The Byzantine Forum
Newest Members
ElijahHarvest, Nickel78, Trebnyk1947, John Francis R, Keinn
6,150 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 1,181 guests, and 74 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
by orthodoxsinner2, September 30
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
by Veronica.H, April 24
Byzantine Catholic Outreach of Iowa
Exterior of Holy Angels Byzantine Catholic Parish
Church of St Cyril of Turau & All Patron Saints of Belarus
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics35,506
Posts417,454
Members6,150
Most Online3,380
Dec 29th, 2019
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 144
J
Member
Member
J Offline
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 144
Hi Curious Joe,
I mean among all jurisdictions that are making the visit to Rome, not my own Ruthenian Church in particular.
In XC,
JAD

Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 421
Member
Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 421
Eastern Orthodoxy here I come!

What Hopwash!

What shortage of men ... it does not exist.

It is a result of WEAK MEN in both churches - the elite club of Bishops and Cardinals who perpetrate anti Eastern sentiment

In my humble opinion - Orthodox Married Priests are superior in life experience than any Celibate Latin Priest I have ever talked to.

I am so tired to this subject I want to scream.

I want to be clergy - my diocese had MANY MANY MEN apply to the diaconate - and only 1 or 2 were selected -

who is going to be left to evangelize?

Another problem I have is that some Celibate priests (and yes I am going to get in trouble - this post will follow me for life) are GAY MEN trying to cope with their GAYNESS -

I don't care if they are GAY - I'm glad they are choosing the priesthood in answer to their homosexuality.

BUT MARRIED PRIESTS are sexual too - Gay priests are sexual whether they express it or NOT
SEXUALITY SHOULD NOT BE AN IMPEDIMENT TO PRIESTHOOD - ESPECIOALLY IN AN EASTERN CATHOLIC CHURCH.

I believe the Orthodox Church in America was started in large part by Eastern Rite Catholics who could no longer bear the intrusion of their heritage by ROME trying to dominate.

ROME SHOULD SERVE US - NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND

PRIEST AND BISHOPS SHOULD SERVE US NOT LORD OVER US THEIR UNREASONABLE DEMANDS FOR "THE RIGHT KIND OF MEN"

THIS IS A FARCE - IF WE DON'T STAND IN REVOLT TO THIS AND MAKE ROME CHANGE - IF WE ARE TRUE TO THE FAITH WE PRACTICE AND PRAY
WE SHOULD LEAVE ROME - AS THEY DID IN THE 20'S AND 30'S CREATING THE OCA

May God help me understand and try to cope with patience and love the Pope I currently swear allegiance to. I'm not sure how much more I can take from this Latin Dominance of our heritage.

John

Last edited by Irish Melkite; 05/18/12 01:53 AM. Reason: to remove generalization
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 421
Member
Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 421
TRUTH THE TRUTH IS THE ONLY WAY TO DEAL WITH ALL THIS

ORTHODOXY VS LATIN CATHOLICISM VS UNIATES

WE MUST ADHERE TO THE TRUTH.

WHERE DID JESUS EVERY SAY - HEY - ONLY QUALIFIED MEN AROUND ME PLEASE

HE HUNG OUT WITH THE SINNERS

HE LOVED THE SINNERS

ALL THE FISHERMEN HE SELECTED - DID THEY HAVE MASTERS DEGREE'S IN DIVINITY OR FOR THAT MATTER FISHING?

GOD HELP US - SEEK THE TRUTH IN ALL THINGS

THE LATINS LOVE EARTHLY KINGLY ABSOLUTE OBEDIENCE TO ROME.
A HIGHLY STRUCTURE KINGSHIP - LORDING OVER THE SERFS

WHERE IS THE LOVE OF CHRIST IN ALL THIS?

Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 714
Likes: 5
J
jjp Offline
Member
Member
J Offline
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 714
Likes: 5
Originally Posted by haydukovich
Another problem I have is that some Celibate priests (and yes I am going to get in trouble - this post will follow me for life) are GAY MEN trying to cope with their GAYNESS -

I don't care if they are GAY - I'm glad they are choosing the priesthood in answer to their homosexuality.

Do you include monastics in this, or only priests?

Last edited by Irish Melkite; 05/18/12 01:54 AM. Reason: generalization
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 10,090
Likes: 15
Global Moderator
Member
Global Moderator
Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 10,090
Likes: 15
John, my friend,

I have toned down the one generalization that you made. I don't think it's supportable, defensible, or fair in the way it was initially phrased.

Many years,

Neil


"One day all our ethnic traits ... will have disappeared. Time itself is seeing to this. And so we can not think of our communities as ethnic parishes, ... unless we wish to assure the death of our community."
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,953
D
DMD Offline
Member
Member
D Offline
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,953
Originally Posted by Irish Melkite
John, my friend,

I have toned down the one generalization that you made. I don't think it's supportable, defensible, or fair in the way it was initially phrased.

Many years,

Neil

I know that the poster is upset, and I understand the underlying angst.

Just a word in general is in order. The grass is not always greener on the other side - often it is just 'different.'

Life-changing decisions ought not to be made in the heat of passion, but rather upon due deliberation and prayer.

Good luck!

Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,461
Likes: 1
Member
Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,461
Likes: 1
Quote
Does Cardinal Sandri know that 25% (13 out of 52) of the priests in the Ukrainian Archeparchy of Philadelphia are married?

And that is the lowest percentage of all of the constituent Eparchies and Archeparchy of the UGCC Metropolia in the US. In my Eparchy it is much higher (about 60%).

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 272
J
Member
Member
J Offline
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 272
Well, we can all agree that Cardinal Sandri has done much to enliven and energize the posts in the Forum.

Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 8
I
Junior Member
Junior Member
I Offline
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 8
The issue is NOT how many priests in the Ukrainian Catholic Archeparchy of Philadelphia are married.....The issue is the ordination of married men to the priesthood in the U.S. Out of the 25% mentioned, how many of these married men were ordained by the Metropolitan? i can only think of one. Now Stamford? That is another issue. The same goes for Chicago and Parma....... The news releases on this ad limina visit seem to indicate not so much the issue of married clergy (celibacy vs non-celibacy) but the Eastern Bishops not seeking the permission of the Holy See to ordain married men. My take is that the Holy See is insisting upon a proper protocol to be followed...........

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,855
Likes: 8
A
Member
Member
A Offline
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,855
Likes: 8
Originally Posted by haydukovich
Another problem I have is that some Celibate priests (and yes I am going to get in trouble - this post will follow me for life) are GAY MEN trying to cope with their GAYNESS -

I don't care if they are GAY - I'm glad they are choosing the priesthood in answer to their homosexuality.

BUT MARRIED PRIESTS are sexual too - Gay priests are sexual whether they express it or NOT
SEXUALITY SHOULD NOT BE AN IMPEDIMENT TO PRIESTHOOD - ESPECIOALLY IN AN EASTERN CATHOLIC CHURCH.
I agree with the first part of your post (i.e., that many celibate priests are "gay"), but I do not agree with the second part. As I see it, if it is known that a man suffers from this disordered sexual condition he should not be ordained.

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,855
Likes: 8
A
Member
Member
A Offline
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,855
Likes: 8
Originally Posted by Fr. Deacon Lance
They shouldn't be asking. They should be telling Rome they will ordain who they see fit, period.
I agree. It is none of Rome's business if the Eastern Catholic Churches ordain married men. After all, that is our tradition.

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,855
Likes: 8
A
Member
Member
A Offline
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,855
Likes: 8
Originally Posted by jjp
I think the point is that *quietly* ordaining married men without upsetting the Roman prefect of the Eastern Congregation is bad enough, without said prefect admonishing our bishops against it.

Again, it is my hope that the Eastern Churches are unanimous, assertive and clear in their response.
I think that the "Eastern Congregation" should be completely ignored. To be honest, that curial congregation should not even exist.

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 73
C
Member
Member
C Offline
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 73
So how do we start a movement, demanding that the colonial office be closed?

Last edited by countertenor; 05/19/12 03:16 PM.
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 384
Likes: 1
S
Member
Member
S Offline
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 384
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Apotheoun
Originally Posted by haydukovich
Another problem I have is that some Celibate priests (and yes I am going to get in trouble - this post will follow me for life) are GAY MEN trying to cope with their GAYNESS -

I don't care if they are GAY - I'm glad they are choosing the priesthood in answer to their homosexuality.

BUT MARRIED PRIESTS are sexual too - Gay priests are sexual whether they express it or NOT
SEXUALITY SHOULD NOT BE AN IMPEDIMENT TO PRIESTHOOD - ESPECIOALLY IN AN EASTERN CATHOLIC CHURCH.
I agree with the first part of your post (i.e., that many celibate priests are "gay"), but I do not agree with the second part. As I see it, if it is known that a man suffers from this disordered sexual condition he should not be ordained.

How can you say that, Apotheoun? What do you mean by 'suffer with this...condition'?

We all suffer from 'disordered sexual conditions'. Unless our inclinations are always entirely in sync with revelation then, according to your paradigm, no one should be ordained.

What is important is that a priest seek to conform himself to the mind of Christ in all things, and when he fails, to repent and keep trying to conform.

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,855
Likes: 8
A
Member
Member
A Offline
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,855
Likes: 8
Originally Posted by countertenor
So how do we start a movement, demanding that the colonial office be closed?
biggrin

I do not think that that kind of movement would get very far in Rome. After all, Rome loves useless bureaucracy and it is not about to reduce the size of its structural apparatus just to please a small faction (i.e., Eastern Catholics) in the Catholic communion.

That said, the Eastern Catholic response to the Vatican on most issues should be silence as we simply ignore the curia (and even the Pope) and do our best to maintain our traditions.

I am sure that the Orthodox are watching to see what Rome does, so that they can determine whether or not there is any real reason to continue the process of ecumenical dialogue with the Vatican.

Page 3 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6

Link Copied to Clipboard
The Byzantine Forum provides message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial, have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as a source for official information for any Church. All posts become property of byzcath.org. Contents copyright - 1996-2024 (Forum 1998-2024). All rights reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0