The Byzantine Forum
Newest Members
PoboznyNeil, Hammerz75, SSLOBOD, Jayce, Fr. Abraham
6,185 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
3 members (bwfackler, Adamcsc, theophan), 416 guests, and 92 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
by orthodoxsinner2, September 30
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
by Veronica.H, April 24
Byzantine Catholic Outreach of Iowa
Exterior of Holy Angels Byzantine Catholic Parish
Church of St Cyril of Turau & All Patron Saints of Belarus
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics35,533
Posts417,711
Members6,185
Most Online4,112
Mar 25th, 2025
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#312914 02/17/09 11:50 PM
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,028
A
Member
Member
A Offline
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,028
I just saw this wonderful webpage, containing the clearest pictures I've seen of Orthodox incorruptibles:

http://www.genuineorthodoxchurch.net/miraclesrelics.html

My only quibble is that the skull of St. John the Baptist is obviously not incorrupt.

One thing that impresses me is the way these incorrupt bodies are displayed without any cosmetic enhancements, wax masks and casings, or preservative treatments. I actually find these to be more edifying than the heavily waxed and enhanced bodies of not a few Catholic saints.

Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 213
Member
Member
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 213
Someone needs to cover St. Gregory of Sinai's mouth.

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 53
Member
Member
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 53
Thanks for the pics.
nun Alexandra

Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 221
Member
Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 221
Very interesting, thanks Asian Pilgrim.

Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,678
Likes: 1
L
Member
Member
L Offline
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,678
Likes: 1
Asianpilgrim,

But there are likewise many Catholic saints whose remains are shown as incorruptible for veneration who have had no work whatever.

I would also add that most of these pre-Schism saints on this page are also Catholic saints, just in possession of the Orthodox.

Alexis

Last edited by Logos - Alexis; 02/19/09 03:03 PM.
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,528
Grateful
Member
Grateful
Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,528
Thank you, asianpilgrim. Those were interesting photographs.

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,268
A
Member
Member
A Offline
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,268
These are the most famous "incorruptibles" of the Catholic Church:

http://listverse.com/religion/top-10-incorrupt-corpses/

Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,518
Catholic Gyoza
Member
Catholic Gyoza
Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,518
I'm sorry, but St. Zita and a number of the Orthodox Saints in the earlier post look no different to me than any mummy that one can see in a museum. In fact, Dr. Bob Brier examined an "incorruptible" Catholic Saint on one of the "scientific" channels on cable and found that she had in fact been mummified.

Joined: Aug 1998
Posts: 4,337
Likes: 24
Moderator
Member
Moderator
Member
Joined: Aug 1998
Posts: 4,337
Likes: 24
Glad to know it just not me thinking that. Perhaps miraculously preserved would be a better designation because to me incorruptible means just that incorrupt, no discoloration, no deterioration, no shrinkage.


My cromulent posts embiggen this forum.
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,028
A
Member
Member
A Offline
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,028
Originally Posted by Dr. Eric
I'm sorry, but St. Zita and a number of the Orthodox Saints in the earlier post look no different to me than any mummy that one can see in a museum. In fact, Dr. Bob Brier examined an "incorruptible" Catholic Saint on one of the "scientific" channels on cable and found that she had in fact been mummified.


It is true that many "incorruptibles" were in fact mummified. Pope John XXIII is the best example, he was preserved with plastic being injected into his veins and stomach. Joseph Cardinal Slipyj was also mummified.

And many of the "incorruptibles" touted in a lot of Catholic websites are nothing more than the wax casing for the bones of these saints (for some reason, the Italians like putting the bones of saints in wax.) Others, such as Padre Pio, are partially incorrupt and have been fitted with lifelike masks. Still others were indeed found incorrupt upon exhumation, then immediately subjected to preservative treatment (best examples: St. Bernadette and St. Pius X).

(It might be pointed out, though, that Popes are buried within three tightly sealed coffins that are normally buried within a stone sarcophagus, which definitely aid in preserving the body).

However, there are Catholic incorruptibles who have not been subjected to preservatives to this very day. St. Zita is actually one of the best examples of someone whose body has been repeatedly examined and found to be preserved without artificial means. SS. Catherine of Bologna, Claire of Montefalco, Rita of Cascia, Ubald of Gubbio, Hannibal De Francia and others fall under this category.

As a rule, untreated Catholic incorruptibles do look darkened and dried up, same with the Orthodox. However, just because a body looks like a mummy doesnt mean that it is a mummy. And I've seen hundreds of pictures of unwrapped pharaonic mummies and they definitely look far worse than many of the natural, untreated Catholic and Orthodox incorruptibles. Pharaonic mummies tend to have a lot of damage and a lot of awful incisions, and many body parts are often reduced to dust upon discovery.

As for Bob Brier on the Discovery Channel, I've seen the same documentary, and I find it telling that Mr. Brier chose to examine what is, by any account, one of the worst-preserved "incorruptibles" (the Blessed in question had a completely skeletonized head). His snide remarks comparing Catholicism to Egyptian religion and accusing Pope Pius XII of doing nothing for the Jews also cast grave doubt on his impartiality.

Last edited by asianpilgrim; 02/19/09 10:37 PM.
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,028
A
Member
Member
A Offline
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,028
Originally Posted by Logos - Alexis
Asianpilgrim,

But there are likewise many Catholic saints whose remains are shown as incorruptible for veneration who have had no work whatever.
Alexis

Haven't denied that at all. See my other posts.

Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,028
A
Member
Member
A Offline
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,028
Originally Posted by Amadeus
These are the most famous "incorruptibles" of the Catholic Church:

http://listverse.com/religion/top-10-incorrupt-corpses/

Ok, let's go over the list:

1) St. Bernadette -- found incorrupt, but immediately treated in wax afterwards. The "face" is actually a wax mask. I've read a description of the real face and it is dried up and sunken.

2) St. John Vianney -- really incorrupt, but the face is covered with a wax mask. It isn't even an accurate depiction of his face!

3) St. Teresa Margaret -- my kind of "incorruptible"! No preservatives (hence the dark brown color). The teeth are exposed.

4) St. Vincent De Paul -- no longer incorrupt. Bones in wax.

5) Saint Silvan -- I'll be very surprised if this isn't wax!

6) St. Veronica Giuliani -- no longer incorrupt. Bones in wax.

7) St. Zita -- really incorrupt

8) Saint John Bosco -- was never incorrupt. Bones in wax. I've read the account of his exhumation and it clearly speaks of his body being reduced to bones.

9) Pope Pius IX -- really incorrupt, head covered in silver mask. (But the papal coffins...)

10)Pope John XXIII -- oh, dear! The Holy See took pains to make it clear that he was not incorrupt, during the time of his beatification. I guess some apologists just like to fool themselves!

Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,678
Likes: 1
L
Member
Member
L Offline
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,678
Likes: 1
I was sort of perplexed by Abbot Chrysostom of Kakoraztia's inclusion. He reposed in 1988. It seems to me (someone who knows next to nothing about how fast bodies deteoriate, mind you!), that his condition is normal-to-below average on what I would expect an unpreserved person to look like after 20 years.

Alexis

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,520
Likes: 10
G
Member
Member
G Offline
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,520
Likes: 10
Originally Posted by asianpilgrim
My only quibble is that the skull of St. John the Baptist is obviously not incorrupt.

Which skull of John the Baptist??? smile
There are several places that claim to have the
skull.

The one already mentioned in the first post is from the Amiens cathedral in France.

Others include:

Church of San Silvestro in Capite in Rome: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Silvestro_in_Capite

The Royal Residence Museum in Munich, Germany: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3068/2517783717_6b0c6a15f6.jpg?v=0

Topkapi Palace, Constantinople, Turkey
http://www.mgr.org/JdBRelics.jpg

Still other places also claim to have the head or a fragment of it.




Last edited by griego catolico; 02/20/09 02:44 AM.
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,028
A
Member
Member
A Offline
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,028
St. John the Baptist has four skulls? No problem. One was his skull at infancy... another from his adolescence... another from his early adulthood and the last one was the skull he had when he got beheaded. See? Very logical.


Last edited by asianpilgrim; 02/20/09 05:56 AM.
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  theophan 

Link Copied to Clipboard
The Byzantine Forum provides message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial, have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as a source for official information for any Church. All posts become property of byzcath.org. Contents copyright - 1996-2024 (Forum 1998-2024). All rights reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0