The Byzantine Forum
Newest Members
Frank O, BC LV, returningtoaxum, Jennifer B, geodude
6,176 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 323 guests, and 114 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
by orthodoxsinner2, September 30
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
by Veronica.H, April 24
Byzantine Catholic Outreach of Iowa
Exterior of Holy Angels Byzantine Catholic Parish
Church of St Cyril of Turau & All Patron Saints of Belarus
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics35,523
Posts417,632
Members6,176
Most Online4,112
Mar 25th, 2025
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
theophan #352112 09/01/10 11:13 PM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 175
G
Member
Member
G Offline
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 175
I'm copying a note I wrote to two friends who had objections based on free will.

Quote
It appears to me that you are *unconsciously* reading the synergistic, conditional salvation view into what I've written. This view makes God's will ultimately impotent against man's will. The error of this view is to assume that if God engages his omnipotence in converting a soul, then such a conversion could not be a free act from the human side. This is a fallacy which ignores the reality of what Saint Augustine called "efficacious grace." This grace is the true causative source of saving faith. As St Paul wrote to the Thessalonians, "It is given to you not only to believe in Christ but also to suffer for his sake." Efficacious grace does not over-ride human free will, but draws the soul, enabling the once perverse will to approach God in repentance and faith. Mark well that St Paul (I Tim. 1: 16) refers to his own conversion as the pattern after which all are brought to faith; not in the same blinding light and voice from heaven, but by the same almighty power of divine grace, which infuses faith into our souls without violating our free will, but enabling it to be for the first time truly free.

If you believe that God loves all his human creatures and gives them free will to respond to his love, can you really imagine that God would ever, even in imposing needed punishments, strip them of their free will so that they could not any longer choose to love him? Yet this is what some proponents of endless torment have stated. The idea that death forms a cut-off after which repentance and return to God is no longer possible is, I believe, a hideous notion which makes God not the Most Holy Lover of Mankind, but the Most Cruel Tyrant, whom we may fear and tremble before, but never love.

Death does form a certain cut-off point, but not to all further chances for salvation. Rather it forms the cut-off point for being the first-fruits and first-born, by which he will effect his plan to save all.

I believe that God has his elect whom he calls by his efficacious grace to conversion in this life, and that they are called not only for their own salvation, but for that of all others, who will be called and converted hereafter, in the ages to come. Is this not implied by the Fatima Prayer? "O my Jesus, forgive us our sins and save us from the fire of hell; lead all souls to Heaven, especially those most in need of thy mercy."

Did you ever consider the possibility that God, who holds the destiny of all souls in his almighty hands, is calling some to salvation now, and others he will call later? And that he calls some now for the sake of those whom he will call later? I see this clearly in the Scriptures. Consider St Paul's words: "But we, brethren beloved of God, are bound to give thanks to God always for you, because God has chosen you as first-fruits unto salvation through the sanctification of the Spirit and belief of the truth" (II Thessalonians 2: 13, Confraternity Version). Now "First-fruits" are not the whole harvest, but rather the guarantee of the whole harvest to come in due time! All we who believe now, in this life, are the first-fruits called and ordained by God to guarantee the whole harvest of souls to come, according to his plan of the ages. We, as the first-born, have the incredible opportunity to serve him in the salvation of those who will be the latter-born. Who could ever sufficiently thank God for such a privilege? By the way, this is the answer to the lame objection that "if everyone will make it to heaven, what's the point of living a good Christian life now?"

Gabriel #355513 11/05/10 10:04 PM
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 31
M
Member
Member
M Offline
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 31
Did the Council of Florence dogmatically define purgatory as distinct from hell?

And did it say anything dogmatic about duration?

MichaelB #355561 11/07/10 03:17 AM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 175
G
Member
Member
G Offline
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 175
Michael B:

First, welcome to this forum!

Would you please clarify what is behind your questions?

Thank you,
Gabriel

Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1
Junior Member
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1
I like what St Faustina says the Lord told her: that at the moment of death each and every person is me by Jesus and offered His salvation.

Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 450
D
Member
Member
D Offline
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 450
rfp,

I think there is a typo in your sentence.

Do you have a reference for this? I have heard this before. Can you cite the source, please?

thanks

Gabriel #355604 11/08/10 10:11 PM
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 31
M
Member
Member
M Offline
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 31
Originally Posted by Gabriel
Michael B:

First, welcome to this forum!

Would you please clarify what is behind your questions?

Thank you,
Gabriel
Thank you Gabriel.

I've read that the Latin Church (at the time of the council of Florence) believed that the Orthodox were "soft on hell," and I'd be interested in what was dogmatically "defined" (for a Roman Catholic) at this council.

I understand there are some Roman Catholics who hope for the Salvation of all (as I do), and I'd like to know how they interpret the words of this council (within the context of their communion's doctrine of infallibility.)

MichaelB #355827 11/12/10 03:19 PM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 175
G
Member
Member
G Offline
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 175
The eternity of punishment has never been defined. The Church has simply quoted Scripture on the subject of eschatalogical punishment. Hence the meaning of various Church decrees remains subject to what Scripture actually means in the passages quoted. For example, at the Council of Florence in the decree Cantate Domino (1441) for union with the Copts & Jacobites we read: "It firmly believes, professes and preaches that none of those living outside the Catholic Church, not only pagans but also Jews, heretics, and schismatics, can become partakers of eternal life, but will go into 'the everlasting fire prepared for the devil and his angels' (Matt. 25:41) unless before death they shall be joined to the flock." Now I don't doubt that the overwhelming majority of Catholics - and most Eastern Orthodox also - have taken the language of 'everlasting fire' in a literalistic manner. Yet as I have indicated, the Greek word aionos normally means age-long, and only means eternal in relation to God. Moreover the fire is not to burn and torment unfortunate souls for all eternity but to burn away sin by the divine energy which is analogically called fire. As Origen said, "'Our God is a consuming fire.' And what shall that fire consume? Our sins."

Gabriel #355875 11/13/10 09:48 PM
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 31
M
Member
Member
M Offline
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 31
Originally Posted by Gabriel
The eternity of punishment has never been defined. The Church has simply quoted Scripture on the subject of eschatalogical punishment. Hence the meaning of various Church decrees remains subject to what Scripture actually means in the passages quoted. For example, at the Council of Florence in the decree Cantate Domino (1441) for union with the Copts & Jacobites we read: "It firmly believes, professes and preaches that none of those living outside the Catholic Church, not only pagans but also Jews, heretics, and schismatics, can become partakers of eternal life, but will go into 'the everlasting fire prepared for the devil and his angels' (Matt. 25:41) unless before death they shall be joined to the flock." Now I don't doubt that the overwhelming majority of Catholics - and most Eastern Orthodox also - have taken the language of 'everlasting fire' in a literalistic manner. Yet as I have indicated, the Greek word aionos normally means age-long, and only means eternal in relation to God. Moreover the fire is not to burn and torment unfortunate souls for all eternity but to burn away sin by the divine energy which is analogically called fire. As Origen said, "'Our God is a consuming fire.' And what shall that fire consume? Our sins."
Thank you Gabriel.

Page 3 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  theophan 

Link Copied to Clipboard
The Byzantine Forum provides message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial, have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as a source for official information for any Church. All posts become property of byzcath.org. Contents copyright - 1996-2024 (Forum 1998-2024). All rights reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0