The press agency that issued this story is “World of Mysteries” and it was this agency that chose what I believe is an offensive title: “Russian Believers to Take Holy Fire to the North Pole.”
World-Mysteries (they are not a press agency) says on their site: “This web site is privately owned, totally independent, and not associated with any religious group or political organization.” One rather doubts, especially as they are not a press agency, that they were conscious that the headline would offend some viewers – probably seeing it as innocuous.
Additionally, I suspect that they found the juxtaposition of ‘North Pole’ and ‘Holy Fire’ to be too good an opportunity to miss. Add to which, they probably thought that it was much catchier than ‘Russian Arctic research station’. What I’m very sure of is that they did not ‘choose’ to be offensive.
I managed to tract down the original article issued by the Russian press agency Interfax and that article does not include the words “North Pole”.
It is going to sound ‘snarky’ but, given your attitude toward Russia, it is interesting to see that you found comfort in the headline writing of Interfax, about as russified a source as one could name.
19 April 2009, 12:51
Holy Fire arrives at
Russian Arctic research station Barneo (Arctic), April 19, Interfax - The Holy Fire has been brought to the Barneo Arctic research station and handed over to the Russian polar researchers.
The ceremony involved Vladimir Yakunin, the chairman of the Board of Trustees of the St. Andrew the First-Called Foundation, and Artur Chilingarov, a lawmaker and chairman of the Association of Polar Researchers.
A prayer service was conducted, followed by a procession with the Holy Fire, ignited in Jerusalem on Saturday.
A special flight carrying the Holy Fire took off from Moscow's Vnukovo-3 airport on Easter Night, earlier reports said.
The fire burning in icon lamp was brought to Spitsbergen, and then the delegation took it to Barneo aboard another flight.
http://www.interfax-religion.com/?act=news&div=5946 Thus, you can see that the original post does not include the words
“North Pole”.No, it doesn’t. Shall we require that all posters, on all occasions, seek out the ‘original’ version of all texts and post only links to those? Unless, of course, that original version contains ‘offensive’ text, in which case the poster would be required to track down an edited version that lacks offensiveness.
I think the poster showed poor judgment in posting an article connecting Russian with the North Pole. I am willing to give her the benefit of the doubt since maybe she is not aware of the controversy between Canada and Russia at the moment over the ownership of the North Pole and other Artic regions. This topic has certainly has been in the press.
The poster showed no such thing as poor judment! And, frankly, that comment – together with your willingness ‘to give her the benefit of the doubt’ is typical of the attitudes that you consistently display, those of being superior, condescending, and feeling put-upon.
This is an international forum – in the last few hours, I have read posts from Ireland, Scotland, England, Romania, Norway, Finland, Italy, Australia, Brazil, Mexico, the Philippines, as well as Canada and the US. On other days, I could easily add Israel, Portugal, Singapore, Japan, and other nations to that list.
It is not a Canadian forum, nor an American forum, and – quite frankly – a lot of folks here are totally unaware of territorial disputes over Arctic territory, as they are over such involving Antarctica. Does that make them ignorant or ill-informed? No, it means that the issues involved don’t affect them and most don’t have a limitless capacity for reading and absorbing the details of the myriad territorial disputes underway across the world on any given day.
I’m personally aware of the Canadian-Russian dispute because I read Canadian news rather regularly due to the fact that my two youngest children hold dual US-Canadian citizenship. Had I seen the item before Rose would I have considered it potentially offensive? No! I’d have thought, as most anyone who was not entrapped in an insular, parochial way of thinking, that it was interesting and that others might find it so. The post was about the Holy Fire – not about Canada, not about Russia – about the Holy Fire!
The second issue has to deal with the claims of the Moscow Patriarchate and its daughter, the OCA to jurisdictions over all of North America . Since the reunion of the MP and the ROCOR outside of Russia , the MP has actually increased its press coverage and efforts to extend its jurisdiction over Orthodox believers around the world who have some connection in the past with the former USSR or the Russian Empire in the days of the Tsar. This of course included ethnic Ukrainians.
However, the Ecumenical Patriarchate claims jurisdiction over all “barbarian” lands. In Canada , the two major Orthodox churches, the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of Canada and the Greek Orthodox are both under the jurisdiction of the Ecumenical patriarchate.
I know people on this forum are aware of this issue because of the discussion on another thread about Metropolitan Jonah’s (OCA) speech.
This has absolutely nothing to do with the topic of the thread!
I find this Forum to be increasing intolerant of Canada and Ukrainians, both in Canada and in Ukraine itself. Canada was founded as a bi-lingual country and has two codes of law. Canada is also officially a multi-cultural country. Canada does not pursue an assimilationist policy.
The charge of intolerance is absolutely without merit. I would estimate that a third of the active posters to this forum are Ukrainian, Orthodox or Catholic. Read threads to this forum in which posters praise Ukrainian hierarchs, both Catholic and Orthodox, for the stances that they’ve taken, for their willingness to dialogue with one another, for the erudition of their sacred works, the beauty of their temples, their heroic martyrdoms under communism. Note that some of the most prolific posters to this site are Ukrainians.
As to Canadians, the allegation is even more ludicrous. Personally, I consider Canada to be America’s best ally in almost all regards and I decry the fact that what was the longest open border in the world is no longer such. I remember well that it was a Canadian diplomat who hid and subsequently spirited US embassy staff out of Iran decades ago, at the risk of his own life.
This Forum has one poster (Neil) who attaches this comment to the bottom of his posts:
"One day all our ethnic traits ... will have disappeared. Time itself is seeing to this. And so we can not think of our communities as ethnic parishes, ... unless we wish to assure the death of our community."
I find this extremely offensive and have written to him in the past about it and received no reply.
I’m sorry that you find it offensive but it is a patent falsehood to say that you have written me about it in the past – I have never received any such communication from you!
The words themselves are not mine – they were said by Archbishop Joseph (Tawil), of blessed memory, in a pastoral message during which he spoke of the two greatest dangers to the Melkite Church (and, by extension, to all the Eastern and Oriental Churches). The two dangers that he saw were, oddly, extreme opposites – a ghetto mentality and assimilation! And, I believe, as do many, that he was correct; excerpts from that pastoral letter are frequently quoted.
The supply of ethnic Christians available to any of the Eastern or Oriental Churches, Orthodox or Catholic, is not limitless – intermarriage, mobility, loss of faith, decreasing interest in culture, heritage, and nationality are all contributing to this. Additionally, if we fail to reach out and offer our faith to those who are of other faiths, ethnicities, etc., we will have failed to fulfill God’s mandate that we go forth and preach to all nations.
Are we to preach to them and then not offer them a place in which to worship alongside us?
“We gave you faith, now go found your own true Church, because you aren’t of ‘us’” ????
I am a fourth generation Ukrainian-Canadian. Both sides of my family came to Canada in the 1890’s. I have no desire to have my “ethnic traits” disappear. Nor does my church. Nor does the Greek Orthodox Church in Canada. The province in which I grew up in Western Canada has a bilingual school system Ukrainian-English schools for the public (elementary) school system. I am a product of this background.
I find some of the posters on this Forum have an attitude which assume that all of us “cradle Orthodox” will “disappear”. That is not the case. And I think that is the main issue here. I think some of the posters of this Forum are intolerant of people who want to maintain their ethnic heritage and the customs of their church.
You’re rather naïve to think that there are many here who would have that happen. I, for one, am not Arabic by birth or marriage, but I would be saddened to see my Church lose its cultural or ethnic heritage. But, I am also enough the realist to know that those are being diminished somewhat by the influx into our parishes of persons not of Arab ethnicity. Four decades ago, I was a curiousity as a redhead in a Melkite parish – not so any more. Is that a bad thing? No, because people are coming to us and being welcomed. I think this is less the case in Canada, until now, than it is in the US – but some measure of assimilation will occur in time, as it did here.
I am questioning why I as a craddle Orthodox and as a Ukrainian-Canadian would want to participate on this Forum when I see the ideals I love and respect be constantly insulted.
That is your choice to make but I would suggest that you came here for some purpose, rather than to any of several other sites you could have chosen. This is a site that, as I’ve said time and again, is dedicated to dialogue, to educating, and to being educated. It is a community and it can only remain that if we all participate in it in a fashion that encourages those ideals. That means contributing thoughtfully and positively to discussion, not putting others down, being proud of your religious and ethnic heritage but not to the point of denigrating that of others. You are obviously well-read; you have the capability to be an asset to this site. I hope that is the choice you will make.
Many years,
Neil