The Byzantine Forum
Newest Members
HopefulOlivia, Quid Est Veritas, Frank O, BC LV, returningtoaxum
6,178 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
5 members (bwfackler, San Nicolas, EastCatholic, 2 invisible), 332 guests, and 130 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
by orthodoxsinner2, September 30
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
by Veronica.H, April 24
Byzantine Catholic Outreach of Iowa
Exterior of Holy Angels Byzantine Catholic Parish
Church of St Cyril of Turau & All Patron Saints of Belarus
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics35,525
Posts417,643
Members6,178
Most Online4,112
Mar 25th, 2025
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 47
Member
Member
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 47
I have seen many variations in styles of iconography, yet most icons I have seen have a clear message and serve as windows into heaven that are used purposely for veneration.

Though, when too much artistic liberty and ignoring of the rules of iconography happens, the icon seems to no longer serve a purpose to me.

I am speaking mostly in criticism of the Cathedral of the Ascension in Oakland, California. [Linked Image]

This icon and all others in this cathedral are downright terrifying and don't even look like they represent humans. The Pantokrator looks like an alien from a science fiction film, that had nitric acid spilled on its face. The platytera icon is no better.

No matter what manner of iconography (Western, Baroque, Russian, Greek, Coptic, Ethiopian, Syrian etc.) an image of holiness and a message of the faith are obvious and tolerable.

Yet HOW can such atrocities like the aforementioned examples even be even considered as icons or even allowed in churches?

I think the iconoclasts saw icons like these.

Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,208
S
Member
Member
S Offline
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,208
one of the things that happens when iconography doesn't follow the rules is the hideous, frightening illustration you posted. After that, it's downhill all the way. yecch.

what were these people thinking? It astonishes me that this in in an Orthodox temple, of all places.

If I thought Jesus looked like that I'd run screaming as far away as I could get.

Last edited by sielos ilgesys; 04/12/11 09:12 AM.
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 848
Member
Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 848
"This icon and all others in this cathedral are downright terrifying and don't even look like they represent humans. The Pantokrator looks like an alien from a science fiction film, that had nitric acid spilled on its face. The platytera icon is no better."

LOL

Last edited by Otsheylnik; 04/12/11 11:02 PM.
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 384
Likes: 1
S
Member
Member
S Offline
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 384
Likes: 1
You should visit Lourdes! The image of the Theotokos in the Basilica of the Holy Rosary is downright startling, while I can't say the iconography in the Ukrainian church knew what he was doing, either. All in all, as much as I love the place, Lourdes is a study in a bad - indeed very bad - iconography.

Mind you, I don't think anything quite beats the image that started this thread!

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,010
Likes: 1
C
Member
Member
C Offline
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,010
Likes: 1
I've been told the icons in Oakland are referred to by some as "cave paintings" given the overall architecture of the cathedral. smile

Dn. David

Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 52
E
Member
Member
E Offline
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 52
the image above recalls travolta in Battlefield Earth.

Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 47
Member
Member
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 47
Originally Posted by eamon
the image above recalls travolta in Battlefield Earth.

LOL WOW! THAT IS HILARIOUS AND WHAT'S SAD IS I CAN SEE THE RESEMBLANCE!

Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 52
E
Member
Member
E Offline
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 52
my wife ( an Icon writer) has chimed in that is looks like Warf from star trek Next generation, I am concerned that we seem like big scifi fans, alas we are not.

Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1
G
Junior Member
Junior Member
G Offline
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1
What happens when the canons are not followed, is that "I" show through in stead of God showing through. Worship is destroyed and idolatry ensues.

Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 1
L
Member
Member
L Offline
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 1
My first exposure to Orthodoxy, and my only exposure for decades, was in this temple. When I went to the funeral of my best friend's Papou at Ascension there were only 6 or 8 of the apostles completed on the dome [flickr.com].

The Pantokrator and the Platytera are just weird, but they somehow did not deter a 10 year old High Church Episcopalian from being totally drawn into the service, which would have been I'm sure entirely in Greek. Having been exposed through the funeral I found a way to get there again a number of times over the years before making my own journey East.

Now that I have been exposed to other icons, done within the traditional language of Holy Icons, and having taken several classes in Holy Icons... I have to say I still am very fond of the iconostatis at Ascension [viewat.org], except for the Mystical Supper which I really find awful. I also like the apostles on the dome.

Personally I detest the pews more than the iconography. Luckily when I'm there for things like Compline during Great Lent there are only about 8 of us in the pews and half of that number including myself just stand in the aisles.

I also like very much the mosaics in the exonarthex.

I will always love this temple. It will be very interesting to see what kind of iconography they will have in the separate chapel [flickr.com] when that gets completed. In the current economy it seems like completion may be a ways off still.

Last edited by likethethief; 05/24/11 12:11 AM.

Moderated by  theophan 

Link Copied to Clipboard
The Byzantine Forum provides message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial, have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as a source for official information for any Church. All posts become property of byzcath.org. Contents copyright - 1996-2024 (Forum 1998-2024). All rights reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0