1 members (Fr. Al),
542
guests, and
64
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums26
Topics35,506
Posts417,454
Members6,150
|
Most Online3,380 Dec 29th, 2019
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 167
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 167 |
As a Christian baptised in the Modern Roman Rite, yet exposed by grace to the Orthodox Church and her bold stance against innovations, I have this one observation: Ad orientum seems to be one of the most fiercely contested liturgical matters within Modern Catholicism.
I truly believe one's position on "ad orientum" and "versus populum" exposes the roots of one's ideology. If a person proclaims that the priest is "turning his back on the people," that speaks volumes on his personal theology.
I think restoring ad orientum worship to Modern Catholic parishes would be a major strike against heresy.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 73
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 73 |
As a Christian baptised in the Modern Roman Rite, yet exposed by grace to the Orthodox Church and her bold stance against innovations, I have this one observation: Ad orientum seems to be one of the most fiercely contested liturgical matters within Modern Catholicism.
I truly believe one's position on "ad orientum" and "versus populum" exposes the roots of one's ideology. If a person proclaims that the priest is "turning his back on the people," that speaks volumes on his personal theology.
I think restoring ad orientum worship to Modern Catholic parishes would be a major strike against heresy. Preach it, Benjamin!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 167
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 167 |
In my humble view, especially as a non-theologian, opposition to ad orientum is a core pillar of Neo-Iconoclasm.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 19
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 19 |
In my humble view, especially as a non-theologian, opposition to ad orientum is a core pillar of Neo-Iconoclasm. I'm told that having the priest stand behind the altar and face the people was considered and rejected as part of the infamous Ruthenian RDL. So I guess we do need to be thankful. It could have been far worse than it is.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,953
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,953 |
In defence of Father Petras and others, if this was considered, it was only because someone suggested it and I suspect it was quickly and forcefully dismissed. I'm sure that many oddities were 'suggested' from various interest groups.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,994 Likes: 10
Moderator Member
|
Moderator Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,994 Likes: 10 |
Also the ancient liturgy of St. James (first Bishop of Jerusalem, and the DL that was used there) faces the people.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 569 Likes: 2
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 569 Likes: 2 |
Please, brethren, as the last native speaker of Latin from before the fall of the Roman Empire, I can assure you it is 'ad orientem' not 'ad orientum'. Of course, I'm speaking of accidence here, not liturgical preference! Also, 'coram populo' is surely preferable to 'versus populum'. Jes sayin'!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 16
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 16 |
I've seen photos of the Divine Liturgies of St James, Sarapion, etc served apparently versus populum (coram populo?) ... but upon what principle or evidence is such a west-facing practice based? Any commentary I have been able to find states that the practice is "for education", or only applies during the Liturgy of the Catechumens.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,518 Likes: 10
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,518 Likes: 10 |
Also the ancient liturgy of St. James (first Bishop of Jerusalem, and the DL that was used there) faces the people. The Mystagogy blog has a seven-part critique of the Liturgy of St. James titled, The Liturgy of Saint James: The Trojan Horse of "Liturgical Renewal": link. [ johnsanidopoulos.com]
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,675 Likes: 7
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,675 Likes: 7 |
Parts of this linked reply are inaccurate, for example:
"Yet, important is the fact that the Non-Chalcedonian churches, with whom union has almost practically been achieved because our atheological schools have made sure to tell us that the Fathers of the Fourth Ecumenical Synod were in error in regards to who they condemned and in fact they were really Orthodox, these use this Liturgy of Saint James. Could it be that through this Liturgy we will all receive the Common Cup not only with the Papists, but also with the Monophysites?"
The Non-Chalcedonian Orthodox, specifically the Syriac Orthodox, do not use this same Liturgy of St. James, although they bear the same name. Nor do they normally face the people during their Liturgy.
In addition to this inaccuracy, the poster continues to tirade against different forms of Liturgy. This makes one wonder if he believes the EO is unable to handle a non-monolithic uniform Liturgy. The OO and Catholics have been able to accept various forms, why can't his EO? I wonder how he sees the WRO.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 16
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 16 |
Yes, Michael Thoma - with respect to Fr Basil, I think his article needs to be read with several grains of salt. Though it is interesting to see a reaction to the increasingly common westwardly served Byzantine Liturgy of St James. Interestingly, there is a video of a Russian service of this Liturgy (Godbearer "Soothe My Sorrows" Church, Saratov) that, while sharing some of the elements criticised by Fr Basil, could hardly be deemed served in an "untraditional" manner: Божественная литургия по чину святого апостола Иакова [ youtube.com].
|
|
|
|
|