The Byzantine Forum
Newest Members
bluedawg, AndrewGre12, miloslav_jc, King Iyk, BlindEyes
6,136 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 276 guests, and 72 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
by orthodoxsinner2, September 30
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
by Veronica.H, April 24
Byzantine Catholic Outreach of Iowa
Exterior of Holy Angels Byzantine Catholic Parish
Church of St Cyril of Turau & All Patron Saints of Belarus
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics35,493
Posts417,361
Members6,136
Most Online3,380
Dec 29th, 2019
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 16
Junior Member
Junior Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 16
A Catholic friend of mine told me that Catholics believe that the Orthodox are part of the "True Church."

Is he right when he says this?

Dave Armstrong said in his book Orthodoxy and Catholicism: A Comparison that Catholics "must believe that Orthodoxy is a part of the universal Church." He cites the Vat II and Papal encyclicals.

All this sounds heretical to me.

Sure they have Apostolic Succession, and sure they are Churches, but that doesn't make them any less schismatic from the visible Church of Christ.

Does it?

I have been led to believe that the Catholic Church is the True Church of Christ, and the EO, even though they have Apostolic Succession and valid sacraments, are in schism with the True Church.

I am I wrong on this? If I am, can y'all show me how from like the CCC or something authoritave?

I want to make sure that my understanding of the Church is following Catholic dogma. I am still learning about the Catholic Faith and I really am confused now.


Thanks in advance.

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 951
Likes: 1
M
Member
Member
M Offline
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 951
Likes: 1
The Orthodox Church is not a part of the True Church, neither she is a defective Church, as someone said in a recent time.

The Holy Orthodox Church is the True Church of Christ, and she has fullnesses of truth.

m+

Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 16
Junior Member
Junior Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 16
Are you Orthodox?

Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 31
Likes: 1
A
Hi!
Member
Hi!
Member
A Offline
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 31
Likes: 1
Hello, :-)
I have a few thoughts on this, but not the time to put them all down.
Originally Posted by Knightwolf
A Catholic friend of mine told me that Catholics believe that the Orthodox are part of the "True Church."

Is he right when he says this?

Dave Armstrong said in his book Orthodoxy and Catholicism: A Comparison that Catholics "must believe that Orthodoxy is a part of the universal Church." He cites the Vat II and Papal encyclicals.

All this sounds heretical to me.

Sure they have Apostolic Succession, and sure they are Churches, but that doesn't make them any less schismatic from the visible Church of Christ.

Does it?

I have been led to believe that the Catholic Church is the True Church of Christ, and the EO, even though they have Apostolic Succession and valid sacraments, are in schism with the True Church.

Well, the Eastern Orthodox Church has mutual felling about the nature of Schism, except we Catholics are the one's who are Schismatic. I know that many Catholic will say that the Eastern Orthodox are schismatic, but I much prefer to buck the trend. So long as the feeling is mutual, the schism will not end! I fond it to be a contradiction in terms to say that the Eastern Orthodox have true Apostolic succession and sacraments, but are not part of the true Church of Christ. One of the marks of the Church is being Apostolic. (This is my opinion.)

Quote
I am I wrong on this? If I am, can y'all show me how from like the CCC or something authoritave?

I want to make sure that my understanding of the Church is following Catholic dogma. I am still learning about the Catholic Faith and I really am confused now.


Thanks in advance.

Are you new to the Church, or just new to learning about the Church?

I do hope that you get the answers you are looking for from this thread.

God Bless,
R.

P.S. I will return to draw out my thoughts.

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 951
Likes: 1
M
Member
Member
M Offline
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 951
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Knightwolf
Are you Orthodox?

Yes.

Joined: May 2007
Posts: 212
A
Member
Member
A Offline
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 212
Originally Posted by Knightwolf
A Catholic friend of mine told me that Catholics believe that the Orthodox are part of the "True Church."

Is he right when he says this?

Yes it is

The term "True Churches" has been officially used by the Vatican Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith in its declaration Dominus Iesus (link [vatican.va]):
"The Churches which, while not existing in perfect communion with the Catholic Church, remain united to her by means of the closest bonds, that is, by apostolic succession and a valid Eucharist, are True particular Churches."

Last edited by antv; 03/18/08 05:21 PM.
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,528
Grateful
Member
Grateful
Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,528
Hi Knightwolf,

Welcome to the Forum.

If you want to check on someone's religion here (like when you asked Marian is he is Orthodox), you can just check his or her profile. Usually, it states what church or religion a person belongs to.

As for the official Catholic view, the Catholic Church believes it (alone) is the True Church in all of its Fullness. As such, it views the Orthodox as separated and (may I be frank?) lesser brothers in Christ. It has an even dimmer view of Protestants and, well, you get the picture. I'm sure the participants at the website "Catholic Answers" (most of whom are arch-conservative Roman Catholics) will be happy to assist you in finding the references to these points.

Unsurprisingly, members of those other churches and religions have a different opinion on the matter.

Be well.

-- John

Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,678
Likes: 1
L
Member
Member
L Offline
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,678
Likes: 1
Really? I think there are a lot of "wacky liberals" over at Catholic Answers. A frighteningly large number of posters over there don't know much about Catholicism, ironically. Not saying that I do, but I think I at least have the basics and then some. A lot of people over there seem not to.

Anyway, the Catholic Church has said time and time (and time and time) again that the Catholic Church is the True Church of Christ. The Eastern Orthodox Churches are "Churches" because they have Apostolic Succession, but the fulness of the Faith is not found there (according to us Catholics). The Protestant communities are not Churches in any sense, but are "ecclesial communities," whatever that means.

Alexis

Last edited by Logos - Alexis; 03/18/08 07:25 PM.
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,306
Likes: 91
Moderator
Member
Moderator
Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,306
Likes: 91
Quote
A Catholic friend of mine told me that Catholics believe that the Orthodox are part of the "True Church."

Is he right when he says this?

Dave Armstrong said in his book Orthodoxy and Catholicism: A Comparison that Catholics "must believe that Orthodoxy is a part of the universal Church." He cites the Vat II and Papal encyclicals.

All this sounds heretical to me.

Sure they have Apostolic Succession, and sure they are Churches, but that doesn't make them any less schismatic from the visible Church of Christ.

Does it?

I have been led to believe that the Catholic Church is the True Church of Christ, and the EO, even though they have Apostolic Succession and valid sacraments, are in schism with the True Church.

I am I wrong on this? If I am, can y'all show me how from like the CCC or something authoritave?

Knightwolf:

Welcome to the Byzantine forum.

You might start with the Catechism of the Catholic Church because the information you have within your post is about 45 years out of date. Beginning with the Vatican Council some 40+ years ago, a new way of looking at our brethren in the Lord has come about and the way in which we express it has been changed. We do not refer to our Orthodox brethren as being in schism, though we do not share Eucharistic communion as of this date. We all approach the past millenium as an extremely sad period of our common history. That Churches that share a common Apostolic heritage should be separated is cause for great sadness. Pope JP2 of blessed memory made a public apology to our Orthodox brethren for offenses the Latin Church made in the past millenium. We need to approach each other in humilty and repentance.

The Vatican Council stated that the Catholic Church, mentioned in the Nicene Creed, of which we believe we are the visible representation today subsists in our communion. But what you have missed is that subsistit is not est: est is the verb "to be" a statement of equality that shuts down any other relationship. The Council also stated that there are many ways of belonging to the Catholic Church: all who enjoy the relationship with God established with Baptism are in some way part of us even though we cannot see how that is possible now.

So, please, in charity, go to the official Catholic sources and begin to expand your education about how others who are followers of Jesus Christ are already our brethren in the Lord and pray for the day when the Holy Spirit cuts through the bad blood we have created by our own sin. The CCC begins with paragraphs 830 to 838 with this instruction. Then there is the paragraph "Characteristics of the People of God" (782) which states that "One becomes a member of (the People of God) . . . by being "born anew" . . . by faith in Christ, and Baptism."

Take a little time to read Pope JP2's Ut Unum Sint.

There are many genuine Christian people you will meet here who share the Apostolic Faith in Christ. After getting to know them, you'll understand the full tragedy that we are not now one. But we all love and respect each other and pray for the day that we will be one at the Table of the Lord. One prayer for that purpose is posted at the top of our Prayer thread.

In Christ,

BOB

Last edited by theophan; 03/18/08 07:29 PM.
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,758
Likes: 29
John
Member
John
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,758
Likes: 29
Originally Posted by Knightwolf
A Catholic friend of mine told me that Catholics believe that the Orthodox are part of the "True Church."

Is he right when he says this?

Dave Armstrong said in his book Orthodoxy and Catholicism: A Comparison that Catholics "must believe that Orthodoxy is a part of the universal Church." He cites the Vat II and Papal encyclicals.
David Armstrong is correct.

Open your Catholic Catechism to section 838 to starter:
Quote
838 "The Church knows that she is joined in many ways to the baptized who are honored by the name of Christian, but do not profess the Catholic faith in its entirety or have not preserved unity or communion under the successor of Peter." Those "who believe in Christ and have been properly baptized are put in a certain, although imperfect, communion with the Catholic Church." [i]With the Orthodox Churches,[i] this communion is so profound "that it lacks little to attain the fullness that would permit a common celebration of the Lord's Eucharist."
All Christians are brothers in the truest sense of the word. From the Catholic perspective those who are Orthodox have an imperfect membership in the Catholic Church. Pope John Paul the Great stated that the term �schism� was too strong a word to describe the remaining separation.

I highly recommend looking up the Vatican II and papal documents. They make this very clear.

Welcome to the Forum!

Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,678
Likes: 1
L
Member
Member
L Offline
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,678
Likes: 1
"From the Catholic perspective those who are Orthodox have an imperfect membership in the Catholic Church."

I didn't know this. Could you quote official documents that must be believed by Catholics that say exactly this? Do these documents have dogmatic weight? I sometimes think these terms can get very confusing. We can say that all the baptized are brought into some special communion with the Holy Trinity, and in that sense all the baptized have "an imperfect membership" in the Church, and the Orthodox would be no different.

Obviously, the Catechism says that something is "lacking" in a fullness that would permit celebrating the Eucharist together though it doesn't state what that is. I feel that a lot of people on here will probably say the thing that's "lacking" is just the Orthodox willingness to do so, whereas perhaps other Catholics would say that it is because the Eastern Orthodox are schismatic.

Alexis

Last edited by Logos - Alexis; 03/18/08 07:40 PM.
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,678
Likes: 1
L
Member
Member
L Offline
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,678
Likes: 1
"You might start with the Catechism of the Catholic Church because the information you have within your post is about 45 years out of date. Beginning with the Vatican Council some 40+ years ago, a new way of looking at our brethren in the Lord has come about and the way in which we express it has been changed."

Maybe he should check back in a few years from now and make sure the information and perspective hasn't changed again. Who knows?

My point is, truth can't change. If it were true 40 years ago, it's true today. The way in which opinions are expressed can change, and certainly have, but the ideas behind them can't contradict something previously taught.

Alexis

Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 510
M
Member
Member
M Offline
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 510
C. I. X.

Harmon, your welcoming directive is what I guess mission churches say we are in need of. In the profile when truthful information is offered it does help gage from what perspective the person viewing the matter at hand may be coming from. A North American�s viewer will probably be assumed more liberal than that of an European. �Semantics" are the toys of some �cuteness� of others. Of cores those who give their location as �under the stars� leaves us clueless. In North America (major) city can provide more insight and age could be enlightening on where their perspective may have formed, yet some like it anonymous.

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,758
Likes: 29
John
Member
John
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,758
Likes: 29
Originally Posted by Logos-Alexis
Originally Posted by Administrator
"From the Catholic perspective those who are Orthodox have an imperfect membership in the Catholic Church."
I didn't know this. Could you quote official documents that must be believed by Catholics that say exactly this? Do these documents have dogmatic weight?
Are you suggesting that the Catechism does not provide a reasonable explanation of Church Teaching?

Quote
Vatican II: Lumen Gentium
15. The Church recognizes that in many ways she is linked with those who, being baptized, are honored with the name of Christian, though they do not profess the faith in its entirety or do not preserve unity of communion with the successor of Peter. (14*) For there are many who honor Sacred Scripture, taking it as a norm of belief and a pattern of life, and who show a sincere zeal. They lovingly believe in God the Father Almighty and in Christ, the Son of God and Saviour. (15*) They are consecrated by baptism, in which they are united with Christ. They also recognize and accept other sacraments within their own Churches or ecclesiastical communities. Many of them rejoice in the episcopate, celebrate the Holy Eucharist and cultivate devotion toward the Virgin Mother of God.(16*) They also share with us in prayer and other spiritual benefits. Likewise we can say that in some real way they are joined with us in the Holy Spirit, for to them too He gives His gifts and graces whereby He is operative among them with His sanctifying power. Some indeed He has strengthened to the extent of the shedding of their blood. In all of Christ's disciples the Spirit arouses the desire to be peacefully united, in the manner determined by Christ, as one flock under one shepherd, and He prompts them to pursue this end. (17*) Mother Church never ceases to pray, hope and work that this may come about. She exhorts her children to purification and renewal so that the sign of Christ may shine more brightly over the face of the earth.

Quote
Vatican II: Decree on Ecumenism
3. Even in the beginnings of this one and only Church of God there arose certain rifts,(19) which the Apostle strongly condemned.(20) But in subsequent centuries much more serious dissensions made their appearance and quite large communities came to be separated from full communion with the Catholic Church-for which, often enough, men of both sides were to blame. The children who are born into these Communities and who grow up believing in Christ cannot be accused of the sin involved in the separation, and the Catholic Church embraces upon them as brothers, with respect and affection. For men who believe in Christ and have been truly baptized are in communion with the Catholic Church even though this communion is imperfect. The differences that exist in varying degrees between them and the Catholic Church-whether in doctrine and sometimes in discipline, or concerning the structure of the Church-do indeed create many obstacles, sometimes serious ones, to full ecclesiastical communion. The ecumenical movement is striving to overcome these obstacles. But even in spite of them it remains true that all who have been justified by faith in Baptism are members of Christ's body,(21) and have a right to be called Christian, and so are correctly accepted as brothers by the children of the Catholic Church.(22)

Moreover, some and even very many of the significant elements and endowments which together go to build up and give life to the Church itself, can exist outside the visible boundaries of the Catholic Church: the written word of God; the life of grace; faith, hope and charity, with the other interior gifts of the Holy Spirit, and visible elements too. All of these, which come from Christ and lead back to Christ, belong by right to the one Church of Christ.

The brethren divided from us also use many liturgical actions of the Christian religion. These most certainly can truly engender a life of grace in ways that vary according to the condition of each Church or Community. These liturgical actions must be regarded as capable of giving access to the community of salvation.

It follows that the separated Churches(23) and Communities as such, though we believe them to be deficient in some respects, have been by no means deprived of significance and importance in the mystery of salvation. For the Spirit of Christ has not refrained from using them as means of salvation which derive their efficacy from the very fullness of grace and truth entrusted to the Church.

Nevertheless, our separated brethren, whether considered as individuals or as Communities and Churches, are not blessed with that unity which Jesus Christ wished to bestow on all those who through Him were born again into one body, and with Him quickened to newness of life-that unity which the Holy Scriptures and the ancient Tradition of the Church proclaim. For it is only through Christ's Catholic Church, which is "the all-embracing means of salvation," that they can benefit fully from the means of salvation. We believe that Our Lord entrusted all the blessings of the New Covenant to the apostolic college alone, of which Peter is the head, in order to establish the one Body of Christ on earth to which all should be fully incorporated who belong in any way to the people of God. This people of God, though still in its members liable to sin, is ever growing in Christ during its pilgrimage on earth, and is guided by God's gentle wisdom, according to His hidden designs, until it shall happily arrive at the fullness of eternal glory in the heavenly Jerusalem.
Also see sections 13-16.

Quote
Vatican II: Decree on Ecumenism
15. Everyone also knows with what great love the Christians of the East celebrate the sacred liturgy, especially the eucharistic celebration, source of the Church's life and pledge of future glory, in which the faithful, united with their bishop, have access to God the Father through the Son, the Word made flesh, Who suffered and has been glorified, and so, in the outpouring of the Holy Spirit, they enter into communion with the most holy Trinity, being made "sharers of the divine nature".(35) Hence, through the celebration of the Holy Eucharist in each of these churches, the Church of God is built up and grows in stature(36) and through concelebration, their communion with one another is made manifest.

In this liturgical worship, the Christians of the East pay high tribute, in beautiful hymns of praise, to Mary ever Virgin, whom the ecumenical Council of Ephesus solemnly proclaimed to be the holy Mother of God, so that Christ might be acknowledged as being truly Son of God and Son of Man, according to the Scriptures. Many also are the saints whose praise they sing, among them the Fathers of the universal Church.

These Churches, although separated from us, yet possess true sacraments and above all, by apostolic succession, the priesthood and the Eucharist, whereby they are linked with us in closest intimacy. Therefore some worship in common (communicatio in sacris), given suitable circumstances and the approval of Church authority, is not only possible but to be encouraged.
There is no change in Truth here. The Church does, however, mature in the way she understands and speaks about what is true.

Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,678
Likes: 1
L
Member
Member
L Offline
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,678
Likes: 1
Ahh okay, so as I suggested in my post above, all the baptized are imperfectly united to the Church. The way you phrased your first post made it seem like you were saying that that only held for the Eastern Orthodox, not all of the baptized. I apologize if I misunderstood you.

Alexis

Page 1 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Moderated by  Irish Melkite 

Link Copied to Clipboard
The Byzantine Forum provides message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial, have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as a source for official information for any Church. All posts become property of byzcath.org. Contents copyright - 1996-2024 (Forum 1998-2024). All rights reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0