1 members (EastCatholic),
225
guests, and
95
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums26
Topics35,515
Posts417,582
Members6,167
|
Most Online4,112 Mar 25th, 2025
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 55
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 55 |
What if any does the idea of "Doctors of the Church" have on Byzantine or other eastern traditions. As far as I know the title does not exist in eastern churches, and many of the doctors are western saints with western theological promulgations. The closest thing I can think of are the Three Holy Hierarchs in honor and sanctity of teaching. I would appreciate all of your input. Thanks in advance!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 7
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 7 |
Well, the Doctors of the Church, are, well, the doctors of the church. This includes the whole church, both east and west. I don't know about the Orthodox, though.  God Bless!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309 Likes: 3
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309 Likes: 3 |
Actually, it's a Latin title, which, while applied to some of the Fathers, is also applied to a number of second millennium Latin theologians whose views are not entirely consistent with the perspectives of the Eastern Churches. So, while we honor, venerate and learn from those Fathers who are also Doctors, in general we do not pay that much attention to the Doctors who are not Fathers.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 55
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 55 |
I agree with your view Stuart, but in arguing that position to Latin Catholics, they are taken aback and push that Doctors are for the WHOLE CHURCH. Not only with this, but there is confusion that a Church can have things peculiar to only one Rite, even if it is the biggest. They often cite the inclusion of Eastern Fathers in the Doctors, but I think my best retort is where are the Armenian Fathers (Some of which are unique only to the Armenians).
Have you encountered this?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309 Likes: 3
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309 Likes: 3 |
Have you encountered this? Haven't we all?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 37
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 37 |
It is my understanding that "Doctor of the Church" is primarily a liturgical distinction. Example: Ignatius of Antioch is NOT a doctor of the church because he is a martyr, and martyrdom takes precedence. Essentially it is class of saints, with their own common, proper antiphons, readings, etc.
As such, I'm not really sure it has a meaning for us Byzantines, beyond the point of the title indicating that the writings and teachings of these saints are considered important by the Latin Church.
It certainly isn't an exclusive list of great theologians, even from a Latin perspective as is witnessed by the omission of Ignatius of Antioch.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,405
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,405 |
The title of "Doctor of the Church" was introduced by Pope Boniface VIII in 1298, when it was bestowed on the four great Western Fathers of the Church, St. Gregory the Great ("Dialogus"), St. Ambrose, St. Augustine, and St. Jerome. Their feasts were given the rank of duplex in the Roman Calendar and took precedence over ordinary semiduplex Sundays.
In 1568, the Dominican Pope St. Pius V added the four great Eastern Fathers, St. John Chrystostom, St. Basil the Great, St. Gregory of Nazianzus, and St. Athanasius, as well as St. Thomas Aquinas.
Since then, there has been a proliferation of Doctors of the Church. Feasts of Doctors of the Church now rank as memoriæ and no longer outrank ordinary Sundays, but there is a special Common of Doctors in the Liturgy of the Hours. I like the Magnificat antiphon for Doctors of the Church: "O Doctor optime, Ecclesiæ sanctæ lumen, beate N., divinæ legis amator, deprecare pro nobis Filium Dei."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 695
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 695 |
I guess the short answer is that we don't have "Doctors of the Church" as a category, but if the Latin church wants to give this title to some of its saints, well that is their business. And if they want to put this title on to our saints, well...we can't stop them I suppose. Neither is it a "deal breaker".
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 65
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 65 |
Isn't it true that in the Eastern Churches, the age of the Fathers has never closed? It seems to me that there are Doctors of the Church in the East also, but we call them Fathers of the Church while the West had to begin to call its new Fathers of the Church Doctors of the Church because it claims that the time of the Fathers is over.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,042
novice O.Carm. Member
|
novice O.Carm. Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,042 |
The title of "Doctor of the Church" was introduced by Pope Boniface VIII in 1298, when it was bestowed on the four great Western Fathers of the Church, St. Gregory the Great ("Dialogus"), St. Ambrose, St. Augustine, and St. Jerome. Their feasts were given the rank of duplex in the Roman Calendar and took precedence over ordinary semiduplex Sundays.
In 1568, the Dominican Pope St. Pius V added the four great Eastern Fathers, St. John Chrystostom, St. Basil the Great, St. Gregory of Nazianzus, and St. Athanasius, as well as St. Thomas Aquinas.
Since then, there has been a proliferation of Doctors of the Church. Feasts of Doctors of the Church now rank as memoriæ and no longer outrank ordinary Sundays, but there is a special Common of Doctors in the Liturgy of the Hours. I like the Magnificat antiphon for Doctors of the Church: "O Doctor optime, Ecclesiæ sanctæ lumen, beate N., divinæ legis amator, deprecare pro nobis Filium Dei." The Roman Missal also contains a common for Doctors of the Church.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 7
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 7 |
The Orthodox give the title "Doctor of the Church" to St. Gregory Palamas, and while he isn't one of the 33 "Doctors of the Church" commemorated liturgically by the Roman Rite (and we don't use the term "doctor" liturgically anyway), I don't see any reason why we shouldn't use that term for him ourselves.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 65
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 65 |
The Orthodox give the title "Doctor of the Church" to St. Gregory Palamas, and while he isn't one of the 33 "Doctors of the Church" commemorated liturgically by the Roman Rite (and we don't use the term "doctor" liturgically anyway), I don't see any reason why we shouldn't use that term for him ourselves. Excellent point, Peregrinu. I completely agree. St. Gregory Palamas, intercede for us! Many blessings, Scott
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 55
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 55 |
Thanks for all the help.
I tried searching up for documentation regarding Palamas being called a Doctor by the Russians but I could not come up with anything. Any assistance would be greatly appreciated!
|
|
|
|
|