The Byzantine Forum
Newest Members
ElijahHarvest, Nickel78, Trebnyk1947, John Francis R, Keinn
6,150 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 1,157 guests, and 74 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
by orthodoxsinner2, September 30
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
by Veronica.H, April 24
Byzantine Catholic Outreach of Iowa
Exterior of Holy Angels Byzantine Catholic Parish
Church of St Cyril of Turau & All Patron Saints of Belarus
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics35,506
Posts417,454
Members6,150
Most Online3,380
Dec 29th, 2019
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 9 of 14 1 2 7 8 9 10 11 13 14
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 424
Member
Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 424
LOL, I'll let you know about that if my change of Rite goes through appropriately smile

Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,264
Member
Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,264
Originally Posted by Job
...thus as of today "Catholic First, Byzantine Second" still holds...

Sorry - is that a bad position to take? I do not see the two as mutually exclusive, hence my ecclesiastical affiliation. I should wish such a thing on Latin Catholics as well! ("Catholic First, Latin Second")

An excessive particularism is no virtue. Byzantium's earliest strength was precisely in its catholic breadth, drawing on the virtues of East and West. Neither the Church in Latin territories nor the Church in Greek or Syriac territories were originally hermetically sealed realities. Polemics and later heavy handed anti-Western policies by Muslim overlords (not to mention an early and excessive identification with the Imperium as the center of Church polity) contributed as much to the estrangement as any of the theological developments within the Latin West.

To identify more with a particular jurisdiction than the Church as a whole (or to see the two as somehow in competition) is tribalism. Nothing could be more antithetical to the biblical theology of the New Testament (especially St. Paul) regarding the universal vocation of the Church.

Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,441
Likes: 5
J
Job
Offline
Cantor
Member
Cantor
Member
J Offline
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,441
Likes: 5
I guess my problem is I DO agree with the Church as a whole...that's why innovations from the Latin church do not sit right with me...and if they were "part of the Church from the beginning" then eastern catholics would not need to do gymnastics trying to bend latin concepts into eastern theology...I've stated it before and I'll state it again, (then duck grin ) the UNIA should simply go away...the eastern catholic churches which are to be "a bridge" between the RCC and the Orthodox is not a bridge but a "road block"...but I'm getting off topic...

Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 1
Member
Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Job
I guess my problem is I DO agree with the Church as a whole...that's why innovations from the Latin church do not sit right with me...and if they were "part of the Church from the beginning" then eastern catholics would not need to do gymnastics trying to bend latin concepts into eastern theology...I've stated it before and I'll state it again, (then duck grin ) the UNIA should simply go away...the eastern catholic churches which are to be "a bridge" between the RCC and the Orthodox is not a bridge but a "road block"...but I'm getting off topic...

Oh my! If I would have said that... eek

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,760
Likes: 29
John
Member
John
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,760
Likes: 29
Originally Posted by Job
I guess my problem is I DO agree with the Church as a whole...that's why innovations from the Latin church do not sit right with me...and if they were "part of the Church from the beginning" then eastern catholics would not need to do gymnastics trying to bend latin concepts into eastern theology...I've stated it before and I'll state it again, (then duck grin ) the UNIA should simply go away...the eastern catholic churches which are to be "a bridge" between the RCC and the Orthodox is not a bridge but a "road block"...but I'm getting off topic...
You are most certainly free to reject Catholic communion. And I will agree that the Unia should go away (and will go away once full communion is re-established between East and West). But you really do need to be accurate and fair. The idea of the Eastern Catholic Churches being a “bridge” between Rome and the Orthodox went out of style at Vatican II (40 years ago), and the idea of “uniatism” has long been rejected. So what you are claiming we are supposed to be is false and I think you are smart enough to know it. Being accurate and fair is part of being charitable. If you have studied the Catholic Church's documents (especially V2's Decree on the Eastern Churches and JPII's Orientale Lumen) you'd realize that a tremendous effort is being made at mending fences. No one on the Catholic side considers Orthodoxy to be a "road block".

If you have chosen the path of Orthodoxy accept it on its own terms. Don't drag the baggage of your past experiences with you. The way the members of your parish were treated was unchristian. But being treated poorly is not a good enough reason to become Orthodox. The only reason to become Orthodox (or Catholic) is because through prayer and the work of the Holy Spirit you are led there, and find the truth there.

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,411
A
AMM Offline
Member
Member
A Offline
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,411
That was well said.

Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 1
Member
Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 1
"But being treated poorly is not a good enough reason to become Orthodox. The only reason to become Orthodox (or Catholic) is because through prayer and the work of the Holy Spirit you are led there, and find the truth there."


I think the above statement is unfair. Many people who were treated poorly became Orthodox 100 years ago. Were they wrong, or their living descendents wrong? You know how many people have been hurt by the RDL, let alone abrupt closure of a parish. How do you know that anyone affected by Holy Trinity's closure wasn't considering Orthodoxy long before it happened?

You say being treated poorly is not a good reason to become Orthodox. This was precisely why some in the affected parish became Orthodox.

Is the reason right or wrong? Who are we to say. The Holy Spirit works in mysterious ways. A major spiritual catastrophe like the closing of a parish may actually be the work of the Holy Spirit.



Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,441
Likes: 5
J
Job
Offline
Cantor
Member
Cantor
Member
J Offline
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,441
Likes: 5
Quote
How do you know that anyone affected by Holy Trinity's closure wasn't considering Orthodoxy long before it happened?


Thank you Etnick. This is a key point. The fact is that those who became Orthodox, such as myself, considered it for years prior to the closure of HT.

Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,441
Likes: 5
J
Job
Offline
Cantor
Member
Cantor
Member
J Offline
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,441
Likes: 5
Quote
But you really do need to be accurate and fair. The idea of the Eastern Catholic Churches being a “bridge” between Rome and the Orthodox went out of style at Vatican II (40 years ago), and the idea of “uniatism” has long been rejected.


It may have "gone out of style" but John, can you honestly say it is not a prevailent view. (Maybe it's not in vogue to speak this language amongst the "higher ups in dialogue" but it is amongst almost everyone else) Following the dialogues myself, although with 3 kids not nearly as much as I had in the past, although it's not "stated" that thought does still exist.

May I ask, what part(s) of "uniatism" have been rejected.

Quote
But being treated poorly is not a good enough reason to become Orthodox.


I agree. smile

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,231
Member
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,231
Originally Posted by Job
Quote
And let's face facts, had the same priest not been pastor of the nearby Greek Catholic parish of the same jurisdiction, many if not most of Holy Trinity's parishioners may have remained Greek Catholic and gone to that parish. Just a merger of the two parishes into one, making a stronger parish. Unfortunately that was not the outcome.


Actually, even if the same priest had not been pastor of the nearby Greek Catholic parish of the same jurisisdiction...the damage was done not only from the local pastor but the bishop and "his minions" so we can not blame all of it on the local administrator.

I know from experience with the former pastor of my old parish, that HE recommended to the bishop to close the other parish that he served, and not the bishop telling him that it was going to close. Knowing the personalities involved, I would wager that was the same situation with HT. My former parish has refugees from the parish that remains open in the Bridgeport area, and that speaks volumes.

Meanwhile, the other very small, moribund parish in CT that is served from by yet another parish in CT remains open because the pastor does not mind driving to it each week to serve, when the bishop did want to close it.

Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,441
Likes: 5
J
Job
Offline
Cantor
Member
Cantor
Member
J Offline
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,441
Likes: 5
Father George did want the parish closed from the time he arrived. "Because he was too busy." Shameful.

Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 38
A
Member
Member
A Offline
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 38
I just read on these forums where Father Ed donated money under his own name (when it was not politically correct to do so)to help save Holy Trinity Hungarian Byzantine Catholic Church in Bridgeport, CT.

That's our Father Ed -- tough and full of resolve.

Sadly it seems the church was closed anyway. Anyone happen to know what became of the building?

Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,441
Likes: 5
J
Job
Offline
Cantor
Member
Cantor
Member
J Offline
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,441
Likes: 5
Quote
I just read on these forums where Father Ed donated money under his own name (when it was not politically correct to do so)to help save Holy Trinity Hungarian Byzantine Catholic Church in Bridgeport, CT.


I can confirm yes Fr. Ed definitely did do this. If his check was actually cashed that's another matter. His home parish of Holy Trinity in Bridgeport, CT is now a French speaking baptist church...

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 10,090
Likes: 15
Global Moderator
Member
Global Moderator
Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 10,090
Likes: 15
Originally Posted by Job
Quote
I just read on these forums where Father Ed donated money under his own name (when it was not politically correct to do so)to help save Holy Trinity Hungarian Byzantine Catholic Church in Bridgeport, CT.


I can confirm yes Fr. Ed definitely did do this. If his check was actually cashed that's another matter. His home parish of Holy Trinity in Bridgeport, CT is now a French speaking baptist church...

As regards the congregation that purchased and now uses the former Holy Trinity, I remain, several years later, touched by the sensitivity of this community toward their fellow Christians - those of our peoples - who went before them.

As my brother, Job, described in a post that he made at the time ...

Originally Posted by Job
One thing that came back to me on this was when the Eparchy cleaned out the church they left the Hungarian flag ... and this new community who purchased the facilities, (French speaking African-Americans) plans to leave the Hungarian flag there as a reminder of the community that built the church...


May the memory of Holy Trinity Church be eternal!

Many years,

Neil


"One day all our ethnic traits ... will have disappeared. Time itself is seeing to this. And so we can not think of our communities as ethnic parishes, ... unless we wish to assure the death of our community."
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 38
A
Member
Member
A Offline
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 38
Any idea how much Holy Trinity Parish in Bridgeport was sold for? Was it sold through a real estate brokerage or via auction? Thanks.

Last edited by Abraham; 08/18/11 01:31 PM.
Page 9 of 14 1 2 7 8 9 10 11 13 14

Moderated by  Irish Melkite, theophan 

Link Copied to Clipboard
The Byzantine Forum provides message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial, have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as a source for official information for any Church. All posts become property of byzcath.org. Contents copyright - 1996-2024 (Forum 1998-2024). All rights reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0