The Byzantine Forum
Newest Members
Frank O, BC LV, returningtoaxum, Jennifer B, geodude
6,176 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 328 guests, and 113 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
by orthodoxsinner2, September 30
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
by Veronica.H, April 24
Byzantine Catholic Outreach of Iowa
Exterior of Holy Angels Byzantine Catholic Parish
Church of St Cyril of Turau & All Patron Saints of Belarus
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics35,524
Posts417,636
Members6,176
Most Online4,112
Mar 25th, 2025
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,518
Catholic Gyoza
Member
Catholic Gyoza
Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,518
So my book by Mike Aqulina has it wrong?

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 571
Member
Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 571
I don't know. What does it say?

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,131
A
Member
Member
A Offline
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,131
Originally Posted by Logos - Alexis
This has been discussed ad nauseam in a few threads. I'm sure we could dig them up.

The way I understand it, Addai and Mari might be the oldest, as well as the Roman. The Roman Rite strictly speaking is apparently older than the Byzantine, but there is a gap between 300 AD and 600 BC during which a good bit seems to have changed in the Roman Rite, but we can't be sure exactly when.

I think I have that right...

It is really all very subjective...how much change does a Rite undergo to be considered very different than that which originally spawned it? Clearly lace and fiddleback chasubles weren't around in 500 BC, but all rites have undergone some external (and textual) revisions.

Alexis


Agreed. Strictly speaking, the modern Roman rite re-introduced some ancient elements that could be said to be older still than some of the rites practiced by other churches in longer continuity... Or conversely different Byzantine Churches - Orthodox and Catholic - have revisions and alterations in their various rescensions that go all the way back to 2006 (or whatever we did this morning wherever we were!)...

If you are looking for the litrugy with the oldest elements, that is one thing...

If you are looking for the litrugy that has the longest continuity in a particular form, that would seem to be another...

Joined: May 2007
Posts: 199
W
Member
Member
W Offline
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 199
Many elements of the Byzantine Liturgy (and its accouterments) grew up rather late, as did elements of the Roman Mass. The Proskomedia (or Prothesis) Service is one late development; the full processional at the Great Entrance is another. It's hard to imagine the latter began simply with the deacon going out to find the best loaf of bread....

Ultimately, it's not so much the "older than thou" argument that is important but whether a legitimate, approved liturgy accurately conveys one or another liturgical heritage and thus is capable of deifying those who worship according to it.

-------
Western Orthodoxy Blog [westernorthodox.blogspot.com]

Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 560
T
Member
Member
T Offline
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 560
"The Liturgy of Mar Mari and Addai is celebrated by the Assyrian Church of the East, the Chaldean Catholic Church, and the Syro-Malabar Catholic Church (somewhat latinised).

The Syriac Liturgy of St. James is celebrated by the Syriac Catholic Church, Syriac Orthodox Church, Syro-Malankara Catholic Church, the Malankara Orthodox Church, and (in a somewhat latinised form) by the Maronite Catholic Church. " Michael Thoma posted this earlier.

Do we have links where we can read or hear the Liturgies mentioned? I would be very interested in looking at similarities to each other and to the Roman Liturgy. Which Roman Liturgy as we talking about, by the way? There are several as have been mentioned earlier.

Tim


Joined: May 2006
Posts: 802
Likes: 2
Member
Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 802
Likes: 2
Thank you very much for the answers!

And another question: i have seen be affirmed that the Melkite Church is the oldest church. It is not true, is not it?

Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,564
Likes: 1
F
Member
Member
F Offline
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,564
Likes: 1
Such a question is difficult to answer. If one accepts the argument that the Greek-Catholic Patriarchate of Antioch and All the East [which nowadays also incorporates Alexandria and Jerusalem] is the direct - and senior - lineal descendant of the Church established by Saint Peter and Saint Paul, which properly boasts of such Hierarchs as Saint Ignatius of Antioch, the Flavians, Patriarch Peter III, and so on, then yes, this is the oldest Church still functioning (the Church of Jerusalem was severely interrupted and it would be difficult to maintain that there was still a Hierarch at the head of it from the time of the Roman Conquest until the Peace of the Church).

But there are other Churches - including, of course, the Greek Orthodox Patriarchate - who will hotly dispute this claim. And neither of the "Greek" Patriarchates is using the same Liturgy that was used in Antioch during the first Millennium.

Fr. Serge

Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,678
Likes: 1
L
Member
Member
L Offline
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,678
Likes: 1
But what about Sts. Peter and Paul founding the Church of Rome? And St. Mark founding it in Alexandria? And St. Thomas in India? Aren't these all "equal"?

Alexis

Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 6
P
Junior Member
Junior Member
P Offline
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 6
This Actually is not as easy as one might think. All liturgy's have been modified to some extent or another, however as far as i know (and this is only what i have gotten from my liturgy study)3 Rites can claim to be the oldest and all three were founded about the same time. Jerusalem Rite, Roman Rite, and Byzantine Rite. All other Rites are a derivative of these. The problem is When did "Rites" begin? Who what what influence on what Rite?

As far as we can tell the "Rites" all started out the same and while the "Liturgy of St. James" is often times considered the oldest even that is in question. Peter was The original head of the Jerusalem Church.

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 132
Member
Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 132
According to Acts, James the Just was the original head of the Jerusalem Church.

Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 212
Member
Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 212
This is all very interesting. I had been under the impression that the Syriac rites were the oldest, followed by the Byzantine, and that the Roman rite was the baby of the liturgical family. smile

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 51
May Offline
Member
Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 51
yes, it is my understanding that the rites of rome, antioch, alexandria, jerusalem, armenia and those in india are older than the byzantine rite that emerged only in the 4th century.

Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  theophan 

Link Copied to Clipboard
The Byzantine Forum provides message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial, have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as a source for official information for any Church. All posts become property of byzcath.org. Contents copyright - 1996-2024 (Forum 1998-2024). All rights reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0