1 members (San Nicolas),
375
guests, and
101
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums26
Topics35,514
Posts417,578
Members6,167
|
Most Online4,112 Mar 25th, 2025
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 204
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 204 |
I have been talking to an acquaintance who have started a private association of the faithful and he intends it to become a religious congregation someday. When I questioned him about the charism of the congregation, his replies are:
1. With the issue of our charism, that is a matter of privacy within the local Ordinary, the Charismatic and Ecclesiastical Founder, and of the association. It can be seen in the mission and apostolate of the association.
2. The charism is, canonically and theologically, must be private because it is the gift of the Spirit that each members carry and apply from the moment they enter religious life.
Unfortunately, it is not the bishop who established the association but it was approved by him.
My question: In general, is the charism private? If not, why?
My understanding is that a charism is a gift of the Holy Spirit and it used to build up the Church. Thus it is not private but rather public.
Any idea?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,125 Likes: 1
Za myr z'wysot ... Member
|
Za myr z'wysot ... Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,125 Likes: 1 |
Elexeie, First of all, congratulations to your friend for undertaking such a work for the glory of God! It does, however, seem a bit strange that he regards the new association's charism as a private matter. As you said: My understanding is that a charism is a gift of the Holy Spirit and it used to build up the Church. Thus it is not private but rather public. As I reflect on this, I think the problem is that he is understanding the term "charism" in a slightly different way: either as the individual charisms of the group's members, or else the more subtle and personal working of the Holy Spirit within the group. Understood in this way, a "charism" could be seen as something private. Traditionally, however, the term charism has been used to refer to the group/community's specific ministry, along with their unique approach to that ministry. In this sense it is indeed public.  Unfortunately, it is not the bishop who established the association but it was approved by him. I don't understand why it would be better if the bishop were the one who established the association, rather than laypeople.  Peace, Deacon Richard
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,760
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,760 |
Elexeie,
My discernment of "charism" is formed by 1Corinthians, Chapter 12.
Verse seven answers the question whether it's a matter of privacy, "But the manifestation of the Spirit is given to each one for the profit of all.
Fr Deacon Paul
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 204
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 204 |
Elexeie, First of all, congratulations to your friend for undertaking such a work for the glory of God! It does, however, seem a bit strange that he regards the new association's charism as a private matter. As you said: My understanding is that a charism is a gift of the Holy Spirit and it used to build up the Church. Thus it is not private but rather public. As I reflect on this, I think the problem is that he is understanding the term "charism" in a slightly different way: either as the individual charisms of the group's members, or else the more subtle and personal working of the Holy Spirit within the group. Understood in this way, a "charism" could be seen as something private. Traditionally, however, the term charism has been used to refer to the group/community's specific ministry, along with their unique approach to that ministry. In this sense it is indeed public.  Unfortunately, it is not the bishop who established the association but it was approved by him. I don't understand why it would be better if the bishop were the one who established the association, rather than laypeople.  Peace, Deacon Richard Dear Deacon Richard, My reaction in regards to the bishop not establishing the association is based on what he said that the bishop knows their charism because he is the founder. Unfortunately, it is not true since in their manual, it was stated who are the founders of the group and the bishop is not one of them. For me, this is misleading. In Christ, Ruel
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 204
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 204 |
Elexeie,
My discernment of "charism" is formed by 1Corinthians, Chapter 12.
Verse seven answers the question whether it's a matter of privacy, "But the manifestation of the Spirit is given to each one for the profit of all.
Fr Deacon Paul Dear Father, Bless!!! Indeed. I definitely agree. Thank you for pointing this. 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 10,090 Likes: 15
Global Moderator Member
|
Global Moderator Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 10,090 Likes: 15 |
Off topic, but it is good to see you posting here again, elexeie. I was afraid that your brief appearance to thank the members for prayers was going to be just that - a brief appearance. I'm pleased to see that you're back with us, even if only for a while.
Many years,
Neil
"One day all our ethnic traits ... will have disappeared. Time itself is seeing to this. And so we can not think of our communities as ethnic parishes, ... unless we wish to assure the death of our community."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 204
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 204 |
Hi Neil!
Hahaha =) I was kind of busy in the past years creating the formation program for the Lay Carmelites and still there are work to be done. I'll try to be active now that I have a mobile internet which I can plug-in anywhere. =)
Cordial greetings!
|
|
|
|
|