1 members (theophan),
466
guests, and
36
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums26
Topics35,461
Posts417,217
Members6,101
|
Most Online3,380 Dec 29th, 2019
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,750 Likes: 28
John Member
|
John Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,750 Likes: 28 |
As far as I can tell, the Orthodox Churches would like us Greek Catholics to shut up and disappear, or, in borg-like manner, be "assimilated" into the Orthodox Church. That is indeed our task once full communion is re-established. "That they may all be one, just as you, Father, are in me, and I in you, that they also may be in us, so that the world may believe that you have sent me." (John 17:21)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309 Likes: 3
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309 Likes: 3 |
So His Grace Bishop John Michael has said: "We Greek Catholics have a vocation to disappear".
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 209
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 209 |
Would someone be kind enough to provide a clear and simple definition of the fuss with the filoque? If there is already an archived topic on this matter in the forum, and therein is such an explanation, please point me in that direction. Sorry for the tangential intrusion into the present discussion. I think this is a good/quick overview. The Taboric Light - The Filioque Controversy. [ sites.google.com] For information on the ecumenical efforts on this issue see http://www.scoba.us/resources/orthodox-catholic/2003filioque.html wherein you'll see under recommendations "•that the Catholic Church, as a consequence of the normative and irrevocable dogmatic value of the Creed of 381, use the original Greek text alone in making translations of that Creed for catechetical and liturgical use."
Last edited by ByzBob; 09/17/11 09:40 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 209
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 209 |
As far as I can tell, the Orthodox Churches would like us Greek Catholics to shut up and disappear, or, in borg-like manner, be "assimilated" into the Orthodox Church. I long for the day that this happens.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,208
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,208 |
Well, an attempt to assimilate us in borg-esque fashion was made back in the 1940s - and although the ROC-MP's efforts were provoked and supported by the NKVD - and even to this very day regarded by Metropolitan Hilarion as an appropriate thing to do - it didn't happen.
Must have been a nasty and infuriating disappointment to them when we emerged, wounded but alive and kickin', from the Soviet-imposed catacomb existence.
It was one of the happiest days of my life.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,208
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,208 |
One could just as easily - and correctly - declare that the Orthodox Churches will be absorbed into the Catholic Communion of Churches once full communion is re-established.
Only I don't envision it happenening in cahoots with anything like the NKVD; or, for that matter, like the Borg.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,855 Likes: 8
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,855 Likes: 8 |
One could just as easily - and correctly - declare that the Orthodox Churches will be absorbed into the Catholic Communion of Churches once full communion is re-established. Except that they are the mother Chruches from which our Churches sprang. As a Melkite I have no problem with the idea that we will be "absorbed" or - as I prefer to say - reunited with our mother Church in the Middle East. Perhaps the Latinized UGCC will be absorbed by the Roman Church, since its (i.e., the UGCC's) new catechism regurgitates the modern Latin theory of the papacy.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 384 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 384 Likes: 1 |
I am not sure how happy I am with the repeated references on here to the 'Latinised' UGCC.
While I entirely accept that the UGCC appears to be very Latinised in various quarters, this - as many of you will know - is a result of many historical influences that have largely passed now. The Basilians remain as an order, and the Ukrainian Redemptorists retain control of a good number of parishes (at least in Canada), but in places like the UK and the rest of Europe, and parts of Canada (and these are only the places I have experience of), there are some very good things going on.
Young priests and deacons of the UGCC everywhere (together with their Patriarch!) are working to re-educate the faithful on their inheritance, and we would be loath to think that Latinisers have had the final say.
That said, I was conversing with my parish priest this morning about the catechism, and while he has not yet seen it, he expressed that he would be surprised if there was a Latin view of papacy in it, as he knows people who were involved in its composition, and they would not countenance such a thing.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,855 Likes: 8
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,855 Likes: 8 |
Of course you do not have to agree with me on the issue of theological Latinization in the UGCC, but after having watched on Youtube some of the liturgical celebrations at the UGCC's Immaculate Conception Cathedral in Philadelphia I came away with a sense that - not only theologically, but also liturgically - it has a rather modern Roman Catholic approach to the faith.
That is my impression, and I make no apologies for it.
P.S. - At least in the videos I watched - unlike at the UGCC parish I personally visited some years ago in Pittsburgh - there were no altar girls. I was thankful for that small blessing.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,855 Likes: 8
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,855 Likes: 8 |
That said, I was conversing with my parish priest this morning about the catechism, and while he has not yet seen it, he expressed that he would be surprised if there was a Latin view of papacy in it, as he knows people who were involved in its composition, and they would not countenance such a thing. If the translation at the beginning of this thread is accurate, it follows that the new UGCC catechism has presented a basically Latin view in connection with the position and authority of the bishop of Rome. Why would it reference Vatican I if it were not presenting a Roman take on primacy (or as Western Catholics often prefer to say - supremacy)? I must admit I remember reading an article by someone working on the UGCC catechism a few years ago where he spoke about documents coming out of Rome as "universal," and that gave me pause to wonder whether or not the individual had an orthodox view of the nature of the Church. After all, Rome is not "universal" and thus somehow above all the local Churches; instead, each and every local Church is the full realization of the one holy Catholic and Apostolic Church.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,968
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,968 |
That said, I was conversing with my parish priest this morning about the catechism, and while he has not yet seen it, he expressed that he would be surprised if there was a Latin view of papacy in it, as he knows people who were involved in its composition, and they would not countenance such a thing . It's also possible that, if the "Latin view of the papacy" is in the new UGCC Catechism, it could be because the final editing was done in Rome by the Eastern Congregation. According to page 3 this report [ stjosaphateparchy.org]: The committee has until April, 3, 2010, to finish its work; whereupon the text will be passed on for consideration and acquaintance to the Congregation of Eastern Churches in Rome. Afterwards, the final formulation of the Catechism and its preparation for publishing will be carried out in July - August of 2010. I had asked one of the people who had been involved in some of the early preparation of the Catechism if it would teach papal infallibility and they replied they couldn't say since they had not seen the final text. I took that as a good sign as they did not quickly give a yes to my query. It appears, however, that the final text does teach papal infallibility in section 291. I have since noted that two paragraphs later in section 293 the new Catechism quotes the Council of Florence. Can someone who has the text and who can read Ukrainian confirm if it is quoting from the papal bull from Florence which in discussing the Pope says: We also define that the holy apostolic see and the Roman pontiff holds the primacy over the whole world and the Roman pontiff is the successor of blessed Peter prince of the apostles, and that he is the true vicar of Christ, the head of the whole church and the father and teacher of all Christians, and to him was committed in blessed Peter the full power of tending, ruling and governing the whole church, as is contained also in the acts of ecumenical councils and in the sacred canons. (From the papal bull Laetentur Coeli, given in full here. [ dailycatholic.org])
Last edited by DTBrown; 09/18/11 03:27 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 384 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 384 Likes: 1 |
Apotheoun,
It is undeniable that the UGCC was in bondage to the Latin Church, throughout the same period that Ukraine was in bondage to the Soviets. And probably even before.
So, I am not looking for an apology.
I am saying, however, that it would be unfair to describe the present UGCC as 'Latinised' as if that is an accurate term in the present. There are people who are pouring their guts out with a view to seeing the Church restored to the tradition which gives it its raison d'etre, beginning with Blessed Andriy Sheptytsky.
The fact that the Cathedral in Philedelphia is called 'Immaculate Conception' makes me cringe, but such examples (among many, many others) should only serve to spur 'renewers' on in their work. In which case, I would beg others not to consign us to the 'Latinised' dust bin. Just keep us in your prayers.
In any case, for better examples of what we are doing, look for YouTube clips of the Patriarch's enthronement Liturgy in Kyiv, or at the incredible work coming out of Saint Elias in Canada. Or even, dare I say it, the remarkable revival going on in my own humble parish...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 384 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 384 Likes: 1 |
With respect to the catechism, though, I am going to do some investigating. I want to know who the theologians are that have been involved in its composition, and how they were selected to work on it.
Not mush has been said about it here. In fact, not much at all. It makes me wonder if it is analagous to one of the many 'para-catachisms' that were composed by any number of well-meaning RCs in the decades before the CCC was released.
As I find out more, I will post.
*EDIT: I hadn't read DTBrown's post before posting this. Obviously the answer to my question is in what he wrote. But that being the case, then it would look like whatever is in the Catechism is the Eastern Congregation's teaching and not the teaching of the UGCC. Which may explain why it hasn't met with much fanfare.
Last edited by Slavophile; 09/18/11 03:37 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,968
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,968 |
Please let us know what you find out. As for the history of the development of the new UGCC Catechism, a good recap is given here. [ catholicukes.org.au] This new Catechism is not only officially produced by the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church but it was also vetted by Rome. As such, what it presents on issues related to differences between Catholicism and Orthodoxy is significant. I have expressed elsewhere that I hoped this Catechism might be a model for finding common ground on these issues between our Churches. If these initial translations are correct, I think that it could not be such.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,968
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,968 |
*EDIT: I hadn't read DTBrown's post before posting this. Obviously the answer to my question is in what he wrote. But that being the case, then it would look like whatever is in the Catechism is the Eastern Congregation's teaching and not the teaching of the UGCC. Which may explain why it hasn't met with much fanfare. I just want to add that I believe there most likely is much good in this new Catechism from an Eastern point of view. My guess is that there are only a few paragraphs that focus on the traditional Catholic differences with the East. I'm sure this new Catechism will provide much good instruction to the UGCC and these few paragraphs should not overshadow the rest of the text.
|
|
|
|
|