Hello,
In a previous post I posed the question: "What ARE the rules of an Icon being legitimate, i.e. useable and venerable as an Icon?" I am new to iconology/iconography and byzantine traditions and hoping someone might be able to provide some insight?
With some research I found some info regarding the rules of iconography:
In iconography, a number of artistic rules and conventions apply. The underlying drawing is geometrically structured and proportioned. Color areas are clearly defined. Figures are elongated, eyes large and shadowed, eyebrows arched, noses long and straight, mouths closed, hands gracefully stylized. The forehead (seat of the intellect) and the collar bone (gateway to the heart) are emphasized. Both eyes and at least one ear must be visible to enable the holy figure to see and hear the viewer. Out of respect for the commandment against graven images, Orthodox icons avoid strongly three-dimensional effects; but the complex cubist-like highlights hint at spiritual dimensions. Perspective is flattened or even inversed.
...and,
The reason for the rules governing the writing of icons is because of their purpose. In the Quinisext council of 692, iconographic rules and styles were agreed to and set down, so that icons would reveal and proclaim doctrine in an Orthodox context...they are integral to Orthodox worship. As such, they must communicate the truths of the faith, whether it’s illuminating the doctrine of Transfiguration, as seen in Saint’s icons, or the doctrine of the Incarnation, as depicted by the numerous styles of the icons of Jesus. In addition...the iconography reflects and amplifies the hymnography, and vice versa.
From these statements I come to understand a bit more about the rules and purpose of icons, but I am still not sure what in a particular icon which makes that icon venerable. Is it simply to meet the artistic criteria described above (and be blessed of course) to be venerable? Are there specific characteristics that, for example, an icon of Christ or St. Nicholas must have in order to make it legitimate and venerable? I've seen varying examples of Christ, St. Nicholas and others which leads me to believe that there is not one and only one proper rendition for each holy person...but maybe just with a few certain identifying characteristics. But I am guessing there must be some guidelines? Maybe in the Quinisext council of 692, where the iconographic rules and styles were agreed to and set down?
Sorry for the long post, but I am just very interested to know.
Thanks.
