The Byzantine Forum
Newest Members
ElijahHarvest, Nickel78, Trebnyk1947, John Francis R, Keinn
6,150 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 1,087 guests, and 72 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
by orthodoxsinner2, September 30
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
by Veronica.H, April 24
Byzantine Catholic Outreach of Iowa
Exterior of Holy Angels Byzantine Catholic Parish
Church of St Cyril of Turau & All Patron Saints of Belarus
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics35,506
Posts417,454
Members6,150
Most Online3,380
Dec 29th, 2019
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 8 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,264
Member
Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,264
Mary,

Of course, one may also find some insight as well into Metropolitan John Zizoulas's description of all those who are ordained as "ecclesial persons".

Gordo

Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,564
Likes: 1
F
Member
Member
F Offline
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,564
Likes: 1
Since the Catholic Church fully recognizes the sacramental forms used by the various Eastern liturgical traditions, and these forms are not worded as that paragraph quotes "I baptize . . . I absolve . . . " etc. It would appear that the paragraph is not of ecumenical significance. This is the more true in that I have nowhere encountered such forms as "I consecrate . . ." or "I communicate thee . . . " in relation to the Eucharist.

Moreover, a paragraph in the catechism is of less importance than a dogmatic statement of a general council.

Fr. Serge

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 571
Member
Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 571
Originally Posted by ebed melech
Thank you, Father Serge, for your explanation. I agree with your distinction.

Blessings this weekend on your 40th anniversary of ordination!

God grant you many years!

God bless,

Gordo
Hi Gordo,

I hope your trip was fruitful.
May I add my prayers and felicitations to Fr. Serge for his 40th anniversary of ordination!

Michael


Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,264
Member
Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,264
Originally Posted by ebed melech
Mary,

Of course, one may also find some insight as well into Metropolitan John Zizoulas's description of all those who are ordained as "ecclesial persons".

Gordo

I was being rushed out the door by my kiddos and so did not have the opportunity to complete my thought:

Insofar as the Pope as Bishop of Rome, Patriarch of the Latin West and Successor of St. Peter is an ecclesial person the charism of infallibility is a personal charism. Insofar as he is simply an individual human person, it is not a personal charism, say as one might regard a personal possession. All charisms are ultimately for the building up of the Body of Christ.

I also think about Archbishop Joseph's point of in The Face of God that the Pope's authority is personal and does not reside within the various congregations, save those decisions which receive his direct approbation. There does have to be some personal dimension to the full range of charisms granted to his or any other bishop's office.

God bless,

Gordo

PS: Michael, it was a great trip!

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 571
Member
Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 571
Gordo,

Originally Posted by ebed melech
I was being rushed out the door by my kiddos and so did not have the opportunity to complete my thought:
Ouch. Don't you hate it when that happens!

Originally Posted by ebed melech
The Pope [is] ... Patriarch of the Latin West
Apparently, no longer. I think he renounced this title last year. I didn't understand the true import of it from the news reports. I wonder if anyone on the Forums could explain the rationale?

Removal of 'Patriarch of the West' [catholicnews.com]

Originally Posted by ebed melech
I also think about Archbishop Joseph's point of in The Face of God that the Pope's authority is personal and does not reside within the various congregations, save those decisions which receive his direct approbation. There does have to be some personal dimension to the full range of charisms granted to his or any other bishop's office.
I am unacquainted with Archbishop Joseph. Who is he, and where is his See? This view seems uncontroversial to me, but perhaps that is because his view was already incorporated into theology by the time I studied it?

Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,555
Member
Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,555
Originally Posted by Serge Keleher
Since the Catholic Church fully recognizes the sacramental forms used by the various Eastern liturgical traditions, and these forms are not worded as that paragraph quotes "I baptize . . . I absolve . . . " etc. It would appear that the paragraph is not of ecumenical significance. This is the more true in that I have nowhere encountered such forms as "I consecrate . . ." or "I communicate thee . . . " in relation to the Eucharist.

Moreover, a paragraph in the catechism is of less importance than a dogmatic statement of a general council.

Fr. Serge

Unless one's name is Sullivan, this is a helpful clarification from Archbishop Tarcisio Bertone.

http://www.cin.org/vatcong/md&pd.html


Last edited by Elijahmaria; 05/25/07 08:01 AM.
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,555
Member
Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,555
Originally Posted by ebed melech
Insofar as the Pope as Bishop of Rome, Patriarch of the Latin West and Successor of St. Peter is an ecclesial person the charism of infallibility is a personal charism. Insofar as he is simply an individual human person, it is not a personal charism, say as one might regard a personal possession. All charisms are ultimately for the building up of the Body of Christ.

I also think about Archbishop Joseph's point of in The Face of God that the Pope's authority is personal and does not reside within the various congregations, save those decisions which receive his direct approbation. There does have to be some personal dimension to the full range of charisms granted to his or any other bishop's office.

God bless,

Gordo

In my estimation the 20th century, in terms of Catholic and Orthodox Catholic theology, was the Century of the Person.

I expect that the 21st century will be examining the production of that century in light of Communion.

For my part, it is fervently to be hoped that the good work continues.

Mary

Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,555
Member
Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,555
Here is another useful explanatory text in the discussion of infallibility and teaching authority exerised through the Church.

http://www.ignatiusinsight.com/features2006/wmay_authority_nov06.asp

Last edited by Elijahmaria; 05/25/07 08:21 AM.
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 11
M
Deacon
Junior Member
Deacon
Junior Member
M Offline
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 11
Originally Posted by Elijahmaria
Unless one's name is Sullivan, this is a helpful clarification from Archbishop Tarcisio Bertone.

http://www.cin.org/vatcong/md&pd.html


I am mildly curious as what was meant by "Unless one's name is Sullivan"?

Your servant in Christ,
Deacon Michael (Husvar) Sullivan

Page 8 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Moderated by  theophan 

Link Copied to Clipboard
The Byzantine Forum provides message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial, have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as a source for official information for any Church. All posts become property of byzcath.org. Contents copyright - 1996-2024 (Forum 1998-2024). All rights reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0