Forums26
Topics35,510
Posts417,516
Members6,161
|
Most Online3,380 Dec 29th, 2019
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 396
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 396 |
Well resignation of a head of state can lead to some interesting situations. Who would a pope hand his resignation to..the papal secratry of state?? Remember when tricky Dick turned his resignation into Henry Kissinger, who was Secretary of state at the time, in 1972 ?
Last edited by johnzonaras; 01/20/11 03:21 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,268
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,268 |
I wonder when the Pope will submit his resignation . . . That would certainly be an interesting step. Among other things, it would mandate re-educating the Latin Church to the fact that it is actually possible for a Pope to resign. I think many in the Latin Church know that in the Catholic Church (universal), there are only 2 cases whereby the office of the Supreme Pontiff becomes vacant or sedes vacante: the death of the Pope or his resignation. The unresolved question is: to whom does the Pope tender his resignation? Amado
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 308
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 308 |
I think many in the Latin Church know that in the Catholic Church (universal), there are only 2 cases whereby the office of the Supreme Pontiff becomes vacant or sedes vacante: the death of the Pope or his resignation.
The unresolved question is: to whom does the Pope tender his resignation?
Amado This was a burning issue leading to the last days of Pope John Paul II. Many felt he was too sick to be the Pope and was expecting he would resign (at that point) soon.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,431
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,431 |
While I'm at it, who is the Pope to "accept" a Patriarch's resignation??? I would say the Catholic Church needs to rethink its understanding of the term "Patriarch". I think the first step should be to stop using it as an honorary title for certain Latin bishop (e.g. Jerusalem). But having said that, I think I would actually be surprised if the pope wasn't involved in Sfeir's decision to resign -- keep in mind that, in addition to being a Patriarch, Sfeir is the pastor of a parish in Rome (as are nearly all of the Eastern Catholic patriarchs).
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309 Likes: 3
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309 Likes: 3 |
The unresolved question is: to whom does the Pope tender his resignation? The Emperor--the same fellow who had to ratify his election. What? You didn't know the Bishop of Rome had to get his election ratified, just like the Archbishop of Constantinople? So many problems could be resolved so easily, if only we could reestablish the Roman empire.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,268
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,268 |
While I'm at it, who is the Pope to "accept" a Patriarch's resignation??? I would say the Catholic Church needs to rethink its understanding of the term "Patriarch". I think the first step should be to stop using it as an honorary title for certain Latin bishop (e.g. Jerusalem). But having said that, I think I would actually be surprised if the pope wasn't involved in Sfeir's decision to resign -- keep in mind that, in addition to being a Patriarch, Sfeir is the pastor of a parish in Rome (as are nearly all of the Eastern Catholic patriarchs). I don't think HB Sfeir is the "pastor" of a parish in Rome because he is the Patriarch of the Maronites. He is assigned a titular suburbicarian Church in Rome because he is a Cardinal. (BTW, even if HB Sfeir resigns as the Patriarch of the Maronites, he remains a Cardinal, unless he also resigns his cardinalate.) Other Eastern Catholic Patriarchs, who are also named Cardinals, each has his own titular suburbicarian Church in Rome. Amado
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,268
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,268 |
The unresolved question is: to whom does the Pope tender his resignation? The Emperor--the same fellow who had to ratify his election. What? You didn't know the Bishop of Rome had to get his election ratified, just like the Archbishop of Constantinople? So many problems could be resolved so easily, if only we could reestablish the Roman empire. I think it's only the East that has not recovered from the loss of her Emperor!  Amado
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 18
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 18 |
What are a patriarchal curia, patriarchal eparchy, and titular suburbicarian church?
And does the authority that the pope submits his resignation to have the right to not accept it?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,431
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,431 |
You're quite right, Amadeus. I would have said "titular pastor", except that I figured the titular part was obvious. (One big clue is the fact that he doesn't live in Rome.  )
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,208
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,208 |
The Code of Canon Laws says that the Pope is not obligated to submit his resignation to anyone, but it has to be public and freely given.
Now who would decide those issues I couldn't say.
I wonder what the life/garb/residence of a pope-emeritus would be like.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309 Likes: 3
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309 Likes: 3 |
In the old days, they put a pillow over his head and pushed down really hard. Or they slipped something in his bed time toddy. But the Church is different now.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 10,090 Likes: 15
Global Moderator Member
|
Global Moderator Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 10,090 Likes: 15 |
But having said that, I think I would actually be surprised if the pope wasn't involved in Sfeir's decision to resign -- keep in mind that, in addition to being a Patriarch, Sfeir is the pastor of a parish in Rome (as are nearly all of the Eastern Catholic patriarchs). I don't think HB Sfeir is the "pastor" of a parish in Rome because he is the Patriarch of the Maronites. He is assigned a titular suburbicarian Church in Rome because he is a Cardinal. (BTW, even if HB Sfeir resigns as the Patriarch of the Maronites, he remains a Cardinal, unless he also resigns his cardinalate.) Other Eastern Catholic Patriarchs, who are also named Cardinals, each has his own titular suburbicarian Church in Rome. Amado, my brother, So good to see a post from you, my friend  . However, as is invariably the case when you and I post of patriarchs who are cardinals, we must again disagree. Canon 350 §1 of the Latin Code says: The College of Cardinals is divided into three orders: the episcopal order, to which belong those Cardinals to whom the Roman Pontiff assigns the title of a suburbicarian Church, and Eastern-Rite Patriarchs who are made members of the College of Cardinals; the presbyteral order, and the diaconal order. As you will notice, a distinction is made between 'those Cardinals to whom the Roman Pontiff assigns the title of a suburbicarian Church and eastern-Rite Patriarchs who are made members of the College of Cardinals'. As noted in §3 of the same Canon Eastern Patriarchs within the College of Cardinals have their patriarchal see as a title. Thus, the title of the Maronite Patriarch is that of his Patriarchal See, Antioch; that of the Patriarch of the Chaldeans is Babylon and Ur of the Chaldees; that of the Armenian Patriarch is Cilicia; and, that of the Coptic Patriarch is Alexandria. Were the Melkite Patriarch to accept the red hat, his would be of Antioch, Alexandria, & Jerusalem; were the Syriac Patriarch to be offered and to accept the red hat, his would be of Antioch, as well. Certain Churches in Rome are designated as Patriarchal Churches. The Patriarchal Basilicas, so-called, and those to whom they are ascribed are: Saint John in Lateran (the Pope of Rome) Saint Peter in the Vatican (Patriarch of Constantinople) Saint Mary Major (Melkite Patriarch of Antioch) Saint Paul Outside the Walls (Patriarch of Alexandria) Each of the other Eastern Catholic Patriarchs also holds title to a Patriarchal Church. In the case of the Maronites, it is the Church of St Maroun, if I remember correctly. Many years, Neil
"One day all our ethnic traits ... will have disappeared. Time itself is seeing to this. And so we can not think of our communities as ethnic parishes, ... unless we wish to assure the death of our community."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 10,090 Likes: 15
Global Moderator Member
|
Global Moderator Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 10,090 Likes: 15 |
What are a patriarchal curia, patriarchal eparchy, and titular suburbicarian church? Catherine, A patriarchal curia is defined by Canon 114 of the CCEO (the Eastern Code of Canon Law): Canon 114 1. Distinct from the curia of the eparchy of the patriarch, the patriarch must have at his see a patriarchal curia which is comprised of
- the permanent synod,
- the bishops of the patriarchal curia,
- the ordinary tribunal of the patriarchal Church,
- the patriarchal finance officer,
- the patriarchal chancellor,
- the liturgical commission,
- as well as other commissions which by law are attached to the patriarchal curia
. (emphasis added) 2. Persons belonging to the patriarchal curia can be selected by the patriarch from the clergy of the entire Church over which he presides, having consulted their eparchial bishop or, if it is a case of a member of a religious institute or society of the common life in the manner of religious, their major superior. 3. The offices of either curia of the patriarch, inasmuch as it is possible, are not to be conferred upon the same persons. For all intents and purposes, the patriarchal curia is comprised of those charged with the administrative functions of the patriarchate. As to its components, which I bulleted above: The permanent synod is the patriarch and the four bishops who function as the synod between (the usually annual) meetings of the full synod (all bishops of the Church). The bishops of the patriarchal curia are those bishops with particular responsibilities over and above diocesan management that touch directly on the administrative functions of the patriarchate. The ordnary tribunal is comprised of a president, judges, promoter of justice, defenders of the bond, and other necessary officials (e.g., notaries), and ordinarily hears appeals of matters initially decided by tribunals at lower jurisdictional levels. The patriarchal finance officer administers the material goods and monies of the patriarchate. The chancellor (or protosynchellos) presides over the chancery and archives of the patriarchate. The liturgical commision - pretty self-explanatory. Such other commissions as may be required for the effective administration of the patriarchate. For example, there might be one for humanitarian works, for the educational endeavors of the patriarchate, etc. The patriarchal curia is distinct from the curia of the patriarchal eparchy - the latter has much the same responibilities, on a much smaller scale, for the eparchy of which the patriarch himself is the presiding hierarch/bishop. ********** A patriarchal eparchy is a canonical jurisdiction (metropolitinate, archeparchy, eparchy, however styled) of which the patriarch himself is the incumbent/reigning hierarch, although its day-to-day management might be vested in auxiliary bishops, vicars, etc. The patriarchal eparchies are: - the Maronites, the Eparchy of Joubbe, Sarba and Jounieh of the Maronites - the Armenians, the Archeparchy of Beirut of the Catholic Armenians - the Copts, the Eparchy of Alexandria of the Catholic Copts - the Syriacs, the Eparchy of Beirut of the Syriac Catholics - the Chaldeans, the Metropolitan Archeparchy of Baghdad of the Chaldeans - the Melkites, the Metropolitan Archeparchy of Damascus of the Melkites *********** A titular suburbican church (or diocese) is one of 7 dioceses in the vicinity of Rome, By long tradition, these were assigned to those cardinals who held the rank of cardinal bishop. These were individuals who had important, virtually full-time, responsibilities in the administration of the Vatican and really had no time to devote to the administration of their dioceses. As a result, they were provided with auxiliary bishops who would deal with the diocesan responsibilities. During his reign, HH John Paul II made a change and assigned an actual (not auxiliary) bishop to each of the dioceses. The cardinal-bishops no longer have any responsibilities for the dioceses, but continue to hold the titular title as if they did - although it is now merely symbolic. It's a purely Latin function and of neither concern nor particular interest to the East. Many years, Neil
"One day all our ethnic traits ... will have disappeared. Time itself is seeing to this. And so we can not think of our communities as ethnic parishes, ... unless we wish to assure the death of our community."
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,953
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,953 |
The unresolved question is: to whom does the Pope tender his resignation? The Emperor--the same fellow who had to ratify his election. What? You didn't know the Bishop of Rome had to get his election ratified, just like the Archbishop of Constantinople? So many problems could be resolved so easily, if only we could reestablish the Roman empire. Yeah, but if that happened the Eastern Empire would come back too and we would just have some more good old fashioned religious wars.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,431
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,431 |
Canon 350 §1 of the Latin Code says: The College of Cardinals is divided into three orders: the episcopal order, to which belong those Cardinals to whom the Roman Pontiff assigns the title of a suburbicarian Church, and Eastern-Rite Patriarchs who are made members of the College of Cardinals; the presbyteral order, and the diaconal order. As you will notice, a distinction is made between 'those Cardinals to whom the Roman Pontiff assigns the title of a suburbicarian Church and eastern-Rite Patriarchs who are made members of the College of Cardinals'. As noted in §3 of the same Canon Eastern Patriarchs within the College of Cardinals have their patriarchal see as a title. Interesting distinction. Thanks for filling us in on that Neil.
|
|
|
|
|