The Byzantine Forum
Newest Members
Jayce, Fr. Abraham, AnonymousMan115, violet7488, HopefulOlivia
6,182 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
1 members (Roman), 585 guests, and 98 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
by orthodoxsinner2, September 30
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
by Veronica.H, April 24
Byzantine Catholic Outreach of Iowa
Exterior of Holy Angels Byzantine Catholic Parish
Church of St Cyril of Turau & All Patron Saints of Belarus
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics35,530
Posts417,670
Members6,182
Most Online4,112
Mar 25th, 2025
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 14 of 14 1 2 12 13 14
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,399
Likes: 33
ajk Offline
Member
Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,399
Likes: 33
Originally Posted by Administrator
What exactly were the "innovations" introduce in the Diocese of Chelm? There is always a tendency to assume that the Orthodox usage was correct and the Greek Catholic usage incorrect but that is not always true. I think we would need to have a good knowledge of the specific liturgical issues in order to put this document in context. My read of this is that the liturgical issues (serious as they were) were but a symptom of larger issues in the diocese at that time.

Here is a convenient on-line source: Religion and nationality in Western Ukraine: the Greek Catholic Church and Ruthenian National Movement in Galicia, 1867-1900 By John-Paul Himka ( link [books.google.com] )

Starting at page 42, The Conflict in Przemysl, but see especially page 57 The Conversion of the Chlem Eparchy to Orthodoxy.

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,968
Member
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,968
The closest I can come up with as far as a list is this which was prepared for this article [theor.jinr.ru] by Fr. Serge Keleher:

Quote
In principle Greek-Catholics retain the Eastern Orthodox tradition in matters of spirituality, theology, liturgy and discipline, but in practice the Greek-Catholic Churches have usually been severely romanised or 'latinised' in each of these areas. The Greek-Catholics in the Kholm diocese had endured a heavy dose of this 'latinisation'. By the middle of the nineteenth century the churches did not have iconscreens; the altar tables were fixed to the wall (which makes the processions and incensations that are necessary for the Byzantine liturgical tradition impossible); numerous Roman Catholic devotional practices and liturgical furnishings had been introduced everywhere; and the liturgical texts had been seriously altered in a romanising direction. The churches were furnished with organs, confessionals, and monstrances; various Roman Catholic devotions such as the feast of Corpus Christi, the blessing of fire, the Holy Hour, the Rosary, and the Stations of the Cross were in common use. The Greek-Catholic priests dressed and groomed themselves like Roman Catholic clergy. By the latter part of the nineteenth century the Greek-Catholics in the Kholm diocese had lost even the memory of much of their own authentic Orthodox tradition.

The principle of "correction" of the Byzantine liturgy was mentioned by Pius IX earlier in [i]In suprema Petri apostoli sede[/i] [orthocath.files.wordpress.com]:

Quote
We ask of you only those things that are strictly necessary: return to unity; agree with us in the profession of the true faith that the Catholic Church holds and teaches; and, along with that of the whole Church itself, maintain communion with the supreme see of Peter. With respect to your sacred rites, only those things found in them contrary to catholic faith and unity are subject to correction. Once remedied in this regard, your ancient Eastern liturgies will remain unchanged.

Personally, I am not inclined to think that Pius IX had all the things from Fr. Serge's article above in mind.

Perhaps Fr. Serge could comment if he catches this discussion?



Last edited by DTBrown; 11/06/10 07:29 PM.
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,968
Member
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,968
Thanks, Fr. Deacon Tony, for this resource!

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,760
Member
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,760
Originally Posted by ajk
Here is a convenient on-line source: Religion and nationality in Western Ukraine: the Greek Catholic Church and Ruthenian National Movement in Galicia, 1867-1900 By John-Paul Himka ( link [books.google.com] )

Starting at page 42, The Conflict in Przemysl, but see especially page 57 The Conversion of the Chlem Eparchy to Orthodoxy.

Fr Deacon Tony,
I tried the link; it only displays to p32. Can you give us some quotes or idea of the details?


Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,399
Likes: 33
ajk Offline
Member
Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,399
Likes: 33
Fr. Deacon Paul,

There is a content link near the top and to the left (under the heading Religion and nationality in Western Ukraine: the Greek Catholic Church and ... By John-Paul Himka). In the content drop-down menu there should be a link to page 42, The Conflict in Przemysl; click on it. From there, page 42, use the arrows next to the content link to page ahead. This worked for me.

Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 10
K
Junior Member
Junior Member
K Offline
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 10
Reading the "Conversion of Chelm" chapter in Himka, it seems that the "innovations" refered to in OMNEM SOLLICITUDINEM are actually the attempt by the new administrator of the eparchy to purify the ritual of "... all the Latin-Polish admixtures inappropriate to it and of arbitraty deformities." But Himka doesn't detail the specific latinizations.

It's interestiing that the people of many parishes wanted desperately to keep their latinizations: (from Himka, p. 58)

"In numerous parishes the parishioners refused to accept the purified ritual and made their refusal known by such acts as dragging the pastor out of the church, taking the church keys away from him, or packing all his belongings in a cart in front of the rectory..."

Note that those of us didn't take kindly to the RDL have exhibited a rather milder reaction...

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309
Likes: 3
S
Member
Member
S Offline
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309
Likes: 3
It could also be that many of the "purifications" represented russifications; i.e., imposition of a Nikonian liturgy in place of the pre-Nikonian rite used by the "Ruteni". But without additional information, it is impossible to tell.

Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 10
K
Junior Member
Junior Member
K Offline
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 10
Originally Posted by StuartK
It could also be that many of the "purifications" represented russifications; i.e., imposition of a Nikonian liturgy in place of the pre-Nikonian rite used by the "Ruteni". But without additional information, it is impossible to tell.

Good point, Stuart, that I hadn't considered.

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,760
Member
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,760
Thanks, I had reached my page limit; I switched to another browser and was able to read it.

The ecclesiastical history for this period closely follow the political history; Austria-Hungary vs Ukraine vs Russia vs Rusyn. We seem to be on a never-ending merry-go-round....the names change but the controversies continue.

Page 14 of 14 1 2 12 13 14

Moderated by  theophan 

Link Copied to Clipboard
The Byzantine Forum provides message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial, have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as a source for official information for any Church. All posts become property of byzcath.org. Contents copyright - 1996-2024 (Forum 1998-2024). All rights reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0