The Byzantine Forum
Newest Members
Frank O, BC LV, returningtoaxum, Jennifer B, geodude
6,176 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
1 members (KostaC), 448 guests, and 115 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
by orthodoxsinner2, September 30
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
by Veronica.H, April 24
Byzantine Catholic Outreach of Iowa
Exterior of Holy Angels Byzantine Catholic Parish
Church of St Cyril of Turau & All Patron Saints of Belarus
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics35,524
Posts417,637
Members6,176
Most Online4,112
Mar 25th, 2025
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 89
S
Member
Member
S Offline
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 89
For a while now, I have been using two Greek New Testament editions for study. The first is, "The New Testament in the Original Greek, Byzantine Textform" edited by M. A. Robertson and W. G. Pierpont. The other is, "The Greek New Testament According to the Majority Text", edited by Z. C. Hodges and A. L. Farstad. The two were prepared using similar text ctitical methods and are nearly alike (but not quite).

I have been told that these printed editions are quite similar to the official Greek New Testament maintained by the Orthodox Church. I would be pleased if someone could advise me if this be true or not.

Thanks!

τω συστρατιωτης

Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 787
F
Member
Member
F Offline
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 787
Originally Posted by Systratiotes
For a while now, I have been using two Greek New Testament editions for study. The first is, "The New Testament in the Original Greek, Byzantine Textform" edited by M. A. Robertson and W. G. Pierpont. The other is, "The Greek New Testament According to the Majority Text", edited by Z. C. Hodges and A. L. Farstad. The two were prepared using similar text ctitical methods and are nearly alike (but not quite).

I have been told that these printed editions are quite similar to the official Greek New Testament maintained by the Orthodox Church. I would be pleased if someone could advise me if this be true or not.

Thanks!

τω συστρατιωτης
I am not familiar with the first publication, though it sounds as though it might be the Church's text. If it is, it would be excellent to use.

I am very familiar with "The Greek New Testament According to the Majority Text", edited by Z. C. Hodges and A. L. Farstad. I have it, and I like it very much because (a) the Greek is close to the Church's Text, (b) the apparatus giving the variants of the various Greek texts in use is a wonderful tool, and (c) I think that they have done the interlinear English text in a very helpful way.

The Received Text of the Greek New Testament (the Textus Receptus), however, is closer to the Church's text than is the Majority Text. For example, the Church's text does include the famous Johannine Comma (I John 5:7), as does the Received Text, whereas the Majority Text does not include it. For that reason I also have the "Interlinear KJV Parallel Greek-English New Testament" edited by George Ricker Berry and consult it for the Textus Receptus.

Fr David Straut


Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 89
S
Member
Member
S Offline
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 89
Thank you, Fr. Straut!

Hodges and Farstad in fact used a double textual apparatus, and I agree it is quite helpful. I gave my copy of G. R. Berry's edition to a brother who needed one. I have a copy of the original "Englishman's Greek Testament" edited by Mr. Thomas Newberry. So for me G.R. Berry's "reproduction" was surplus.

You probably know the TR is not one single published Greek Text but a few. The Newberry edition (and Berry's by default) utilizes the 1550 Stephanus (Robert Estienne) "Royal" GNT and has a textual apparatus compiled by Mr. C. E. Stuart which reflects alternate readings from other TR editions. I know this because I used it for years and am familiar with the works of those two brothers.

As you correctly wrote, the 1550 Stephanus/Estienne GNT does indeed contain the so-called "Johannine Comma". But it seems his 1552 edition does not. Curious thing, eh?


τω συστρατιωτης


Moderated by  theophan 

Link Copied to Clipboard
The Byzantine Forum provides message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial, have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as a source for official information for any Church. All posts become property of byzcath.org. Contents copyright - 1996-2024 (Forum 1998-2024). All rights reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0