The Byzantine Forum
Newest Members
fslobodzian, ArchibaldHeidenr, Fernholz, EasternLight, AthosEnjoyer
6,167 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
1 members (San Nicolas), 375 guests, and 101 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
by orthodoxsinner2, September 30
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
by Veronica.H, April 24
Byzantine Catholic Outreach of Iowa
Exterior of Holy Angels Byzantine Catholic Parish
Church of St Cyril of Turau & All Patron Saints of Belarus
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics35,514
Posts417,578
Members6,167
Most Online4,112
Mar 25th, 2025
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309
Likes: 3
S
Member
Member
S Offline
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309
Likes: 3
Actually, polyphony came to Russian liturgical chant not through Galicia or Kyiv or the Carpathians, but in the form of Italian or Italian trained court composers, who began by rearranging existing chants for multiple parts, and, by the beginning of the 18th century, began replacing traditional chants altogether with composed choral pieces based on operatic modes.

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,405
Likes: 38
Member
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,405
Likes: 38
Dear Pavloosh,

I was just very happy with what you said earlier, as Irish Melkite said!

Alex

Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 24
Junior Member
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 24
Originally Posted by haydukovich
I read somewhere perhaps "Russian Orthodox Chanting"
The spirit of Worship in Awe and Wonder is what we are after - not who can sing the best or who sounds the best - although sound does help create a spiritual atmosphere - sometimes even an out of tune congregation and choir who cannot sing to save themselves but come together out of love of God and one another is BEAUTIFUL MUSIC INDEED.

No denying that, brother! My comment was only to ponder the musical characteristics of the two (sub-)traditions and was in no way meant to suppose that even perfect rendering of the melodically most beautiful chants would be truly beautiful if there's "nothing inside", so to say.

Originally Posted by haydukovich
We need to count our blessings when there are more than only 2 or 3 people in our congregations unless that is all we have - then we need to thank God for the 2 or 3!
I more than agree: I have here (when I am in Sweden) chance for participating in the Divine Liturgy only a couple of times per year and even then it can be that we are only my family plus a few (Latin) friends joining us...

Last edited by Lyachovits; 08/21/13 06:51 AM.
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 24
Junior Member
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 24
Originally Posted by StuartK
Actually, polyphony came to Russian liturgical chant not through Galicia or Kyiv or the Carpathians, but in the form of Italian or Italian trained court composers, who began by rearranging existing chants for multiple parts, and, by the beginning of the 18th century, began replacing traditional chants altogether with composed choral pieces based on operatic modes.
Makes sense even if one doesn't consider history, just what is now: most of Galician or Ruthenian chanting is maximum homophonic (latter mostly monophonic) and not polyphonic so cannot really be the source of that in Russian liturgical singing.

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,405
Likes: 38
Member
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,405
Likes: 38
There are also some Italianate pictures brought directly from Italy by Italian composers and other visitors that, over time, have become much venerated Orthodox miraculous shrines.

It is said that St Seraphim's icon "Of Tender Feeling" is just one such image.

Not that there's anything wrong with that . . .

Alex

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309
Likes: 3
S
Member
Member
S Offline
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309
Likes: 3
Quote
Makes sense even if one doesn't consider history, just what is now: most of Galician or Ruthenian chanting is maximum homophonic (latter mostly monophonic) and not polyphonic so cannot really be the source of that in Russian liturgical singing.

According to Gardner (writing in the 1920s), while the singing of the Sub-Carpathian Rus' was congregational and monadic, sung from memory and led by cantors, the people did add their own folk harmonies, while those who could not sing "reinforced the base line"--indicating, I think, that Prostopinje must have had something like an ison.

It should also be noted that in churches with a high ceiling, the echo and reverberation of monadic singing tends to create its own harmonies.

Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 421
Member
Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 421
love that reverberation!

there are flutes from my native Yugoslavia - Kaval - that have a tone know as a KABA - it is actually a weird 2 tone sound that is produced as a natural part of the kaval flute - and can notes can be played in this mode.

it creates its own polyphony and sounds a lot like an Ison and melody together - although it is witch-like in its enchantment.

most kaval players played to their flocks of sheep - I often wonder if the sheep liked the music (they probably did)

Last edited by haydukovich; 08/22/13 10:21 AM.
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 421
Member
Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 421
yes ... it is good know where things come from ... thanks for those posts.

I actually love all the differences ... and I love music theory and if i ever have time will perfect my knowledge of Byzantine Musical notation - (more free form - more freedom for the cantor to do what he can with the melody and to make it sound "Byzantine")


Last edited by haydukovich; 08/22/13 10:18 AM.
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 844
Member
Member
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 844
Originally Posted by StuartK
Quote
Makes sense even if one doesn't consider history, just what is now: most of Galician or Ruthenian chanting is maximum homophonic (latter mostly monophonic) and not polyphonic so cannot really be the source of that in Russian liturgical singing.

According to Gardner (writing in the 1920s), while the singing of the Sub-Carpathian Rus' was congregational and monadic, sung from memory and led by cantors, the people did add their own folk harmonies, while those who could not sing "reinforced the base line"--indicating, I think, that Prostopinje must have had something like an ison.

It should also be noted that in churches with a high ceiling, the echo and reverberation of monadic singing tends to create its own harmonies.

Yeah, high ceiling, as well as a church that longer than it is wide would help, too, since there are some high-ceilinged Churches that just look like they are wider than they are longer, and leaving me with that claustrophobic feeling where I feel I can't chant as freely.

Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4

Moderated by  theophan 

Link Copied to Clipboard
The Byzantine Forum provides message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial, have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as a source for official information for any Church. All posts become property of byzcath.org. Contents copyright - 1996-2024 (Forum 1998-2024). All rights reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0