The Byzantine Forum
Newest Members
BC LV, returningtoaxum, Jennifer B, geodude, elijahyasi
6,175 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 435 guests, and 109 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
by orthodoxsinner2, September 30
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
by Veronica.H, April 24
Byzantine Catholic Outreach of Iowa
Exterior of Holy Angels Byzantine Catholic Parish
Church of St Cyril of Turau & All Patron Saints of Belarus
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics35,522
Posts417,625
Members6,175
Most Online4,112
Mar 25th, 2025
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,968
Member
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,968
As far as I know, this is the last Ukrainian Catholic catechism that's been published prior to the upcoming "Christ Our Pascha," due out in Ukrainian this week. From the file description:

Quote
"Our Faith: A Byzantine Catechism for Adults," by Fr. Casimir Kucharek. This is a Ukrainian Catholic Catechism, bearing the imprimatur of the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church, one of the Eastern Catholic Churches in union with the Pope of Rome. Not to be confused with the new Ukrainian Catholic Catechism "Christ our Pascha" which is due to be released in Ukrainian in June 2011. Permission to share on Internet given February 12, 2010.

It can be read online or downloaded here. [archive.org]

Fr. Kucharek was the noted author of The Byzantine-Slav Liturgy of St. John Chrysostom and The Sacramental Mysteries: A Byzantine Approach.

Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 26
I
Junior Member
Junior Member
I Offline
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 26
Thanks for sharing this resource; it looks valuable. I've noticed some unfortunate typos here and there, though. On p. 148, for example, in discussing devotion to the Theotokos, the section title reads, "The Mother is God in the Liturgy." Obviously that should say, "The Mother of God in the Liturgy" -- hopefully our Protestant friends don't mistakenly take the typo as evidence of idolatry! wink

Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 26
I
Junior Member
Junior Member
I Offline
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 26
Sorry to comment again, but after looking through the section on "The Pope, Successor to Peter," I was struck by how strong some of the language is in favor of what some would call a "Latin" view of the Pope. On p. 168 it is said that "he is bishop, not only of Rome, but of the universal Church. As chief shepherd, he is bishop over all his fellow bishops . . . " Papal infallibility is also clearly taught from pages 173-176. Interesting.

The last version of this was published in 1983, is that correct?

Last edited by Iason; 06/23/11 12:34 PM.
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 695
H
Member
Member
H Offline
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 695
Yes, Fr. Kucharek's (vichnaya pamyat) stuff is pretty latinised.
cf. his photo.

Not too surprising, he was born in 1928 and worked in Saskatchewan

Vatican II in the Canadian UGCC did not even really begin seriously until maybe the 1990s - maybe later in Sask.

So a man of his times - he's no Archimandrite Robert Taft SJ.

Long ago I read his book on Sacraments - very disappointing, but now that I know something of his context, not too surprising. (a far cry from the Instruzzione!)

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,968
Member
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,968
Yes, Fr. Casimir was a man of his times. When his catechism was published, it was considered a landmark event. His work was considered invaluable at the time.

It's much different nowadays. Today, the new Ukrainian Catholic Catechism Christ our Pascha is being unveiled in Ukraine. I tried to see what the UGCC website is saying about it but the site is currently down. Likely, it has a lot of activity today.

Edited to add: the site is back up. There are a couple of new articles on the Ukrainian language page but not much specific information on the content of the new Catechism yet. Hopefully, we'll see something soon.

Last edited by DTBrown; 06/24/11 08:01 AM.
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 695
H
Member
Member
H Offline
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 695
Back then there was almost nothing - (re the theology of our Church, latinized or truly Orthodox)
Certainly nothing in English.
(cf. back in the 70s there was almost nothing in English on Orthodoxy - I remember searching the university library and all I could find was Benz; then finally someone put me on to Timothy Ware (now His Eminence Kallistos) (now the shelves are full of books etc. from St. Vlads etc. all in English)

Kucharek's an interesting historical piece to compare with the New Catechism.

Also one can deduce where the mind and theology of the hierarchy was and is now.

Back then most clergy thought we were just ethnic Roman Catholics with a different mass. (some still do!)

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 10,090
Likes: 16
Global Moderator
Member
Global Moderator
Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 10,090
Likes: 16
Originally Posted by Herbigny
Back then most clergy thought we were just ethnic Roman Catholics with a different mass. (some still do!)

Herb,

Or just ethnics with funny hats, who thought we were Catholics.

Many years,

Neil (sorry, I could not resist blush )


"One day all our ethnic traits ... will have disappeared. Time itself is seeing to this. And so we can not think of our communities as ethnic parishes, ... unless we wish to assure the death of our community."
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 695
H
Member
Member
H Offline
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 695
dear Moderator Neil:

OJALA they had "funny hats" - that would be a huge step forward
I remember one protopresbyter telling me that kamilavkas were "exclusively Orthodox".

unless you mean those kopak things (then they are indeed "funny hats" {unless one is a Cantor of a Schul) (maybe they were an ecumenical effort in headgear - ojala).

a Blessed Fast to all.


Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,885
Member
Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,885
One of the Sister Servants that followed Bishop Stasiuk to Australia said that they had to do courses to discover what their UGCC church culture was as they had no idea at all, after Vat II.

Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 695
H
Member
Member
H Offline
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 695
Originally Posted by Pavel Ivanovich
what their UGCC church culture was as they had no idea at all, after Vat II.


sorry, not sure I quite understand. Can you say more?

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,855
Likes: 8
A
Member
Member
A Offline
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,855
Likes: 8
Originally Posted by Iason
Sorry to comment again, but after looking through the section on "The Pope, Successor to Peter," I was struck by how strong some of the language is in favor of what some would call a "Latin" view of the Pope. On p. 168 it is said that "he is bishop, not only of Rome, but of the universal Church. As chief shepherd, he is bishop over all his fellow bishops . . . " Papal infallibility is also clearly taught from pages 173-176. Interesting.

The last version of this was published in 1983, is that correct?
Yes, it does appear to be heavily Latinized.

I hope that the new catechism of the Russian Orthodox Church, which is presently in the works, will be translated into English.


Moderated by  theophan 

Link Copied to Clipboard
The Byzantine Forum provides message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial, have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as a source for official information for any Church. All posts become property of byzcath.org. Contents copyright - 1996-2024 (Forum 1998-2024). All rights reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0