The Byzantine Forum
Newest Members
EasternChristian19, James OConnor, biblicalhope, Ishmael, bluecollardpink
6,161 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 366 guests, and 97 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
by orthodoxsinner2, September 30
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
by Veronica.H, April 24
Byzantine Catholic Outreach of Iowa
Exterior of Holy Angels Byzantine Catholic Parish
Church of St Cyril of Turau & All Patron Saints of Belarus
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics35,511
Posts417,528
Members6,161
Most Online3,380
Dec 29th, 2019
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 4 1 2 3 4
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,268
A
Member
Member
A Offline
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,268
I would like to share an article written in 2001 regarding the use of the "Pallium" in the Roman tradition:

Quote
A tradition in evolution: Pallium signifies authority, loyalty

By John Norton
Catholic News Service

VATICAN CITY (CNS) -- In keeping with a 1,700-year-old church tradition, Pope John Paul II solemnly slipped a circular band of lambs' wool over the bowed heads of new archbishops in late June.

Known as a "pallium," the strip of cloth has historical roots in the attire of Roman emperors and symbolizes the pope's concession of authority and communion to heads of major local churches.

As with most church traditions, the pallium's look and use have gradually evolved over the centuries, including several fairly radical changes introduced by Pope John Paul.

Starting in 1984, the Polish pontiff was the first to personally consign the pallium annually to all new archbishops -- a task his predecessors since the fourth century regularly had delegated.

He also fixed the date for bestowing palliums to June 29, the feast of Sts. Peter and Paul, and, for the first time in church history, incorporated the ceremony into the celebration of the Mass.

He enacted the changes to increase the pallium's impact as a physical sign of the ties among the pope, St. Peter and the local churches, according to a Vatican official.

And though very few people noticed, the pope recently experimented with -- but quickly abandoned -- a different style of pallium, one based loosely on those worn by popes in the Middle Ages and still employed in Eastern churches.

In its present Western form, dating back several hundred years, the pallium is a circular strip of hand-woven white wool nearly three inches wide, with two 14-inch ``tails'' hanging front and back. It is decorated with six black silk crosses, four of which have loops to hold long pins that often are topped with a precious stone.

But on Christmas Eve 1999, the opening of the jubilee year, the pope appeared in St. Peter's Basilica with a custom-made pallium that was wider, much longer and decorated with red crosses.

After the liturgy, the pallium was stored away and never used again. Informed sources say it failed to pass aesthetic and safety tests: With the pope's back curved with age, the extra lengths of wool doubled up in an ungainly way on his chest; and, more dangerously, they dangled precariously close to his uncertain footsteps.

``We've been told to keep making them the way we always have,'' said Sister Rosaria, 60, a member of the cloistered Benedictine community at Rome's Basilica of St. Cecilia that has been entrusted for more than a century with preparing the palliums.

The nuns once produced the palliums from scratch, hand-weaving pure-white lambs' wool into bands that they would then sew together and decorate. But these days, with their numbers reduced, the nuns commission a textile company outside of Rome to supply the unfinished wool strips.

Despite that concession to modernity, a host of traditions still surrounds the preparation of the palliums.

To this day, some of the wool comes from two lambs blessed by the pope around Jan. 21, the feast of St. Agnes, a Roman martyr who is often depicted with a lamb.

The lambs are raised by Trappist monks who live near Rome's Basilica of St. Paul Outside the Walls. After being decorated with red and white flowers and blessed in a formal ceremony at the Basilica of St. Agnes and by the pope at the Vatican, the lambs are delivered to the Benedictine nuns and shorn as Holy Week approaches.

Underscoring the lamb's traditional symbolism for Christ, the nuns slaughter the animals in Holy Week, using the meat for their Easter Sunday banquet.

This year, the community delivered 50 carefully folded palliums to the Vatican in the week before the pope's Mass.

The day prior to the celebration, the pope blessed them and gave them to an aide to place overnight under the main altar of St. Peter's Basilica in a 350-year-old silver chest which tourists often mistakenly think contains St. Peter's bones.

The June 29 Vatican Mass is the only time archbishops wear the palliums together. Once bestowed, liturgical rules require that the pallium be worn only in the metropolitan's own see, and then only during solemn liturgies like ordinations.

Because of the cloth's territorial character, an archbishop who is transferred to another metropolitan see receives a second pallium. Among them this year, Cardinal Theodore E. McCarrick, who already has a pallium from his tenure as head of the Newark Archdiocese, donned a new pallium for the Washington Archdiocese.

According to tradition, an archbishop with two palliums is buried with the most recent one around his neck; the other is rolled up and placed under his head.
Amado

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,688
Moderator
Member
Moderator
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,688
Regarding the wearing of the pallium, Mr Norton is not entirely correct. The metropolitan may wear the pallium within his own ecclesiatical province, which would include his own see as well as the suffragan sees of the province. I recall Archbishop Sheehan of Santa Fe wearing the pallium at the consecration and enthronement of Bishop William (Skurla), which occurred in Phoenix.

Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,337
Likes: 98
Moderator
Member
Moderator
Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,337
Likes: 98
Amadeus:

I doubt that they removed the crozier before nailing on the coffin's cover. They'd have had to put it under his arn AFTER moving him from the pallet into the coffin. Otherwise it would have slipped and fallen on the floor, probably damaging it. Remember that the Holy Father was not embalmed and after six days the body would have been very "loose" for lack of a better term. Those who encoffined him would have had to reposition his arms and anything else on or around him.

(Moved too many of the dead in similar situations--embalmed and unembalmed--to believe that one could move the body WITH CROZIER and not have it on the floor.)

BOB

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,010
Likes: 1
C
Member
Member
C Offline
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,010
Likes: 1
Most hierarchs have more than one crozier; it would only have been natural for Pope John Paul II to have had more than one of the same "papal" design. My guess would be that, while one was buried with him, the others of the same design were passed on to the new pope.

Dave

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,688
Moderator
Member
Moderator
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,688
Actually the crozier that many associate with John Paul II had been in use since the ministry of Paul VI. If one does any type of search for Paul VI and crozier, there are a number of photos of him with that same crozier. In fact, a number of sede vacantist sites point to Paul's use of that crozier as a "proof" that he was an antipope. :rolleyes:

Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,505
Member
Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,505
I for one was quite disappointed with the new pallium. Not its size or shape but the quality of the pallium itself. It was tacky!
Would have been much nicer done the same as the former palliums (lambs woof unbleached and the black silk) only larger and in the eastern fashion.
Stephanos I

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 10,090
Likes: 15
Global Moderator
Member
Global Moderator
Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 10,090
Likes: 15
Quote
Originally posted by Deacon John Montalvo:
Regarding the wearing of the pallium, Mr Norton is not entirely correct. The metropolitan may wear the pallium within his own ecclesiatical province, which would include his own see as well as the suffragan sees of the province. I recall Archbishop Sheehan of Santa Fe wearing the pallium at the consecration and enthronement of Bishop William (Skurla), which occurred in Phoenix.
Deacon John,

I'd make one distinction - Bishop William's enthronement occurred in a Latin parish, where a Holy Table and iconostasis were installed for the occasion. Thus, Archbishop Sheehan was within his prerogative to wear the pallium.

Had the enthronement been served in a church of the Eparchy of Van Nuys, Archbishop Sheehan would not have been entitled to wear the pallium, as he would have stepped outside of his metropolitan province once on the grounds of the parish.

Quote
Canon 437

�2 The Metropolitan can wear the pallium, in accordance with the liturgical laws, in any church of the ecclesiastical province over which he presides, but not outside the province, not even with the assent of the diocesan Bishop.
Many years,

Neil


"One day all our ethnic traits ... will have disappeared. Time itself is seeing to this. And so we can not think of our communities as ethnic parishes, ... unless we wish to assure the death of our community."
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,405
Likes: 38
Member
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,405
Likes: 38
Dear Father Deacon John Montalvo,

You've intrigued me!

WHY would they say the crozier indicated that Pope Paul was heretical?

What is wrong with that style of crozier?

It is fascinating that many associate it with Pope John Paul II - I understand sales of the Cross on the top of the Crozier of the Holy Pope are skyrocketing - they're selling out faster than they can supply them.

Alex

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,688
Moderator
Member
Moderator
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,688
Alex,

I have no idea why sedevacantists would consider Paul VI a heretic (I made no mention of that in my post), nor do I comprehend why the sv's would consider him an antipope because of his crozier. An antipope does not make one a heretic. St Hippolytus of Rome was an antipope and yet the Church venerates him as a saint.

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,268
A
Member
Member
A Offline
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,268
The sedevacantists consider all Popes after Pope Pius XII as "heretics" because they say:

Pope John XXIII (r: 1958-1963) joined the freemasons in 1935, an act that, if true, would have earned automatic excommunication and so made him ineligible for the papacy;

Pope Paul VI (r: 1963-1978) abandoned the wearing of the papal crown (called the papal tiara) and that no true pope would have refused to wear the traditional symbol of the papacy;

Pope John Paul I (r: August-September 1978) abandoned the Papal Coronation; and

Pope John Paul II (r: 1978-2005) declined to take the papal oath.

I haven't read nor heard what they say about Pope Benedict XVI. But since the Holy Father did not accede to any of the above traditional symbols of the papacy, Pope Benedict XVI must be 2 or 3 times a heretic! biggrin

Amado

Joined: May 2002
Posts: 212
C
Member
Member
C Offline
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 212
Quote
Originally posted by Amadeus:
I haven't read nor heard what they say about Pope Benedict XVI. But since the Holy Father did not accede to any of the above traditional symbols of the papacy, Pope Benedict XVI must be 2 or 3 times a heretic! biggrin

Amado
Dear Amado,

If you want to see what one sede vacantist group thinks, here is a link:
http://www.truecatholic.org/heresiesb16.htm

The link lists the purported heresies of Pope Benedict XVI (they call him anti-pope). The folks who run this site have an incredibly fluid view of what popes can do. Their incumbent, Pius XIII, was a Capuchin friar. To condense the story of his consecration as bishop: a group of "true Catholics" elected him pope. He then created his own cardinals and, even though he was not a bishop, he ordained one of his cardinals a priest and then consecrated him a bishop, even though he himself was not a bishop and thus could not validly confer holy orders. Then he had this cardinal consecrate him a bishop.

The people who are involved in this group are in great need of our prayers.

Peace,

Charles

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,405
Likes: 38
Member
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,405
Likes: 38
Dear Charles,

And professional help too?

Alex

Joined: May 2002
Posts: 212
C
Member
Member
C Offline
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 212
Quote
Originally posted by Orthodox Catholic:
Dear Charles,

And professional help too?

Alex
Dear Alex,

The True Catholic site evokes feelings of deep sadness in me. While the validity of Pius XIII`s presbyteral ordination is unquestioned, this group is just going through the motions. They are simulating the sacrament of holy orders and those who have undergone ordination by Pius XIII are not offering valid liturgies nor validly absolving penitents. That is profoundly sad and troubles me greatly.

Peace,

Charles

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,405
Likes: 38
Member
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,405
Likes: 38
Dear Charles,

There is a saying in Ukrainian that goes like this:

There are many crazies in the world - but thank God that they don't all walk together in a big group . . .

Alex

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 335
P
Former
Former
P Offline
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 335
Dear Alex,
The Pius XIII nut cases remind me of the self-priesting Ukrainians, with whom you are surely familiar ... who decided that if there were enough presbyters gathered together for the laying on of hands, they could call down enough Grace to ordain a bishop ... and they used some relics of sainted bishops' hands, in addition, for their cheirotinia.

Are there still any of these folks around?

A Glorious Pascha to You and Yours,
S prazdnikom! (is this used in Ukrainian?)
Photius

Page 3 of 4 1 2 3 4

Moderated by  theophan 

Link Copied to Clipboard
The Byzantine Forum provides message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial, have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as a source for official information for any Church. All posts become property of byzcath.org. Contents copyright - 1996-2024 (Forum 1998-2024). All rights reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0