The Byzantine Forum
Newest Members
connorjack, Hookly, fslobodzian, ArchibaldHeidenr, Fernholz
6,169 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
1 members (1 invisible), 595 guests, and 106 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
by orthodoxsinner2, September 30
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
by Veronica.H, April 24
Byzantine Catholic Outreach of Iowa
Exterior of Holy Angels Byzantine Catholic Parish
Church of St Cyril of Turau & All Patron Saints of Belarus
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics35,518
Posts417,611
Members6,169
Most Online4,112
Mar 25th, 2025
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 4 of 22 1 2 3 4 5 6 21 22
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,505
Member
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,505
Originally Posted by Fr. Deacon Lance
The saying of the prophets are now being fulfilled: the holy mountain is planted in the womb; the divine ladder is set up; the throne of the great king is ready; the God-inspired city is being adorned. The unburnable bush is beginning to bud forth, and the treasure house of grace is overflowing. It is spreading over the rivers of unfruitfulness of the god-wise Anne whom we glorify in faith.

3rd Sticheron of Vespers for the Conception of the Theotokos

How can one be a treasure house of grace if one is not in dwelt by the Holy Spirit?


The holy mountain, the divine ladder, etc. refer to the Mother of God.

The treasure house of grace refers to Saint Anne whom it is inundating with grace.


Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 26
I
Junior Member
Junior Member
I Offline
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 26
Here is Vladimir Lossky on (some of) the consequences of the Fall: "The decadence of human nature is the direct consequence of the free decision of man . . . A condition against nature must lead to the disintegration of the being of man, which dissolves finally in death, the last separation of nature, become unnatural and separate from God. There is no longer a place for uncreated grace in the perverted nature . . . The deprivation of grace is not the cause, but rather the consequence of the decadence of our nature. Man has obstructed the faculty in himself for communion with God" (Mystical Theology of the Eastern Church).

If I understand this right, it means that our nature is wounded as a consequence of the Fall, so that it no longer "possesses" (for lack of a better word) the grace that it possessed before the ancestral sin. It can possess that grace again, but only by virtue of Christ's salvific work and the mercy of God.

So far, I think that's all consistent with Eastern theology. Is that right? If so, then let's turn to the next thoughts with that in mind.

The Angel Gabriel greets the Theotokos at the time of the Annunciation like so: "Hail, full of grace, the Lord is with thee!" (Luke 1:28). This suggests that she at least possesses that grace that was lost in the Fall at the moment of the Annunciation. This is also consistent with Eastern theology, yes?

Now, shared Tradition has it that the Theotokos did not sin in her lifetime. If we are to avoid ideas that at least [i]sound[/i] Pelagian, we will have to say that this could be so only if she were specially graced throughout her lifetime. So, she was blessed with grace--grace that had been lost to our nature as a consequence of the Fall--throughout her lifetime. This still isn't the doctrine of the Immaculate Conception, true. I'm just moving step-by-step. All of this is still consistent with Eastern theology, right?

Let me now say this as a brief interlude: I'm trying to understand the Virgin's state not in negative terms familiar to the Western tradition (i.e., "free from the stain of sin") but rather in positive terms familiar to the Eastern tradition (i.e., "energized or transfigured by grace"). This is in line with Pope John Paul II's wish that "the negative formulation of the Marian privilege, which resulted from the earlier controversies about original sin that arose in the West, must always be complemented by the positive expression of Mary's holiness more explicitly stressed in the Eastern tradition."

Okay, so... The Theotokos appears to have been in possession of that energizing grace that was otherwise lost as a consequence of the Fall throughout her entire life. Now, what about her conception? All that appears to be required for a seemingly-Eastern view of the "Immaculate Conception," not itself dependent on a Western understanding of "original sin," is the view that, even at the first moment of her being, the Theotokos possessed, through the mercy of God and in light of the salvific work of Jesus Christ, the grace that was lost to us as a consequence of the Fall, the very same grace which she apparently possessed throughout her life. My hope is that this does away with the thought that the doctrine depends on "purely Western" views about original sin.

Now, this is where the material that Fr. Kimel cites becomes most relevant, I think. Some of it may suggest that indeed the thought that the Theotokos possessed this grace at the moment of her conception was present within the Tradition. Along these lines, I will just add the following quotes:

"Many saints appeared before thee, but none was as filled with grace as thou . . . No one has been purified in advance as thou hast been." -- St. Sophronius of Jerusalem, Oration 2:25 on the Annunciation to the Holy Mother of God

"Nature was defeated by grace and stopped, trembling, not daring to take precedence over it. Since the Virgin Mother of God was to be born of Anne, nature did not dare to precede the product of grace; but remained sterile until grace had produced its fruit. O blessed loins of Joachim, whence the all-pure seed was poured out! O glorious womb of Anna, in which the most holy offspring grew and was formed, silently increasing! O womb in which was conceived the living heaven, wider than the wideness of the heavens . . . This heaven is clearly much more Divine and awesome than the first. Indeed He Who created the sun in the first heaven would Himself be born of this second heaven, as the Sun of Justice . . . She is all beautiful, all near to God. For she, surpassing the cherubim, exalted beyond the seraphim, is placed near to God." -- St. John of Damascus, Homily on the Nativity of the Blessed Virgin

"O choir of prophets, rejoice exceedingly! For behold, today Anna bears the holy fruit You foretold to us. . . . " -- The Feast of the Conception of the Theotokos

Joined: Aug 1998
Posts: 4,337
Likes: 24
Moderator
Member
Moderator
Member
Joined: Aug 1998
Posts: 4,337
Likes: 24
Fr. Ambrose,

You are incorrect. Look at the strucutre of the hymn. The unburnable bush is the Mother of God. This metaphor is followed in the same sentence by: The treasure house of grace (the object-the Mother of God) is overflowing, spreading over the rivers of unfruitfulness of the god-wise Anne...(the subject). It is clear every metaphor in this hymn refers to the Theotokos, St. Anne only being referred to by name in the last sentence.

Fr. Deacon Lance



My cromulent posts embiggen this forum.
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 26
I
Junior Member
Junior Member
I Offline
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 26
[quote]The holy mountain, the divine ladder, etc. refer to the Mother of God.[/quote]
Given that the quote is from the Vespers for the Conception of the Theotokos, and it says that "now" the holy mountain is planted in the womb, do you think that this gives one reason to think that the mountain is holy at the very moment of the planting (i.e., at the conception)? Or do you perhaps think that the hymn refers to the Theotokos as "the holy mountain" only in light of later events, though she was not in fact holy at the moment of her "planting?" If she was specially holy at the moment of the planting, then presumably this was because God's grace was with her even then? (Though these questions will probably sound as though they are "leading" questions, I do intend them as genuine questions.)

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,505
Member
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,505
Sorry, I jumped in there too quickly without devoting enough thought to the verse. blush

Are you saying that it is an argument that the Orthodox used to believe in the IC?

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,505
Member
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,505
Originally Posted by DoxRox
Well, that's the point of this conversation, whether that is the Orthodox answer or an Orthodox answer, traditional or modern.

In his earlier post on the first page of the thread Fr Kimel has given us a veritable truckload of references to Eastern writers who purportedly teach the IC, from the 9th to the 13th century.

Obviously it is absolutely necessary to locate their words and see what answers you can come to. It is going to be quite a scholarly task. Fr Kucharek passed away 10 years ago but hopefully there will be a library close to you with these works or they are available on interloan.

I'll just run through them again for your convenience...

Patriarch Photius in his homilies _De
Annuntiatione_ and _De Nativitate Deiparae_ (S. Aristarchis,
_Photiou logoi kai homiliai_, Vol. II [Constantinople, 1900],
pp. 230-245, 368-380);

George of Nicomedia in his homilies
(PG 100, 1336-1504), especially _Conceptione deiparae_ and
_Praesentatione Mariae virginis_;

Michael Psellos in the
recently discovered and edited homily _De Annuntiatione_ (PO
16, pp. 517-525);

John Phurnensis, _Oratione de Dormitione_
(G. Palamas, _Theophanous tou kerameos homiliai_, [Jerusalem,
1860], append., pp. 271-276);

Michael Glykas, _Annales_, III
(PG 158, 439-442);

Germanus II, Patriarch of Constantinople,
_In annuntiationem_ (edit. Ballerini, op. cit., Vol. II, pp.
283-382);

Theognostos the Monk, _In dormitionem_ (PO 16, pp.
457-562);

Nicetas David, _In nativitatem B.M.V._ (PG 105,
16-28);

Leo the Wise, _In dormitionem_ and _In
praesentationeum_ (PG 107, 12-21);

Patriarch Euthymius of
Constantinople, _In Conceptionem Annae_ (PO 16, pp. 499-505);

Bishop Peter Argorum, _In conceptionem B. Annae_(PG 104,
1352-1365);

John Mauropos, _In dormitionem_ (PG 120,
1075-1114);

James the Monk, _In nativitatem et in
praesentationem B.M.V._ (PO 16, pp. 528-538). Cf. Jugie,
_L'immaculee Conception dans l'Ecriture Sainte et dans la
tradition orientale [Rome, 1952], pp. 164-307, for others.

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 10,090
Likes: 16
Global Moderator
Member
Global Moderator
Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 10,090
Likes: 16
Originally Posted by LittleFlower
I wrote a couple posts but they were not posted, does anyone know a possible reason why? :S

LittleFlower,

Are you speaking of the two posts you made that appear on the 2nd page (depending on how many posts per thread page you have your preferences set to) of this thread.?

Quote
I completely believe in the Immaculate Conception smile
the reason it was declared dogma at a particular time, is because in the Catholic Church, teachings are only proclaimed dogmas when they're opposed, or when there's a need to. The idea was believed by the Catholic faithful before it became a dogma though.

Also I disagree that in the Old Testament the Holy Spirit only interacted with people 'externally', as we can see in Numbers 11:
"Then the LORD came down in the cloud and spoke with him, and he took of the Spirit that was on him and put the Spirit on the seventy elders. When the Spirit rested on them, they prophesied, but they did not do so again."
I read somewhere (sorry I don't have the source) that when Scripture says that the Holy Spirit overshadowed Mary, the word for "overshadowed" is one that is used in the Old Testament also but only in very special occasions.

God bless

Quote
In my understanding... the Roman Catholic teaching is that Mary still had free will and COULD have said 'no' to God, but she didn't have the inclination to sin that comes from original sin. So she was in a similar state as Eve. As we know Eve did say 'no' to God, so being without original sin does not take away a person's free will smile

Mary could have said no to God, but she chose to say yes, and this came from her free will... but she also didn't have inclination to sin, and if she was ever tempted it was merely external temptation.

Many years,

Neil


"One day all our ethnic traits ... will have disappeared. Time itself is seeing to this. And so we can not think of our communities as ethnic parishes, ... unless we wish to assure the death of our community."
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 100
Member
Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 100
Neil, yes those are the ones I meant! :) they didn't appear for a while lol! :grin: thanks!

Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 157
F
Member
Member
F Offline
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 157
Originally Posted by Iason
Let me now say this as a brief interlude: I'm trying to understand the Virgin's state not in negative terms familiar to the Western tradition (i.e., "free from the stain of sin") but rather in positive terms familiar to the Eastern tradition (i.e., "energized or transfigured by grace"). This is in line with Pope John Paul II's wish that "the negative formulation of the Marian privilege, which resulted from the earlier controversies about original sin that arose in the West, must always be complemented by the positive expression of Mary's holiness more explicitly stressed in the Eastern tradition."
Iason, here may be an example of the positive expression of our Lady's original holiness that you are looking for--St Andrew of Crete's Homily on the Nativity of the Theotokos:
Quote
Homily on the Nativity of the Most Holy Mother of God

by Saint Andrew, Archbishop of Crete

The present feastday is for us the beginning of feastdays. Serving as a boundary limit to the law and to foretypes, it at the same time serves as a doorway to grace and truth. "For Christ is the end of the law" (Rom 10:4), Who, having freed us from the writing, doth raise us to spirit. Here is the end (to the law): in that the Lawgiver, having made everything, hath changed the writing in spirit and doth head everything within Himself (Eph 1:10), hath taken the law under its dominion, and the law is become subjected to grace, such that the properties of the law not suffer reciprocal commingling, but only suchlike, that the servile and subservient (in the law) by Divine power be transmuted into the light and free (in grace), "so that we," sayeth the Apostle, "be not enslaved to the elements of the world" (Gal 4:3) and be not in a condition under the slaveish yoke of the writing of the law. Here is the summit of Christ's beneficence towards us! Here are the mysteries of revelation! Here is the theosis [divinisation] assumed upon humankind -- the fruition worked out by the God-man.

The radiant and bright coming-down of God for people ought to possess a joyous basis, opening to us the great gift of salvation. Such like also is the present feastday, having as its basis the Nativity of the Mother of God, and as its purposful end -- the uniting of the Word with flesh, this most glorious of all miracles, unceasingly proclaimed, immeasurable and incomprehensible. The less comprehensible it is, the more it is revealed; and the more it is revealed, the less comprehensible it is. Wherefore the present God-graced day, the first of our feastdays, showing forth the light of virginity and as it were the crown woven from the unfading blossoms of the spiritual garden of Scripture, doth proffer creatures a common joy. Be of good cheer -- sayeth it -- behold, this is the feast of the Nativity of the Virgin and of the renewal of the human race! The Virgin is born, She groweth and is raised up and prepareth Herself to be the Mother of God All-Sovereign of the ages. All this, with the assist of David, makes it for us an object of spiritual contemplation. The Mother of God manifests to us Her God-bestown Birth, and David points to the blessedness of the human race and wondrous co-kinship of God with mankind.

And thus, truly one ought to celebrate the mystery today and to offer to the Mother of God a word by way of gift: since nothing is so pleasing to Her, as a word and praise by word. It is from here also that we receive a twofold benefit: first, we enter into the region of truth, and second, we emerge from the captivity and slavery of the written law. How? Obviously, when darkness vanishes, then light appears; so also here: after the law there follows the freedom of grace.

The present day solemnity is a line of demarcation, separating the truth from its prefigurative symbol, and ushering in the new in place of the old. Paul -- that Divine Trumpeter of the Spirit -- exclaims thus about this: "For anyone that be in Christ, ye are remade a new creature; the old passeth away and behold all is become new" (2 Cor 5:17); "for the law hath perfected nothing adducing for a better hope, whereby we draw nigh to God" (Heb 7:19). The truth of grace hath shown forth brightly.

Let there now be one common festal celebration in both heaven and on earth. Let everything now celebrate, that which is in the world and that beyond the world. Now is made the created temple for the Creator of all; and creation is readied into a new Divine habitation for the Creator. Now our nature having been banished from the land of blessedness doth receive the principle of theosis and doth strive to rise up to the highest glory. Now Adam doth offer from us and for us elements unto God, the most worthy fruit of mankind -- Mary, in Whom the new Adam is rendered Bread for the restoration of the human race. Now is opened the great bosom of virginity, and the Church, in the matrimonial manner, doth place upon it a pure pearl truly immaculate. Now human worthiness doth accept the gift of the first creation and returns to its former condition; the majesty darkened by formless sin -- through the conjoining by His Mother by birth "of Him made beautiful by Goodness," man receives beauty in a most excellent and God-seemly visage. And this creating is done truly by the creation, and recreation by theosis, and theosis by a return to the original perfection! Now a barren one is become beyond expectation a mother, and the Birth-giver hath given birth without knowing man, and she doth sanctify natural birth. Now is readied the majestied color of the Divine scarlet-purple and the impoverished human nature is clothed in royal worthiness. Now -- according to prophecy -- there sprouts forth the Offshoot of David, Who, having eternally become the green-sprouting Staff of Aaron, hath blossomed forth for us with the Staff of Power -- Christ. Now of Judah and David is descended a Virgin Maiden, rendering of herself the royal and priestly worthiness of Him that hath taken on the priesthood of Aaron in the order of Melchisedek (Heb 7:15). Now is begun the renewal of our nature, and the world responding, assuming a God-seemly form, doth receive the principle of a second Divine creation.

The first creation of mankind occurred from the pure and unsullied earth; but their nature darkened the worthiness innate to it, they were deprived of grace through the sin of disobedience; for this we were cast out of the land of life and, in place of the delights of paradise, we received temporal life as our inheritance by birth, and with it the death and corruption of our race. All started to prefer earth to heaven, such that there remained no hope for salvation, beyond the utmost help. Neither the natural nor the written law, nor the fiery reconciliative sayings of the prophets had power to heal the sickness. No one knew how to rectify human nature and by what means it would be most suitable to raise it up to its former worthiness, so long as God the Author of all did not deign to reveal to us another arranged and newly-constituted world, wherein is annihilated the pervasive form of the old poison of sin, and granting us a wondrous, free and perfectly dispassionate life, through our re-creation in the baptism of Divine birth. But how would this great and most glorious blessing be imparted to us, so very in accord with the Divine commands, if God were not to be manifest to us in the flesh, not subject to the laws of nature -- nor deign to dwell with us in a manner, known to Him? And how could all this be accomplished, if first there did not serve the mystery a Pure and Inviolate Virgin, Who contained the Uncontainable, in accord with the law, yet beyond the laws of nature? And could some other virgin have done this, besides she alone, who was chosen before all others by the Creator of nature?

This Virgin is the Mother of God -- Mary, the Most Glorious of God, from the womb of Whom the Most Divine issued forth in the flesh and by whom He Himself did arrange a wondrous temple for Himself. She conceived without seed and gave birth without corruption, since that Her Son was God, though also He was born in the flesh, without mingling and without travail. This Mother, truly, avoided that which is innate to mothers but miraculously fed with milk Her Son, begotten without a man. The Virgin, having given birth to the Seedlessly Conceived-One, remained a Pure Virgin, having preserved incorrupt the marks of virginity. And so in truth She is named the Mother of God; her virginity is esteemed and her birth-giving is glorified. God, having conjoined with mankind and become manifest in the flesh, hath granted Her a unique glory. Woman's nature suddenly is freed from the first curse, and just as the first did bring in sin, so also doth the first initiate salvation also.

But our discourse has attained its chief end, and I, celebrating now and with rejoicing sharing in this sacred feast, I greet you in the common joy. The Redeemer of the human race -- as I said -- willed to arrange a new birth and re-creation of mankind: like as under the first creation, taking dust from the virginal and pure earth, wherein He formed the first Adam, so also now, having arranged His Incarnation upon the earth, -- and so to speak, in place of dust -- He chooses from out of all the creation this Pure and Immaculate Virgin and, having re-created mankind within His chosen-one from amidst mankind, the Creator of Adam is made the New Adam, in order to save the old.

Who indeed was this Virgin and from what sort of parents did she come? Mary, the glory of all, was born of the tribe of David, and from the seed of Joachim. She was descended from Eve, and was the child of Anna. Joachim was a gentle man, pious, raised in God's law. Living prudently and walking before God he grew old without child: the years of his prime provided no continuation of his lineage. Anna was likewise God-loving, prudent, but barren; she lived in harmony with her husband, but was childless. As much concerned about this, as about the observance of the law of the Lord, she indeed was daily stung by the grief of childlessness and suffered that which is the usual lot of the childless -- she grieved, she sorrowed, she was distressed, and impatient at being childless. Thus, Joachim and his spouse lamented that they had no successor to continue their line; yet the spark of hope was not extinguished in them completely: both intensified their prayer about the granting to them of a child to continue their line. In imitation of the prayer heard of Hannah (1 Kings 1: 10), both without leaving the temple fervently beseeched God that He would undo her sterility and make fruitful her childlessness. And they did not give up on their efforts, until their wish be fulfilled. The Bestower of Gifts did not condemn the gift of their hope. The unceasing power came quickly in help to those praying and beseeching God, and it made capable both the one and the other to produce and bear a child. In such manner, from sterile and barren parents, as it were from irrigated trees, was borne for us a most glorious fruition -- the Immaculate Virgin. The constraints of infertility were destroyed -- prayer, upright manner of life -- these rendered them fruitful; the childless begat a Child, and the childless woman was made a happy mother. Thus the immaculate fruition issuing forth from the womb occurred from an infertile mother, and then the parents, in the first blossoming of her growth brought her to the temple and dedicated her to God. The priest, then making the order of services, beheld the face of the girl and of those in front of and behind, and he became gladdened and joyful, seeing as it were the actual fulfillment of the Divine promise. He consecrated her to God, as a reverential gift and propitious sacrifice and, as a great treasury unto salvation, he led her within the very innermost parts of the temple. Here the Maiden walked in the upright ways of the Lord, as in bridal chambers, partaking of heavenly food until the time of betrothal, which was preordained before all the ages by Him Who, by His inscrutable mercy, was born from her, and by Him Who before all creation and time and expanse Divinely begat Him, and together with His consubstantial and co-reigning and co-worshipped Spirit -- this being One Godhead, having One Essence and Kingdom, inseparable and immutable and in which is nothing diverse, except the personal qualities. Wherefore, in solemnity and in song I do offer the Mother of the Word the festal gift; since that He born of her hath taught me to believe in the Trinity: the Son and Word without beginning hath made in her His Incarnation; the Father begetting Him hath blessed this; the Holy Spirit hath signed and sanctified the womb which incomprehensibly hath conceived.

Now is the time to question David: in what did the God of all forswear him? Speak, O Psalmist and Prophet! He hath sworn from the fruit of my loin to sit upon my throne (Ps 131[132]:11). Here in this He is forsworn and wilt not break His oath, He hath forsworn and His Word is sealed with a deed! "Once," said he, "I forswear by My Holiness, that I lie not to David; his seed wilt prevail forever, and his throne, like the sun before Me and like the moon coursing the ages: a faithful witness also in heaven" (Ps 88[89]:35-38). God hath fulfilled this oath, since it is not possible for God to lie (Heb 6:18). Consider this: Christ in the flesh is named my Son (Mt. 22: 42), and all nations will worship my Lord and Son (Ps 71[72]:11), seeing him sit upon a virginal throne! Here also is the Virgin, from whose womb the Pre-eternal One issued forth, incarnated at the end of the ages and renewing the ages, likewise sprung forth from my loins! All this is so!

People of God, holy nation, sacred gathering! Let us revere our paternal memory; let us extol the power of the mystery! Each of us, in the measure given by grace, let us offer a worthy gift for the present feast. Fathers, a prosperous lineage; mothers, fine children; the unbearing, the not-bearing of sin; virgins, a twofold prudence of soul and of body; betrothed, praiseworthy abstinence. If anyone of you be a father, let him imitate the father of the Virgin; and if anyone be without child, let them make harvest of fruitful prayer cultivating a life pleasing to God. The mother, feeding her children, let her rejoice together with Anna, raising her Child, given to her in infertility through prayer. She that is barren, not having given birth, lacking the blessing of a child, let her come with faith to the God-given offshoot of Anna and offer there her barrenness. The virgin, living blamelessly, let her be a mother by discourse, adorning by word the elegance of soul. For a betrothed, let her offer mental sacrifice from the fruits of prayer. All together rich and poor, lads and maidens, old and young (Ps 48:2, 148:12), priests and levites -- let all together keep the feast in honor of the Maiden, the Mother of God and the Prophetess: from Her hath issued forth the Prophet, foretold of by Moses, Christ God the Truth (Dt 18:15). Amen.

This homily does not "prove" the Immaculate Conception, at least as formulated by scholastic Catholicism; but does it not suggest the Virgin's specialness from the beginning of her existence, determined so completely by God's act of new creation in Christ? At least on my reading, at no point are we allowed to say "Mary was born under the dominion of Satan" or "Mary was into a condition of alienation from her Creator." Even at the moment of her birth, years before the Annunciation, she participates in some way in the eschatological reality that will be her Son. Already the creation is being prepared for its re-creation in Christ. Does it not sound as if the infant Mary has already been re-born in the Holy Spirit, as if the New Covenant has already, in a hidden way, begun?

It's a remarkable homily.


Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,505
Member
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,505
Originally Posted by Fr_Kimel
Let me now say this as a brief interlude:

Dear Father Kimel,

We really really really need those quotes which you mention in your earlier message - the various Eastern writers from the 9th to the 13th centuries who wrote supporting the Immaculate Conception.

Knowing what they wrote would almost certainly answer the question posed by DoxRox. These are indispensable references to shed light onto this thread. Please! somebody produce them! At the moment, without those quotes mentioned by Kucharek, we are just messing around at the edges.

Joined: Aug 1998
Posts: 4,337
Likes: 24
Moderator
Member
Moderator
Member
Joined: Aug 1998
Posts: 4,337
Likes: 24
Originally Posted by Hieromonk Ambrose
Sorry, I jumped in there too quickly without devoting enough thought to the verse. blush

Are you saying that it is an argument that the Orthodox used to believe in the IC?

I am saying it along with hymnography for the Theotokos' Nativity and Entrance is proof that it is at least an acceptable theological opinion to believe the Theotokos was indwelt by the Holy Spirit from the moment of her Conception, without delving into Scholastic arguements about Original Sin/Immaculate Conception. This is the positive formulation Pope John Paul II was talking about.


My cromulent posts embiggen this forum.
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,735
Likes: 6
Member
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,735
Likes: 6
DoxRox, I'm just curious, but does your priest know that you espouse these views?

Alexandr

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,505
Member
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,505
Originally Posted by Fr. Deacon Lance
I am saying it along with hymnography for the Theotokos' Nativity and Entrance is proof that it is at least an acceptable theological opinion to believe the Theotokos was indwelt by the Holy Spirit from the moment of her Conception,

Leaving that aside for the moment, Father, because it is distracting us from the focus of the thread.... Fr Kimel and Dave Brown have both quoted Kucharek and say that there is proof in the writings of Eastern theologians on the Immaculate Conception that "Orthodox theologians unanimously taught it"

There is the claim in black and white: "Orthodox theologians unanimously taught it"

And they go on to give a list of 13 theologians and references to their works which they claim teach the Immaculate Conception.

So, we could say, what further proof do we need? Please simply produce these writings.

Show us that our own theologians "unanimously taught it."

Here is the quote from Fr Kimel's message. He is quoting Dave Brown who is quoting the late Fr Casimir Kucharek...

"Even during the twelfth and thirteenth
centuries, when some Western theologians doubted or denied
the truth of her immaculate conception, Byzantine Catholic
and Orthodox theologians unanimously taught it.

"In support of this statement, Fr. Kucharek cites these
references in a footnote on pp. 355-356:"


and the list of 13 Eastern writers follows....

Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 157
F
Member
Member
F Offline
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 157
Originally Posted by Hieromonk Ambrose
Originally Posted by Fr_Kimel
Let me now say this as a brief interlude:

Dear Father Kimel,

We really really really need those quotes which you mention in your earlier message - the various Eastern writers from the 9th to the 13th centuries who wrote supporting the Immaculate Conception.

Golly gee whiz, Father, there are lots of things I want immediately, right now, at this very moment ... but God in his wisdom has deemed it proper to withhold them from me. wink

Yes, it would be nice to have the full citations. Perhaps even better it would be nice to read some scholarly studies by competent scholars on the Marian beliefs of medieval Byzantine Christianity. I do not know of any such studies available in English. Do you?

Kucharek does make some strong claims. It would be nice to see these claims evaluated by competent scholars.

In the meantime, you might find of interest Fr Lev Gillet's article: "The Immaculate Conception and the Orthodox Church" [eirenikon.wordpress.com] (check the comments to find the links to parts 2, 3 & 4). I do not know if this piece was written before or after Fr Lev's conversion to Orthodoxy, though it seems to have been written during his Orthodox period.


Last edited by Fr_Kimel; 02/18/10 09:17 PM.
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,855
Likes: 8
A
Member
Member
A Offline
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,855
Likes: 8
Originally Posted by Hieromonk Ambrose
Originally Posted by Fr_Kimel
Let me now say this as a brief interlude:

Dear Father Kimel,

We really really really need those quotes which you mention in your earlier message - the various Eastern writers from the 9th to the 13th centuries who wrote supporting the Immaculate Conception.
Fr. Ambrose,

No one really needs the quotations, but without them it is clear that a person is free to discount Fr. Kucharek's position as unproven.

God bless,
Todd

Page 4 of 22 1 2 3 4 5 6 21 22

Moderated by  Irish Melkite 

Link Copied to Clipboard
The Byzantine Forum provides message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial, have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as a source for official information for any Church. All posts become property of byzcath.org. Contents copyright - 1996-2024 (Forum 1998-2024). All rights reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0