The Byzantine Forum
Newest Members
EasternChristian19, James OConnor, biblicalhope, Ishmael, bluecollardpink
6,161 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
2 members (theophan, James OConnor), 1,309 guests, and 83 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
by orthodoxsinner2, September 30
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
by Veronica.H, April 24
Byzantine Catholic Outreach of Iowa
Exterior of Holy Angels Byzantine Catholic Parish
Church of St Cyril of Turau & All Patron Saints of Belarus
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics35,508
Posts417,511
Members6,161
Most Online3,380
Dec 29th, 2019
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,398
J
Member
Member
J Offline
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,398
Does anyone know what kind of thinking there was in the early Church prior to Christianity's legalization in the Roman empire concerning councils? Is the "Ecumenical" council a purely imperial concept or was there some Ante-Nicene reflection on the nature of conciliarity and the status and function of a council such as the on found in Acts? Did any of the Ante-Nicene fathers anticipate the holding of a council as a way to deal with doctrinal and canonical difficulties?

Joe

Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 478
Member
Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 478
Joe,

Councils were not unheard of before the Edict of Milan, but they were all regional (and sporadic, due to the underground nature of the Church at the time). However, in my studies I have seen no indications that there was any concept of an "ecumenical" council that would definitively, and universally, determine doctrine issues. Not that such a concept is contradictory to the Ante-Nicene Church, just that the idea of a council of all the bishops of the world was pretty far-fetched practically!

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 12
P
Junior Member
Junior Member
P Offline
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 12
On the one hand, we can find lineaments of ecumenicity in the apostolic Council of Jerusalem in Acts 15. On the other hand, according to John Meyendorff, "ecumenical councils" are the direct historical product of the distinct relationship between Church and Roman Emperor:

"throughout the fourth and fifth centuries, the bishops could not agree among themselves. Council succeeded council, issuing formula after formula, so that, in order to assure unity, the emperors were, in fact, forced into choosing between ecclesiastical factions and, therefore, interpreting conciliar formulas themselves. There are many occasions showing that Constantine and his successors stepped in with great reluctance into the role of interpreters of Christian theology and church discipline, and that Christians called on them to assure that role. The most famous case in point is Constantine's role in settling the Donatist dispute in Africa. His personal decision in favor of the Catholic party followed lengthy and persistent attempts at having councils--in Rome, then Arles--to resolve the dispute." Imperial Unity and Christian Divisions, p. 34.


Moderated by  theophan 

Link Copied to Clipboard
The Byzantine Forum provides message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial, have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as a source for official information for any Church. All posts become property of byzcath.org. Contents copyright - 1996-2024 (Forum 1998-2024). All rights reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0