The Byzantine Forum
Newest Members
HopefulOlivia, Quid Est Veritas, Frank O, BC LV, returningtoaxum
6,178 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
4 members (Adamcsc, bwfackler, theophan, 1 invisible), 432 guests, and 134 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
by orthodoxsinner2, September 30
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
by Veronica.H, April 24
Byzantine Catholic Outreach of Iowa
Exterior of Holy Angels Byzantine Catholic Parish
Church of St Cyril of Turau & All Patron Saints of Belarus
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics35,526
Posts417,646
Members6,178
Most Online4,112
Mar 25th, 2025
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,994
Likes: 10
A
Moderator
Member
Moderator
Member
A Offline
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,994
Likes: 10
Originally Posted by Nataly
I think this is neither a parody, nor a genre and nor an art at all. It is a kitsch without any philosophical and ideological basis. It's also not a decorative thing which is pleasant to hang on the wall. It is a dull painting which must not cause any serious discussions.

Dear Natalia,

Thank you for this intelligent post. I see your point. You are most correct, and have chosen the correct words to describe these paintings.

In Christ,
Alice

Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 34
Member
Member
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 34
The kitsch caused all of us to kvetch. biggrin

Last edited by JGlennCee; 02/06/14 04:50 PM.
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 157
Member
Member
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 157
Originally Posted by JGlennCee
The kitsch caused all of us to kvetch. biggrin

This discussion will not be quenched smirk

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,994
Likes: 10
A
Moderator
Member
Moderator
Member
A Offline
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,994
Likes: 10
Originally Posted by Nataly
Originally Posted by JGlennCee
The kitsch caused all of us to kvetch. biggrin

This discussion will not be quenched smirk

Dear Nataly,

On a side note, I would like to congratulate you and your country on a brilliant and wonderful opening ceremony at the Winter Olympics in Sochi. smile

Alice

Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 740
G
Member
Member
G Offline
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 740
When the hammer and sickle were part of the glorification of the communist period at the opening of the Olympic Games, I thought of my family who starved to death!!! at the time of the Stalin's Holodomor (Ukrainian: Голодомор, "Extermination by hunger" 1932 1933 in Ukraine and all of those Christians who died as a result of Soviet persecution!

Yes part of the opening was fantastic and congratulations are due but......

Just how many died.??? ”In all, it is estimated that some 15 to 20 million Christians were martyred under the Soviet regime” - David Barrett, “World Christian Trends”

For info re the Holodomor en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holodomor
Вічная Пам’ять
Eternal Memory

Garaj


Last edited by Garajotsi; 02/09/14 09:45 AM.
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 157
Member
Member
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 157
Originally Posted by Garajotsi
When the hammer and sickle were part of the glorification of the communist period at the opening of the Olympic Games, I thought of my family who starved to death!!! at the time of the Stalin's Holodomor

I'm disagree with you. This part of the open ceremony wasn't a glorification of communist era at all! It was shown a great influence of the industrial period of the first Soviet years: all these machines and mechanisms, collectivization, this red color as symbol of blood, little figures of participants acting as parts of a great machine called Soviet republic. This scene was done in stylistics of Suprematism (Malevich, Rodchenko etc).
http://rusplt.ru/policy/olimpiada-v-sochi-otkryita-7956.html

This was a symbolic interpretation of pain and disharmony. It showed how a normal human civilization of Russians had changed into depersonalized masses. It was more a symbol of tragedy of the Soviet people, but not a glorification.

These hammer and sickle were parts of a very famous Soviet sculpture Worker and Kolkhoz Woman (showed at the World's Fair in 1937), a famous symbol of the Soviet period, was also showed crashed on the ceremony. You could see only parts of it (head, hammer and sickle were showed apart.
http://www.dp.ru/a/2014/02/08/Dmitrij_Medvedev_usnul_na/gallery/19304/143292/
This symbol of the Soviet Union was showed destroyed. And you think it was a glorification? It's a pity, you didn't catch the main idea, though everything on the ceremony was shouting about it, even music with its cacophonic and disharmonic tunes of Stravinsky and Schnitke.
Also there are rules of the Olympic Comittee which prohibit to show tragic times and wars in the historical parts of the ceremonies. That's why also the Second World War wasn't shown in the opening Ceremony in Sochi.

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,994
Likes: 10
A
Moderator
Member
Moderator
Member
A Offline
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,994
Likes: 10
Dear Nataly,

Thank you for the interpretation of the brilliant artistic symbolic elements of the ceremony which apparently escaped many people.

In Christ's love,
Alice

Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 157
Member
Member
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 157
Dear Alice,
thank you! I just move this topic into the Town Hall. It is very interesting to me, I think to all Russians, to know how did the foreign audience like the Opening Ceremony? What did they like most of all and what not?
Telling the truth, I was impatiently waiting for it but with not much expectations and hope for a good and intelligent show. I was expecting something patriotic with hymns, balalaika and matreshka etc. But they did it with much taste and, I wonder, with a good artistic flair. The first TV Channel showing all the time kitsch, propaganda and endless soap operas suddenly created a good show?! It means they can do it for the foreign audience, but why do they feed the Russian audience with low quality products all the time? It was a rhetorical question - the answer is obvious... frown

Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 34
Member
Member
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 34
Dear Nataly, that's a great rhetorical question. Here in America, we have been asking ourselves the same question the last 50 or 60 years or so. And, why is it, that with several hundred cable channels available, there's nothing to see.

BTW, thanks also for your analysis of the Opening Ceremony. I didn't get to see it the first time around, but I'll make a point of looking for it on youtube.

Glenn

Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  theophan 

Link Copied to Clipboard
The Byzantine Forum provides message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial, have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as a source for official information for any Church. All posts become property of byzcath.org. Contents copyright - 1996-2024 (Forum 1998-2024). All rights reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0