0 members (),
291
guests, and
72
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums26
Topics35,487
Posts417,328
Members6,129
|
Most Online3,380 Dec 29th, 2019
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 94
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 94 |
I would like to write as a Russian Orthodox believer occassionally paying attention to what Rome does, that Pope Francis comes across as more liberal than Paul VI. I would venture to say that if Pope Francis enjoyed Paul VI's zeitgeist, the already reformed nature of Vatican II Roman Catholicism would take a very, Anglican, relativist direction currying favor with the San Francisco values crowd. Pope Francis is a liberal, at times closeted, but a liberal.
Is Pope Francis a heretic? Thankfully, it is none of my business. Although if one gives credence to the anathemas of Pope Pius X against liberalism and modernism, the question is not easily dismissed. Who's right? Pius X, canonized, whose church was better run and much more flourishing, or Francis, presiding over a church in decline, constantly revising things to keep its identity "current"? I leave the question to those whom it ecclesiologically concerns.
For an Orthodox Christian, the pre Vatican II church in its worship was something which could be seen as a sort of Western relative. The reformed worship of Vatican II comes across as something Protestant, even impious. The openess Vatican II inaugurated in interfaith discussion and theological, scriptural, ecclesiological encounter is something more constructive generally than the old Tridentine mindset. However, the process has notoriously been run by liberals who approach things with a very liberal casuistry and relativized/modern outlook (syncretistic?), albeit one that ultimately supports a papal primacy (of their own creation).
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,370 Likes: 31
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,370 Likes: 31 |
I assume the Bishop of Rome is a topic of relevance to most people here. A patristics scholar has come out with this new interview strongly suggesting that Amoris Laetitia is very close to heresy and the whole scenario as "unprecedented" and "apocalyptic." https://gloria.tv/video/zYDLfafjvndC4DNFsQpMLKieoI was going to start a new thread about the direction in which Pope Francis is steering the Church. I had been doing some soul searching after being taken to task in another thread and, in the process, I ran across this old thread and the Quotes of Pope Francis compared to prior Church teaching [ francisquotes.com]. I do not endorse that sites conclusion but I thought it did a service by not only gathering various doctrinal and pastoral concerns but then actually giving primary references on the Vatican website itself. This is a rarity in journalism where I have found, on the occasions where I've checked, that the news article is biased or just superficial interpretation and trendy reporting, and fails to provide either a primary document link or the proper context. Yet, that is how most of us get such information. The interview quoted above is almost five years old; I wonder what Professor Claudio Pierantoni's appraisal is now. I found his actual remarks to be balanced, thoughtful and respectful...and raised legitimate concerns. Two points stood out for me: 1. Unlike the situation with Popes Honorius and Vigilius, Amoris Laetitia is given in the form of an official teaching document. 2. He ups the concern by observing that the document is not just ambiguous but rather, "indirect" (at ~1:25), that is, it takes a circuitous route but nevertheless indicates clear enough the intended destination. Such concerns need to be considered in relation to the current effort, Synod on Synodality [ usccb.org], for the Church " to live communion, to achieve participation, to open Herself to mission." But that is the stuff of its own thread.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,296 Likes: 91
Moderator Member
|
Moderator Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,296 Likes: 91 |
Christ is in our midst!! ajk, I have had similar misgivings about the teachings of Pope Francis. The following excerpt from "A DOCUMENT ON HUMAN FRATERNITY FOR WORLD PEACE AND LIVING TOGETHER" has caused me to question his thoughts. I made bold the key part. Freedom is a right of every person: each individual enjoys the freedom of belief, thought, expression and action. The pluralism and the diversity of religions, colour, sex, race and language are willed by God in His wisdom, through which He created human beings. This divine wisdom is the source from which the right to freedom of belief and the freedom to be different derives. Therefore, the fact that people are forced to adhere to a certain religion or culture must be rejected, as too the imposition of a cultural way of life that others do not accept; The document seems to say that all religions lead people to God in direct contrast to Christ's teaching that "No one comes to the Father except by (through) me." It also seems to make the saving sacrifice of Christ something that was not really necessary. The idea that all roads lead to God leaves open the question of why Christ gave his Apostles the Great Commission to go to preach to the whole world and baptize the people there into the Trinity. When we are baptized, we are plunged into Christ; into all that He is and all that he did. This has been taught as so absolutely important that we baptize infants so that no one would be left out. But if all roads lead to God the Father, why bother? In other places, including the links you provide, some of Pope Francis' statements seem to say that we ought not send out missionaries with the Divine Teachings of Christ out of respect for these other roads. It seems to turn the entire history of the Church upside down. How dare we have evangelized the Slavic people, the German people, the Anglo-Saxon people--or anyone else outside the ancient Jewish community for that matter. How dare the Apostles have preached at Pentecost? I have grave doubts about the wisdom of this document and the confusion it has caused since its adoption in February 5 years ago. I've gone through the link to Pope Francis' other statements and each seems more opposite the Faith that I was taught than the last. Bob
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,296 Likes: 91
Moderator Member
|
Moderator Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,296 Likes: 91 |
My fall back is this. My father, a Lutheran and a very good Christian and good man--God rest his soul--gave me a piece of advice decades ago that I remember when things like Pope Francis' teachings come to my attention.
Dad said that "a man is a success (in his pilgrim walk) if, when he meets the Lord, he can say 'I have not compromised Your Teaching.'" In other words, I am responsible for keeping and living out what I have been taught. I am not responsible for others who may stray away from the Faith. I am not responsible for my pastor, my bishop, the Pope. Now we all fall short of this, but I think the idea is linked to another thought I was given by one of my spiritual fathers. The Lord blesses the struggle. He may or may not provide success, but He asks us to struggle to stay faithful.
Later I learned of St. John Chrysostom's admonition to clergy he ordained. He said that "the floor of Hell is paved with the skulls of priests." They have a greater responsibility because they are officially charged with teaching the Faith so we pray for them not to falter or get off on a tangent. But we are not responsible except to point out to them, in love, what we believe to be their error. Christ is in our midst!! I was discussing with a few friends and acquaintances recently about their--and my--struggle(s) with the spoken teaching of clergy members. One is a second cousin for whom I have become someone who I encourage when he has issues with his pastor. Others have expressed dismay at some things Pope Francis has said on many topics during his pontificate. Others have been frustrated by the fact that the Catholic bishops of the United States have disappointed us with their failed attempt to make a statement about Catholic politicians who push so hard for abortion and other things directly opposed to Catholic teaching. This is a reply I sent to one and that person asked me to share it. I hope that it edifies anyone who reads it. Bob
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 776 Likes: 24
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 776 Likes: 24 |
Pope Francis, a kind, great and holy pastor, has done in written and spoken words, what Jesuit missionaries and educators have done for centuries in bringing the compelling Word of God to a largely nonChristian world by finding in the cultures, traditions and religious beliefs of such people elements that, if they don’t conform to that Word, at least aspire to It. How can you fault his call to universal brotherhood in Frateli Tutti? It is Jesuit evangelism at its best. If the Vatican, at the time of Fr. Matteo Ricci’s activity in China, had left him alone, it is my humble opinion that the Church would have flourished there. Heretical modernism? Nonsense! This Bishop of Rome is thoroughly evangelical in the best sense of the word, and, I am sure, finds these accusations of heresy deeply hurtful. I personally find them ridiculous.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,723 Likes: 2
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,723 Likes: 2 |
I wouldn't call him a heretic. However, he does reflect the socialistic South American culture from whence he came. I would be surprised if the ambiguity prevalent in the world did not affect even the pope since it has gotten into nearly everything else. Maybe Jesuits should be seen and not heard.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 776 Likes: 24
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 776 Likes: 24 |
I wouldn't call him a heretic. However, he does reflect the socialistic South American culture from whence he came. I would be surprised if the ambiguity prevalent in the world did not affect even the pope since it has gotten into nearly everything else. Maybe Jesuits should be seen and not heard. I used to be a ranger for the National Park Service. An elderly couple approached me at the visitor desk and, because I was in uniform, found me a target for their big government complaints. "How do you feel about socialized medicine - that OBMACARE stuff?" they asked. I did not resond to their queston, but asked one of my own. "How do you like the Park Service and the US Navy's "USS Constitution" next door?" "Oh, we just love the Park Service; been to over 50!" they said. I replied, "It's just socialized recreation." They walked away puzzled. Be careful about how you use that "socialistic" term for South America. Beyond Cuba, Nicaragua, Venezuala and, perhaps, Bolivia, I never thought of South American countries as being socialistic. But, more to the point, I do not think that Pope Francis has an ideological bone in his body, but is thoroughly a man of the Gospel and of the Church he loves intensely. I hope you emulate that same love, because that is all he seeks of us.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,370 Likes: 31
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,370 Likes: 31 |
Pope Francis, a kind, great and holy pastor, has done in written and spoken words, what Jesuit missionaries and educators have done for centuries in bringing the compelling Word of God to a largely nonChristian world by finding in the cultures, traditions and religious beliefs of such people elements that, if they don’t conform to that Word, at least aspire to It. How can you fault his call to universal brotherhood in Frateli Tutti? It is Jesuit evangelism at its best. Is this such an example? APOSTOLIC JOURNEY OF HIS HOLINESS POPE FRANCIS TO GEORGIA AND AZERBAIJAN (30 SEPTEMBER - 2 OCTOBER 2016) IN-FLIGHT PRESS CONFERENCE OF HIS HOLINESS POPE FRANCIS [ vatican.va] FROM AZERBAIJAN TO ROME Papal Flight Sunday, 2 October 2016 Joshua McElwee:
Thank you, Holy Father. In that same speech yesterday in Georgia, as in many other countries, you spoke of “gender” theory, saying that it is the great enemy, a threat to marriage. I would like to ask what would you say to a person who has suffered for years with his or her sexuality and truly feels that it is a biological problem, that his or her physical makeup does not correspond to what he or she considers his or her sexual identity? As a pastor and minister, how would you accompany these people?
Pope Francis:
First of all, in my life as a priest, as a bishop – and also as Pope – I have accompanied many people with homosexual tendencies and also homosexual activity. I have accompanied them, I have brought them closer to the Lord; some cannot do it, but I have always accompanied them and never abandoned anyone. This is what has to be done. Individuals have to be accompanied, as Jesus accompanies them. When a person who has this condition comes before Jesus, Jesus certainly does not say: “Go away because you are homosexual.”
No. What I was talking about has to do with the mischief going on these days with the indoctrination of gender theory. A French father told me that he was at the table speaking to his children – he is Catholic, his wife is Catholic, the children are Catholic, lukewarm Catholics, but Catholics – and he asked his ten-year old son: “And what do you want to be when you grow up?” – “A girl.” And his father realized that the schoolbooks were teaching gender theory. This is against the realities of nature. It is one thing if a person has this tendency, this option; some people even change sex. But it is another thing to teach this in schools, in order to change people’s way of thinking. I call this “ideological colonization.”
Last year I received a letter from a Spanish man who told me his story from the time when he was a child. He was born a female, a girl, and he suffered greatly because he felt that he was a boy but physically was a girl. He told his mother, when he was in his twenties, at 22, that he wanted to have an operation and so forth. His mother asked him not to do so as long as she was alive. She was elderly, and died soon after. He had the operation. He is a municipal employee in a town in Spain. He went to the bishop. The bishop helped him a great deal, he is a good bishop and he “wasted” time to accompany this man. Then he got married. He changed his civil identity, he got married and he wrote me a letter saying that it would bring comfort to him to come see and me with his bride: [b]he, who had been she, but is he[/b]. I received them. They were pleased. And in the neighbourhood where he lived there was an elderly priest, over 80 years old, the former parish priest who assisted the nuns, there, in the parish… Then a new [parish priest] came. When the new priest would see him, he would yell at him from the sidewalk: “You’ll go to hell!” When he went to the old priest, the old priest said to him: “How long has it been since you made your confession? Come now, I will hear your confession so you can receive Communion”.
Do you see what I am saying? Life is life, and things have to be taken as they come. Sin is sin. Tendencies or hormonal imbalances create many problems and we have to take care not to say: “It doesn’t make any difference, let’s live it up.” No, not at all. But for every case welcome it, accompany it, look into it, discern and integrate it. This is what Jesus would do today. Please, do not say: “The Pope blesses transsexuals!” Please! Because I can already see the newspaper headlines… No, no. Are there any doubts about what I said? I want to be clear. It is a moral problem. It is a problem. It is a human problem. And it must be resolved as best we can, always with the mercy of God, with the truth, as we said in the case of marriage, reading the entire Amoris Laetitia, but always this way, with our hearts open. [ emphasis added] I like a good story to teach us but what is this saying? Anecdotal theology? Love the sinner and accompany even affirm (?) the sinner and hate the sin but...."sin is sin" and ...? So she is now he and " he got married" and " his bride" and ...? " It is one thing if a person has this tendency, this option; some people even change sex. But it is another thing to teach this in schools" so OK to exercise the " option " but just not to teach it? Confession and Communion and right then back to his bride and lifestyle and ,,,? OK? Pope Francis asks "Do you see what I am saying?" IS this " what Jesus would do today."? Recall the woman with the " condition": John 8:7-11 ,,, and Jesus said to them, he who is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her ... Has no one condemned you? ... And Jesus said to her, "Neither do I condemn you; go and sin no more." I give the Holy Father the benefit of the doubt but he seems to be, as it were, hedging his bets -- "avoid committing oneself when faced with a difficult choice." -- with the result that the words in the title that are telling is "Papal Flight."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,723 Likes: 2
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,723 Likes: 2 |
I am glad you think so highly of Pope Francis. If he isn't influenced by socialism, there might be some Peron influences there. With him it is hard to tell. I don't know whether Francis just talks in circles, or speaks off the cuff without adequate preparation beforehand. He is not a theologian, so he doesn't speak in precise terms as theologians tend to do. I am glad he "loves intensely," but he often creates confusion when speaking. I don't understand him.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 776 Likes: 24
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 776 Likes: 24 |
Is this such an example? APOSTOLIC JOURNEY OF HIS HOLINESS POPE FRANCIS TO GEORGIA AND AZERBAIJAN (30 SEPTEMBER - 2 OCTOBER 2016) IN-FLIGHT PRESS CONFERENCE OF HIS HOLINESS POPE FRANCIS [ vatican.va] FROM AZERBAIJAN TO ROME Papal Flight Sunday, 2 October 2016 I give the Holy Father the benefit of the doubt but he seems to be, as it were, hedging his bets -- "avoid committing oneself when faced with a difficult choice." -- with the result that the words in the title that are telling is "Papal Flight." Come on, ajk, you could give the man a little more than the benefit of the doubt. Pope Francis was 80 in 2016. An arduous schedule in and around Tbilisi might exhaust anyone let alone an octogenerian. Add a long plane flight, a painful siatic nerve, journalists, anxious to get the scoop, and you'll have an old bishop who might be prone to have an ad lib stumble and ramble or two at these in-flight press conferences that I would like to see ended in any case. Since he generally speaks in Italian, it's possible that the English transcription misses the nuances of the language in use. Press conferenes are not Encyclicals, dogmatic statements, or Moto Proprios for that matter - give the Holy Father a break. I think he faces this modern and chaotic world quite bravely, and has done wonders in spreading good will throughout it.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,370 Likes: 31
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,370 Likes: 31 |
Is this such an example? APOSTOLIC JOURNEY OF HIS HOLINESS POPE FRANCIS TO GEORGIA AND AZERBAIJAN (30 SEPTEMBER - 2 OCTOBER 2016) IN-FLIGHT PRESS CONFERENCE OF HIS HOLINESS POPE FRANCIS [ vatican.va] FROM AZERBAIJAN TO ROME Papal Flight Sunday, 2 October 2016 I give the Holy Father the benefit of the doubt but he seems to be, as it were, hedging his bets -- "avoid committing oneself when faced with a difficult choice." -- with the result that the words in the title that are telling is "Papal Flight." Come on, ajk, you could give the man a little more than the benefit of the doubt. Pope Francis was 80 in 2016. An arduous schedule in and around Tbilisi might exhaust anyone let alone an octogenerian. Add a long plane flight, a painful siatic nerve, journalists, anxious to get the scoop, and you'll have an old bishop who might be prone to have an ad lib stumble and ramble or two at these in-flight press conferences that I would like to see ended in any case. Since he generally speaks in Italian, it's possible that the English transcription misses the nuances of the language in use. Press conferenes are not Encyclicals, dogmatic statements, or Moto Proprios for that matter - give the Holy Father a break. I think he faces this modern and chaotic world quite bravely, and has done wonders in spreading good will throughout it. Utroque, I found comfort in this, your appraisal, and I think the Pope needs and deserves defenders like you. For me your word are words of hope. I think Pope Francis doesn't seem to care that he is used by a media that is hostile to the faith, and who will turn on him when his words can't be manipulated to their purpose. Faithful Catholics are paying the price for his "ad lib stumble and ramble." Does Pope Francis hear their anguish? Does their anguish also touch his heart? Better then that he speaks less but speaks clearly and carefully. The English translation is --official? -- on the Vatican website.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,296 Likes: 91
Moderator Member
|
Moderator Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,296 Likes: 91 |
Christ is in our midst!! I don't know if anyone here has this problem, but I have had it for 24+ years. When I see that, I can forgive anyone anything. Each morning the first few steps mean a bolt of electricity shooting straight to the brain. And I started when I was only 42 as a result of work-related injuries. The only thing that seems to work is walking for an hour and not on a concrete surface. For me it means getting up before dawn and going somewhere lighted to work it out. If His Holiness, at 80+, is struggling with this, I can forgive any off-the-cuff remarks that may cause confusion because when I have this pain--and until I work it out--I am not fit company to talk to anyone. Bob
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,370 Likes: 31
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,370 Likes: 31 |
... I can forgive any off-the-cuff remarks that may cause confusion because when I have this pain--and until I work it out--I am not fit company to talk to anyone. If you know that (" not fit company to talk to anyone"), the Pope of Rome, given the weight of all that is believed of his unique ministry, should know it and act accordingly. Maybe, he is surrounded by "yes-men." That "management" approach has landed the Church in scandal, embarrassment, injustice and bankruptcy, just to state the more obvious. I still see and experience" the church" adhering to that mindset, the lesson not having been learned.
|
1 member likes this:
byzanTN |
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 776 Likes: 24
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 776 Likes: 24 |
I think Pope Francis doesn't seem to care that he is used by a media that is hostile to the faith, and who will turn on him when his words can't be manipulated to their purpose. Faithful Catholics are paying the price for his "ad lib stumble and ramble." Does Pope Francis hear their anguish? Does their anguish also touch his heart?
Better then that he speaks less but speaks clearly and carefully. The English translation is --official? -- on the Vatican website. I think he does care, as he cares about the faithful (including bishops, priests and religious) oogling their photophones in St Peter's for the best "shots" during papal liturgical events, but is reluctant because that's just the way he is. The only time I saw him express anger was when that rambunctious woman nearly tore his arm off in the square. Faithful Catholics are also paying a price when they hear some of the sarcastic and negative editorializing that's done on Mother Angelica's network regarding this pope. Like the in-flight papal press conferences and Vatican interviews, I wish it would stop.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,370 Likes: 31
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,370 Likes: 31 |
Faithful Catholics are also paying a price when they hear some of the sarcastic and negative editorializing that's done on Mother Angelica's network regarding this pope. Like the in-flight papal press conferences and Vatican interviews, I wish it would stop. I don't follow EWTN but sporadically. I can better appreciate your point with a worse case example.
|
|
|
|
|