July 8, Father Robert Pasley, pastor of Mater Ecclesia, a diocesan approved Latin Mass parish in Berlin, New Jersey, said in his homily �We are living through and are part of a major, fundamental, awesome reaffirmation of the traditions of our Faith.�

Father Pasley also noted that with this new papal document, those who worked for decades against seemingly impossible odds for the restoration of the Old Mass �have been affirmed and vindicated.�

Bishop Bernard Fellay, Superior General of the Society of St. Pius X, issued a statement on July 7 saying, �By the Motu Proprio Summorum Pontificum, Pope Benedict XVI has reinstated the Tridentine Mass in its rights, and clearly affirmed that the Roman Missal promulgated by Saint Pius V had never been abrogated. The Priestly Society of Saint Pius X rejoices to see the Church thus regain her liturgical Tradition, and give the possibility of a free access to the treasure of the Traditional Mass for the glory of God, the good of the Church and the salvation of souls, to the priests and faithful who had so far been deprived of it. The Priestly Society of Saint Pius X extends its deep gratitude to the Sovereign Pontiff for this great spiritual benefit.�

Bishop Fellay continued, �The letter which accompanies the Motu Proprio does not hide however the difficulties that still remain. The Society of Saint Pius X wishes that the favorable climate established by the new dispositions of the Holy See will make it possible � after the decree of excommunication which still affects its bishops has been withdrawn � to consider more serenely the disputed doctrinal issues.�

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 135
J
Member
Member
J Offline
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 135
Cardinal Ratzinger � now Pope Benedict XVI - could easily have been speaking of the Revised Divine Liturgy (I think "Ruined" is a better term). Pray God that the petitions to Rome reach the ears of the Holy Father and he strike down this fabricated RDL.

Important Quote 1: �What earlier generations held as sacred remains sacred and great for us too, and it cannot be all of a sudden entirely forbidden or even considered harmful,� the Pope wrote.

The bishops have forbidden what we and our forefathers considered sacred.

The bishops have forbidden what all of Orthodoxy considers sacred.

Important Quote 2: Cardinal Ratzinger said, �in the place of liturgy as the fruit of development came fabricated liturgy. We abandoned the organic, living process of growth and development over the centuries and replaced it � as in a manufacturing process � with a fabrication, a banal on-the-spot product.�

A Liturgy based upon the whims and desires of a commission is "a fabrication, a banal on-the-spot product.�

A Liturgy that conforms to the demands of secular feminist politics (gender neutral language) is "a fabrication, a banal on-the-spot product.�

Important Quote 3: �A community is calling its very being into question when it suddenly declares that what was its holiest and highest possession is strictly forbidden and when it makes longing for it seem downright indecent.�

The official Ruthenian Divine Liturgy is our "holiest and highest possession." What do the bishops say about our Church when they forbid us to pray our own official Divine Liturgy?

And the bishops and other revisionists treat those who long for the Ruthenian Liturgy as the enemy. What do the bishops say about what they believe when they treat people who wish to pray according to our own books as the enemy?

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,769
Likes: 30
John
Member
John
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,769
Likes: 30
Originally Posted by John Damascene
And the bishops and other revisionists treat those who long for the Ruthenian Liturgy as the enemy. What do the bishops say about what they believe when they treat people who wish to pray according to our own books as the enemy?
There is room for the agendas of revision.

There is room for the agendas of secular feminists, their language and politics.

There is no room for the o/Orthodox Ruthenian recension!

Very telling indeed!

biggrin


Link Copied to Clipboard
The Byzantine Forum provides message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial, have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as a source for official information for any Church. All posts become property of byzcath.org. Contents copyright - 1996-2024 (Forum 1998-2024). All rights reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0