The Byzantine Forum
Newest Members
EasternChristian19, James OConnor, biblicalhope, Ishmael, bluecollardpink
6,161 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
4 members (EasternChristian19, James OConnor, Michael_Thoma, 1 invisible), 1,263 guests, and 104 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
by orthodoxsinner2, September 30
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
by Veronica.H, April 24
Byzantine Catholic Outreach of Iowa
Exterior of Holy Angels Byzantine Catholic Parish
Church of St Cyril of Turau & All Patron Saints of Belarus
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics35,510
Posts417,516
Members6,161
Most Online3,380
Dec 29th, 2019
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#265581 11/30/07 11:25 AM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 212
Member
Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 212
I figured this would be a pretty good place to ask...I've heard (The) Ukraine refered to as both 'Ukraine' and 'The Ukraine.' So now I'm wondering, which is it? confused

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,994
Likes: 10
A
Moderator
Member
Moderator
Member
A Offline
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,994
Likes: 10
Originally Posted by Doubting Thomas
I figured this would be a pretty good place to ask...I've heard (The) Ukraine refered to as both 'Ukraine' and 'The Ukraine.' So now I'm wondering, which is it? confused

OH NO! TAKE COVER!!!! eek

Dear Brother, Many of us have been foolish enough to ask this same question and have lived to regret it!!! For the record, it is officially 'Ukraine'. 'The' connotes negative historical recollections.

In Christ,
Alice

Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 22
A
Christina
Junior Member
Christina
Junior Member
A Offline
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 22
I know it is officially Ukraine, but for some reason I can't just say "Ukraine". It comes out better for me as THE Ukraine. If it was UkraniA, it would be easier for me to say without the THE.


Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 476
Member
Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 476
I agree with Alice. I remember a Ukrainian Catholic living with me in the dorms in college taking great offense when a Russian student used "The Ukraine".

However, historically, the definite artilce 'the' has been used, in many instances, for certain places to fit English grammatical usage. Let's take 'Ukraine' for example. The word 'Ukraine' roughly means 'borderland'. To to say in English, "We are going to borderland" would be incorrect hence the definite article. Another example would be "the Barbados". Most people don't realize that the word "Barbados" is actually in the plural and was originally called "la illha dos barbados" or "the island of the Bardados" or "the island of the bearded ones". Thus it retained the definite article for some time.

There are other places like this:
(in the singular) the Sudan, the Argentine, etc.
(in the plural) the West Indies, the Californias, etc.

In Spanish people still say "El Per�", "La Argentina", etc.
And in French we still hear "Vive la France!"

Now one could also point out that some place like England, which means "land of the Angles" has lost the definite article. This is absolutely correct. Over time, people forget the original meaning of a word, or it becomes so well-used, that the definite article is dropped. Since the word 'Ukraine' has been used in the English language for less than a hundred years, it is to be expected that some people will still use the definite article. However, we should be respectful (to some extent) of what people want their country to be called. I do, however, get frustrated by places like Burma/Myanamar (which alternates between the two every few years).

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 476
Member
Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 476
Please excuse the typos above. The words should read Barbados and Myanmar

Joined: May 2006
Posts: 487
M
Member
Member
M Offline
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 487
Originally Posted by Byzantophile
I agree with Alice. I remember a Ukrainian Catholic living with me in the dorms in college taking great offense when a Russian student used "The Ukraine".

However, historically, the definite artilce 'the' has been used, in many instances, for certain places to fit English grammatical usage. Let's take 'Ukraine' for example. The word 'Ukraine' roughly means 'borderland'. To to say in English, "We are going to borderland" would be incorrect hence the definite article. Another example would be "the Barbados". Most people don't realize that the word "Barbados" is actually in the plural and was originally called "la illha dos barbados" or "the island of the Bardados" or "the island of the bearded ones". Thus it retained the definite article for some time.

There are other places like this:
(in the singular) the Sudan, the Argentine, etc.
(in the plural) the West Indies, the Californias, etc.

In Spanish people still say "El Per�", "La Argentina", etc.
And in French we still hear "Vive la France!"

Now one could also point out that some place like England, which means "land of the Angles" has lost the definite article. This is absolutely correct. Over time, people forget the original meaning of a word, or it becomes so well-used, that the definite article is dropped. Since the word 'Ukraine' has been used in the English language for less than a hundred years, it is to be expected that some people will still use the definite article. However, we should be respectful (to some extent) of what people want their country to be called. I do, however, get frustrated by places like Burma/Myanamar (which alternates between the two every few years).

In Ukrainian and every Slavic language I have ever encountered there are no articles. Meaning there are not words for 'the' 'a' 'an' etc. So if the regions language is taken into consideration then this should answer your question as to why 'the' should be omitted.

Furthermore, in English, to say 'the Ukraine' can imply to some that it is not an independent country but rather a region of another country.

Maybe calling Ukraine 'Kyiven Rus' would solve this?

Where's Yaroslav the Wise when you need him? smile

Note: To my fellow Ukes, the last two lines are jokes.

Monomakh

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 473
J
Member
Member
J Offline
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 473

To which group do you think Ukraine belongs:

Group A - single coutries

(1) Uganda
(2) Uruguay

Group B

(1) The United States
(2) The United Kingdom

Although most Ukrainians would like Ukraine to belong to Group B, in reality it belongs to group A since Ukraine is not a federated state (or multiple kingdoms) but rather a single country.

Russian Imperialists believed that Ukraine was simply a region of the Russian Empire (and it was for almost 300 years) and therefore used the term 'The' before Ukraine.

I.F.




Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,214
Member
Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,214
When Yushchenko was poioned before winning the election, I remember reading "the Ukraine" in many place. It seems a common mistake for Westerners to make.

Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 144
B
Member
Member
B Offline
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 144
as for me/ not -english man /looks better The Ukraine //show spiritual wealth and great culture and nation , people whose roots are from this Land

Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,564
Likes: 1
F
Member
Member
F Offline
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,564
Likes: 1
English is a linguistic mongrel. Some names of countries came in via French, which finds it normal to use the definite article as a prefix in such cases. One will still find older people, for example, who will say "The Lebanon". Odd.

Nowadays relatively few English-speaking people are fluent in French, so there is no reason to retain this particular usage.

Fr. Serge

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,964
T
Member
Member
T Offline
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,964
Originally Posted by Monomakh
Where's Yaroslav the Wise when you need him? smile


Over the years, I have met many a wise guy.

But very few few wise men. Very few.

More wise women than men, I think, but still, very few.

But no Yaroslav. The closest I came was reading something by Jaroslav Pelikan.

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,405
Likes: 38
Member
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,405
Likes: 38
Dear Friends,

The Republic of Ukraine, if you must. But otherwise "Ukraine."

However, it doesn't really bother me if someone says, "The Ukraine" in all innocence.

Especially if that someone is from the former Royal Colonies of British North America (aka "the United States of America").

And, remember, my fellow Americans, it's never too late to come back home! smile

Alex

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,405
Likes: 38
Member
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,405
Likes: 38
Dear Two Lungs,

That's "Saint Yaroslav the Wise" now - he was glorified a saint in recent times, although he was always venerated locally in the Kyivan area as a saint (as were the Princes Mykola-Askold and Dir).

Alex

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,217
Likes: 2
L
Member
Member
L Offline
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,217
Likes: 2

Never say "The Ukraine".
Never spell Kyiv as Kiev.
Never spell L'viv as Lvov or Lwow, you'd have to be incredibly old to say Lemberg though.
Never say "Little Russian". A friend of mine said if he's ever referred to as Little Russian, he refers back to the person responsible as a Muscovite.

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,964
T
Member
Member
T Offline
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,964
Originally Posted by Byzantophile
I agree with Alice. I remember a Ukrainian Catholic living with me in the dorms in college taking great offense when a Russian student used "The Ukraine".

Things could be worse. smile

I know of a wonderful woman, of Scotch-Irish/Quebecois ancestry, who, after nearly twenty years marriage to a Ukrainian man, just doesn't get it. (or maybe she's just trying to get his goat?)

She loves pyrohy and the other foods, and the Icons and the pysanky, so they always go the the Church festivals and bazaars.

BUT...

She always refers to it as "going to the RUSSIAN Church." eek

No amount of explaining seems to make a difference in her head.

So far as I know, she has not yet been beaten by the Babas. grin

We shall see.... It could be worse. smile

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  Irish Melkite, theophan 

Link Copied to Clipboard
The Byzantine Forum provides message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial, have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as a source for official information for any Church. All posts become property of byzcath.org. Contents copyright - 1996-2024 (Forum 1998-2024). All rights reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0