Forums26
Topics35,470
Posts417,251
Members6,109
|
Most Online3,380 Dec 29th, 2019
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 4
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 4 |
Having a Latin TLM but was wondering if there is any protocol for an Eastern priest to participate (wife-to-be is Eastern). I don't mean concelebrate, but if there's a blessing or something he could do after (for example), have him sit in choir, and preach to the in-laws in their native tongue that would be awesome. (Would love to incorporate some Easterness into me wedding - sorry Latins). Thanks
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,688
Moderator Member
|
Moderator Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,688 |
Since there is no concelebration in the TLM, there’s no place for the Eastern cleric to participate. Although the Latin pastor could allow the Eastern presbyter to give the homily.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 4
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 4 |
I was referring to more if there is some sort of blessing(s) the priest could give. Is there a book of blessings analogous to the Roman Ritual?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,688
Moderator Member
|
Moderator Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,688 |
There is such a book, but it’s highly irregular for the Eastern priest to offer the nuptial blessing during a Latin liturgy. The Code of Canons of the Eastern Churches, at least in the context of concelebration, directs the ministers to avoid liturgical syncretism (c. 701). All are to follow the liturgical books of the principal celebrant.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 569 Likes: 2
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 569 Likes: 2 |
Of course, I'm not in possession of all the facts: but if the bride-to-be is a member of one of the Eastern Catholic Churches, surely the crowning ought to be celebrated in her church, by her pastor, in her rite and this for VALIDITY!
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 2
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 2 |
He can sit "in choro". No problem
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,277 Likes: 88
Moderator Member
|
Moderator Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,277 Likes: 88 |
Christ is in our midst!!
Jedediah,
Welcome to the forum.
Bob Moderator
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,036 Likes: 4
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,036 Likes: 4 |
An EC married by an RC *priest* is validly married.
The problem is when it's a deacon, which fails.
Isn't the bride's parish strongly preferred over the groom's, though?
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 134 Likes: 10
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 134 Likes: 10 |
An EC married by an RC *priest* is validly married.
The problem is when it's a deacon, which fails.
Isn't the bride's parish strongly preferred over the groom's, though? So you're saying that an EC married by a (RC?) deacon is not validly married?
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 134 Likes: 10
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 134 Likes: 10 |
Isn't the bride's parish strongly preferred over the groom's, though? This is probably true, though I can't substantiate it. However, there may be circumstances in a particular instance which make the wedding at the bride's parish difficult or impossible.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,036 Likes: 4
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,036 Likes: 4 |
So you're saying that an EC married by a (RC?) deacon is not validly married? yes; there was a wave of those going through the tribunals some time back. In the RC, the couple are the ministers of the Sacrament of Matrimony. In Byzantine practice, the priest is the minister of the Sacrament, and it cannot be conferred without him.
|
1 member likes this:
Pavel Ivanovich |
|
|
|
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 134 Likes: 10
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 134 Likes: 10 |
So you're saying that an EC married by a (RC?) deacon is not validly married? yes; there was a wave of those going through the tribunals some time back. In the RC, the couple are the ministers of the Sacrament of Matrimony. In Byzantine practice, the priest is the minister of the Sacrament, and it cannot be conferred without him. Ok, thanks!
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2024
Posts: 8 Likes: 4
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: May 2024
Posts: 8 Likes: 4 |
So you're saying that an EC married by a (RC?) deacon is not validly married? yes; there was a wave of those going through the tribunals some time back. In the RC, the couple are the ministers of the Sacrament of Matrimony. In Byzantine practice, the priest is the minister of the Sacrament, and it cannot be conferred without him. So what do Byzantine Catholics do in the event a priest is unavailable? This scenario is discussed often enough by traditional RC's, given we are never sure when the pope will suppress Latin Mass orders, or the entire pre-Vatican II liturgy and sacraments. And in the past, the ability for Catholics to marry themselves absent a priest has allowed the Church to survive, as the case of Japanese Catholics was for centuries (in the Roman Rite, the two sacraments absolutely necessary for the Church to continue to exist can be administered by laity: Baptism and Matrimony. I'm not much of a theologian, but I believe the allowance for marriage is because it already was a natural institution, Christ raised it to a supernatural level).
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 1998
Posts: 4,337 Likes: 24
Moderator Member
|
Moderator Member
Joined: Aug 1998
Posts: 4,337 Likes: 24 |
You get a civil marriage and have it blessed by priest when he is available. Or you could apply for a dispensation to be married by a Latin priest.
My cromulent posts embiggen this forum.
|
1 member likes this:
dochawk |
|
|
|
Joined: May 2024
Posts: 8 Likes: 4
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: May 2024
Posts: 8 Likes: 4 |
You get a civil marriage and have it blessed by priest when he is available. Or you could apply for a dispensation to be married by a Latin priest. Ah. That makes sense. Thank you. I imagined there had to be some work around in the Byzantine churches since they've generally lived under more oppressive regimes than the Latin Rite, where a priest might be hard to come by.
|
|
|
|
|