The Byzantine Forum
Newest Members
Frank O, BC LV, returningtoaxum, Jennifer B, geodude
6,176 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
1 members (KostaC), 420 guests, and 119 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
by orthodoxsinner2, September 30
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
by Veronica.H, April 24
Byzantine Catholic Outreach of Iowa
Exterior of Holy Angels Byzantine Catholic Parish
Church of St Cyril of Turau & All Patron Saints of Belarus
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics35,524
Posts417,637
Members6,176
Most Online4,112
Mar 25th, 2025
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 7 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Joined: Aug 1998
Posts: 4,337
Likes: 24
Moderator
Member
Moderator
Member
Joined: Aug 1998
Posts: 4,337
Likes: 24
"If the Bishop forbids something, the priest's choice is rather moot!"

True but if the bishop allows it then falls to the priest whether it will be used in the parish.


My cromulent posts embiggen this forum.
Joined: Aug 1998
Posts: 4,337
Likes: 24
Moderator
Member
Moderator
Member
Joined: Aug 1998
Posts: 4,337
Likes: 24
"I said it before and I'll say it again, the BCA hierarchs have issued statements that preclude Slavonic, period."

You can say it till your blue in the face it isn't going to make it true. Slavonic is allowed period, at least in 3 of 4 Eparchies. If having a Slavonic Liturgy at Otpust, where all the bishops are present, isn't proof of the veracity of Professor's statement then I don't know what is.

It seems to me you and others want this alleged prohibition to be true so you have another log to throw on the fire of why the RDL should torched. Which in my opinion is confusing issues. Those who want to be able to do the full Liturgy will win the request, I believe. I am not so sure what translation they will be allowed to use to do that however.


My cromulent posts embiggen this forum.
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,373
U
Member
Member
U Offline
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,373
Fr. Deacon,

The Uniontown Otpust one token Slavonic liturgy (with NO bishop presiding or concelebrating) does not mean there is wide-spread Slavonic usage. The last bishop the actually recited liturgical parts in Church Slavonic was probably Bishop Bilock and/or Archbishop Kocisko some 15-16 years ago.

Ungcsertezs


Last edited by Ung-Certez; 12/08/07 08:52 PM.
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 1
Member
Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Ung-Certez
Fr. Deacon,

The Uniontown Otpust one token Slavonic liturgy (with NO bishop presiding or concelebrating) does not mean there is wide-spread Slavonic usage. The last bishop the actually recited liturgical parts in Church Slavonic was probably Bishop Bilock and/or Archbishop Kocisko some 15-16 years ago.

Ungcsertezs

How true.

At least four parishes in the Parma eparchy that I know of use no Slavonic at all. It's actually frowned upon and strongly discouraged at my former parish. The priests hair stands up if the cantor sings "Svjaty Bozhe". frown

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,131
A
Member
Member
A Offline
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,131
Originally Posted by Etnick
Originally Posted by Ung-Certez
Fr. Deacon,

The Uniontown Otpust one token Slavonic liturgy (with NO bishop presiding or concelebrating) does not mean there is wide-spread Slavonic usage. The last bishop the actually recited liturgical parts in Church Slavonic was probably Bishop Bilock and/or Archbishop Kocisko some 15-16 years ago.

Ungcsertezs

How true.

At least four parishes in the Parma eparchy that I know of use no Slavonic at all. It's actually frowned upon and strongly discouraged at my former parish. The priests hair stands up if the cantor sings "Svjaty Bozhe". frown


Why do you think that is?

Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 1
Member
Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by A Simple Sinner
Originally Posted by Etnick
Originally Posted by Ung-Certez
Fr. Deacon,

The Uniontown Otpust one token Slavonic liturgy (with NO bishop presiding or concelebrating) does not mean there is wide-spread Slavonic usage. The last bishop the actually recited liturgical parts in Church Slavonic was probably Bishop Bilock and/or Archbishop Kocisko some 15-16 years ago.

Ungcsertezs

How true.

At least four parishes in the Parma eparchy that I know of use no Slavonic at all. It's actually frowned upon and strongly discouraged at my former parish. The priests hair stands up if the cantor sings "Svjaty Bozhe". frown


Why do you think that is?

What seems like a strong desire by those in charge to kill any ties to our Slavic heritage. I'll go to my grave defending my Rusyn heritage and Slavonic Byzantine liturgical tradition!!!

Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,036
Likes: 4
D
Member
Member
D Offline
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,036
Likes: 4
Originally Posted by Fr. Deacon Lance
Ask Bishop William's permission.

Fr. Deacon Lance

At Fr. Marcus' ordianation, Bishop William described the Byzantine Catholic Church as "Addicted to the Divine Liturgy, addicted to singing, and addicted to pirogies" . . .

Somehow, I don't see him as likely be unsympathetic to a bit of tradition . . .

hawk

Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,036
Likes: 4
D
Member
Member
D Offline
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,036
Likes: 4
Originally Posted by tjm199
I realize that might be rushing it a bit, since I am sure there is a cost per book involved and not every church has money just lying around waiting to be spent on extra pew books.

Fr. Nils indicated that it was $15 on the initial order, and $20 for later replacements.

hawk

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 856
B
Member
Member
B Offline
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 856
The Slavonic liturgy booklets that tjm was talking about can probably be prepared at a copy shop for about $1.50 apiece, including cover and stapling.

Copies of the hardbound "green book" for the Byzantine Catholic Church (the new 2007 service book) are sold by the Byzantine Seminary Press for $15 a copy.

Yours in Christ,
Jeff

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 646
Likes: 1
S
Cantor
Member
Cantor
Member
S Offline
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 646
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Fr. Deacon Lance
JD,

... In Pittsburgh Slavonic is used freely with the knowledge and approval of the Metropolitan. Now that Bishop Andrew is retired it is a moot point. Ask Bishop William's permission.

Fr. Deacon Lance

Chances that he will allow Slavonic? About the same as winning the Mega Millions or other multi state lottery.

Joined: May 2006
Posts: 487
M
Member
Member
M Offline
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 487
Originally Posted by Steve Petach
Originally Posted by Fr. Deacon Lance
JD,

... In Pittsburgh Slavonic is used freely with the knowledge and approval of the Metropolitan. Now that Bishop Andrew is retired it is a moot point. Ask Bishop William's permission.

Fr. Deacon Lance

Chances that he will allow Slavonic? About the same as winning the Mega Millions or other multi state lottery.


It is disconcerting to hear that the odds are worse than slim to none for a parish to use Slavonic in the Eparchy of Passaic. I can see why it would not be pragmatic in a church where no one understands it, but if a situation exists (I don't know all of the Passaic Eparchy well) where there are immigrants and/or those who understand and are comfortable with Slavonic, why in the world would it not be not only permitted, but encouraged in order for that parish to thrive?

Sadly, Steve, I think that your assessment is right on.

Monomakh

Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 560
T
Member
Member
T Offline
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 560
I still don't know why anyone would not allow Slavonic. I would think they would encourage it, at least the basic greetings and prayers--Svatje Boze, Christos Voskrese, etc. And the Otce Nas is just too beautiful in Slavonic. Why on earth would any priest not want to use it, let alone an Eparch try to stifle it's use? Maybe I'm naive, but I find it hard to believe. How does it benefit the entire Church to abandon our roots? All it does is give people one more reason to attend an RC church. Our differences make us who we are and make us more than just another Catholic Church! If the Eparchs truly do want to do away with Slavonic and our heritage, then they are basically trying to destroy the church and do away with their own jobs. What advantage is there in doing away with Slavonic?

Tim


Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,564
Likes: 1
F
Member
Member
F Offline
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,564
Likes: 1
It's probably a consequence of a generational phenomenon often found in immigrant ethnic communities - the bishops and priests trying to dump the old language are of the generation which is determined to be "100% American". The following generation usually realizes that something precious has been lost as a result, and starts striving to recover it.

Fr. Serge

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 339
T
Member
Member
T Offline
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 339
Glory to Jesus Christ!

As a member of a parish in the Eparchy of Passaic, I will only add that Slavonic is used in just about every liturgy -- typically, Holy God, the Cherubic Hymn, Holy, holy, holy, It is truly proper, or the Our Father. And this is post-RDL.

In Christ,
Theophilos

Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,373
U
Member
Member
U Offline
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,373
Glad to hear that, especially since there are no Slavonic settings in the new RDL book.

Ungcsertezs

Last edited by Ung-Certez; 12/14/07 05:32 PM.
Page 7 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Link Copied to Clipboard
The Byzantine Forum provides message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial, have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as a source for official information for any Church. All posts become property of byzcath.org. Contents copyright - 1996-2024 (Forum 1998-2024). All rights reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0