The Byzantine Forum
Newest Members
EasternChristian19, James OConnor, biblicalhope, Ishmael, bluecollardpink
6,161 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 473 guests, and 95 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
by orthodoxsinner2, September 30
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
by Veronica.H, April 24
Byzantine Catholic Outreach of Iowa
Exterior of Holy Angels Byzantine Catholic Parish
Church of St Cyril of Turau & All Patron Saints of Belarus
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics35,511
Posts417,526
Members6,161
Most Online3,380
Dec 29th, 2019
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,189
Likes: 3
Member
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,189
Likes: 3
As long as there is obstinate disunion I suspect that there are many errors in both camps. But then I'm not the Church. Let us reunite and and have a good ecumenical council to sort out the details.

We've had this discussion many many times over the years on this very forum. Without a willingness to unite it won't happen. All I've suggested is that we pray for each other no matter what either side thinks.

CDL

Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,398
J
Member
Member
J Offline
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,398
Originally Posted by carson daniel lauffer
As long as there is obstinate disunion I suspect that there are many errors in both camps. But then I'm not the Church. Let us reunite and and have a good ecumenical council to sort out the details.

We've had this discussion many many times over the years on this very forum. Without a willingness to unite it won't happen. All I've suggested is that we pray for each other no matter what either side thinks.

CDL

In my opinion (for what it's worth) the issue is not one of stubborness but of genuine doctrinal disagreement. Unless one side capitulates, there will not be reunion. Having said that, I do think that privately we should pray for one another but in the liturgy we can only commemorate those hierarchs who are a part of our communion.

Joe

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,189
Likes: 3
Member
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,189
Likes: 3
If I believed that there is no hope I'd become a follower of Mel Gibson, if you catch my drift.

CDL

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 56
A
Member
Member
A Offline
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 56
Re "Is canon 34 of the apostolic canons erroneous then?"

"Apostolic" canon 34 does not mention the Pope. It does not seem to be incompatible with the doctrine of the universal jurisdiction of the Pope. Here it is:
Quote
It befits us bishops of every nation to know the one among them who is the premier or chief, and to recognize him as their head, and to refrain from doing anything superfluous without his advice and approval: but, instead each of them should do only whatever is necessitated by his own parish, and by the territories under him. Let not even such a one do anything without the advice, consent and approval of all. For thus will there be concord, and God will be glorified through the Lord in Holy Spirit, the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Spirit.

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,411
A
AMM Offline
Member
Member
A Offline
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,411
Quote
It does not seem to be incompatible with the doctrine of the universal jurisdiction of the Pope.

So universal jurisdiction is understood at all times to be subject to the consent and approval of the church as outlined in canon 34?

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 512
Likes: 1
Member
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 512
Likes: 1
I've gotta agree with Father Deacon Lance and Joe on this one.

The purpose of the commemoration is (so it seems to me) to pray for and acknowledge communion with the bishop of the local church, whose orthodoxy is unquestioned and who can trace his succession back to the apostles and to the legitimate local synod [those who have access to actual scholarly knowledge on this issue please chime in]. This distinguishes us from vagante groups and diverse heretics, whether we're talking about Palestine in 200AD, Rome in 300 AD or modern day America (in fact, my minimal study of the time period gives me the impression that there were more heretical groups, vagantes, pagans and pseudo-spiritual gatherings back then than there are today)

Thus I'm told the "correct" tradition is to commemorate only the local bishop (as discussed by Joe), who from there commemorates the patriarch of the synod, and the patriarch who commemorates those he's in communion with. Commemoration of the patriarch is allegedly a later addition. Even the commemoration of the Pope of Rome I'm told is not traditional outside of a Patriarchal liturgy - whom the patriarch is in communion with is his business. This again underscores communion in the local church; commemoration of those outside the local synod strikes me as contrary to the purpose of the commemoration.

Thus, it would be strange and to my mind superfluous for Melkite liturgies to commemorate Patriarch Lubomyr (as much as I may like him and the Ukrainians) or the local Latin bishop, since they are not part of our local church, even though we are in communion with them as the leaders of fellow [small o] orthodox Christians.

I'd say similar applies to commemoration of Patriarch Kiril or (I must sadly say) of Patriarchs Bartholomew, Theophilos, Theodoros, or Ignatius since they aren't part of our synod. In fact, commemoration of them is even more problematic than with Patriarch Lubomyr because they are not in communion with us; they do not recognize the Melkite Greek Catholic Church as a church of [small and large O] Orthodox Christians.

My $0.02

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,189
Likes: 3
Member
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,189
Likes: 3
It seems to me that there isn't much difference between the canon and the way the Pope and his bishops have been operating for quite some time.

CDL

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,411
A
AMM Offline
Member
Member
A Offline
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,411
So why is the Pope protos of Eastern Christians outside their countries of origin?

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,189
Likes: 3
Member
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,189
Likes: 3
Markos,

Thank you for the explanation. Is there a way that would not damage some liturgical canon to pray for our enemies, or must we have an ecumenical council to permit us to do what we are asked to do by Jesus Himself?

CDL

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,765
Likes: 30
John
Member
John
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,765
Likes: 30
Originally Posted by carson daniel lauffer
Markos,

Thank you for the explanation. Is there a way that would not damage some liturgical canon to pray for our enemies, or must we have an ecumenical council to permit us to do what we are asked to do by Jesus Himself?

CDL
CDL,

Your post is over the top. This is not a matter of wanting to pray for enemies! In every Divine Liturgy we already pray for the "holy churches of God and for the union of all". Those who wish to pray more intensely for the restoration of full communion between East and West can certainly do so. There are even places in the litanies prayed at Vespers, Matins and the Divine Liturgy where special petitions - appropriately worded - can be inserted.

Admin

Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  theophan 

Link Copied to Clipboard
The Byzantine Forum provides message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial, have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as a source for official information for any Church. All posts become property of byzcath.org. Contents copyright - 1996-2024 (Forum 1998-2024). All rights reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0