3 members (Hutsul, San Nicolas, 1 invisible),
1,734
guests, and
135
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums26
Topics35,526
Posts417,648
Members6,181
|
Most Online4,112 Mar 25th, 2025
|
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,941
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,941 |
Patriarch Says Better Relations With Vatican To Hinge on Deeds MOSCOW, January 12 (Itar-Tass) - A possibility of improving relations between the Russian Orthodox Church and the Vatican is hinged on real moves, and not words, Patriarch of Moscow and all Russia Alexis II said in an interview with Agence France Presse. Its text was placed at the official website of the Russian Church Monday.
"Vatican officials have many a time given assurances of their brotherly feelings for the Russian Orthodox Church and have denounced proselytism or unifications as a means of attaining genuine unity among the Western and Eastern Christians," Alexis II said.
Their statements have failed to bring about a real improvement of the situation so far, he indicated.
He denounced the practices of Roman Catholic proselytism and said: "The Russian Orthodox Church has never put up obstacles to the Roman Catholic clergy in the spiritual fostering of their traditional laity here".
"What happens in reality is that dozens of Catholic missionary orders are now operating in Russia and other countries of the CIS and their real target is somewhat different from the spiritual guidance of traditional believers," Alexis II said.
"They are working to convert to Catholicism the believers who have been born, baptized, and brought up in the Eastern Orthodox faith and culture and are its historical inheritors," he said.
"This is happening in a country with a millennium-old Christian tradition, and the Catholic missionaries do not bother to take account of the opinions of the Russian Orthodox Church; they are actually ignoring the presence of this Church on its historical canonic territory," Alexis II said.
As he described the situation in western Ukraine, Alexis II stated: "Hundreds of thousands of Eastern Orthodox believers have found themselves in the position of an outcast minority there, while the Greek Catholics are aggravating the situation by eastwards religious expansionism to the traditional Orthodox southern and eastern regions".
He voiced concern over the attempts of the Greek Catholics to move their episcopal see from the western city of Lvov to Kiev and to raise its status to that of a patriarchate.
"They are thus trying to impose their own style of religious union in the parts of Ukraine where unification trends have never existed," Alexis II said.
"How the situation will develop there in the future is highly contingent on the Vatican's position," he said.
Alexis II voiced the hope that "sober thinking of the Roman Catholic leadership will avert an irreparable worsening of the situation". http://www.stetson.edu/~psteeves/relnews/0401a.html#05 A line in the sand on the move to Kyiv.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 712
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 712 |
When the Holy Father JP2 visited Kyiv in 2000 he made reference to that city as being "the cradle of Slavic Christianity". By making this statement (in Ukrainian) he paid tribute to Kyivans as the heirs of a millennium old Slavic Christian tradition. The 'buzz-around-town' for many months after his historic visit was how special and important this brother Slav made the Kyivans feel after having been subjected to decades of dehumanizing godless communism. Today, Kyivans are restoring their accient Orthodox churches, and rebuilding (from pictures) those which were reduced to rubble by the Soviets in the 1930's. The Kyivans understand that the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church is also an integral part of their Christian heritage and for this reason have given it a prime piece of land on the left bank of the Dnipro river facing the 'Monestary of the Caves' (Pecherska Lavra) to build the new Patriarchal Sobor. Once completed, it will be seen from almost very notable landmark on the left bank of the city of Kyiv. By building this historic Sobor and residencial complex on the left bank of the Dnipro, the Kyivans have made a bold historic statement; "Greek Catholisms is part our heritage and an integral part of our future". Kyivans are proud to uphold their heritage as the "craddle of Slavic Christianity" and will welcome the UGCC Patriarchal Sobor as part of this millennium old tradition. http://ugcc.lta.lviv.ua/photos/kyiv/sobor4.jpg http://ugcc.lta.lviv.ua/photos/kyiv/sobor3.jpg
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 441
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 441 |
Bulgarians are proud of their country's part as the cradle of Slavic Christianity...
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 564
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 564 |
The comments from the patriarch of Moscow in my point of view have a negative and yet a positive aspect. The negative aspect is that many in the Vatican make a strong effort to do anything to please the Moscow patriarch as much as possible and this is the only real and true reason why up to this date they will not recognize a Ukrainian Greek Catholic Patriarchate (Kyivan), the other excuses that the Vatican gives is just a lot of "BUSHWAH". The statement of the Moscow patriarch not only influences members of the Roman Curia but the general public that don't have sufficient cultural and historical background to understand the situation as it truly is. So, we Ukrainians are looked upon as a group of trouble makers, and being so we are left aside and sometimes even ignored. I bet that when a group of Ukie bishops walk down the corridoor in the halls of the Vatican the cardinals probably mummble something like " Here comes trouble". The positive aspect to all of this and what makes me feel good is that we have shown our Northern neighbors and the Roman Curia that we are alive, active and well and getting better. We are getting along very well with our Ukie Orthodox brothers and sisters from the Kyivan Patriarchate and the UAOC (and that's what counts). Lauro
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,461 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,461 Likes: 1 |
He voiced concern over the attempts of the Greek Catholics to move their episcopal see from the western city of Lvov to Kiev and to raise its status to that of a patriarchate.
"They are thus trying to impose their own style of religious union in the parts of Ukraine where unification trends have never existed," Alexis II said. Alexei II is apparently not well read on his Kyivan history. It was precisely the legitimate Metropolitan of Kyiv, Mikhail Rahoza, who approached Rome for union. This is nothing more than the restoration of the see to its historical place of origin.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 712
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 712 |
Originally posted by lpreima: The comments from the patriarch of Moscow in my point of view have a negative and yet a positive aspect. The negative aspect is that many in the Vatican make a strong effort to do anything to please the Moscow patriarch as much as possible and this is the only real and true reason why up to this date they will not recognize a Ukrainian Greek Catholic Patriarchate (Kyivan), the other excuses that the Vatican gives is just a lot of "BUSHWAH". The statement of the Moscow patriarch not only influences members of the Roman Curia but the general public that don't have sufficient cultural and historical background to understand the situation as it truly is. So, we Ukrainians are looked upon as a group of trouble makers, and being so we are left aside and sometimes even ignored. I bet that when a group of Ukie bishops walk down the corridoor in the halls of the Vatican the cardinals probably mummble something like " Here comes trouble". The positive aspect to all of this and what makes me feel good is that we have shown our Northern neighbors and the Roman Curia that we are alive, active and well and getting better. We are getting along very well with our Ukie Orthodox brothers and sisters from the Kyivan Patriarchate and the UAOC (and that's what counts). Lauro I believe you may be correct when it comes to a certain portion of the Roman curia. However, there are many who understand the UGCC history very well, and they will not be suportive of any backroom deals in which our church does not have it's rights upheld. For example, Patriarch Lubomyr as a guest of the German Catholic curia was welcomed as a 'head of state'. He was honored with a banquet which was attended by the president and elite of Germany's goverment and society. His 'two lungs' speach was well understood, and supported by all those present. Also, we should note that the Holy Father John Paul II understands and supports the need of a Patriarch. Furthermore, for the first time in our own UGCC history, all of our bishops have requested the official recognition of a Patriarchate by the Vatican. IMHO, this Holy Father will not sacrifice the UGCC Patriarchate for a visit to the Moscow. PS: "BUSHWAH" = I checked the word in the modern American dictionary, and the definition was: 'Crying sound made by standing American President when things don't go his way" 
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 564
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 564 |
Dear Hritzko, Well, if what you say is true, than what's the deal? Why hasn't the Vatican recognized the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Patriarchate? What are they waiting for? or Who are they waiting for? When is the right time? Excuse my expression but are they waiting for hell to freeze over? I'm sure that there must be some cardinals that are on our side but for sure they are a minority because if it were the other way around (the majority), they would have recognized the Patriarchate some time ago and we had a lot of appropriate dates to do so: The day of Independence of Ukraine, The day when Kyr Hussar was elected Head of the UGCC, The Pope's visit to Ukraine,etc. What about all the Christmases and Easters that have past by, all of these dates were and are appropriate to recognize the Patriarchate officially. So what gives? Lauro
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 845
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 845 |
Also, we should note that the Holy Father John Paul II understands and supports the need of a Patriarch. So what's stopping him from recognizing it? While he's at it, he might want to consider getting off of that BS about "traditional territories." Furthermore, for the first time in our own UGCC history, all of our bishops have requested the official recognition of a Patriarchate by the Vatican. Should our bishops really be going Mitra in hand to Rome? What's stopping them from saying "we are a Patriarchal Church" recognizing the following as "sister churches:" The Chuch of Rome, The Church of Constantinople, etc. etc. etc. Yours, hal
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 712
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 712 |
Originally posted by lpreima: ..... we Ukrainians are looked upon as a group of trouble makers, and being so we are left aside and sometimes even ignored. I bet that when a group of Ukie bishops walk down the corridoor in the halls of the Vatican the cardinals probably mummble something like " Here comes trouble"........
I bet some of the moderators of this website must say the same thing, just replace the word bishops with: Alex, Hritzko, Halychanyn, Ipreima, etc.... so what ? Zdobudemo Ukraijinsku derzhavu abo zhenymo u borotbi za neji ! 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 712
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 712 |
Originally posted by lpreima: Dear Hritzko, Well, if what you say is true, than what's the deal? Why hasn't the Vatican recognized the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Patriarchate? What are they waiting for? or Who are they waiting for? When is the right time? Excuse my expression but are they waiting for hell to freeze over? I'm sure that there must be some cardinals that are on our side but for sure they are a minority because if it were the other way around (the majority), they would have recognized the Patriarchate some time ago and we had a lot of appropriate dates to do so: The day of Independence of Ukraine, The day when Kyr Hussar was elected Head of the UGCC, The Pope's visit to Ukraine,etc. What about all the Christmases and Easters that have past by, all of these dates were and are appropriate to recognize the Patriarchate officially. So what gives? Lauro Dear Ipreima, In order assure success a SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats) analysis is constanly being performed by any organization in regards to it's operations. The Vatican is constantly performing SWOT analysis in regards to the it' own success and that of it's sister churches (ie: "the whatever" Kyivan Church). It takes the advice of many pro and anti Patriarchate curia members. There is not enough threads on the internet to complete a SWOT analysis for all the churches so I'm not even going to try now. In a nutshell, the Vatican knows that the Patriarchate is in the best interest of the Latin and Eastern rites (ie; best penetration strategy, best synergies, etc...). So, if I were sitting in the Vatican (and I'm not, I'm here listening to my secretary blabber about something), and I wanted my sister "the whatever" kyivan Church to succeed, and the Latin rite church as well, I would perform a SWOT analysis today. IMHO, the results would indicate that a Patriarchate is needed, but the following environment is prerequisite to ensure it's success; (1) Patriarchal Sobor with Administrative complex and residence. Our beloved Patriarch as you know has moved to Kyiv, and has set up a small chapel on the site of the Sobor where services are being held. This has been done to try to create a 'defacto' presence in Kyiv in spite of construction still going on. (2) President of Ukraine who does not have a "little brother complex" (po nashomu = Komplexs menshvartosty). We must have a president who is able to stand as an equal with the guy next door - Putin - to support the plurality of Ukrainian religious life. There will be elections in 2004. I would suggest that you do whatever you can in your communities to ensure the above. Have any kind of fundraisers you can for either cause above. By having a completed Sobor in Kyiv and a Christian Democrat as President, the chances of success are very high for recognition of our church leader as a Patriarch by the Vatican. If we do it on our own, without Vatican approval, the moskali will do everything possible to ensure failure and blame it on rabid nationalism.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,405 Likes: 38
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,405 Likes: 38 |
Dear Hritzko, But please remember that I no longer post here . . . Good saying at the end of your post, though - did you read that or did you come up with it yourself? O.K., back to lurkerdom . . . alex
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 564
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 564 |
Dear Alex, Although you're not posting, it's good to know that you're lurking? How's everything? Lauro
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 712
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 712 |
Originally posted by Orthodox Catholic:
Good saying at the end of your post, though - did you read that or did you come up with it yourself?
No it's not mine. I think it's Evhen Konovaletz's. ( Pryvit - ty zmozhesh vernutysia za pjiat mishatziv  )
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,405 Likes: 38
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,405 Likes: 38 |
Dear Lauro, Everything is calmer in my life! Dear Hritzko, Dyakuyu! Ale ya vzhe bilshe ne vernusia tut! I ya ne povynen i teper tut pysaty - ale na hetza pyshu! Alex
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,941
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,941 |
Eureka!
Alex, I started this thread just to get you to post!
|
|
|
|
|