1 members (KostaC),
400
guests, and
126
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums26
Topics35,523
Posts417,632
Members6,176
|
Most Online4,112 Mar 25th, 2025
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 27
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 27 |
The old adage "Be careful of what you ask for. You just might get it..." is screaming at me right now. Hi John. Thanks for your input, though, I am now (through no fault of yours) more confused than ever. Let me ask this and then leave this issue alone for now - Is the new metropolitan then the highest authority (at least generally speaking) in this country in the Byzantine Church? There is no "bishop's conference" in the Byzantine rite that would be a higher authority than he, is there? Oh, and one more thing: The new Metropolitan Archbishop of Pittsburgh, Basil Schott, will be the head of the "Sui Juris" (self-governing) Byzantine Catholic Church in the USA, which officially is subordinate only to the Pope. This one threw me a bit. I was under the impression that the Byzantine rite as a whole, throughout the world, would have one leader (patriarch?) under the Pope. Do the metropolitans/bishops/patriarchs of the rite in every country all hold equal authority with each other underneath the Pope? Thanks again. Greg [ 05-04-2002: Message edited by: Mystic ]
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 27
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 27 |
Lance,
Thank you. I will do that.
Mike,
Yes, I know. Sorry, I worded that post poorly.
Greg
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,688
Moderator Member
|
Moderator Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,688 |
Originally posted by Mike C.: to Mystic:
The plural of monsignor is monsignori. It is not in the chain of command. The title of monsignor is honorific. It is not given to members of a religious order. Actually, the issue is a little more complex depending what country you are from. What makes this more confusing is that when specific bishops are referred to in official documents, the abbreviation "Mons." is used(Italian, Monsignore, French, Monseigneur, literally, "My Lord")(see the Italian vesion of the Vatican press release on page one of this thread when Bishop Basil is referrenced). Thus in countries were the Romance languages are in use "Mons." refers to those in the episcopate. In the English speaking countries "monsignor(s)" refers to the presbyters who have received some form of papal honor. [ 05-04-2002: Message edited by: bisantino ]
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 1998
Posts: 4,337 Likes: 24
Moderator Member
|
Moderator Member
Joined: Aug 1998
Posts: 4,337 Likes: 24 |
Mystic Greg,
Do not cofuse Rite and Church. Several sui iuris Churches may share the same rite but are seperate jurisdictionally speaking. I offer this brief outline, detailing which Churches use which rite and what dignity the chief hierarch holds. The chief hierarch answers to no one else but the Holy Father.
Byzantine Rite Churches:
Melkite-Patriarch Ukrainian-Major Archbishop Romanian-Metropolitan Ruthenian(USA)-Metropolitan Ruthenian(Ukraine)-Eparch/Bishop Croatian-Eparch/Bishop Slovak-Eparch/Bishop Hungarian-Eparch/Bishop Italo-Albanian/Greek-Eparch/Bishop Greek-Exarch/Bishop Bulgarian-Exarch/Bishop Macedonian-Exarch/Bishop Russian-Exarch/currently without hierarch Belarusan-Exarch/currently without hierarch
Syrian Rite Churches:
Syriac-Patriarch Syro-Malankar-Metropolitan
Chaldean Rite Churches:
Chaldean/Assyrian-Patriarch Syro-Malabar-Major Archbishop
The following Churches all follow the Rite desiganted by their name:
Coptic-Patriarch
Maronite-Patriarch
Armenian-Patriarch
Ethiopian-Metropolitan
My cromulent posts embiggen this forum.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 64
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 64 |
+Christ is Risen! Indeed He is Risen!!
Lance,
Excellent outline! :-)
May our God grant our two new hierarchs many happy, healthy, and holy years and lead and strengthen them well in His holy work! Glory to God! Glory to Him Forever!
God bless you all.
[ 05-04-2002: Message edited by: Liz ]
[ 05-04-2002: Message edited by: Liz ]
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 780
Administrator Member
|
Administrator Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 780 |
Mystic, Lance sort of answers the questions you asked: Let me ask this and then leave this issue alone for now - Is the new metropolitan then the highest authority (at least generally speaking) in this country in the Byzantine Church? There is no "bishop's conference" in the Byzantine rite that would be a higher authority than he, is there? However, the answer may not be clear. First, there is no such thing as the "Byzantine Church" -- the term "Byzantine" refers to a Rite which is used by 14 Churches (which Lance has listed). The new Metropolitan is the "top dog" in the Ruthenian Church in the United States. As in the Latin Church the Bishops' Conference does not outweigh the head of the Church, although, unlike the Latin Church, it has more authority and power. Edward, deacon and sinner. [ 05-04-2002: Message edited by: FrDeaconEd ]
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 443
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 443 |
Hi,
The Lord said to St. Francis "My house is falling down. I want you to rebuild it." We have 3 Franciscans as Hierarchs. It's meant to be. Our Church is going to be just fine.
Nicky's Baba
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 268
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 268 |
Originally posted by FrDeaconEd: Mystic,
Lance sort of answers the questions you asked: However, the answer may not be clear. First, there is no such thing as the "Byzantine Church" -- the term "Byzantine" refers to a Rite which is used by 14 Churches (which Lance has listed).
The new Metropolitan is the "top dog" in the Ruthenian Church in the United States. As in the Latin Church the Bishops' Conference does not outweigh the head of the Church, although, unlike the Latin Church, it has more authority and power.
Edward, deacon and sinner.
[ 05-04-2002: Message edited by: FrDeaconEd ] Actually this is somewhat inaccurate. The offical name, promoted by every Ruthenian Greek Catholic Church I have been to, is the Byzantine Catholic Church. This is the official name of the Ruthenian Greek Catholic Church. The term "Ruthenian" is minimized in America, except when you want to differentiate yourselves, especially from your brother's and sister's on the other side of the Carpathians, the Ukrainians (Ruthenians too!) It is dishonest (MHO). For if what was important was being Byzantine Catholic, why does the Ruthenian Church in America conitue to promote two Byzantine Churches in Ukraine? When, in fact, it would be more benefical to be part of one Byzantine Catholic Church in Ukraine and the continued effort to seperate yourselves from anything Ukrainian only further alienates the people of Transcarpathia from the society in which they aare a part of. Why does'nt the Ruthenian Church in America also promote the idea of a "Ruthenian" Greek Catholic Church in Slovakia and other European nations which encompass your conceptual "homeland" Ruthenia? ALity
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 268
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 268 |
May the Holy Spirit dwell within the newly appointed Archbishop of Pittsburgh and bishop-elect of Parma.
May God grant the Church continued spiritual growth and a renewal of our Holy Orthodox traditons.
May God grant us one united Church of Kyiv-Rus, so that we may serve one another in faith, hope and love, witnessing the love of Christ to all nations.
Christ is Risen!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 571
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 571 |
Slava Isusu Christu!
I have a question: were does His Grace Bishop Basil stand on the Orthodox barometer. From a scale of 1-10 how Orthodox would he be? Is he latinized at all - being that he is a Franciscan? Why do you think Rome chose him to be the next Metropolitan for our Church? Will he follow the vision of Metropolitan Judson? These are just a few questions I have. I do not know Bishop Basil that is why I am asking. Thank you.
In Christ,
Robert Horwath
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,700
Administrator Member
|
Administrator Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,700 |
Dear Robert,
Christ is Risen!
I understand your curiousity about our new Metropolitan. However, in my poor opinion, I must ask, if there is a time when such questions are almost inappropriate?
"Why Rome chose him", is a question only Rome can answer, of course. But I think we must presume, that he was chosen because he was the best man for the job!
"Will he share Metropolitan Judson's vision?" He is not Metropolitan Judson, but he will be Metropolitan Basil, and I think we will have to look forward to the time when he will articulate his own vision for our Church, and initiate his own style of leadership.
"How Orthodox is he?" He made a full profession of the Orthodox and Catholic faith when he was ordained a bishop.
If I sound a little irritated by these questions, (and the tone of some of the other posts in this thread), I am sorry.
Would I be out of line (the Administrator may correct me) to suggest that there is a time when we should merely offer the support of our prayers, as these newly appointed leaders take up their duties? This is a difficult time for the Churches, and I dare say these newly appointed leaders need the support of our prayers, more than we need our curiousity satisfied.
Let us allow Bishop Basil, and Archpriest John, to begin their ministry with all our support. And let us keep an open mind, disdaining others' opinions, giving ourselves credit to form our own after a suitable time.
With apologies, for daring to speak so boldly...
Elias
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 788
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 788 |
Elias,
No need to apologize, at least to me. I have found these comments a little unseemly myself, and not one that show Catholicism in a very positive light to this Orthodox. I'm more impressed by a spiritual man of God than some-one nitpicking out liturgical "latinisms".
Axios
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,405 Likes: 38
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,405 Likes: 38 |
Dear Friends, Well, the mystery of the hierachical order of the Churches is even moreso for me now . . . As for the new Franciscan Hierarchs, I offer up St Francis' blessing: The Lord bless them and keep them, The Lord make His Face to shine on them and be gracious unto them, The Lord lift up His Countenance upon them and grant them Peace! May our Lord bless them - through the prayers of Our Lady of the Angels and of our Venerable and God-Bearing Father, Francis of Assisi. Amen! Alex
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 421
Moderator
|
Moderator
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 421 |
I hope that Father Elias will excuse me for chiming in, but I can't help my self. One of my friends is a seminarian for the eparchy of Parma, and knows Bishop Basil well. He has told me on numerous occassions that our new Metropolitan is a great supporter of restoring Eastern traditions. Other evidence that I have seen confirms this. In short, we are in very good hands! Anthony
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,405 Likes: 38
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,405 Likes: 38 |
Dear Anthony,
And excuse me for ringing my mission bell here . . .
When I see you ordained a married priest by the new Metropolitan . . .
I'll make a novena to St Francis!!
Alex
|
|
|
|
|