Many of you may already have heard the tragic news of the death of an infant that occurred during a baptism at an Orthodox parish in Moldova. News reports state that the priest involved did not cover the infant's mouth and nose while immersing.
This leads me to the following questions: How is a priest supposed to hold an infant when baptizing? Is he supposed to use one hand to cover its nose and mouth?
I have been to several baptisms and the priest needs to hold the infant with both hands in order to prevent the child from slipping out of his arms. I have never seen a priest use his hand to cover an infant's mouth or nose. The immersion is quite quick to prevent an infant from breathing in water. I would think that having only one hand to hold the baby while using the other to cover its nose and mouth increases the risk of the infant slipping out of the priest's hands during the baptism itself.
Babies cannot drown unless held underwater for more than a minute. They instinctively hold their breath, and will hold it until the pass out. Anyone who has taken their infant to a waterbabies class knows this--you take the baby, put him under the water, and push him off; the baby then doggy paddles to his other parent about three or four feet away, who picks him up. Babies love it.
So, obviously, something else happened to the baby. And holding the baby's nose is definitely not on--it only causes the baby to panic, making him more, not less likely to inhale water.
Here is a news report with video of the actual baptism:
I viewed several baptisms posted on Youtube and there is a variety of ways to baptize. Greek baptisms have the infant placed in the fount with a small amount of water and then the priest pours water over the infant's head. Russian baptisms have the priest immersing the infant usually feet first into a fount full of water, although there was one in which the baby was placed in the fount and the priest poured water with a pan.
In the video involving the Moldovan Orthodox priest, he appears to baptize the child head first into the water.
Headfirst can work. We had an exercise at the pool where the babies were dunked head first. They shut their little mouths, just like they were programmed to do. Whether the baby is completely covered, or has to have water poured over him, depends entirely on the size of the font.
Rule number one, though--always point male babies downrange. You never know when they might go off.
"One day all our ethnic traits ... will have disappeared. Time itself is seeing to this. And so we can not think of our communities as ethnic parishes, ... unless we wish to assure the death of our community."
The Pravda story says there was bruising and bleeding of the soft tissue in the neck, which would indicate someone squeezed the baby, whether accidentally or deliberately. This would cause the baby to cry out, inhaling water. It remains to be seen whether the child actually drowned (water entered the lungs causing pulmonary edema) or the entry of water caused a reflexive closing of the epiglottis resulting in asphyxia. Either way, it looks like excessive force was used during the baptism, resulting in the death of the infant.
I actually said that infants cannot drown simply by being placed under water. They will asphyxiate if held down so long that they pass out for lack of oxygen to the brain. And they can be made to inhale water by squeezing or hurting them so that they cry out in pain under water. It's very rare to find a dead infant who actually has water in his lungs.
I actually said that infants cannot drown simply by being placed under water. They will asphyxiate if held down so long that they pass out for lack of oxygen to the brain. And they can be made to inhale water by squeezing or hurting them so that they cry out in pain under water. It's very rare to find a dead infant who actually has water in his lungs.
Thanks for the clarification. Obviously, to baptize an infant, there is absolutely no need to hold it under water long enough to cause asphyxiation.
Sebastian Junger has an accurate and harrowing description of the mechanics of drowning towards the end of A Perfect Storm. Not for the faint of heart.
For the second time this year a video which shows the baptism of an infant that a short while later expired is circling the Greek internet causing goosebumps to anyone who sees it.
This is a video that was shot three years ago in a village in Moldova. Specifically, in July 2010, the priest Valentin Taraloungka was celebrating the baptism of an infant about a month in age.
A half hour after the baptism the baby died.
The priest appeared in court in November 2011 where he was sentenced for manslaughter with 18 months imprisonment.
Being sure that he was not the perpetrator of the death of the infant, the priest continued to claim his innocence.
At the trial that followed, having been in prison for four and a half months, the priest was acquitted.
A closer analysis of forensic findings proved that eventually the baby did not drown. The child was suffering from a lung disease unknown to the family, which was the cause of his death.
I was present at an Orthodox Baptism many years ago preformed by then-Bishop Theodosius, later Metropolitan. The child was lowered so that his face was always up. He was never fully immersed so that his whole head was under water.
So I find this story chilling. Why was it necessary to immerse the child?
The Byzantine Forum provides
message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though
discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are
those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the
Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the
www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial,
have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as
a source for official information for any Church. All posts become
property of byzcath.org. Contents copyright - 1996-2024 (Forum 1998-2024). All rights
reserved.
