I have seen many variations in styles of iconography, yet most icons I have seen have a clear message and serve as windows into heaven that are used purposely for veneration.
Though, when too much artistic liberty and ignoring of the rules of iconography happens, the icon seems to no longer serve a purpose to me.
I am speaking mostly in criticism of the Cathedral of the Ascension in Oakland, California. [
Linked Image]
This icon and all others in this cathedral are downright terrifying and don't even look like they represent humans. The Pantokrator looks like an alien from a science fiction film, that had nitric acid spilled on its face. The platytera icon is no better.
No matter what manner of iconography (Western, Baroque, Russian, Greek, Coptic, Ethiopian, Syrian etc.) an image of holiness and a message of the faith are obvious and tolerable.
Yet HOW can such atrocities like the aforementioned examples even be even considered as icons or even allowed in churches?
I think the iconoclasts saw icons like these.