The Byzantine Forum
Newest Members
connorjack, Hookly, fslobodzian, ArchibaldHeidenr, Fernholz
6,169 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
1 members (1 invisible), 397 guests, and 110 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
by orthodoxsinner2, September 30
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
by Veronica.H, April 24
Byzantine Catholic Outreach of Iowa
Exterior of Holy Angels Byzantine Catholic Parish
Church of St Cyril of Turau & All Patron Saints of Belarus
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics35,516
Posts417,599
Members6,169
Most Online4,112
Mar 25th, 2025
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 8 of 11 1 2 6 7 8 9 10 11
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,405
L
Member
Member
L Offline
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,405
Alexis,

Don't forget that it is a well-established Roman custom to applaud the Bishop of Rome when he enters and leaves a church. The people even applaud the Pope's coffin, as happened during the funeral of Pope John Paul II.

That said, I agree Pope Benedict XVI received a VERY enthusiastic welcome both at Regina Pacis Centre and at St George's Cathedral smile

Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,678
Likes: 1
L
Member
Member
L Offline
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,678
Likes: 1
Yes, and the English part of me says: applause doesn't belong in liturgical celebrations!! wink LOL.

Alexis

Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,564
Likes: 1
F
Member
Member
F Offline
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,564
Likes: 1
It's not unusual for Antiochian Orthodox to serve on Greek-Catholic parish councils - for that matter, it's not unusual in the Middle East to find Eucharistic sharing between Catholics and Orthodox - the Antiochians in the USA are decidedly uncomfortable with this.

Fr. Serge

Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,678
Likes: 1
L
Member
Member
L Offline
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,678
Likes: 1
Well for good reason I would think, Reverend Father!

Alexis

Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,690
Likes: 8
Member
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,690
Likes: 8
Earlier, someone mentioned the "Minor Eastern Patriarchs", I think this is a mistranslation of what was intended to be said. The Oriental Churches are called "Lesser or Minor Eastern Churches", to differentiate between the "Greater or Major Eastern Churches" of the Byzantine Rites. This is not to degrade them, but to recognize their place in history. The "Greater Churches" were imperial, while the "Lesser" ones were the countryside and native churches -- we see the differences and similarities to this day (iconostas v. veil, etc)

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 10,090
Likes: 16
Global Moderator
Member
Global Moderator
Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 10,090
Likes: 16
Originally Posted by Michael_Thoma
Earlier, someone mentioned the "Minor Eastern Patriarchs", I think this is a mistranslation of what was intended to be said. The Oriental Churches are called "Lesser or Minor Eastern Churches", to differentiate between the "Greater or Major Eastern Churches" of the Byzantine Rites. This is not to degrade them, but to recognize their place in history. The "Greater Churches" were imperial, while the "Lesser" ones were the countryside and native churches -- we see the differences and similarities to this day (iconostas v. veil, etc)

Actually, it is simpler than this and it is not all Oriental Catholic Churches or Patriarchs that are so styled. The Major Eastern Patriarchs are those whose Patriarchal Sees are deemed to have been established by Apostles.

The sole Patriarchates denoted as Minor are those of the Armenians and the Chaldeans. The others - Alexandria of the Copts, Antioch of the Melkites, Antioch of the Maronites, and Antioch of the Syriacs - are deemed Major.

Many years,

Neil


"One day all our ethnic traits ... will have disappeared. Time itself is seeing to this. And so we can not think of our communities as ethnic parishes, ... unless we wish to assure the death of our community."
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,885
Member
Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,885
Yes Neil you are right, the major see in that region are Jerusalem and Antioch. The other Patriarchates that are styled of other places in the region are designated minor, as they came about later on.

Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,405
L
Member
Member
L Offline
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,405
Canonically there is no distinction between "major" and "minor" Eastern Churches or patriarchates. The terms may have been used by historians in the past, especially to distinguish between Chalcedonian and non-Chalcedonian Eastern Churches, but I don't think the terms "major" and "minor" are very useful or provide any greater insight into the history of these Churches. Indeed, today I think distinguishing between "major" and "minor" patriarchates is rather unfortunate, and in fact inaccurate, because, as I have said, canonically there is no such distinction in the Catholic Church.

Last edited by Latin Catholic; 05/11/09 08:46 AM.
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 802
Likes: 2
Member
Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 802
Likes: 2
THE VIDEO OF THE CELEBRATION (complete):

http://www.ktotv.com/cms/videos/fiche_video.html?idV=00044903&vl=video_preferees

Resumés:



http://blog.cancaonova.com/terrasanta/2009/05/09/celebracao-das-vesperas/

But what about photos, anyone hasn't any until now? I've just found these two: http://www.melkite.org/Patriarch/PA12.htm

Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,678
Likes: 1
L
Member
Member
L Offline
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,678
Likes: 1
Those people are going NUTS at the beginning. You'd think the Beatles were in town.

Alexis

Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,564
Likes: 1
F
Member
Member
F Offline
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,564
Likes: 1
Actually, that was calm for the Middle East. I was expecting lots of ululation!

Fr. Serge

Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,405
L
Member
Member
L Offline
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,405
thanks for posting the links

Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,405
L
Member
Member
L Offline
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,405
The French presenter seems to be much better informed than the one at EWTN. He recognized Patriarch Gregory III, despite the fact that his Beatitude's address obviously wasn't included in the original program...

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 351
Member
Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 351
Dear Friends:

Looking at the service, it seems that the Pope and his people were completely out of the loop.

I can't say for sure but I think that the Patriarch of Antioch decided to show up at the last moment and then threw a little wrench into their neet arrangements.

The Pope and his masters of ceremony occasionally looked at their books for guidance and seemed lost at times.

If this is the case Pope Benedict may have only intended to preside at the service and not actively participate.

But non-the-less someone should familiarize His Holiness with the basic forms of Byzantine liturgical practice.

How hard would that be?

JL.

Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,678
Likes: 1
L
Member
Member
L Offline
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,678
Likes: 1
JL,

Well, although in a perfect world the Pope would be fairly familiar with "Byzantine liturgical practice," I'm sure that's pretty far down on his list of things to do.

He is the visible Head of one-fifth of humanity, you know. He has a pretty busy schedule~

Alexis

Page 8 of 11 1 2 6 7 8 9 10 11

Link Copied to Clipboard
The Byzantine Forum provides message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial, have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as a source for official information for any Church. All posts become property of byzcath.org. Contents copyright - 1996-2024 (Forum 1998-2024). All rights reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0