0 members (),
435
guests, and
109
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums26
Topics35,522
Posts417,625
Members6,175
|
Most Online4,112 Mar 25th, 2025
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,968
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,968 |
As far as I know, this is the last Ukrainian Catholic catechism that's been published prior to the upcoming "Christ Our Pascha," due out in Ukrainian this week. From the file description: "Our Faith: A Byzantine Catechism for Adults," by Fr. Casimir Kucharek. This is a Ukrainian Catholic Catechism, bearing the imprimatur of the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church, one of the Eastern Catholic Churches in union with the Pope of Rome. Not to be confused with the new Ukrainian Catholic Catechism "Christ our Pascha" which is due to be released in Ukrainian in June 2011. Permission to share on Internet given February 12, 2010. It can be read online or downloaded here. [ archive.org] Fr. Kucharek was the noted author of The Byzantine-Slav Liturgy of St. John Chrysostom and The Sacramental Mysteries: A Byzantine Approach.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 26
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 26 |
Thanks for sharing this resource; it looks valuable. I've noticed some unfortunate typos here and there, though. On p. 148, for example, in discussing devotion to the Theotokos, the section title reads, "The Mother is God in the Liturgy." Obviously that should say, "The Mother of God in the Liturgy" -- hopefully our Protestant friends don't mistakenly take the typo as evidence of idolatry! 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 26
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 26 |
Sorry to comment again, but after looking through the section on "The Pope, Successor to Peter," I was struck by how strong some of the language is in favor of what some would call a "Latin" view of the Pope. On p. 168 it is said that "he is bishop, not only of Rome, but of the universal Church. As chief shepherd, he is bishop over all his fellow bishops . . . " Papal infallibility is also clearly taught from pages 173-176. Interesting.
The last version of this was published in 1983, is that correct?
Last edited by Iason; 06/23/11 12:34 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 695
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 695 |
Yes, Fr. Kucharek's (vichnaya pamyat) stuff is pretty latinised. cf. his photo.
Not too surprising, he was born in 1928 and worked in Saskatchewan
Vatican II in the Canadian UGCC did not even really begin seriously until maybe the 1990s - maybe later in Sask.
So a man of his times - he's no Archimandrite Robert Taft SJ.
Long ago I read his book on Sacraments - very disappointing, but now that I know something of his context, not too surprising. (a far cry from the Instruzzione!)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,968
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,968 |
Yes, Fr. Casimir was a man of his times. When his catechism was published, it was considered a landmark event. His work was considered invaluable at the time.
It's much different nowadays. Today, the new Ukrainian Catholic Catechism Christ our Pascha is being unveiled in Ukraine. I tried to see what the UGCC website is saying about it but the site is currently down. Likely, it has a lot of activity today.
Edited to add: the site is back up. There are a couple of new articles on the Ukrainian language page but not much specific information on the content of the new Catechism yet. Hopefully, we'll see something soon.
Last edited by DTBrown; 06/24/11 08:01 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 695
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 695 |
Back then there was almost nothing - (re the theology of our Church, latinized or truly Orthodox) Certainly nothing in English. (cf. back in the 70s there was almost nothing in English on Orthodoxy - I remember searching the university library and all I could find was Benz; then finally someone put me on to Timothy Ware (now His Eminence Kallistos) (now the shelves are full of books etc. from St. Vlads etc. all in English)
Kucharek's an interesting historical piece to compare with the New Catechism.
Also one can deduce where the mind and theology of the hierarchy was and is now.
Back then most clergy thought we were just ethnic Roman Catholics with a different mass. (some still do!)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 10,090 Likes: 16
Global Moderator Member
|
Global Moderator Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 10,090 Likes: 16 |
Back then most clergy thought we were just ethnic Roman Catholics with a different mass. (some still do!) Herb, Or just ethnics with funny hats, who thought we were Catholics. Many years, Neil (sorry, I could not resist  )
"One day all our ethnic traits ... will have disappeared. Time itself is seeing to this. And so we can not think of our communities as ethnic parishes, ... unless we wish to assure the death of our community."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 695
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 695 |
dear Moderator Neil:
OJALA they had "funny hats" - that would be a huge step forward I remember one protopresbyter telling me that kamilavkas were "exclusively Orthodox".
unless you mean those kopak things (then they are indeed "funny hats" {unless one is a Cantor of a Schul) (maybe they were an ecumenical effort in headgear - ojala).
a Blessed Fast to all.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,885
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,885 |
One of the Sister Servants that followed Bishop Stasiuk to Australia said that they had to do courses to discover what their UGCC church culture was as they had no idea at all, after Vat II.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 695
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 695 |
what their UGCC church culture was as they had no idea at all, after Vat II. sorry, not sure I quite understand. Can you say more?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,855 Likes: 8
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,855 Likes: 8 |
Sorry to comment again, but after looking through the section on "The Pope, Successor to Peter," I was struck by how strong some of the language is in favor of what some would call a "Latin" view of the Pope. On p. 168 it is said that "he is bishop, not only of Rome, but of the universal Church. As chief shepherd, he is bishop over all his fellow bishops . . . " Papal infallibility is also clearly taught from pages 173-176. Interesting.
The last version of this was published in 1983, is that correct? Yes, it does appear to be heavily Latinized. I hope that the new catechism of the Russian Orthodox Church, which is presently in the works, will be translated into English.
|
|
|
|
|